Faculty Bibliography

This report describes a digital workflow and two-year follow-up of an immediately loaded implant-retained overdenture using flapless surgery and a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) surgical guide. A prosthetically-driven approach, utilising a three-dimensional (3D) planning software and a CAD/CAM surgical guide, was used to place four implants in the edentulous maxillary arch of a 59-year-old male patient. All four implants were inserted through the surgical guide without raising soft tissue flaps. After placement, the patient was delivered an immediately loaded maxillary overdenture. Surgical implant placement was well tolerated by the patient, who reported no discomfort. Following a four-month period, a new implant-retained maxillary overdenture reinforced by a metal framework was fabricated and delivered to the patient. There were no adverse issues noted with neither the implants nor the maxillary overdenture during the two-year follow up period. The technique using the workflow described in this report may be a predictable and affordable alternative in the restoration of edentulous arches as compared to full-arch fixed restorations.

The purpose of this observational study is to evaluate the prevalence and main characteristics of bifid canals within a European adult population, analyzing cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT). The population study examined 300 subjects. The CBCTs were performed between 2012 and 2019, using PaX-Zenith3D with a standard protocol of acquisition. The parameters analyzed were the presence and lengths of the bifid mandibular canals. The sample included 49% male and 51% female participants. The mean age of the patients was 47.07 ± 17.7 years. Anatomical variants of the mandibular canal were identified in 28.8% of the sides and 50.3% of the patients. In 7.3% of the subjects, the anatomical variants were present bilaterally. The most frequently encountered bifid canal was Type 3 (40.5%), followed by the Type 1 canal (39.3%), the Type 2 canal (14.5%), and the Type 4 canal (5.9%), 40% on the right side and 60% on the left side. The average length of the bifid canals located on the right side of the mandible was 11.96 ± 5.57 mm, compared to 11.38 ± 4.89 mm for those measured on the left side. The bifid mandibular canal is a common anatomical variation of the mandibular canal. It is fundamental to performing an accurate preoperative evaluation using CBCT analysis to avoid and/or reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Due to the limitations caused by the specific dimensions of milling burs, milling machines may inaccurately fabricate restorations by either over-reducing or under-reducing restorative material, respectively known as "overmilling" and "undermilling". Overmilling occurs when the bur is unable to accommodate areas smaller than the size of the bur, especially at cusp tips and sharp line angles. This results in excess cement space and a weaker restoration. Undermilling occurs when small concavities are ignored by the larger milling bur, particularly at the margins. This results in inadequate seating of the restoration and open margins due to premature binding, which can lead to restorative failure. To prevent these processing errors, clinicians should ensure that all incisal edges and cusp tips are flattened and rounded, verify that there are no undercuts, and prepare teeth with 1mm thick, smooth finish lines. Furthermore, clinicians may use the preparation check and milling simulation step of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) software to confirm the preparation is adequate and the restorative design does not have potential areas that will lead to overmilling.

Background/purpose/UNASSIGNED:With the rise of digitalization in dentistry, intraoral scanners and digital impressions have recently been adopted by many clinicians. The aim of this study was to investigate surface topography of prepared teeth and the accuracy of digital impressions. Materials and methods/UNASSIGNED:Twenty mandibular typodonts, containing left first premolar and left first molar abutment teeth manufactured by using CAD/CAM, were used in this study. An intraoral scanner was used to scan each typodont, and each STL file generated was exported in high resolution (Group H), moderate resolution (Group M), and low resolution (Group L). All 60 files were inspected in a 3-D mesh processing software. For each file, the number of triangulation points in the meshwork were obtained for both abutment teeth. Results/UNASSIGNED:The measurements obtained from the 3-D mesh processing software revealed that the mean number of triangulation points on the 3-D surface of the abutment teeth (20 premolars + 20 M) were 790,625 ± 98,890 dots in Group H, 592,283 ± 74,881 dots in Group M, and 198,067 ± 19,328 dots in Group L. Significant differences were found between Group H and M (p < 0.05), Group H and L (p < 0.001), and Group M and L (p < 0.01). Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:The outcomes of this study reveal that there are strong correlations between the data quality of digital impressions and surface topography of prepared teeth. Therefore, the utilization of STL files in high resolution format is the recommended choice for clinicians engaging in a digital workflow process.