Faculty Bibliography

Objective: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare but potentially dangerous complication following craniotomies involving the posterior fossa, the skull base, and craniotomies involving the superior sagittal sinus. Surgical manipulation of the sinuses has been shown to cause sinus thromboses of varying degrees. This phenomenon is often clinically silent, with only a small number of patients becoming symptomatic. Recent advances in neuroimaging provide higher resolution evaluation of cerebral sinuses pre and postoperatively, often revealing clinically silent filling defects. Although sinus thrombosis can be a major cause of morbidity and mortality, its incidence and factors that contribute to its formation in the postoperative population remain unclear. In addition, current guidelines advise to anticoagulate with Heparin upon diagnosis, which can be contraindicated for immediate post craniotomy patients. The goal of this study is to evaluate retrospective data of patient outcomes and factors that might contribute to sinus thrombus formation. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at NYU Langone Medical Center. Ninety-seven patients were included who underwent either a retrosigmoid/translabrynthine/suboccipital resection of a posterior fossa tumor or a supratentorial craniotomy for resection of parasagittal/falcine tumor between July 1, 2014 and July 1, 2015. Pre operative Magnetic Resonance Venography (MRV) was obtained per the attending surgeon's discretion. Based on intraoperative findings, clinical symptoms, and surgeon's preference, a postoperative MRV was obtained. Decision to treat a thrombosis was made based on the results of the MRV and clinical symptoms. Treatments included observation, intravenous fluids (IVF) alone, anti-platelet therapy with Aspirin alone, or a combination of the two. Results: A total of 7 of 97 patients (7.22%) had postoperative sinus thrombosis. Of those patients, 5 had occlusion of the venous sinuses. In the occlusion group, 4 had preoperative imaging documenting patency of the sinuses. An additional 2 patients had postoperative MRVs revealing partial thrombosis of the sinus, 1 that was new and 1 that did not have a preoperative MRV for comparison. Compared with the cohort of patients without postoperative thromboses, there was no significant difference in age, BMI, length of surgery, or surgical approach. Of the 5 patients with postoperative thrombotic occlusion, 4 underwent intervention (1 with IVF alone, 2 with IVF and aspirin, and 1 with aspirin alone). Two patients with thromboses also developed CSF leaks requiring lumbar drainage and operative repair. One patient had a persistent CSF leak requiring a shunt. Of the 2 patients with partial thrombosis, 1 was placed on IVF and aspirin. At 3 months follow up, 1 out of 5 patients in the occlusion group had recanalization of the previously thrombosed sinus. Conclusions: MRV is a non-invasive method to evaluate the caliber and patency of dural venous sinuses in post craniotomy patients. Symptomatic thrombosis is rare and can be managed either conservatively or with IVF and/or anti platelet therapy, both which are safer than anticoagulation with heparin in post craniotomy patients. A larger prospective trial is necessary to further characterize the incidence of postoperative venous sinus thrombosis, identify risk factors, and to devise recommendations for therapy

Background: Salvage surgery for progressive symptoms or recurrent growth of vestibular schwannoma (VS) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is uncommon. It has been reported to be more difficult, the same or easier than expected compared with microsurgical resection (MS) of treatment-naive VS, with variable facial nerve outcomes. We conducted a matched cohort analysis to evaluate facial nerve outcomes for patients undergoing MS for progressive symptoms or recurrent growth of VS after SRS compared with MS for treatment-naive VS. Methods: We evaluated the records of 365 non-NF2 VS patients treated with MS from 2001 to 2014. All patients who had postoperative notes were considered to have "adequate follow-up" and included in the study. Nine patients underwent resection for VS after prior SRS (MS-POST SRS) with no prior intervention, 7 of which had adequate follow-up, and 331 patients that underwent MS for treatment naive VS (MS-NO SRS), 317 of which had adequate follow-up. From this dataset, we created propensity score matched cohorts to retrospectively compare facial nerve preservation and clinical outcomes. The propensity score model incorporated age at surgery, tumor size, and pre-operative HB grade, and cases were matched at a ratio of 4:1 MS-NO SRS to MS-POST SRS cases. Results: The MS-POST SRS (n = 7) and MS-NO SRS (n = 28) groups differed only in preoperative hearing status (p < 0.01). Preoperative HB grades were similar between MS-POST SRS and MS-NO SRS groups (p>0.3). The average time-to-intervention after SRS in the MS-POST SRS group was 44.4 months. The indication for MS after SRS was symptom progression with tumor growth in 4 cases, and only tumor growth in the remaining 3. Postoperatively, 3 cases in the MS-POST SRS group demonstrated improvement in HB grade and none became worse whereas 3 of 28 cases in the MS-NO SRS group demonstrated improvement and 12 cases had decrement in HB grade relative to baseline (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the extent of resection with both cohorts (MS-POST SRS and MS-NO SRS) attaining gross total resection in 85.7% of cases. Subsequent intervention was not required for any case in the MS-POST SRS group and 2 cases in the MS-NO SRS group, although this difference was not significant. Both cases requiring subsequent intervention in the MS-POST SRS group were gross total resections via the translabyrinthine approach, with subsequent intervention required at 62 and 48 months. There were no significant differences in the complication rate for individual complications or the overall complication rate between cohorts. Conclusions: At a center with high clinical volume, microsurgical resection of VS after prior SRS was associated with good postoperative facial nerve preservation and low morbidity, comparable to those observed in resection of treatment-naive VS. In addition there were similar outcomes in terms of extent of resection between the two groups. The good outcomes reported here may reflect a confluence of factors which include patient selection, the experience of the attending surgeons, the use of more contemporary SRS dosing protocols during initial treatment for these patients, and divergent goals of therapy between cohorts

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is a proalgesic cytokine that is commonly expressed following tissue injury. TNF-alpha expression not only promotes inflammation but can also lead to pain hypersensitivity in nociceptors. With the established link between TNF-alpha and inflammatory pain, we identified its increased expression in the teeth of patients affected with caries and pulpitis. We generated a transgenic mouse model (TNF-alphaglo) that could be used to conditionally overexpress TNF-alpha. These mice were bred with a dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1)-Cre line for overexpression of TNF-alpha in both the tooth pulp and bone to study oral pain that would result from subsequent development of pulpitis and bone loss. The resulting DMP1/TNF-alphaglo mice show inflammation in the tooth pulp that resembles pulpitis while also displaying periodontal bone loss. Inflammatory infiltrates and enlarged blood vessels were observed in the tooth pulp. Pulpitis and osteitis affected the nociceptive neurons innervating the orofacial region by causing increased expression of inflammatory cytokines within the trigeminal ganglia. With this new mouse model morphologically mimicking pulpitis and osteitis, we tested it for signs of oral pain with an oral function assay (dolognawmeter). This assay/device records the time required by a mouse to complete a discrete gnawing task. The duration of gnawing required by the DMP1/TNF-alphaglo mice to complete the task was greater than that for the controls; extended gnaw time in a dolognawmeter indicates reduced orofacial function. With the DMP1/TNF-alphaglo mice, we have shown that TNF-alpha expression alone can produce inflammation similar to pulpitis and osteitis and that this mouse model can be used to study dental inflammatory pain.

Objectives To identify measurable anatomical factors that may guide the surgical approach for posterior fossa selective vestibular neurectomy (SVN) and predict identification of the vestibulocochlear cleavage (VCC) plane. Study Design Dissection of fixed cadaveric heads through retrolabyrinthine and retrosigmoid-internal auditory canal (RSG-IAC) approaches with measurement of landmarks. Setting Cadaveric dissection model. Main Outcome Measures Area of the Trautmann triangle (TT) and the distance from the posterior semicircular canal to the anterior border of the sigmoid along the posterior Donaldson line (pDL). VCC planes from each approach were calculated and compared. Results Overall mean pDL was 8.53 mm (range: 5-11.5 mm); mean TT area was 124 mm(2) (range: 95-237 mm(2)). The VCC was identified in 63% of ears through the retrolabyrinthine (RVN) approach alone, whereas 37% of ears required the RSG-IAC approach. In ears requiring IAC dissection, the VCC was found within 1 to 2 mm distal to the porus. The pDL (p < 0.05) and area of TT (p < 0.05) were significantly larger in the RVN group compared with the RSG-IAC group. Conclusion Ears amenable to the RVN approach had a greater pDL and TT area. These anatomical measurements may have a role in surgical planning and the choice of approach for SVN.

OBJECTIVES: The global challenge of accessible, affordable cancer care for all older adults requires a new research agenda for gero-oncology nursing to guide investigator skill development, identify priority areas for investigation, and direct resource distribution. DATA SOURCES: Published peer-reviewed literature and web-based resources. CONCLUSION: A cross-cutting theme of the research agenda is the need to determine the gero-oncology nursing care that will preserve economic resources, promote function, provide symptom management, and incorporate patient preferences. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: In partnership with interprofessional colleagues, gero-oncology nurse scientists are poised to conduct global research that improves access to quality cancer care.

Background: The transcochlear approach extends the anterior exposure afforded by the translabyrinthine technique. Although this wider exposure allows improved access to cranial nerves and the brainstem with less retraction on the cerebellum, the classical description involving facial nerve transposition often results in permanent facial paresis. This study discusses the role of the transcochlear approach in resection of cerebellopontine angle tumors including patient selection, surgical technique, and outcomes. Study Design: Retrospective review. Methods: This is a retrospective review conducted at a single academic institution. Cases performed by our skull base team (neurotologist and neurosurgeon) between 2000 and 2015 were reviewed. All cases utilizing the transcochlear approach were included. Factors including tumor size, completeness of resection, facial nerve function, post-operative complications, and length of stay were analyzed. Results: Fourteen cases were included. All of these patients had pre-operative severe hearing loss except for two in which surgery was performed urgently in the setting of hydrocephalus and brainstem compression. Eight out of 14 patients had pre-operative facial paresis. Tumor size ranged from 2.2-7 cm in greatest dimension (mean = 4.56 cm). All patients underwent a transcochlear approach to and removal of tumor with blind sac of the external auditory canal. In addition, 3 patients underwent an immediate facial nerve to hypoglossal anastomosis. Post-operatively, patients remained in the hospital for 3-5 days (mean = 4). Of the patients who started out with normal facial nerve function (n = 6), 3 recovered to House-Brackmann scores II or greater. There were no reported CSF leaks requiring hospitalization and 1 abdominal hematoma from fat graft harvest. There was a single mortality reported in the peri-operative period; however, on autopsy the cause of death was unrelated to the surgery itself or any subsequent intracranial event. Conclusions: As in other surgical approaches destructive to the labyrinth, patients were selected with consideration of their pre-operative hearing status and/or their candidacy for hearing preservation surgery. Patients with pre-operative facial nerve paralysis and hearing loss were deemed particularly appropriate candidates for the transcochlear technique given the additional exposure and the lack of added morbidity. In these cases the surgeon also has the option to perform dynamic facial nerve reanimation at the time of tumor resection

BACKGROUND:Risk factors for poor quality of life (QOL) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remain poorly described. OBJECTIVE:To identify the frequency and predictors of poor QOL 1 year after SAH. METHODS:We studied 1-year QOL in a prospectively collected cohort of 1181 consecutively admitted SAH survivors between July 1996 and May 2013. Patient clinical, radiographic, surgical, and acute clinical course information was recorded. Reduced QOL (overall, physical, and psychosocial) at 1 year was assessed with the Sickness Impact Profile and defined as 2 SD below population-based normative Sickness Impact Profile values. Logistic regression leveraging multiple imputation to handle missing data was used to evaluate reduced QOL. RESULTS:Poor overall QOL was observed in 35% of patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that nonwhite ethnicity, high school education or less, history of depression, poor clinical grade (Hunt-Hess Grade ≥3), and delayed infarction were predictors of poor overall and psychosocial QOL. Poor physical QOL was additionally associated with older age, hydrocephalus, pneumonia, and sepsis. At 1 year, patients with poor QOL had increased difficulty concentrating, cognitive dysfunction, depression, and reduced activities of daily living. More than 91% of patients with poor QOL failed to fully return to work. These patients frequently received physical rehabilitation, but few received cognitive rehabilitation or emotional-behavioral support. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Reduced QOL affects as many as one-third of SAH survivors 1 year after SAH. Delayed infarction is the most important in-hospital modifiable factor that affects QOL. Increased attention to cognitive and emotional difficulties after hospital discharge may help patients achieve greater QOL.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study is to describe the feasibility as well as oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted neck dissection (RAND) through a modified facelift incision in an American population. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective case series. SETTING/METHODS:University tertiary care hospital. METHODS:All patients who underwent RAND between November 2012 and December 2014 were included. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, medical histories, staging, operative information, postoperative hospital course and complications, and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS:There were 11 RANDs identified among 10 patients. Five patients had known nodal metastasis at the time of surgery. Two patients had been previously irradiated. The average time of surgery was 284.4 ± 72.3 minutes, including other associated procedures. The average lymph node yield was 28.5 ± 9.3 nodes. There were no major complications. Average follow-up was 19.4 months. There was 1 supraclavicular recurrence in a previously irradiated patient. All patients are currently alive and without evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS:Robot-assisted neck dissection is a safe and feasible procedure that can be performed by surgeons with familiarity with neck dissection and robot-assisted surgery and who have been trained in RAND. Appropriate oncologic outcomes can be obtained in a patient wishing to avoid a noticeable scar.

In this first paper of the 'Do You Know Your Guidelines' series, we review National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations and underlying evidence for the follow-up and surveillance of head and neck cancer survivors. The goals of follow-up and surveillance care are to 1) Maximize long-term oncologic outcomes of therapy with appropriate evaluation for recurrence; 2) Maximize functional and quality of life outcomes, while 3) Minimizing unnecessary and harmful low-value care. Finding the right balance of testing and surveillance is a challenge for providers and patients. Herein we review all NCCN recommendations for head and neck cancer survivors. We pay particular attention to an area of controversy: the use of ongoing surveillance imaging, in particular PET/CT scans