Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Interest in and acceptance of autologous fat grafting for use in contour abnormalities, breast reconstruction, and cosmetic procedures have increased. However, there are many procedural variations that alter the effectiveness of the procedure and may account for the unpredictable resorption rates observed. METHODS: The authors highlighted studies investigating the effects of harvesting procedures, processing techniques, and reinjection methods on the survival of fat grafts. This review focused on the impact different techniques have on outcomes observed in the following: in vitro analyses, in vivo animal experiments, and human studies. RESULTS: This systemic review revealed the current state of the literature. There was no significant difference in the outcomes of grafted fat obtained from different donor sites, different donor-site preparations, harvest technique, fat harvesting cannula size, or centrifugation speed, when tumescent solution was used. Gauze rolling was found to enhance the volume of grafted fat, and no significant difference in retention was observed following centrifugation, filtration, or sedimentation in animal experiments. In contrast, clinical studies in patients found more favorable outcomes with fat processed by centrifugation compared with sedimentation. In addition, higher retention was observed with slower reinjection speed and when introduced into less mobile areas. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a substantial increase in research interest to identify methodologies for optimizing fat graft survival. Despite some differences in harvest and implantation technique in the laboratory, these findings have not translated into a universal protocol for fat grafting. Therefore, additional human studies are necessary to aid in the development of a universal protocol for clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of head and neck cancer has varying impact on postoperative recovery and return of swallowing function. The authors aim to establish screening tools to assist in preoperatively determining the need for gastrostomy tube placement. METHODS: The authors prospectively assessed all patients undergoing complex head and neck reconstructive surgery during a 1-year study period. Only patients tolerating an oral diet, without preoperative gastrostomies, were enrolled for study. Eight parameters were assessed including: body mass index (BMI), prealbumin, albumin, smoking history, comorbidities [including coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes mellitus (DM)], age, use of microvascular reconstruction, and type of defect. Two specific screening tools were assessed. In the first, a multivariate logistic regression model was employed to determine factor(s) that predict postoperative gastrostomy tube. In a second screening tool, the 8 parameters were scored between 0 to 1 points. The total score obtained for each patient was correlated with postoperative gastrostomy placement. RESULTS: Out of the 60 study patients enrolled in the study, 24 patients (40%) received a postoperative gastrostomy. In the logistic regression model, albumin level was the only factor that was significantly associated with need for postoperative gastrostomy (P < 0.0023). A score of 4 or greater was determined to have a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 61% for postoperative gastrostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a score of 4 or more with this screening scoring system or those patients with an albumin level <3.5 g/dL were at high risk for postoperative feeding tube placement.

Reconstruction of large maxillary and mandibular defects following ablative surgery has posed a challenge to the head and neck surgeon due to the high functional and esthetic demands requiring precise three-dimensional reconstruction. Previous issues with maxillofacial reconstruction have included poor facial contour, unfavorable orthognathic relationships, and inability to provide adequate dental rehabilitation. The advent of the fibula flap along with (3D) facial analysis and virtual surgical simulation has revolutionized surgical interventions of the head and neck. Recent reports on the long-term success of dental implants in fibula reconstructions have made dental rehabilitation a reality. However, the loading and restoration of these implants are usually delayed prior to final prosthodontic rehabilitation leading to adverse functional, esthetic and psychological effects. Rohner et al. has documented the success of a two-stage surgery of fibula harvest and dental implant placement (Stage 1) followed by ablative surgery, inset and immediate loading with a dental prosthesis (Stage 2)⁽²⁾; this procedure is a two stage process that involves a 10-week delay between each surgery and will leave the patient edentulous. At our institution, computer-aided surgery and CAD/CAM technologies have enabled us to virtually plan complex surgery and have afforded our group the opportunity of providing a "Jaw in a Day '¹ This technique is a one-stage complete surgery including ablation, free flap, implant, and prosthetic reconstruction. A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who received immediate dental implants with a dental prosthesis in a fibular free flap following mandibular resection due to benign tumors. "Jaw in a Day 'procedures were completed at two of our affiliated hospitals (Bellevue Hospital Center and NYU Langone Medical Center) from January 2011 to January 2015. We looked at success rate of flaps, implants, and prostheses. We also looked at primary and long-term complications. Of the 8 patients who underwent the above procedure, a total of 35 immediate implants were placed along with a fixed prosthesis. Patients received maxillary/mandibular resection, fibula free flap reconstruction with immediate implant and dental prosthesis placement. All patients treated were diagnosed with benign mandibular (7) and maxillary (1) tumors, including ameloblastoma (6), odontogenic myxoma (1), and AV malformation (1). Of the 35 implants placed, 1 implant failed and was removed. The cumulative survival of fibular-free flaps was 100%. The cumulative implant success rate was 97%. Complications included soft tissue perimplantitis (2), plate exposure (2), and (1) prosthesis that did not adequately fit. The followup of the 8 patients was from January 2011 to January 2015. Single-stage maxillofacial reconstruction with virtual surgical planning has greatly impacted the field of maxillofacial reconstruction allowing for precision and accuracy while improving patient's function and quality of life. The above study shows its feasibility and low complication rates. Immediate implant and dental prosthesis placement has helped reduce the time for dental prosthetic rehabilitation and avoid the traditional 3- to 6-month delay period. Reconstruction with a MVFFF and immediate dental rehabilitation has revolutionized the treatment of benign tumor following ablative surgery