Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study is to estimate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by continuous BMI by age, sex, and demographic group in the United States. METHODS:We estimated HRQoL (overall and by domain) by continuous BMI using SF-6D (Short-Form Six-Dimension) data from 182,778 respondents ages 18 years and older from the repeated cross-sectional Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2008 to 2016. We adjusted for BMI self-report bias and for potential confounding between BMI and HRQoL. RESULTS:(95% CI: 26.45-26.55) for male individuals. By BMI category, excess weight contributed to HRQoL loss of 0.0349 for obesity overall, rising to 0.0724 for class III obesity. By domain, pain was the largest cause of HRQoL loss for obesity (26%), followed by role limitations (22%). CONCLUSIONS:HRQoL is lower for people with excess body weight across a broad range of ages and BMI levels, especially at high levels of BMI, with pain being the largest driver of HRQoL loss. These findings highlight the importance of promoting a healthy weight for the entire population while also targeting efforts to prevent extreme weight gain over the life course.

BACKGROUND:The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Masters Program includes eight distinct clinical pathways. The Bariatric Surgery Pathway focuses on three anchoring procedures, including the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) which is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure in the United States. In this article, we present and discuss the top 10 seminal articles regarding the LSG. METHODS:The literature was systematically searched to identify the most cited papers on LSG. The SAGES Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery committee reviewed the most cited article list, and using expert consensus elected the seminal articles deemed most pertinent to LSG. These articles were reviewed in detail by committee members and are presented here. RESULTS:The top 10 most cited sentinel papers on LSG focus on operative safety, outcomes, surgical technique, and physiologic changes after the procedure. A summary of each paper is presented, including expert appraisal and commentary. CONCLUSIONS:The seminal articles presented support the widespread acceptance and use of the LSG by bolstering the understanding of its mechanism of action and by demonstrating its safety and excellent patient outcomes. All bariatric surgeons should be familiar with these 10 landmark articles.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:This study investigates the prevalence of the use of reusable menstrual materials in LMICs, examines differences in prevalence between countries and areas, and identifies individual and country-level factors associated with their use. METHODS:Data from Multiple Indicator Cluster surveys conducted between 2017 and 2020 in LMICs were used. Prevalence estimates and 95% CIs were calculated for overall, rural, and urban areas. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify individual and country-level factors associated with the use of reusable menstrual materials. RESULTS:The study included 42 surveys from LMICs, with 1653850 weighted women and girls aged 15-49 years. The overall prevalence of the use of reusable menstrual materials was 12.1% (95% CI 12.1-12.2), with significant variation between and within countries, ranging from 0.5% (0.3-0.8) in Serbia to 97.2% (96.5-97.9) in Sao Tome and Principe. The prevalence was higher in rural areas (23.9% [23.8-24.0]) than in urban areas (6.2% [6.2-6.2]), with significant differences between most countries. Use of reusable menstrual materials was associated with lower education levels, being married, low economic status, living in Asia and Africa, living in countries with lower GDP, living in rural areas, and limited availability of private places to wash menstrual materials. The prevalence of the use of reusable menstrual materials had an inverse linear relationship with the country's GDP. CONCLUSIONS:The study found that the use of reusable menstrual materials is more prevalent among women and girls in rural areas, those with lower education levels, lower economic status, and those living in countries with lower GDP. Given these disparities, policies and initiatives targeted at improving menstrual health in LMICs should focus on socioeconomically disadvantaged groups to ensure they have access to safe and appropriate menstrual materials.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Risk factors for serrated polyps (SPs) are not well understood. METHODS:Multivariable analyses of data from a multicenter colonoscopy-based study estimated odds ratios for having either a sessile serrated lesion or traditional serrated adenoma according to participant characteristics. RESULTS:Six thousand seventy-eighty participants were included in the analyses (565 with either a sessile serrated lesion or traditional serrated adenoma). White race was associated with a higher risk of SPs compared with Black race (adjusted odds ratio 4.64, 95% confidence interval 1.89-11.41). Obesity and current smoking were also associated with a higher risk of SPs. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:White race, smoking, and obesity are risk factors for precancerous SPs.

The RAS family GTPases are the most frequently mutated oncogene family in human cancers. Activating mutations in either of the three RAS isoforms (HRAS, KRAS, or NRAS) are found in nearly 20% of all human tumors with NRAS mutated in ~25% of melanomas. Despite remarkable advancements in therapies targeted against mutant KRAS, NRAS-specific pharmacologics are lacking. Thus, development of inhibitors of NRAS would address a critical unmet need to treating primary tumors harboring NRAS mutations as well as BRAF-mutant melanomas, which frequently develop resistance to clinically approved BRAF inhibitors through NRAS mutation. Building upon our previous studies with the monobody NS1 that recognizes HRAS and KRAS but not NRAS, here we report the development of a monobody that specifically binds to both GDP and GTP-bound states of NRAS and inhibits NRAS-mediated signaling in a mutation-agnostic manner. Further, this monobody can be formatted into a genetically encoded NRAS-specific degrader. Our study highlights the feasibility of developing NRAS selective inhibitors for therapeutic efforts.

In 2022, 1 in 8 people in the world were living with obesity, and lifestyle interventions that include diet, exercise, and behavioral modification have been the foundation for management of obesity. Recently, pharmacologic therapies have been developed for management of obesity, the newest of these being glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. With the development of new pharmacologic options, the American Gastroenterological Association developed a guideline in 2022 to provide evidence-based recommendations for the pharmacologic management of obesity in adults and recommended, for adults with obesity or overweight with weight-related complications who have had an inadequate response to lifestyle interventions, adding pharmacologic agents to lifestyle interventions over continuing lifestyle interventions alone. In this article, 2 experts review the available evidence to answer the following questions: How effective are lifestyle interventions for the treatment of obesity? How effective are pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of obesity? Given these options, how do you engage in a shared decision-making discussion to develop a mutually agreed-on treatment plan?

Conscientious objection is a legally protected right of medical professionals to recuse themselves from patient care activities that conflict with their personal values. Anesthesiology is different from most specialties with respect to conscientious objection in that the focus is to facilitate safe, efficient, and successful performance of procedures by others, rather than to perform the treatment in question. This could give rise to a unique, somewhat indirect ethical tension between the application of conscientious objection and potential infringement upon patient autonomy and well-being. While some situations have clear grounds and precedent for conscientious objection (e.g., abortion, or futile procedures), newer procedures, such as gender-affirming surgery and xenotransplantation, may trigger conscientious objection for complex reasons. This review discusses ethical, legal, and practical aspects of conscientious objection; challenges to anesthesia groups, departments, and healthcare organizations when conscientious objection is invoked by anesthesiologists; and strategies to help mitigate the ethical dilemmas.