Faculty Bibliography

Disagreement is a powerful engine of scientific advance. It sharpens conceptual boundaries, directs attention to neglected issues, and, of course, prompts the design of would-be decisive experiments"”(Gilovich et al., 1998)

BACKGROUND:Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring is conventionally performed during surgical procedures without or with minimal neuromuscular blockade (NMB) because of its potential interference with signal interpretation. However, full blockade offers increased anesthetic management options and facilitates surgery. Here, the feasibility of TcMEP interpretation was assessed during full NMB in adult neurosurgical patients. METHODS:Patients undergoing cervical or lumbar decompression received a rocuronium bolus producing 95% or greater blockade by qualitative train-of-four at the ulnar nerve. TcMEPs were recorded in bilateral thenar-hypothenar and abductor hallucis muscles. Adequacy of response for reliable signal interpretation was determined on the basis of repeatability and clarity, assessed by coefficient of variation and signal-to-noise ratio, respectively. RESULTS:All patients had at least 3 of 4 measurable TcMEP limb responses present during full NMB, and 70.8% of patients had measurable responses in all 4 limbs. In total, 82.2% of thenar-hypothenar responses and 62.8% of abductor hallucis responses were robust enough for reliable signal interpretation on the basis of clarity. In addition, 97.8% of thenar-hypothenar responses and 79.1% of abductor hallucis responses met the criteria for reliable signal interpretation on the basis of consistency. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and preoperative weakness were not predictive of absent responses during full NMB. CONCLUSIONS:TcMEP interpretation may be feasible under greater levels of NMB than previously considered, allowing for monitoring with greater degrees of muscle relaxation. Consideration for monitoring TcMEP during full NMB should be made on a case-by-case basis, and baseline responses without blockade may predict which patients will have adequate responses for interpretation.

ABSTRACT:This article presents the telehealth version of the Buffalo Concussion Physical Examination (BCPE) (Tele-BCPE). It is a brief, focused telehealth PE for use in the outpatient setting by sports medicine physicians, pediatricians, neurologists, and primary care physicians. It is derived from the BCPE and includes general considerations for providers performing telehealth services and instructions for adapting traditional clinical tests for virtual use. The Tele-BCPE includes an orthostatic intolerance screen, examination of the cranial nerves, and tests of the oculomotor, vestibular, and cervical systems. It is meant to be used at initial and follow-up outpatient visits for patients acutely after concussion and in those with prolonged symptoms. This telehealth PE, when combined with other assessments, can help provide direct treatment to patients at any stage after concussion and reduce barriers to healthcare access posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and for patients living in rural or underserved areas.

ABSTRACT/UNASSIGNED:Opioids relieve acute pain, but there is little evidence to support the stability of the benefit over long-term treatment of chronic noncancer pain. Previous systematic reviews consider only group level published data which did not provide adequate detail. Our goal was to use patient-level data to explore the stability of pain, opioid dose, and either physical function or pain interference in patients treated for 12 months with abuse deterrent formulations of oxycodone and hydrocodone. All available studies in the Food and Drug Administration Document Archiving, Reporting, and Regulatory Tracking System were included. Patient-level demographics, baseline data, exposure, and outcomes were harmonized. Individual patient slopes were calculated from a linear model of pain, physical function, and pain interference to determine response over time. Opioid dose was summarized by change between baseline and the final month of observation. Patients with stable or less pain, stable or lower opioid dose, and stable or better physical function (where available) met our prespecified criteria for maintaining long-term benefit from chronic opioids. Of the complete data set of 3192 patients, 1422 (44.5%) maintained their pain level and opioid dose. In a secondary analysis of 985 patients with a measured physical function, 338 (34.3%) maintained their physical function in addition to pain and opioid dose. Of 2040 patients with pain interference measured, 788 (38.6%) met criteria in addition. In a carefully controlled environment, about one-third of patients successfully titrated on opioids to treat chronic noncancer pain demonstrated continued benefit for up to 12 months.

Background: Multiple anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF) techniques now use a variety of Polyehteretherketone (PEEK) cages; stand-alone (SA) and zero-profile (ZP) with/without screws, cages filled with demineralized bone matrix/autograft, and cages coated with hydroxyapatite or titanium. We compared the safety/ efficacy between different PEEK ACDF cage constructs in 17 studies, and in some cases, additionally contrasted results with "routine"ACDF (i.e. series/historical data performed with combinations of iliac autograft/allograft and plates). Methods: We focused on the clinical outcomes, fusion rates, postoperative radiographic changes/lordosis/ subsidence, and/or reoperation rates for various PEEK ACDF constructs vs. "routine"ACDF. Results: One to 3 and 4-level PEEK ACDF cages demonstrated high fusion rates, few cage failures, and low reoperation rates. Subsidence for PEEK ACDF cages did not reduce fusion rates or diminish the quality of postoperative outcomes. Further, titanium-coated (T-C) PEEK cages lowered fusion rates in one study (i.e. 44.1% fusions vs. 88.2% for routine PEEK ACDF) while ACDF PEEK cages coated with hydroxyapatite (HA) showed only a "trend"toward enhanced arthrodesis. Conclusion: One to 3-4 multilevel ACDF PEEK cage constructs demonstrated comparable safety/efficacy when compared with each other, or in select cases, with "routine"ACDF (i.e. using autograft/allograft and plates).