Faculty Bibliography

Oxytocin is a hypothalamic neuropeptide that has gained attention for the effects on social behavior. Recent findings shed new light on the mechanisms of oxytocin in synaptic plasticity and adaptively modifying neural circuits for social interactions such as conspecific recognition, pair bonding, and maternal care. Here, we review several of these newer studies on oxytocin in the context of previous findings, with an emphasis on social behavior and circuit plasticity in various brain regions shown to be enriched for oxytocin receptors. We provide a framework that highlights current circuit-level mechanisms underlying the widespread action of oxytocin

Objective Rhinoplasty, a surgical procedure that alters the shape or appearance of the nose while preserving or enhancing the nasal airway, ranks among the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures in the United States, with >200,000 procedures reported in 2014. While it is difficult to calculate the exact economic burden incurred by rhinoplasty patients following surgery with or without complications, the average rhinoplasty procedure typically exceeds $4000. The costs incurred due to complications, infections, or revision surgery may include the cost of long-term antibiotics, hospitalization, or lost revenue from hours/days of missed work. The resultant psychological impact of rhinoplasty can also be significant. Furthermore, the health care burden from psychological pressures of nasal deformities/aesthetic shortcomings, surgical infections, surgical pain, side effects from antibiotics, and nasal packing materials must also be considered for these patients. Prior to this guideline, limited literature existed on standard care considerations for pre- and postsurgical management and for standard surgical practice to ensure optimal outcomes for patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The impetus for this guideline is to utilize current evidence-based medicine practices and data to build unanimity regarding the peri- and postoperative strategies to maximize patient safety and to optimize surgical results for patients. Purpose The primary purpose of this guideline executive summary is to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinicians who either perform rhinoplasty or are involved in the care of a rhinoplasty candidate, as well as to optimize patient care, promote effective diagnosis and therapy, and reduce harmful or unnecessary variations in care. The target audience is any clinician or individual, in any setting, involved in the management of these patients. The target patient population is all patients aged >/=15 years. The guideline is intended to focus on knowledge gaps, practice variations, and clinical concerns associated with this surgical procedure; it is not intended to be a comprehensive reference for improving nasal form and function after rhinoplasty. Recommendations in this guideline concerning education and counseling to the patient are intended to include the caregiver if the patient is <18 years of age. Action Statements The Guideline Development Group made the following recommendations: (1) Clinicians should ask all patients seeking rhinoplasty about their motivations for surgery and their expectations for outcomes, should provide feedback on whether those expectations are a realistic goal of surgery, and should document this discussion in the medical record. (2) Clinicians should assess rhinoplasty candidates for comorbid conditions that could modify or contraindicate surgery, including obstructive sleep apnea, body dysmorphic disorder, bleeding disorders, or chronic use of topical vasoconstrictive intranasal drugs. (3) The surgeon, or the surgeon's designee, should evaluate the rhinoplasty candidate for nasal airway obstruction during the preoperative assessment. (4) The surgeon, or the surgeon's designee, should educate rhinoplasty candidates regarding what to expect after surgery, how surgery might affect the ability to breathe through the nose, potential complications of surgery, and the possible need for future nasal surgery. (5) The clinician, or the clinician's designee, should counsel rhinoplasty candidates with documented obstructive sleep apnea about the impact of surgery on nasal airway obstruction and how obstructive sleep apnea might affect perioperative management. (6) The surgeon, or the surgeon's designee, should educate rhinoplasty patients before surgery about strategies to manage discomfort after surgery. (7) Clinicians should document patient satisfaction with their nasal appearance and with their nasal function at a minimum of 12 months after rhinoplasty. The guideline development group made recommendations against certain actions: (1) When a surgeon, or the surgeon's designee, chooses to administer perioperative antibiotics for rhinoplasty, he or she should not routinely prescribe antibiotic therapy for a duration >24 hours after surgery. (2) Surgeons should not routinely place packing in the nasal cavity of rhinoplasty patients (with or without septoplasty) at the conclusion of surgery. The panel group made the following statement an option: (1) The surgeon, or the surgeon's designee, may administer perioperative systemic steroids to the rhinoplasty patient.

OBJECTIVE:Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) is a widely accepted technique for sellar tumors. Common findings during preoperative assessment include septal deviations and turbinate hypertrophy. This study evaluated quality of life changes after concurrent septoplasty and/or inferior turbinoplasty during EETS. METHODS:A retrospective review was performed of a prospectively collected database including all patients undergoing EETS at our institution during a 10-month period between 2015 and 2016. Patients were divided into a septoplasty/inferior turbinoplasty group and a no septoplasty/inferior turbinoplasty group. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) was used to evaluate quality of life. Mean preoperative scores were compared with 1- and 3-month postoperative scores within each cohort. The SNOT-22 was also reorganized into 5 distinct subdomains. Average subdomain scores were calculated, and preoperative and 1- and 3-month postoperative subdomain scores were compared within each cohort. A paired Student t test was used. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS:All 24 patients met inclusion criteria by completing preoperative and postoperative SNOT-22 surveys. In the septoplasty/inferior turbinoplasty group, preoperative and 3-month postoperative scores showed a clinically significant difference (P = 0.047). The septoplasty/inferior turbinoplasty group specifically showed a significant difference in the psychiatric and sleep SNOT-22 subdomains when comparing preoperative with 3-month postoperative scores (P = 0.03, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Patients who underwent concurrent septoplasty and/or turbinoplasty with EETS had a significantly improved quality of life compared with preoperative assessment, specifically regarding psychological and sleep symptoms.

OBJECTIVE:A significant proportion of children with congenital hearing loss who are candidates for cochlear implants (CIs) may have inner ear malformations (IEMs). Surgical and speech outcomes following CI in these children have not been widely reported. METHODS:The charts of children who were evaluated for a CI between 1/1/1986 and 12/31/2014 at a university-based tertiary level pediatric cochlear implant center were reviewed. Principal inclusion criteria included (i) age 1-18 years, (ii) history of bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, and (iii) limited benefit from binaural amplification. Exclusion criteria included (i) underlying diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorder and (ii) lack of follow up for speech assessment if a CI was performed. The following outcome measures were reviewed: (i) imaging findings with magnetic resonance imaging or high resolution computed tomography, (ii) intraoperative complications, and (iii) speech perception categorized as the ability to perceive closed set, open set, or none. RESULTS:The prevalence of IEMs was 27% (102 of 381), of which 79% were bilateral. Cochlear dysplasia accounted for 30% (40 of 136) of the anomalies. Seventy-eight of the 102 patients received a CI (78%). Surgery was noted to be challenging in 24% (19 of 78), with a perilymphatic gusher being the most common intraoperative finding. Cochlear dysplasia, vestibular dysplasia and cochlear nerve hypoplasia were associated with poor speech perception (open OR closed set speech recognition scores, 0-23%), although the outcomes in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct were similar to those of children with normal inner ear anatomy (65%). CONCLUSIONS:Cochlear implantation is safe in children with IEMs. However, the speech perception outcomes are notably below those of patients with normal anatomy, with the exception of when an enlarged vestibular aqueduct is present.

Virus-mediated gene delivery shows promise for the treatment of chronic pain. However, viral vectors have cytotoxicity. To avoid toxicities and limitations of virus-mediated gene delivery, we developed a novel nonviral hybrid vector: HIV-1 Tat peptide sequence modified with histidine and cysteine residues combined with a cationic lipid. The vector has high transfection efficiency with little cytotoxicity in cancer cell lines including HSC-3 (human tongue squamous cell carcinoma) and exhibits differential expression in HSC-3 ( approximately 45-fold) relative to HGF-1 (human gingival fibroblasts) cells. We used the nonviral vector to transfect cancer with OPRM1, the mu-opioid receptor gene, as a novel method for treating cancer-induced pain. After HSC-3 cells were transfected with OPRM1, a cancer mouse model was created by inoculating the transfected HSC-3 cells into the hind paw or tongue of athymic mice to determine the analgesic potential of OPRM1 transfection. Mice with HSC-3 tumors expressing OPRM1 demonstrated significant antinociception compared with control mice. The effect was reversible with local naloxone administration. We quantified beta-endorphin secretion from HSC-3 cells and showed that HSC-3 cells transfected with OPRM1 secreted significantly more beta-endorphin than control HSC-3 cells. These findings indicate that nonviral delivery of the OPRM1 gene targeted to the cancer microenvironment has an analgesic effect in a preclinical cancer model, and nonviral gene delivery is a potential treatment for cancer pain.

Background: Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion is associated with poor oncologic outcomes in several malignancies. Its effect on recurrence and survival in distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) is unknown. Methods: All patients with DCC who underwent curative-intent pancreaticoduodenectomy at 10 institutions from 2000-2015 were included. 30-day mortalities were excluded. Primary outcomes were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 314 pts with DCC, 206 (66%) underwent curative-intent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Median age was 67yrs, and 53 pts (28%) received perioperative blood transfusions, with a median of 2 units. There were no differences in baseline demographics or operative data between transfusion and no-transfusion groups. Compared to no-transfusion, patients who received a transfusion were more likely to have (+)margins (28vs14%; p < 0.03) and major complications (46vs16%; p < 0.001). Receipt of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy was similar between groups. Transfusion was associated with lower median RFS (19vs32mos; p = 0.006) and OS (15vs29mos; p = 0.003), which persisted on multivariable (MV) analysis for both RFS (HR 1.8; 95%CI 1.1-3.1; p = 0.03)and OS (HR 1.9; 95%CI 1.1-3.2; p = 0.03), after controlling for portal vein resection, EBL, margin status, grade, LVI, LN status, and major complications. Similarly, transfusion of >= 2 pRBC units was associated with lower RFS (17vs32mos; p < 0.001) and OS (14vs29mos; p < 0.001), which again persisted on MV analysis for both RFS (HR 2.6; 95%CI 1.4-4.6; p = 0.002) and OS (HR 3.9; 95%CI 2.1-7.5; p < 0.001). The RFS and OS of patients transfused 1 unit was similar to those not transfused. Conclusions: Perioperative blood transfusion is associated with decreased RFS and OS after resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma, after accounting for known adverse pathologic factors. Volume of transfusion seems to exert an independent effect, as 1 unit is not associated with the same adverse effects as >= 2units. This supports the judicious use of perioperative transfusion; protocols should be developed and followed

Objective Rhinoplasty, a surgical procedure that alters the shape or appearance of the nose while preserving or enhancing the nasal airway, ranks among the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures in the United States, with >200,000 procedures reported in 2014. While it is difficult to calculate the exact economic burden incurred by rhinoplasty patients following surgery with or without complications, the average rhinoplasty procedure typically exceeds $4000. The costs incurred due to complications, infections, or revision surgery may include the cost of long-term antibiotics, hospitalization, or lost revenue from hours/days of missed work. The resultant psychological impact of rhinoplasty can also be significant. Furthermore, the health care burden from psychological pressures of nasal deformities/aesthetic shortcomings, surgical infections, surgical pain, side effects from antibiotics, and nasal packing materials must also be considered for these patients. Prior to this guideline, limited literature existed on standard care considerations for pre- and postsurgical management and for standard surgical practice to ensure optimal outcomes for patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The impetus for this guideline is to utilize current evidence-based medicine practices and data to build unanimity regarding the peri- and postoperative strategies to maximize patient safety and to optimize surgical results for patients. Purpose The primary purpose of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinicians who either perform rhinoplasty or are involved in the care of a rhinoplasty candidate, as well as to optimize patient care, promote effective diagnosis and therapy, and reduce harmful or unnecessary variations in care. The target audience is any clinician or individual, in any setting, involved in the management of these patients. The target patient population is all patients aged >/=15 years. The guideline is intended to focus on knowledge gaps, practice variations, and clinical concerns associated with this surgical procedure; it is not intended to be a comprehensive reference for improving nasal form and function after rhinoplasty. Recommendations in this guideline concerning education and counseling to the patient are also intended to include the caregiver if the patient is <18 years of age. Action Statements The Guideline Development Group made the following recommendations: (1) Clinicians should ask all patients seeking rhinoplasty about their motivations for surgery and their expectations for outcomes, should provide feedback on whether those expectations are a realistic goal of surgery, and should document this discussion in the medical record. (2) Clinicians should assess rhinoplasty candidates for comorbid conditions that could modify or contraindicate surgery, including obstructive sleep apnea, body dysmorphic disorder, bleeding disorders, or chronic use of topical vasoconstrictive intranasal drugs. (3) The surgeon, or the surgeon's designee, should evaluate the rhinoplasty candidate for nasal airway obstruction during the preoperative assessment. (4) The surgeon, or the surgeon's designee, should educate rhinoplasty candidates regarding what to expect after surgery, how surgery might affect the ability to breathe through the nose, potential complications of surgery, and the possible need for future nasal surgery. (5) The clinician, or the clinician's designee, should counsel rhinoplasty candidates with documented obstructive sleep apnea about the impact of surgery on nasal airway obstruction and how obstructive sleep apnea might affect perioperative management. (6) The surgeon, or the surgeon's designee, should educate rhinoplasty patients before surgery about strategies to manage discomfort after surgery. (7) Clinicians should document patients' satisfaction with their nasal appearance and with their nasal function at a minimum of 12 months after rhinoplasty. The Guideline Development Group made recommendations against certain actions: (1) When a surgeon, or the surgeon's designee, chooses to administer perioperative antibiotics for rhinoplasty, he or she should not routinely prescribe antibiotic therapy for a duration >24 hours after surgery. (2) Surgeons should not routinely place packing in the nasal cavity of rhinoplasty patients (with or without septoplasty) at the conclusion of surgery. The panel group made the following statement an option: (1) The surgeon, or the surgeon's designee, may administer perioperative systemic steroids to the rhinoplasty patient.