Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Given the widespread use of facial fillers and recent identification of distinct facial fat compartments, a better understanding of three-dimensional surface changes in response to volume augmentation is needed. Advances in three-dimensional imaging technology now afford an opportunity to elucidate these morphologic changes for the first time. METHODS: A cadaver study was undertaken in which volumization of the deep medial cheek compartment was performed at intervals up to 4 cc (n = 4). Three-dimensional photographs were taken after each injection to analyze the topographic surface changes, which the authors define as the "augmentation zone." Perimeter, diameter, and projection were studied. The arcus marginalis of the inferior orbit consistently represented a fixed boundary of the augmentation zone, and additional cadavers underwent similar volumization following surgical release of this portion of the arcus marginalis (n = 4). Repeated three-dimensional computer analysis was performed comparing the augmentation zone with and without arcus marginalis release. RESULTS: Volumization of the deep medial cheek led to unique topographic changes of the malar region defined by distinct boundaries. Interestingly, the cephalic border of the augmentation zone was consistently noted to be at the level of the arcus marginalis in all specimens. When surgical release of the arcus marginalis was performed, the cephalic border of the augmentation zone was no longer restricted. CONCLUSIONS: Using advances in three-dimensional photography and computer analysis, the authors demonstrate characteristic surface anatomy changes in response to volume augmentation of facial compartments. This novel concept of the augmentation zone can be applied to volumization of other distinct facial regions. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

The human vocal folds are complex structures made up of distinct layers that vary in cellular and extracellular composition. The mechanical properties of vocal fold tissue are fundamental to the study of both the acoustics and biomechanics of voice production. To date, quantitative methods have been applied to characterize the vocal fold tissue in both normal and pathologic conditions. This review describes, summarizes, and discusses the most commonly employed methods for vocal fold biomechanical testing. Force-elongation, torsional parallel plate rheometry, simple-shear parallel plate rheometry, linear skin rheometry, and indentation are the most frequently employed biomechanical tests for vocal fold tissues and each provide material properties data that can be used to compare native tissue to diseased or treated tissue. Force-elongation testing is clinically useful, as it allows for functional unit testing, while rheometry provides physiologically relevant shear data, and nanoindentation permits micrometer scale testing across different areas of the vocal fold as well as whole organ testing. Thoughtful selection of the testing technique during experimental design to evaluate a hypothesis is critical to optimize biomechanical testing of vocal fold tissues.

The management of patients with cleft lip and cleft palate requires prolonged orthodontic and surgical treatment and an interdisciplinary approach in providing them with optimal esthetics, function, and stability. This article describes an update on the current concepts and principles in the treatment of patients with cleft lip and palate. Sequencing and timing of orthodontic/ orthopedic and surgical treatment in infancy, early mixed dentition, early permanent dentition, and after the completion of facial growth will be discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Background The internal mammary vessels are the most commonly used recipients for microsurgical breast reconstructions. Often, the costal cartilage is sacrificed to obtain improved vessel exposure. In an effort to reduce adverse effects associated with traditional rib sacrifice, recent studies have described less-invasive, rib-sparing strategies. Methods After obtaining institutional review board's approval, a retrospective review of all patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction at a single institution between November 2007 and December 2013 was conducted. Patients were divided into two cohorts for comparison: rib-sacrificing and rib-sparing internal mammary vessel harvests. Results A total of 547 reconstructions (344 patients) met inclusion criteria for this study. A total of 64.9% (n = 355) underwent rib-sacrificing internal mammary vessel harvest. Cohorts were similar in baseline patient characteristics, indications for surgery, and cancer therapies. However, patients undergoing rib-sparing reconstructions had significantly shorter operative times (440 vs. 476 minutes; p < 0.01), and significantly less postoperative pain on postoperative day (POD) 1 (2.8/10 vs. 3.4/10; p = 0.033) and POD2 (2.4/10 vs. 3.0/10; p = 0.037). Furthermore, patients undergoing rib-sparing techniques had greater incidence of fat necrosis requiring excision (12.5 vs. 2.8%; p < 0.01) and a trend toward higher incidence of hematoma, venous thrombosis, and arterial thrombosis when compared with rib-sacrificing patients. Conclusions Rib-sparing harvest of internal mammary vessels is a feasible technique in microsurgical breast reconstruction. However, given the significant increase in fat necrosis requiring surgical excision, the trend toward increased postoperative complications, and no significant difference in postoperative revision rates, the purported benefits of this technique may fail to outweigh the possible risks.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the prevalence of voice disturbances in the pediatric craniofacial population and to prove that the pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI) is a useful questionnaire for this unique population. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care center. SUBJECTS: Pediatric patients seen by a pediatric otolaryngologist in a craniofacial clinic. METHODS: Consecutive patients (N = 366) seen by a single pediatric otolaryngologist in a craniofacial clinic from July 2011 to September 2012 were included. Any patient specifically referred for airway problems or voice difficulties completed a pVHI questionnaire. Patients each underwent an evaluation including flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy and videostroboscopy. Voice disturbance was further characterized into dysphonia, hypernasality, or hyponasality. RESULTS: Of all the patients evaluated, 280 (77%) were specifically referred for airway problems or voice disturbance. Of those referred, 39 (10.7%) were found to have an organic vocal fold pathology causing dysphonia, as seen on the videostroboscopic examination; 53.7% of these lesions were attributable to potential iatrogenic causes. Hypernasality and hyponasality were seen in 116 (31.7%) and 78 (21.3%) patients, respectively. The pVHI was 3.95, 26.3, 11.34, and 10.53 for those with no voice disturbance, dysphonia, hypernasality, and hyponasality, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients with craniofacial disorders have a higher prevalence of dysphonia than the general pediatric population. The majority of causes of dysphonia in these patients are possibly iatrogenic in origin. The pVHI serves as a useful questionnaire in this unique patient cohort to quantify the disability from not only dysphonia but also hypernasality and hyponasality.

Complex periorbital subunit reconstruction is challenging because the goals of effective reconstruction vary from one individual to another. The purpose of this article is to explore the indications and anatomic feasibility of periorbital transplantation by reviewing our institutional repository of facial injury. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center for a retrospective chart review conducted on patients with periorbital defects. Patient history, facial defects, visual acuity, and periorbital function were critically reviewed to identify indications for periorbital or total face (incorporating the periorbital subunit) vascularized composite allotransplantation. Cadaveric allograft harvest was then designed and performed for specific patient defects to determine anatomic feasibility. Disease conditions not captured by our patient population warranting consideration were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 7 facial or periorbital transplant candidates representing 6 different etiologies were selected as suitable indications for periorbital transplantation. Etiologies included trauma, burn, animal attack, and tumor, whereas proposed transplants included isolated periorbital and total face transplants. Allograft recovery was successfully completed in 4 periorbital subunits and 1 full face. Dual vascular supply was achieved in 5 of 6 periorbital subunits (superficial temporal and facial vessels). CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of isolated periorbital structures or full face transplantation including periorbital structures is technically feasible. The goal of periorbital transplantation is to re-establish protective mechanisms of the eye, to prevent deterioration of visual acuity, and to optimize aesthetic outcomes. Criteria necessary for candidate selection and allograft design are identified by periorbital defect, periorbital function, ophthalmologic evaluation, and defect etiology.

Academic productivity, demonstrated by a record of scholarly publication, is the main criterion for academic promotion. Nevertheless, there are no data on early-career productivity milestones to guide young faculty members aspiring to attain professor status. We performed a bibliometric analysis to determine the number of scholarly papers published by current professors of orthopedic surgery within 5 years after their having acquired American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery certification (termed early scholarly output). Median early scholarly output for all professors (N = 108) was 11 publications. We found medians of 5 first-author and 2 last-author publications, and 4 publications in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research or Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Median number of papers cited at least 50 times by year 5 was 2. The median number of total citations was 29.5, and median Hirsch index (h-index) was 3. Faculty who were clinical professors published fewer papers and acquired fewer citations than faculty who were promoted but did have the clinical descriptor. Professors certified after 1995 were more productive than those certified before 1990. This descriptive study provided benchmark data on early scholarly productivity of current professors of orthopedic surgery and demonstrated this benchmark has risen in more recent years.

BACKGROUND: The profunda artery perforator free flap has not gained traction for nonbreast reconstruction, likely because of the presence of a proven workhorse in the anterolateral thigh flap. The authors believe that the profunda artery perforator flap offers similar coverage characteristics with the benefits of a medial donor site, a more consistent anatomy, and relatively easy dissection. The authors review their indications, technique, and outcomes in seven patients requiring eight free flap reconstructions. METHODS: The authors applied the use of the vertically oriented profunda artery perforator flap to both lower extremity and head and neck reconstructions in which an anterolateral thigh flap would normally have been used. Details reviewed include soft-tissue defect, perforator location, flap size, recipient vessel, and complications. RESULTS: Eight soft-tissue defects were covered with a vertically oriented profunda artery perforator flap in seven patients. Six reconstructions were for distal lower extremity and two were for head and neck reconstruction, both trauma and oncologic reconstructions. Flap sizes ranged from 40 to 92 cm. The pedicle length ranged from 7 to 10 cm. There were no partial or complete flap losses. One complication of seroma at the donor site requiring washout and closure was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The profunda artery perforator flap is a safe and effective option for perforator-based free flap reconstruction with relative ease of harvest and an inconspicuous donor site. This flap offers an excellent alternative to the anterolateral thigh flap. In certain patient demographics, the profunda artery perforator flap should be considered as a primary option. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.