Faculty Bibliography

Twenty percent of breast cancer cases may be related to a genetic mutation conferring an increased risk of malignancy. The most common and prominent breast cancer susceptibility genes are BRCA1 and BRCA2, found in nearly 40% of such cases. However, continued interest and investigation of cancer genetics has led to the identification of a myriad of different breast cancer susceptibility genes. Additional genes, each with unique significance and associated characteristics, continue to be recognized. Concurrently, advanced genetic testing, while still controversial, has become more accessible and cost-effective. As oncologic and reconstructive advances continue to be made in prophylactic breast reconstructive surgery, patients may present to plastic surgeons with an increasingly more diverse array of genetic diagnoses to discuss breast reconstruction. It is therefore imperative that plastic surgeons be familiar with these breast cancer susceptibility genes and their clinical implications. We, therefore, aim to review the most common non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer susceptibility genetic mutations in an effort to assist plastic surgeons in counseling and managing this unique patient population. Included in this review are syndromic breast cancer susceptibility genes such as TP53, PTEN, CDH1, and STK11, among others. Nonsyndromic breast cancer susceptibility genes herein reviewed include PALB2, CHEK2, and ataxia telangiectasia mutated gene. With this knowledge, plastic surgeons can play a central role in the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment, including successful breast reconstruction, of all patients carrying genetic mutations conferring increased risk for breast malignancies.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Postoperative hematomas are one of the most frequent complications following aesthetic surgery. Identifying risk factors for hematoma has been limited by underpowered studies from single institution experiences. Objectives/UNASSIGNED:To examine the incidence and identify independent risk factors for postoperative hematomas following cosmetic surgery utilizing a prospective, multicenter database. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A prospectively enrolled cohort of patients who underwent aesthetic surgery between 2008 and 2013 was identified from the CosmetAssure database. Primary outcome was occurrence of major hematomas requiring emergency room visit, hospital admission, or reoperation within 30 days of the index operation. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to identify potential risk factors for hematomas including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, type of surgical facility, procedure by body region, and combined procedures. Results/UNASSIGNED:Of 129,007 patients, 1180 (0.91%) had a major hematoma. Mean age (42.0 ± 13.0 years vs 40.9 ± 13.9 years, P < 0.01) and BMI (24.5 ± 5.0 kg/m2 vs 24.3 ± 4.6 kg/m2, P < 0.01) were higher in patients with hematomas. Males suffered more hematomas than females (1.4% vs 0.9%, P < 0.01). Hematoma rates were higher in patients undergoing combined procedures compared to single procedures (1.1% vs 0.8%, P < 0.01), and breast procedures compared to body/extremity or face procedures (1.0% vs 0.8% vs 0.7%, P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of hematoma included age (Relative Risk [RR] 1.01), male gender (RR 1.98), the procedure being performed in a hospital setting rather than an office-based setting (RR 1.68), combined procedures (RR 1.35), and breast procedures rather than the body/extremity and face procedures (RR 1.81). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Major hematoma is the most common complication following aesthetic surgery. Male patients and those undergoing breast or combined procedures have a significantly higher risk of developing hematomas. Level of Evidence/UNASSIGNED:2.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the anatomy of the peripelvic area. 2. Understand the advantages and disadvantages of performing peripelvic reconstruction in patients undergoing oncologic resection. 3. Select the appropriate local, pedicled, or free-flap reconstruction based on the location of the defect and donor-site characteristics. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:Peripelvic reconstruction most commonly occurs in the setting of oncologic ablative surgery. The peripelvic area contains several distinct reconstructive regions, including vagina, vulva, penis, and scrotum. Each area provides unique reconstructive considerations. In addition, prior or future radiation therapy or chemotherapy along with cancer cachexia can increase the complexity of reconstruction.

An aging and more racially and ethnically diverse population, coupled with changes in the health care policy environment, is demanding that the dental profession both redirect and expand its focus. Challenges include providing comprehensive care for patients with complicated medical needs while improving access to care for underserved groups. The purpose of this study is to examine the acceptability of screening for hypertension and diabetes in the dental setting for African American, Puerto Rican, and Dominican older adults who attend senior centers in northern Manhattan, New York City. Focus groups were conducted with 194 racial/ethnic minority men and women aged 50 y and older living in northern Manhattan who participated in 1 of 24 focus group sessions about improving oral health for older adults. All groups were digitally audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. Groups that were conducted in Spanish were transcribed first in Spanish and then translated into English. Analysis of the transcripts was conducted using thematic content analysis. Five themes were manifest in the data regarding the willingness of racial/ethnic minority older adults to receive hypertension and diabetes screening as part of routine dental visits: 1) chairside screening is acceptable, 2) screening is routine for older adults, 3) the interrelationship between oral and general health is appreciated, 4) chairside screening has perceived benefits, and 5) chairside screening may reduce dental anxiety. Reservations centered on 4 major themes: 1) dental fear may limit the acceptability of chairside screening, 2) there is a perceived lack of need for dental care and chairside screening, 3) screening is available elsewhere, and 4) mistrust of dental providers as primary care providers. This study provides novel evidence of the acceptability of screening for hypertension and diabetes in the dental setting among urban racial/ethnic minority senior center attendees. Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this study may be used by oral health providers when deciding whether to conduct chairside screening for medical conditions such as hypertension and diabetes that could affect, or be affected by, the oral health of their patients. Patient experiences of care-along with clinical outcomes, avoidable hospital admissions, equity of services, and costs-are important outcomes to consider in meeting the needs of an aging and racially and ethnically diverse US population.

Presurgical infant orthopedics has been employed since 1950 as an adjunctive neonatal therapy for the correction of cleft lip and palate. Most of these therapies did not address deformity of the nasal cartilage in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate as well as the deficiency of the columella tissue in infants with bilateral cleft. The NasolAveolar molding (NAM) technique, a new approach to presurgical infant orthopedics, developed by Grayson reduces the severity of the initial cleft alveolar and nasal deformity. This enables the surgeon and the patient to enjoy the benefits associated with repair of a cleft deformity that is minimal in severity. This paper will discuss the appliance design, clinical management, and biomechanical principles of nasolaveolar molding therapy. Long-term studies on NAM therapy indicate better lip and nasal form, reduced oronasal fistula and labial deformities, and 60% reduction in the need for secondary alveolar bone grafting. No effect on growth of midface in sagittal and vertical plane has been recorded up to the age of 18 years. With proper training and clinical skills NAM has demonstrated tremendous benefit to the cleft patients as well as to the surgeon performing the repair. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cleft lip and palate is a complex craniofacial anomaly typically requiring treatment from a range of specialists to produce excellent outcomes. Due to the challenges of coordinating this extensive range of specialists, treatment is best provided by a centralized cleft lip and palate treatment team. This article outlines the members of a modern treatment team, their contributions and responsibilities in patient care, and the benefits to both patient and practitioner when treatment is provided by an experienced multidisciplinary team. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Maxillary hypoplasia is a common finding in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). This study evaluated the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in patients with CLP treated with an occlusally bonded maxillary protraction headgear (PHG) appliance. A total of 267 consecutive patients (1995-2012) treated with a PHG appliance were reviewed. In all, 40 patients with CLP (mean age 7.70 years) met the inclusion criteria. Mean treatment duration was 7.5 months with a mean force of 405 g per side. X- and Y-axis displacement for 38 lateral cephalometric landmarks was recorded at pretreatment (T-0), following removal of PHG (T-1), and at 1.5 years follow-up (T-2). From T-0 to T-1, A-point advanced by +2.48 mm (p &lt; 0.01), UIE advanced by +4.91 mm (p &lt; 0.01) and B-point moved posteriorly by -2.03 mm (p &lt; 0.01) and inferiorly by -3.86 mm (p &lt; 0.01). During the same time interval, the ANB angle changed from 0.08 to 3.77 (p &lt; 0.01). At 1.5 year follow-up, A-point moved posteriorly by -0.28 mm (p &gt; 0.05), B-point moved anteriorly by 3.69 mm (p &lt; 0.01) and the ANB angle decreased to 0.51 (p &lt; 0.01). A PHG appliance with a mean 810 g of force resulted in 54.60% skeletal and 45.40% dentoalveolar advancement. At 1.5 years (T2), the maxillary position was stable with minimal anterior growth; however, the mandible showed significant anterior growth contributing to reduction of the ANB angle. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

The orthodontic treatment of adolescents with cleft lip and palate is complex and highly individualized. For such patients, there is a great need for thorough and comprehensive diagnosis as well as attention to multi-disciplinary aspects of orthodontic care. A framework for categorizing patients with varying forms and degrees cleft lip and palate into three levels of skeletal discrepancy from least to most severe is presented, and the specific treatment objectives of phase II orthodontic treatment for each of the three categories is then outlined. Moreover, due to specific challenges of a cleft-related dentition, the various aspects of the management of missing teeth are reviewed. Finally, the importance and most pertinent methods of retention are emphasized. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.