Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has transformed health care. With the need to limit COVID-19 exposures, telemedicine has become an increasingly important format for clinical care. Compared with other fields, neuro-ophthalmology faces unique challenges, given its dependence on physical examination signs that are difficult to elicit outside the office setting. As such, it is imperative to understand both patient and provider experiences to continue to adapt the technology and tailor its application. The purpose of this study is to analyze both neuro-ophthalmology physician and patient satisfaction with virtual health visits during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS:Across three institutions (NYU Langone Health, Indiana University Health, and Columbia University Medical Center), telemedicine surveys were administered to 159 patients. Neuro-ophthalmologists completed 157 surveys; each of these were linked to a single patient visit. Patient surveys consisted of 5 questions regarding visit preparation, satisfaction, challenges, and comfort. The physician survey included 4 questions that focused on ability to gather specific clinical information by history and examination. RESULTS:Among 159 patients, 104 (65.4%) reported that they were satisfied with the visit, and 149 (93.7%) indicated that they were comfortable asking questions. Sixty-eight (73.9%) patients found the instructions provided before the visit easy to understand. Potential areas for improvement noted by patients included more detailed preparation instructions and better technology (phone positioning, Internet connection, and software). More than 87% (137/157) of neuro-ophthalmologists surveyed reported having performed an examination that provided enough information for medical decision-making. Some areas of the neuro-ophthalmologic examination were reported to be easy to conduct (range of eye movements, visual acuity, Amsler grids, Ishihara color plates, and pupillary examination). Other components were more difficult (saccades, red desaturation, visual fields, convergence, oscillations, ocular alignment, and smooth pursuit); some were especially challenging (vestibulo-ocular reflex [VOR], VOR suppression, and optokinetic nystagmus). Clinicians noted that virtual health visits were limited by patient preparation, inability to perform certain parts of the examination (funduscopy and pupils), and technological issues. CONCLUSIONS:Among virtual neuro-ophthalmology visits evaluated, most offer patients with appointments that satisfy their needs. Most physicians in this cohort obtained adequate clinical information for decision-making. Even better technology and instructions may help improve aspects of virtual health visits.

When interpreting clinical 2-deoxy-2[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans of the brain (excluding tumors), the typical abnormality is hypometabolism of various brain regions. Focal areas of hypermetabolism are noted occasionally and the usual interpretation is that the hypermetabolic region represents a seizure focus. In this review, we discuss and illustrate the multiple causes of hypermetabolism that should not be interpreted as seizure activity could potentially lead to an incorrect interpretation of FDG-PET studies. Various causes or conditions where focal hypermetabolism can be encountered on FDG-PET studies include interictal hypermetabolism, Sturge-Weber syndrome, changes associated with brain plasticity following injury, Rett syndrome, hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, various inborn errors of metabolism, and autoimmune encephalitis. The radiologist or nuclear medicine physician interpreting clinical FDG-PET studies should be aware of these circumstances to provide accurate assessment of the study.

Importance/UNASSIGNED:Most antiseizure medications (ASMs) carry a US Food and Drug Administration-mandated class label warning of increased suicidality risk, based on a meta-analysis comparing suicidality between individuals treated with medications vs placebo in randomized clinical trials done before 2008. ASMs approved since then carry this warning although they were not similarly studied. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To review all placebo-controlled phase 2 and 3 studies of 10 ASMs approved since 2008 to evaluate the risk of suicidality of these drugs compared with placebo. Data Sources/UNASSIGNED:Primary publications and secondary safety analyses in PubMed of all phase 2 and 3 randomized placebo-controlled epilepsy trials of ASMs approved since 2008, using keywords epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs, seizures, suicidality, suicidal ideation, and the names of individual drugs. Study Selection/UNASSIGNED:All phase 2 and 3 randomized clinical trials of adjunctive treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy and their secondary safety analyses. Data Extraction and Synthesis/UNASSIGNED:Articles were reviewed for frequency of suicidality (ideation, attempts, and completed suicides). Mode of suicidality ascertainment included treatment-emergent adverse event reports, Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities queries for events in prespecified categories including suicidal ideation and behavior, prospective collection of suicidality data as a prespecified safety outcome using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, and retrospective evaluation by blinded review using the Columbia-Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment. A meta-analysis compared risk for drugs vs placebo of each outcome for all drugs overall and by individual drugs and trials. Main Outcomes and Measures/UNASSIGNED:Suicidality (total and by ideation), attempts, and completed suicides. Results/UNASSIGNED:Excluding studies that did not evaluate suicidality (everolimus and fenfluramine) or did not evaluate it prospectively (lacosamide, ezogabine, and clobazam), 5 drugs were analyzed: eslicarbazepine, perampanel, brivaracetam, cannabidiol, and cenobamate. Suicidality was evaluated in 17 randomized clinical trials of these drugs, involving 5996 patients, of whom 4000 patients were treated with ASMs and 1996 with placebo. There was no evidence of increased risk of suicidal ideation (drugs vs placebo overall risk ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35-1.60) or attempt (risk ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.30-1.87) overall or for any individual drug. Suicidal ideation occurred in 12 of 4000 patients treated with ASMs (0.30%) vs 7 of 1996 patients treated with placebo (0.35%) (P = .74). Three patients treated with ASMs and no patients treated with placebo attempted suicide (P = .22). There were no completed suicides. Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:There is no current evidence that the 5 ASMs evaluated in this study increase suicidality in epilepsy and merit a suicidality class warning.

Importance/UNASSIGNED:In patients with acute spontaneous or traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, early hemostasis is thought to be critical to minimize ongoing bleeding. However, research evaluating hemostatic therapies has been hampered by a lack of standardized clinical trial outcome measures. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To identify appropriate primary outcomes for phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of therapies aimed at reducing acute intracranial bleeding. Evidence Review/UNASSIGNED:A comprehensive review of all previous clinical trials of hemostatic therapy for intracranial bleeding was performed, and studies measuring the frequency, risk factors, and association of intracranial bleeding with outcome of hemorrhage growth were included. Findings/UNASSIGNED:A hierarchy of 3 outcome measures is recommended, with the first choice being a global patient-centered clinical outcome scale measured 30 to 180 days after the event; the second, a combined clinical and radiographic end point associating hemorrhage expansion with a poor patient-centered outcome at 24 hours or later; and the third, a radiographic measure of hemorrhage expansion at 24 hours alone. Additional recommendations stress the importance of separating various subtypes of bleeding when possible, early treatment within a standardized treatment window, and the routine use of computerized planimetry comparing continuous measures of absolute and relative hemorrhage growth as either a primary or secondary end point. Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:Standardization of outcome measures in studies of intracranial bleeding and hemostatic therapy will support comparative effectiveness research and meta-analysis, with the goal of accelerating the translation of research into clinical practice. The 3 outcome measures proposed in this consensus statement could help this process.

Eliglustat, an oral substrate reduction therapy, is approved for eligible adults with Gaucher disease type 1. In the Phase 3 ENGAGE trial of previously untreated adults with Gaucher disease type 1, eliglustat-treated patients had statistically significant improvements in organ volumes and hematologic parameters compared with placebo in the 9-month primary analysis. We report final outcomes by time on eliglustat among all patients who participated in the ENGAGE trial and extension. No patient deteriorated clinically or withdrew due to adverse events; 39/40 patients entered the open-label extension period and 34/40 (85%) remained in the trial until completion or switching to commercial eliglustat after its approval (2.3 to 6 years). Clinically meaningful improvements in Gaucher disease manifestations were seen in all patients concomitant with reductions in pathological lipid substrate levels (glucosylceramide and glucosylsphingosine). Among patients with 4.5 years of eliglustat exposure, mean spleen volume decreased by 66% (from 17.1 to 5.8 multiples of normal [MN], n=13)mean liver volume decreased by 23% (from 1.5 to 1.1 MN, n=13), mean hemoglobin increased 1.4 g/dL (from 11.9 to 13.4 g/dL, n=12), mean platelet count increased by 87% (from 67.6 to 122.6 x 10⁹ /L, n=12), median chitotriosidase decreased by 82% (from 13,394 to 2312 nmol/hr/ml, n=11), median glucosylceramide decreased by 79% (from 11.5 to 2.4 μg/mL, n=11), median glucosylsphingosine decreased by 84% (from 518.5 to 72.1 ng/mL, n=10), and mean spine T-score increased from -1.07 (osteopenia) to -0.53 (normal) (n=9). Together, these outcomes regardless of time on eliglustat showed comparable improvements in Gaucher manifestations and disease biomarkers. Eliglustat was well-tolerated and led to clinically significant improvements in previously untreated patients with Gaucher disease type 1 during 4.5 years of treatment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We reviewed the literature to evaluate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) results from patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who had neurological symptoms and had an MRI that showed (1) central nervous system (CNS) hyperintense lesions not attributed to ischemia and/or (2) leptomeningeal enhancement. We sought to determine if these findings were associated with a positive CSF severe acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR). METHODS:We performed a systematic review of Medline and Embase from December 1, 2019 to November 18, 2020. CSF results were evaluated based on the presence/absence of (1) ≥ 1 CNS hyperintense lesion and (2) leptomeningeal enhancement. RESULTS:In 117 publications, we identified 193 patients with COVID-19 who had an MRI of the CNS and CSF testing. There were 125 (65%) patients with CNS hyperintense lesions. Patients with CNS hyperintense lesions were significantly more likely to have a positive CSF SARS-CoV-2 PCR (10% [9/87] vs. 0% [0/43], p = 0.029). Of 75 patients who had a contrast MRI, there were 20 (27%) patients who had leptomeningeal enhancement. Patients with leptomeningeal enhancement were significantly more likely to have a positive CSF SARS-CoV-2 PCR (25% [4/16] vs. 5% [2/42], p = 0.024). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The presence of CNS hyperintense lesions or leptomeningeal enhancement on neuroimaging from patients with COVID-19 is associated with increased likelihood of a positive CSF SARS-CoV-2 PCR. However, a positive CSF SARS-CoV-2 PCR is uncommon in patients with these neuroimaging findings, suggesting they are often related to other etiologies, such as inflammation, hypoxia, or ischemia.

Background/Purpose: Interferon (IFN)-alpha contributes to susceptibility and severe manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The PRKG1 rs7897633 variant has been previously identified as the top hit in European ancestry patients with SLE and high IFN-alpha compared to those with low circulating IFN activity. However, the mechanisms by which PRKG1 polymorphisms impact the immune system remain unknown. PRKG1 codes for the cGMP-dependent protein kinase I (PKGI). Activation of PKGI leads to VASP phosphorylation, and the inhibition of RhoA and Rho-associated kinases (ROCK). A subgroup of patients with SLE exhibit higher ROCK activity in circulating immune cells compared to healthy controls. ROCK inhibition decreases IFN-alpha production and ameliorates disease in murine models of lupus. Accordingly, we aimed to assess whether the PRKG1 gene variant was associated with decreased gene expression and activity of PRKG1, hyperactivation of the ROCK pathway, and altered response to type I IFN.
Method(s): We used B lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) derived from healthy subjects of European ancestry (Coriell repositories) homozygous (AA or CC) and heterozygous (AC) at the rs7897633 SNP for all experiments. Gene expression of PRKG1, RHOA, and ROCK was assessed by RT-qPCR using gene-specific primers, normalized by GAPDH, and measured by the 2-DELTADELTACT method. IFN score at baseline and after treatment of LCL with increasing doses of IFN-alpha was measured by quantifying 3 canonical IFN-stimulated genes (IFIT1, MX1 and PKR) and summing to generate a score reflecting the degree of IFN-induced gene expression in the cells. Abundance of PKGI and VASP phosphorylation (as a surrogate of PKGI activity) were determined by Western blotting at baseline and after treatment with a PKGI agonist. ROCK2 enzymatic activity was performed by a colorimetric assay (Cell Biolabs). Unstimulated and stimulated cells were compared among PRKG1 genotype categories. Statistically significant differences were determined by Mann Whitney U test or sum-of-squares F test, as appropriate.
Result(s): PRKG1 expression was lower in the homozygous AA genotype as compared with the homozygous CC genotype in LCL (p< 0.05). In contrast, ROCK expression was higher in LCL with the AA rs7897633 genotype (p< 0.05). Compared to LCL with the homozygous AA variant of rs7897633, homozygous CC LCL have greater abundance of PKGI, phosphorylated VASP/total VASP ratio in response to a PKGI agonist (indicating increased PKGI activity), and lower baseline ROCK activity (sum-of-squares F test, p< 0.05). The IFN score was significantly higher in the homozygous CC allele LCL, both at baseline and with increasing doses of IFN-alpha, suggesting increased sensitivity to type I IFN (p< 0.05).
Conclusion(s): PRKG1 AA genotype associates with lower PRKG1 and higher ROCK mRNA expression, decreased PKGI abundance and activity, and greater ROCK baseline activity. In contrast, the rs7897633 CC genotype is associated with increased response to IFNalpha. Overall, these findings suggest an important role of genetic variation at PRKG1 in modulating the RhoA-ROCK pathway and regulating response to type I IFNs in LCL, which may have therapeutic implications in patients with SLE