Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

school:SOM

Department/Unit:Population Health

Total Results:

12287


Sex-specific effects of prenatal undernutrition on resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain at age 68

Boots, Amber; Thomason, Moriah E; Espinoza-Heredia, Claudia; Pruitt, Patrick J; Damoiseaux, Jessica S; Roseboom, Tessa J; de Rooij, Susanne R
Prenatal nutrition may significantly impact brain aging. Results from the Dutch Famine Birth Cohort indicated that prenatal undernutrition is negatively associated with cognition, brain volumes, perfusion and structural brain aging in late life, predominantly in men. This study investigates the association between prenatal undernutrition and late-life functional brain network connectivity. In an exploratory resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study of 112 participants from the Dutch Famine Birth Cohort, we investigated whether the within- and between-network functional connectivity of the default mode network, salience network and central executive network differ at age 68 in men (N = 49) and women (N = 63) either exposed or unexposed to undernutrition in early gestation. Additionally, we explored sex-specific effects. Compared to unexposed participants, exposed participants revealed multiple clusters of different functional connectivity within and between the three networks studied. Sex-specific analyses suggested a pattern of network desegregation fitting with brain aging in men and a more diffuse pattern of group differences in women. This study demonstrates that associations between prenatal undernutrition and brain network functional connectivity extend late into life.
PMID: 35151035
ISSN: 1558-1497
CID: 5157052

Transforming Obesity Prevention for CHILDren (TOPCHILD) Collaboration: protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity

Hunter, Kylie E; Johnson, Brittany J; Askie, Lisa; Golley, Rebecca K; Baur, Louise A; Marschner, Ian C; Taylor, Rachael W; Wolfenden, Luke; Wood, Charles T; Mihrshahi, Seema; Hayes, Alison J; Rissel, Chris; Robledo, Kristy P; O'Connor, Denise A; Espinoza, David; Staub, Lukas P; Chadwick, Paul; Taki, Sarah; Barba, Angie; Libesman, Sol; Aberoumand, Mason; Smith, Wendy A; Sue-See, Michelle; Hesketh, Kylie D; Thomson, Jessica L; Bryant, Maria; Paul, Ian M; Verbestel, Vera; Stough, Cathleen Odar; Wen, Li Ming; Larsen, Junilla K; O'Reilly, Sharleen L; Wasser, Heather M; Savage, Jennifer S; Ong, Ken K; Salvy, Sarah-Jeanne; Messito, Mary Jo; Gross, Rachel S; Karssen, Levie T; Rasmussen, Finn E; Campbell, Karen; Linares, Ana Maria; Øverby, Nina Cecilie; Palacios, Cristina; Joshipura, Kaumudi J; González Acero, Carolina; Lakshman, Rajalakshmi; Thompson, Amanda L; Maffeis, Claudio; Oken, Emily; Ghaderi, Ata; Campos Rivera, Maribel; Pérez-Expósito, Ana B; Banna, Jinan C; de la Haye, Kayla; Goran, Michael; Røed, Margrethe; Anzman-Frasca, Stephanie; Taylor, Barry J; Seidler, Anna Lene
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Behavioural interventions in early life appear to show some effect in reducing childhood overweight and obesity. However, uncertainty remains regarding their overall effectiveness, and whether effectiveness differs among key subgroups. These evidence gaps have prompted an increase in very early childhood obesity prevention trials worldwide. Combining the individual participant data (IPD) from these trials will enhance statistical power to determine overall effectiveness and enable examination of individual and trial-level subgroups. We present a protocol for a systematic review with IPD meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of obesity prevention interventions commencing antenatally or in the first year after birth, and to explore whether there are differential effects among key subgroups. METHODS AND ANALYSIS/UNASSIGNED:Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycInfo and trial registries for all ongoing and completed randomised controlled trials evaluating behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity have been completed up to March 2021 and will be updated annually to include additional trials. Eligible trialists will be asked to share their IPD; if unavailable, aggregate data will be used where possible. An IPD meta-analysis and a nested prospective meta-analysis will be performed using methodologies recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. The primary outcome will be body mass index z-score at age 24±6 months using WHO Growth Standards, and effect differences will be explored among prespecified individual and trial-level subgroups. Secondary outcomes include other child weight-related measures, infant feeding, dietary intake, physical activity, sedentary behaviours, sleep, parenting measures and adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION/UNASSIGNED:Approved by The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2020/273) and Flinders University Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee (HREC CIA2133-1). Results will be relevant to clinicians, child health services, researchers, policy-makers and families, and will be disseminated via publications, presentations and media releases. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER/UNASSIGNED:CRD42020177408.
PMID: 35058256
ISSN: 2044-6055
CID: 5131822

Unpacking the behavioural components and delivery features of early childhood obesity prevention interventions in the TOPCHILD Collaboration: a systematic review and intervention coding protocol

Johnson, Brittany J; Hunter, Kylie E; Golley, Rebecca K; Chadwick, Paul; Barba, Angie; Aberoumand, Mason; Libesman, Sol; Askie, Lisa; Taylor, Rachael W; Robledo, Kristy P; Mihrshahi, Seema; O'Connor, Denise A; Hayes, Alison J; Wolfenden, Luke; Wood, Charles T; Baur, Louise A; Rissel, Chris; Staub, Lukas P; Taki, Sarah; Smith, Wendy; Sue-See, Michelle; Marschner, Ian C; Espinoza, David; Thomson, Jessica L; Larsen, Junilla K; Verbestel, Vera; Odar Stough, Cathleen; Salvy, Sarah-Jeanne; O'Reilly, Sharleen L; Karssen, Levie T; Rasmussen, Finn E; Messito, Mary Jo; Gross, Rachel S; Bryant, Maria; Paul, Ian M; Wen, Li Ming; Hesketh, Kylie D; González Acero, Carolina; Campbell, Karen; Øverby, Nina Cecilie; Linares, Ana M; Wasser, Heather M; Joshipura, Kaumudi J; Palacios, Cristina; Maffeis, Claudio; Thompson, Amanda L; Ghaderi, Ata; Lakshman, Rajalakshmi; Banna, Jinan C; Oken, Emily; Campos Rivera, Maribel; Pérez-Expósito, Ana B; Taylor, Barry J; Savage, Jennifer S; Røed, Margrethe; Goran, Michael; de la Haye, Kayla; Anzman-Frasca, Stephanie; Seidler, Anna Lene
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Little is known about how early (eg, commencing antenatally or in the first 12 months after birth) obesity prevention interventions seek to change behaviour and which components are or are not effective. This study aims to (1) characterise early obesity prevention interventions in terms of target behaviours, delivery features and behaviour change techniques (BCTs), (2) explore similarities and differences in BCTs used to target behaviours and (3) explore effectiveness of intervention components in preventing childhood obesity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS/UNASSIGNED:Annual comprehensive systematic searches will be performed in Epub Ahead of Print/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), CINAHL, PsycINFO, as well as clinical trial registries. Eligible randomised controlled trials of behavioural interventions to prevent childhood obesity commencing antenatally or in the first year after birth will be invited to join the Transforming Obesity in CHILDren Collaboration. Standard ontologies will be used to code target behaviours, delivery features and BCTs in both published and unpublished intervention materials provided by trialists. Narrative syntheses will be performed to summarise intervention components and compare applied BCTs by types of target behaviours. Exploratory analyses will be undertaken to assess effectiveness of intervention components. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION/UNASSIGNED:The study has been approved by The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (project no. 2020/273) and Flinders University Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee (project no. HREC CIA2133-1). The study's findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and targeted communication with key stakeholders. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER/UNASSIGNED:CRD42020177408.
PMID: 35058255
ISSN: 2044-6055
CID: 5131812

Using a Syndemics Framework to Understand How Substance Use Contributes to Morbidity and Mortality among People Living with HIV in Africa: A Call to Action

Peprah, Emmanuel; Myers, Bronwyn; Kengne, Andre-Pascal; Peer, Nasheeta; El-Shahawy, Omar; Ojo, Temitope; Mukasa, Barbara; Ezechi, Oliver; Iwelunmor, Juliet; Ryan, Nessa; Sakho, Fatoumata; Patena, John; Gyamfi, Joyce
Substance use is increasing throughout Africa, with the prevalence of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and other substance use varying regionally. Concurrently, sub-Saharan Africa bears the world's largest HIV burden, with 71% of people living with HIV (PWH) living in Africa. Problematic alcohol, tobacco, and other substance use among PWH is associated with multiple vulnerabilities comprising complex behavioral, physiological, and psychological pathways that include high-risk behaviors (e.g., sexual risk-taking), HIV disease progression, and mental health problems, all of which contribute to nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy. Physiologically, severe substance use disorders are associated with increased levels of biological markers of inflammation; these, in turn, are linked to increased mortality among PWH. The biological mechanisms that underlie the increased risk of substance use among PWH remain unclear. Moreover, the biobehavioral mechanisms by which substance use contributes to adverse health outcomes are understudied in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Syndemic approaches to understanding the co-occurrence of substance use and HIV have largely been limited to high-income countries. We propose a syndemic coupling conceptual model to disentangle substance use from vulnerabilities to elucidate underlying disease risk for PWH. This interventionist perspective enables assessment of biobehavioral mechanisms and identifies malleable targets of intervention.
PMCID:8834153
PMID: 35162121
ISSN: 1660-4601
CID: 5167662

Development and pilot testing of a training for bilingual community education professionals about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer among Latinas: ÁRBOLES Familiares

Vadaparampil, Susan T; Moreno Botero, Laura; Fuzzell, Lindsay; Garcia, Jennifer; Jandorf, Lina; Hurtado-de-Mendoza, Alejandra; Campos-Galvan, Claudia; Peshkin, Beth N; Schwartz, Marc D; Lopez, Katherine; Ricker, Charité; Fiallos, Katie; Quinn, Gwendolyn P; Graves, Kristi D
Cancer health disparities remain a significant problem in the USA, compounded by lack of access to care, language barriers and systemic biases in health care. These disparities are particularly evident in areas such as genetics/genomics. For example, Latinas at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have extremely low rates of genetic counseling/testing. Long-standing barriers and inequities in access to services such as genetic counseling and testing require innovative solutions. One solution can involve training community outreach and education professionals (CORE-Ps) to bridge the gap between underserved communities and genetic specialists. We sought to develop and pilot test a training program for English-Spanish bilingual CORE-Ps to reduce disparities in access to and uptake of genetic services among Latino populations. Guided by Adult Learning Theory and with input from multiple stakeholders, we developed ÁRBOLES Familiares (Family Trees), an in-person and online training program for bilingual CORE-Ps to facilitate identification, referral, and navigation of Latinas to genetic counseling/testing. We conducted a pilot test of 24 CORE-Ps recruited from across the United States and assessed knowledge, genetic literacy, and self-efficacy at baseline and follow-up. At follow-up, participants in the pilot with complete baseline and follow-up data (N = 15) demonstrated significant improvements in HBOC knowledge, genetic literacy, self-efficacy and reports of fewer barriers to identify/navigate Latinas (ps < .05). Qualitative assessment identified ways to improve the training curriculum. Pilot results suggest ÁRBOLES is a promising approach for training CORE-Ps to identify and refer high-risk Latinas to genetic services. Next steps involve further refinement of ÁRBOLES, development of an online toolkit, and adaptation for virtual delivery.
PMCID:8827003
PMID: 34255089
ISSN: 1613-9860
CID: 5166752

Evolution and growth of the ECHO (Enriching Communication skills for Health professionals in Oncofertility) program: a 5-year study in the training of oncofertility professionals

Pecoriello, Jillian; Klosky, James L; Augusto, Bianca; Santiago-Datil, Waleska; Sampson, Amani; Reich, Richard; Vadaparampil, Susan; Quinn, Gwendolyn
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:AYAs with cancer have unique psychosocial needs, with reproductive health being a primary concern. The ECHO training program provides reproductive health communication training to individuals providing care for AYAs with cancer. The purpose of this project is to describe the growth of ECHO and evaluate changes in learner engagement over a 5-year period. METHODS:ECHO is an 8-week online training program offered annually, with the program including learning modules, discussion topics and reflections, and synchronous discussions. Reflection quality scores and number of words were compared between the 5 cohorts using ANOVA with a p < .05 level of significance. Descriptive statistics summarized module topics, reflections, and synchronous discussions. RESULTS:The average number of reflections per unique learner increased each year (1.4 in cohort 1 vs 4.1 in cohort 5), as did average length and quality of reflections (72.1 words in cohort 1 vs 203.4 words in cohort 5, p < .0001; score of 1.21 in cohort 1 vs 4.46 in cohort 5, p < .0001). The percentage of learners in attendance at synchronous discussions increased between cohorts 4 and 5 (4.8% of learners in cohort 4 vs 18.8% of learners cohort 5). CONCLUSIONS:The ECHO program has seen significant growth and improvement in learner engagement over a 5-year period. This is particularly important given that student learning outcomes in online courses can be predicted by the level of engagement with online content. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS/CONCLUSIONS:As fertility and reproductive health remain a top life goal and discussion priority for AYAs surviving cancer, increasing clinical competencies of AHPs in oncofertility is essential.
PMCID:8760090
PMID: 35031917
ISSN: 1932-2267
CID: 5119192

Social Engagement and Subjective Well-Being in Older Adults Newly Diagnosed with Cancer

Vang, Suzanne
Cancer and its treatment can precipitate a range of physical and psychological health issues, particularly in old age. Older adult cancer patients have reported experiencing heightened levels of anxiety, depression, and isolation. The current study aims to understand the role of social engagement in influencing older adult cancer patients’ subjective well-being through a Stress and Coping Framework lens. Using National Health and Aging Trends Study data, this research examines frequency of social engagement and its relationship with subjective well-being. Results indicate that greater social engagement improves subjective well-being in older adult cancer patients. Respondents who are unmarried and experiencing greater anxiety and depressive symptoms are at risk of having poor subjective well-being. Efforts to improve subjective well-being in older adults with cancer should consider promoting social engagement. Special attention should be paid to older adult cancer patients who are unmarried or experiencing elevated anxiety or depressive symptoms. Greater research should examine the mechanisms by which social engagement might impact subjective well-being and how this might vary among different racial/ethnic groups.
ORIGINAL:0017010
ISSN: 2790-4008
CID: 5556752

What to Do When Everything Happens at Once: Analytic Approaches to Estimate the Health Effects of Co-Occurring Social Policies

Matthay, Ellicott C; Gottlieb, Laura M; Rehkopf, David; Tan, May Lynn; Vlahov, David; Glymour, M Maria
Social policies have great potential to improve population health and reduce health disparities. Thus, increasing empirical research seeks to quantify the health effects of social policies by exploiting variation in the timing of policy changes across places. Multiple social policies are often adopted simultaneously or in close succession in the same locations, creating co-occurrence which must be handled analytically for valid inferences. Although this is a substantial methodological challenge for studies aiming to isolate social policy effects, limited prior work has systematically considered analytic solutions within a causal framework or assessed whether these solutions are being adopted. We designated seven analytic solutions to policy co-occurrence, including efforts to disentangle individual policy effects and efforts to estimate the combined effects of co-occurring policies. We leveraged an existing systematic review of social policies and health to evaluate how often policy co-occurrence is identified as a threat to validity and how often each analytic solution is applied in practice. Of the 55 studies, only 17 (31%) reported checking for any co-occurring policies, although 36 (67%) used at least one approach that helps address policy co-occurrence. The most common approaches were: adjusting for measures of co-occurring policies; defining the outcome on subpopulations likely to be affected by the policy of interest (but not other co-occurring policies); and selecting a less-correlated measure of policy exposure. As health research increasingly focuses on policy changes, we must systematically assess policy co-occurrence and apply analytic solutions to strengthen future studies on the health effects of social policies.
PMID: 34215873
ISSN: 1478-6729
CID: 4932722

The Revolution Will Be Hard to Evaluate: How Co-Occurring Policy Changes Affect Research on the Health Effects of Social Policies

Matthay, Ellicott C; Hagan, Erin; Joshi, Spruha; Tan, May Lynn; Vlahov, David; Adler, Nancy; Glymour, M Maria
Extensive empirical health research leverages variation in the timing and location of policy changes as quasi-experiments. Multiple social policies may be adopted simultaneously in the same locations, creating co-occurrence which must be addressed analytically for valid inferences. The pervasiveness and consequences of co-occurring policies have received limited attention. We analyzed a systematic sample of 13 social policy databases covering diverse domains including poverty, paid family leave, and tobacco. We quantified policy co-occurrence in each database as the fraction of variation in each policy measure across different jurisdictions and times that could be explained by co-variation with other policies (R2). We used simulations to estimate the ratio of the variance of effect estimates under the observed policy co-occurrence to variance if policies were independent. Policy co-occurrence ranged from very high for state-level cannabis policies to low for country-level sexual minority rights policies. For 65% of policies, greater than 90% of the place-time variation was explained by other policies. Policy co-occurrence increased the variance of effect estimates by a median of 57-fold. Co-occurring policies are common and pose a major methodological challenge to rigorously evaluating health effects of individual social policies. When uncontrolled, co-occurring policies confound one another, and when controlled, resulting positivity violations may substantially inflate the variance of estimated effects. Tools to enhance validity and precision for evaluating co-occurring policies are needed.
PMID: 34622277
ISSN: 1478-6729
CID: 5031582

Healthcare resource utilisation for chronic kidney disease and other major non-communicable chronic diseases in China: a cross-sectional study

Yang, Chao; Long, Jianyan; Shi, Ying; Zhou, Zhiye; Wang, Jinwei; Zhao, Ming-Hui; Wang, Haibo; Zhang, Luxia; Coresh, Josef
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the healthcare resource utilisation for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and other major non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs) in China. DESIGN:A cross-sectional study. SETTING:A national inpatient database of tertiary hospitals in China. PARTICIPANTS:The study included a total of 19.5 million hospitalisations of adult patients from July 2013 to June 2014. Information on CKD and other major NCDs, including coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cancer, was extracted from the unified discharge summary form. OUTCOME MEASURES:Cost, length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS:The percentages of hospitalisations with CKD, CHD, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, COPD and cancer were 4.5%, 9.2%, 8.2%, 18.8%, 7.9%, 2.3% and 19.4%, respectively. For each major NCD, the presence of CKD was independently associated with longer hospital stay, with increased percentages ranging from 7.69% (95% CI 7.11% to 8.28%) for stroke to 21.60% (95% CI 21.09% to 22.10%) for CHD. Hospital mortality for other NCDs was also higher in the presence of CKD, with fully adjusted relative risk ranging from 1.91 (95% CI 1.82 to 1.99) for stroke to 2.65 (95% CI 2.55 to 2.75) for cancer. Compared with other NCDs, CKD was associated with the longest hospital stay (22.1% increase) and resulted in the second highest in-hospital mortality, only lower than that of cancer (relative risk, 2.23 vs 2.87, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:The presence of diagnosed CKD alongside each major NCD was associated with an additional burden on the healthcare system. Healthcare resource utilisation and prognosis of CKD were comparable with those of other major NCDs, which highlights the importance of CKD as a major public health burden.
PMCID:8762138
PMID: 35027417
ISSN: 2044-6055
CID: 5586352