Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Primary brain calcifications are observed in several inherited diseases due to different pathogenic mechanisms, including the disruption of the neurovascular unit, mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired nucleic acid metabolism. OBJECTIVE:The aim of the study was to identify a novel genetic cause of brain calcifications in genetically unresolved cases. METHODS:Exome sequencing data from two unrelated Pakistani patients with generalized dystonia and primary brain calcifications were analyzed. The best candidate gene (ie, RRP12) was then investigated in two large cohorts of patients with brain calcifications from France (n = 111) and China (n = 543). RRP12 loss-of-function phenotype was explored through Western blot and immunocytofluorescence studies on patient-derived fibroblasts and in a knockdown zebrafish model. RESULTS:A combined approach of exome sequencing and homozygosity mapping allowed the prioritization of a rare homozygous variant in RRP12 (c.1558C>T, p.R520C) in two apparently unrelated Pakistani patients from consanguineous families, presenting with infantile-onset generalized dystonia, spasticity, and widespread brain calcifications. Screening of two large cohorts of patients with unresolved brain calcifications revealed two affected French siblings and one unrelated Chinese individual, each carrying rare, biallelic, missense variants in the RRP12 gene (c.1429G>A, p.E477K and c.2634T>G, p.F878L, respectively). Molecular studies revealed a significant reduction in RRP12 protein and abnormal nucleolar morphology in patient'derived fibroblasts. Consistent with its essential role in RNA metabolism, rrp12 knockdown in zebrafish caused severe developmental delay, crimping, and early lethality. CONCLUSIONS:RRP12 is a novel candidate gene for autosomal recessive brain calcifications, possibly associated with a wide clinical spectrum ranging from early-onset severe forms to adult-onset paucisymptomatic presentations. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

The CSF-BAM assay, developed by Pearlman, Wang, and colleagues, integrates the detection of somatic mutations, genome aneuploidy, and B- and T-cell receptor clonality from a single cerebrospinal fluid DNA library to increase the sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid to diagnosis and track brain tumors. See related article by Pearlman et al., p. 2002.

BACKGROUND:Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the leading cause of epilepsy-related mortality. Generalised-particularly nocturnal-convulsive seizures, longstanding epilepsy, and solitary living have been identified retrospectively as risk factors. No definitive electroclinical biomarkers have been prospectively ascertained. This study aimed to identify SUDEP risk markers using multimodality data with long-term follow-up. METHODS:This prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study, conducted at nine centres (eight in the USA and one in the UK), recruited children and adults with epilepsy who were undergoing prolonged video-electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of epilepsy by an epilepsy specialist, with or without drug resistance; age older than 2 months; admission to the epilepsy monitoring unit of a participating centre, with video-EEG monitoring; and completion of at least one 6-month follow-up. Demographic, electroclinical, and cardiorespiratory data were collected at baseline. Participants were followed up long term through routine clinic visits, review of electronic health records, and telephone interviews to collect information about seizure frequency, medication status, and mortality. The primary endpoint was time to SUDEP. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess significant risk factors. FINDINGS/RESULTS:Between Sept 17, 2011, and Dec, 30, 2021, 2632 children and adults with epilepsy were enrolled in this study; 164 were lost to follow-up. 38 (1·54%) of 2468 participants died from SUDEP (12 definite, 18 probable, and eight possible SUDEP cases) and two had near-SUDEP events. Incident SUDEP mortality rate was 4·76 (95% CI 3·37-6·53) cases per 1000 person-years, from a cohort of 7982 person-years. Living alone (hazard ratio 7·62, 95% CI 3·94-14·71), three or more generalised convulsive seizures in the previous year (3·1, 1·64-5·87]), longer ictal central apnoea (1·11, 1·05-1·18), and longer postictal central apnoea (1·32, 1·14-1·54]) were significant predictors of increased SUDEP risk. In a subanalysis excluding possible and near-SUDEP cases, longer ictal central apnoea was not significant. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:This study shows an association between premortem peri-ictal apnoea and increased SUDEP risk. Cardiorespiratory monitoring during seizures might benefit assessments of epilepsy mortality risk. Together with solitary living and convulsive seizure frequency, peri-ictal apnoea (>14 s for postictal central apnoea and >17 s for ictal central apnoea) could inform the development of a validatable SUDEP risk index. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:US National Institutes of Health.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Epilepsy affects approximately 65 million people worldwide, and 60% have focal seizures. Predicting seizure response and drug resistance to antiseizure medications (ASMs) in people with focal epilepsy remains difficult. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To describe the expected short- and long-term response to treatment with ASMs in people with focal epilepsy using recognized definitions by the International League Against Epilepsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:The Human Epilepsy Project is an international, prospective, observational cohort study that followed up people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy for up to 6 years between 2012 and 2020. Data were analyzed from 2023 to 2024. The Human Epilepsy Project was conducted at 34 tertiary epilepsy centers across the US, Australia, and Europe. Participants with confirmed diagnosis of focal epilepsy aged 12 to 60 years were enrolled within 4 months of treatment initiation with ASM(s). Data were analyzed from February 2024 to July 2024. EXPOSURE/UNASSIGNED:ASM (variable). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary outcome was seizure freedom, defined as a period without seizures for 12 months or 3 times the longest pretreatment seizure-free interval, whichever was longer. Treatment response was categorized as sensitive, meaning seizure free receiving 2 or fewer adequate ASM trials; resistant, meaning having 2 or more adequate ASM trials fail; or indeterminate (neither treatment sensitive nor resistant). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 448 enrolled participants, 267 (59.6%) were female, and median (IQR) participant age was 32 (21-44) years at treatment initiation. Median (IQR) follow-up duration was 3.13 (2.33-3.55) years. Most achieved seizure freedom (267 participants of 448 [59.6%]), largely without relapse (223 [83.5%]). There were 245 treatment-sensitive participants (54.7%), 102 treatment-resistant participants (22.8%), and 101 indeterminate participants (22.5%). Among treatment-sensitive participants, most (217 [89.3%]) responded to monotherapy and half (121 [49.4%], or 27% of total cohort) became seizure free while receiving their first ASM. In the first year of treatment, 251 participants (63%) had ongoing or worsening seizures. Median time to first seizure freedom was 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.7-16.1). This occurred earlier in those who never relapsed (median, 2.2 months; 95% CI, 0.8-3.2) than those who did (median, 7.4 months; 95% CI, 4.0-10.7). Those with infrequent pretreatment seizures were 0.41-fold more likely to be treatment resistant than those with very frequent seizures (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18-0.89; P = .03; HB-corrected P = .02). Participants with self-reported comorbid psychological disorders were 1.78-fold more likely to be treatment resistant than those without (RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.26-2.52; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In the Human Epilepsy Project multicenter prospective cohort study, most people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy took more than a year and more than 1 ASM to become seizure free. Drug resistance can be identified earlier in those with frequent pretreatment seizures, and a history of psychiatric comorbidities at epilepsy diagnosis is an important prognostic factor. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02126774.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:The emergency department (ED) is a critical point of contact within the health care system and an opportunity to initiate nonpharmacologic migraine treatment. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To examine whether progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) smartphone-based migraine self-management improved patient-reported outcomes for migraine compared with enhanced usual care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:A randomized clinical trial of the smartphone application RELAXaHEAD with and without PMR. Patients aged 18 to 65 years visiting New York University Langone Health EDs for headache who met migraine criteria and self reported 4 or more migraine days per month were recruited from June 2019 to October 2021 with follow-up at 3 months. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to June 2025. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:Participants in the intervention group were asked to listen to the app-based PMR for 60 days. Participants in the control group were asked to use the app as a symptom diary. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Primary outcome was change in migraine-related disability (MIDAS). Secondary outcomes were change in migraine-specific quality of life (MSQv2) and monthly headache days (MHDs). Adherence (number of days of diary use, PMR use and total minutes of PMR use over 90-day period) was measured using back-end analytics. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Of the 94 patients (median [IQR] age, 33 [26-45] years; 57 [82.6%] female) randomized (48 control patients and 46 PMR patients), 69 of 94 (73%) had 1 or more follow-up MIDAS scores and constituted the modified intent-to-treat population (35 control patients and 34 PMR patients). The mean (SD) change in MIDAS scores from baseline to 3 months (last observation carried forward [LOCF] used if missing 3-month follow-up data) differed between groups (PMR, 25.09 [29.64] vs control, 6.86 [59.61]; P = .01). PMR had nearly double the number of respondents improving by 5 or more MIDAS points (28 of 34 [82.4%] vs 16 of 35 [45.7%] respondents; P = .002). There was no difference in MSQv2 domains from baseline to LOCF between PMR and control (mean [SD] role function preventive domain for PMR, 16.9 [24.5] vs control, 11.3 [25.9]); emotional function domain (mean [SD] for PMR, 26.5 [26.9] vs control, 19.8 [38.5]); and role function restrictive domain (mean [SD] for PMR, 18.1 [22.7] vs control, 18.7 [26.8]). Mean (SD) change in MHDs (baseline to 3 months) did not differ between groups (PMR, 2.9 [8.0]; 23 days vs control, -1.6 [6.5]; 25 days). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:A PMR-based self-management program offered to patients with migraine after ED discharge yielded clinically significant reductions in migraine-related disability. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04281030.

Our understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) has grown exponentially, thanks to significant investments by the National Institute on Aging (NIA). This article celebrates the 40th anniversary of the NIA's Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers, highlighting the pivotal role of neuropathology as the bedrock for neurodegeneration research. Neuropathology has championed the key principles of proteinopathy, selective vulnerability, and stereotypic spread. Furthermore, neuropathologic studies advanced our understanding of ADRD prevalence, heterogeneity, clinical-pathological correlations, and genetic underpinnings, spurring biomarker development for target engagement and disease monitoring. Disease-modifying therapies for AD were inspired and informed by neuropathology. The neuropathology community is poised to refine diagnostics, leveraging digital pathology and integrating genetics and pathomics to enhance subtyping for novel precision medicine approaches. Despite some common misconceptions and logistical challenges, neuropathology continues to be a critical component of the ADRD research infrastructure, serving as a key bridge between allied basic and clinical sciences. HIGHLIGHTS: We celebrate 40 years of NIA-funded ADRCs and their contributions through neuropathology studies that have significantly advanced our understanding and treatment of ADRD. Neuropathology uncovers principles of neurodegenerative disease: proteinopathy, selective vulnerability, and stereotypic spread, informing diagnostics and therapies. Development of AD biomarkers with reference to neuropathology enhances accuracy in diagnosis and monitoring, paving the way for targeted disease-modifying therapies. Integration of digital pathology, genetics, and novel tools in neurodegeneration research promises advanced precision medicine approaches and refined diagnostics. Misconceptions and logistical challenges to neuropathological research are addressed to improve understanding and collaboration.

BACKGROUND:Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the most common category of epilepsy-related mortality. Centrally mediated respiratory dysfunction has been observed to lead to death in the majority of cases of SUDEP. SUDEP also mainly occurs during nighttime sleep. This study seeks to identify sleep EEG and sleep-related respiratory biomarkers of SUDEP risk. METHODS:In this case-control study, we compared demographic, clinical, EEG, and respiratory data from people with epilepsy who later died of SUDEP (the SUDEP group) with data from age and sex-matched living people with epilepsy, classified as high risk of SUDEP (with ≥1 generalised tonic-clonic seizure [GTCS] per year), low risk of SUDEP (no history of GTCS), and non-epilepsy controls. These data were prospectively collected as part of a multicentre National Institutes of Health study. We analysed sleep macroarchitecture and microarchitecture features and measured sleep homoeostasis by calculating overnight change in slow wave activity (SWA; 0·5-4·0 Hz) in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep during seizure-free nights using linear regression models. We also analysed sleep respiratory metrics, including inter-breath interval variability. We used receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the individual discriminative performance of demographic, clinical, sleep EEG, and sleep-related respiratory features to predict the risk of SUDEP. FINDINGS/RESULTS:Between Sept 1, 2011, and Oct 15, 2022, 41 participants who later died of SUDEP and 123 matched controls (41 people living with epilepsy at hight risk of SUDEP, 41 people living with epilepsy at low-risk of SUDEP, and 41 non-epilepsy controls) were enrolled. The SUDEP group showed an abnormal lack of overnight decline and an increase in the slope of SWA power compared with the other groups (SUDEP group mean 0·005 standardised error of the mean [SEM] 0·003; high-SUDEP risk group -0·005, 0·002; low-SUDEP risk group -0·003, 0·002; non-epilepsy controls -0·007, 0·003; p=0·017). The overnight increase in the SWA slope was more pronounced in males compared with females (males mean 0·012, SEM 0·001; females 0·001, 0·002; p=0·005). The variability of the inter-breath interval was significantly higher in the SUDEP (coefficient of variation mean 0·15, SD 0·09; SD mean 0·54 s SD 0·35 s) and high-SUDEP risk groups (0·11, 0·03; 0·46 s, 0·19 s) compared with low-SUDEP risk group (0·08, 0·03; 0·30 s, 0·14 s) and non-epilepsy controls (0·08, 0·02; 0·31 s, 0·11 s; p<0·0001). The coefficient of variation of inter-breath interval had the greatest predictive power of SUDEP risk (between-group point estimate difference 0·30, AUC 0·80; 95% CI 0·70-0·90; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:This study identifies impaired sleep homoeostasis in the form of altered SWA progression during NREM sleep overnight in people with epilepsy who later died of SUDEP, and an increase in respiratory variability during NREM sleep in people with epilepsy who later died of SUDEP and in people with epilepsy at high risk of SUDEP. Multiday polysomnography studies are needed to validate sleep homoeostasis and respiratory variability during sleep as potential biomarkers of SUDEP risk. Further studies are required to explore possible sleep interventions that could mitigate SUDEP risk. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.