Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Disordered eating in early adolescence impacts development, with long-term health implications. Minoritised adolescents might be at higher risk of disordered eating due to minority stress, but most research has focused on White, heterosexual, cisgender individuals; less is known about disordered eating among minoritised adolescents. We examined sexual, gender, racial, and ethnic identities in relation to disordered eating in early adolescence. METHOD/METHODS:Using 2-year follow-up data from adolescents ages 10-14 in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (N = 9385), we examined associations between sexual, gender, racial, and ethnic identities and past-2 week disordered eating (preoccupation with weight, weight control behaviors, and binge eating). RESULTS:Compared to heterosexual peers, gay/bisexual adolescents had higher odds of all three outcomes (AOR 1.90-3.32); those "questioning" their sexual identity had higher odds of preoccupation with weight (AOR 1.82) and binge eating (AOR 2.53). Compared to cisgender adolescents, transgender adolescents had higher odds of binge eating (AOR 2.62); those "questioning" their gender identity had higher odds of preoccupation with weight (AOR 2.45). Adolescents whose racial identity was categorised as "Another" had higher odds of preoccupation with weight (AOR 1.46) and weight control behaviors (AOR 1.58) compared to White adolescents. Finally, Hispanic adolescents had higher odds of all disordered eating outcomes than non-Hispanic adolescents (AOR 1.25-1.59). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study is among the first to reveal disparities in disordered eating among minoritised early adolescents. Further examination of these disparities can inform future interventions. Healthcare providers are encouraged to screen for disordered eating, recognising that minoritised early adolescents may be at risk.

BACKGROUND:Benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed drugs; however, their prolonged use can lead to tolerance, dependence, and other adverse effects. Despite these risks, long-term use remains common, presenting a public health concern. This study aims to explore the beliefs and opinions held by the public regarding benzodiazepines, as understanding these perspectives may provide insights into their usage patterns. METHODS:We collected public tweets published in English between January 1, 2019, and October 31, 2020, that mentioned benzodiazepines. The content of each tweet and the characteristics of the users were analyzed using a mixed-method approach, including manual analysis and semi-supervised machine learning. RESULTS:Over half of the Twitter users highlighted the efficacy of benzodiazepines, with minimal discussion of their side effects. The most active participants in these conversations were patients and their families, with health professionals and institutions being notably absent. Additionally, the drugs most frequently mentioned corresponded with those most commonly prescribed by healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS:Social media platforms offer valuable insights into users' experiences and opinions regarding medications. Notably, the sentiment towards benzodiazepines is predominantly positive, with users viewing them as effective while rarely mentioning side effects. This analysis underscores the need to educate physicians, patients, and their families about the potential risks associated with benzodiazepine use and to promote clinical guidelines that support the proper management of these medications. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER/BACKGROUND:Not applicable.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The authors examined the prevalence and correlates of co-occurring opioid use disorder and opioid overdose among individuals receiving psychiatric services. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This was a cross-sectional study of adults with continuous enrollment in New York State Medicaid who received at least one psychiatric service in 2020 (N=523,885). Logistic regression models were used to examine the correlates of both opioid use disorder and overdose. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:In the study sample, the prevalence rate of opioid use disorder was 8.1%; within this group, 7.7% experienced an opioid overdose in the study year. Opioid use disorder rates were lower among younger (18-24 years; 2.0%) and older (≥65 years; 3.1%) adults and higher among men (11.1%) and among those residing in rural areas (9.9%). Compared with Whites (9.4%), opioid use disorder rates were lower for Asian Americans (2.0%, adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.22) and Blacks (6.8%, AOR=0.76) and higher for American Indians (13.2%, AOR=1.43) and Hispanics (9.6%, AOR=1.29). Individuals with any substance use (24.9%, AOR=5.20), posttraumatic stress (15.7%, AOR=2.34), bipolar (14.9%, AOR=2.29), or anxiety (11.3%, AOR=2.18) disorders were more likely to have co-occurring opioid use disorder; those with conduct (4.5%, AOR=0.51), adjustment (7.4%, AOR=0.88), or schizophrenia spectrum (7.4%, AOR=0.87) disorders were less likely to have opioid use disorder. Those with suicidality (23.9%, AOR=3.83) or economic instability (23.7%, AOR=3.35) had higher odds of having opioid use disorder. Overdose odds were higher among individuals with suicidality (34.0%, AOR=6.82) and economic instability (16.0%, AOR=2.57). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:These findings underscore the importance of providing opioid use disorder screening and treatment for patients receiving psychiatric services.

OBJECTIVE:Because understanding barriers to universal suicide risk screening in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) may improve both identification and management of suicidal behaviors and ideation, this study assessed barriers to a quality improvement initiative examining the use of a novel computerized adaptive test (CAT), the Kiddie-CAT, in 2 PEDs. METHODS:Research assistants (RAs) trained in Rapid Assessment Procedures-Informed Clinical Ethnography methods documented barriers related to the environment, individuals, and workflow as encountered during screening shifts, categorizing the barriers' impacts as either general to a screening shift or related to screening an individual youth/caregiver dyad. Using thematic content analysis, investigators further categorized barriers based on type (eg, workflow, language/comprehension, clinician attitudes/behaviors) and relationship to the limited integration of this initiative into clinical protocols. Reasons for refusal and descriptive data on barriers are also reported. RESULTS:Individual screen barriers were most often related to workflow (22.9%) and youth/caregiver language/comprehension challenges (28%). Similarly, workflow issues accounted for 48.2% of all general shift barriers. However, many of these barriers were related to the limited integration of the initiative, as RAs rather than clinical staff conducted the screening. CONCLUSIONS:Although this study was limited by a lack of complete integration into clinical protocols and was complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic impacts on PEDs, the findings suggest that considerable attention needs to be directed both to physician education and to workflow issues that could impede universal screening efforts.

Efforts to bolster the school readiness of Latine children from low-income and immigrant homes have focused on fostering parent engagement in children's education. In assessing parent engagement, most measures center school-based activities in alignment with middle class, European American dominant norms, missing the multiple ways that Latine families engage with their children to support their educational experiences and development. Additionally, studies of predictors of Latine parent engagement have mainly focused on parent demographic and linguistic factors, limiting our understanding of how to support parent engagement equitably. Using a measure of parent engagement sensitive to culturally contextualized behaviors of Latine families, this study describes the ways Latine parents living in historically disinvested neighborhoods in New York City engage in their children's learning at home and in school during a nationally charged anti-immigrant, anti-Latine sociopolitical climate. We also examine whether immigration enforcement threat and parent health are associated with Latine family engagement in home and school-based activities. Data come from a larger study conducted with Latine parents (n=103; 42% immigrant) of pre-K children. Descriptive results indicate that despite a charged sociopolitical context, levels of engagement in children's education and development across multiple domains were comparable with mean levels established by the developers. Findings from regression analyses demonstrated that above and beyond demographic, linguistic and financial factors, immigration enforcement threat and parent health were associated with aspects of family engagement in young children's learning among Latine families in low-income communities. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

The HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study, a multi-site prospective longitudinal cohort study, will examine human brain, cognitive, behavioral, social, and emotional development beginning prenatally and planned through early childhood. Electroencephalography (EEG) is one of two brain imaging modalities central to the HBCD Study. EEG records electrical signals from the scalp that reflect electrical brain activity. In addition, the EEG signal can be synchronized to the presentation of discrete stimuli (auditory or visual) to measure specific cognitive processes with excellent temporal precision (e.g., event-related potentials; ERPs). EEG is particularly helpful for the HBCD Study as it can be used with awake, alert infants, and can be acquired continuously across development. The current paper reviews the HBCD Study's EEG/ERP protocol: (a) the selection and development of the tasks (Video Resting State, Visual Evoked Potential, Auditory Oddball, Face Processing); (b) the implementation of common cross-site acquisition parameters and hardware, site setup, training, and initial piloting; (c) the development of the preprocessing pipelines and creation of derivatives; and (d) the incorporation of equity and inclusion considerations. The paper also provides an overview of the functioning of the EEG Workgroup and the input from members across all steps of protocol development and piloting.

AIM/OBJECTIVE:Schizophrenia is a leading cause of disability worldwide; early detection and intervention are critical. Early in their illness, individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis have subthreshold psychotic symptoms that are often derogatory and self-directed. We hypothesized that CHR participants with negative self-reference (NSR) as a component of subthreshold psychosis would also have higher levels of social anxiety and depression, lower self-esteem and lower social/role/global functioning as compared with CHR participants without NSR. METHODS:One hundred and sixty-eight participants from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Regroup Cognitive Behavioural Social Skills Training (CBSST) study were included. Clinical vignettes that included the Scale of Psychosis-Risk Symptoms were coded categorically to indicate whether NSR was present. t-tests were used to determine the association between NSR, symptom, and functional measures. RESULTS:Participants with NSR demonstrated significantly more social interaction anxiety (p < .001), negative beliefs about the self (p ≤ .001), defeatist beliefs (p < .05), depressive symptoms (p < .05) and positive symptoms (p < .005). There were no significant differences in social self-efficacy, positive or negative beliefs about others, positive beliefs about the self or psychosocial functioning between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:Clinically significant differences were found between CHR participants with and without NSR, suggesting that this may be a useful factor to identify and address. Follow-up studies are needed to determine whether NSR responds to CBSST and whether or not its resolution would be associated with improvement in other symptom domains.