Faculty Bibliography

Objective: A recent clinical trial with 0.7mg/kg/day of fenfluramine (FFA) showed 62.3% (IC 95%: -47.7%; -72.8%; p<0.001) reduction in convulsive seizure frequency (CSF) compared to placebo. However, the impact of the disease on the patient and their caregivers may depend on other variables. This alternative analysis value the impact of other results.
Method(s): After a baseline period of 6 weeks patients with DS ages 2 to 18 years, was randomized to FFA 0.7 or 0.2mg/kg/day or placebo added. Time to new event (time required to experience the same number of crisis as in the reference period [TTE]) was analyzed. Intervals without crisis and number of days without crisis was analyzed too.
Result(s): 119 patients with DS receiving FFA 0.7mg/kg/day; FFA0.2mg/kg/day; or placebo. TTE was significantly longer in active groups. Placebo: 6 weeks, FFA 0.2mg/kg/day:8 weeks and FFA 0.7mg/kg/day: >12 weeks (p<0.001; ~60% of patients in the FFA 0.7mg/kg/day group never reached their baseline seizure count and were censored). The number of days without crisis was higher in groups treated with FFA: 33 and 20 days without additional crisis counted in the active groups. The longest average without crisis was higher with FFA 0.7mg/kg/day (25 days; p<0.001) and FFA 0.2mg/kg/day (15 days; Px0.035) than with placebo (9.5 days).
Conclusion(s): FFA extended TTE and provided significantly more days without crisis and longer periods without crisis than placebo. Our analysis can help assess the ability of a treatment to reduce the burden of seizures in patients with SD and their caregivers

In the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, one potential cause of concern is that some discharged COVID-19 patients are testing positive again for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. To better understand what is happening and to provide public health policy planners and clinicians timely information, we have searched and reviewed published studies about discharged patients testing positive again for the SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Our search found 12 reports, all of which described patients in China. Our review of these reports indicates the presence of discharged patients who remain asymptomatic but test positive. However, it is unclear whether they are contagious because a positive RT-PCR test does not necessarily indicate the presence of replicating and transmissible virus. Our review suggests the need for timely, parallel testing of different samples, including for example, fecal specimens, from COVID-19 patients before and after they are discharged from hospitals. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) appears to be an independent risk factor for stroke. We hypothesize that patients who develop stroke while hospitalized for severe COVID-19 will have higher inflammatory markers and distinct stroke imaging patterns compared with patients positive for COVID-19 with out-of-hospital stroke onset and milder or no COVID-19 symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This is a retrospective case series of patients positive for COVID-19 on polymerase chain reaction testing with imaging-confirmed stroke treated within a large health care network in New York City and Long Island between March 14 and April 26, 2020. Clinical and laboratory data collected retrospectively included complete blood counts and creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, ferritin, and D-dimer levels. All CT and MR imaging studies were independently reviewed by 2 neuroradiologists who recorded stroke subtype and patterns of infarction and intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS:< .003). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with stroke hospitalized with severe COVID-19 are characterized by higher inflammatory, coagulopathy, and tissue-damage biomarkers, supporting proposed pathogenic mechanisms of hyperinflammation activating a prothrombotic state. Cautious balancing of thrombosis and the risk of hemorrhagic transformation is warranted when considering anticoagulation.

Mural cells (smooth muscle cells and pericytes) are integral components of brain blood vessels that play important roles in vascular formation, blood-brain barrier maintenance, and regulation of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). These cells are implicated in conditions ranging from developmental vascular disorders to age-related neurodegenerative diseases. Here we present complementary tools for cell labeling with transgenic mice and organic dyes that allow high-resolution intravital imaging of the different mural cell subtypes. We also provide detailed methodologies for imaging of spontaneous and neural activity-evoked calcium transients in mural cells. In addition, we describe strategies for single- and two-photon optogenetics that allow manipulation of the activity of individual and small clusters of mural cells. Together with measurements of diameter and flow in individual brain microvessels, calcium imaging and optogenetics allow the investigation of pericyte and smooth muscle cell physiology and their role in regulating rCBF. We also demonstrate the utility of these tools to investigate mural cells in the context of Alzheimer's disease and cerebral ischemia mouse models. Thus, these methods can be used to reveal the functional and structural heterogeneity of mural cells in vivo, and allow detailed cellular studies of the normal function and pathophysiology of mural cells in a variety of disease models. The implementation of this protocol can take from several hours to days depending on the intended applications.

OBJECTIVE:We sought to evaluate early clinical differences between cerebral arteriolosclerosis (pARTE), Alzheimer disease (pAD), and AD with arteriolosclerosis (ADARTE). METHODS:Using National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center neuropathology diagnoses, we defined pARTE (n=21), pAD (n=203), and ADARTE (n=158) groups. We compared demographics, medical history, psychometrics, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) allele variants across neuropathology groups. Retrospective timepoints were first evaluation with Global Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0.5 and 1.0, via the CDR Dementia Staging Instrument, corresponding to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia, respectively. RESULTS:In MCI, clinical differences were minimal but pARTE subjects were older, had later onset cognitive decline, and progressed less severely than pAD. In mild dementia, pAD subjects were younger and had earlier onset of decline. Neuropsychiatric (depression) and psychometric (Logical Memory Delayed Recall, Trails B) differences also emerged between the groups. In MCI, APOE4 associated with worse Logical Memory Delayed Recall in pAD and ADARTE. In mild dementia, APOE4 associated with better animal fluency in pAD, but with better Trails A performance and more neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire) in ADARTE. CONCLUSIONS:Differences between pARTE, pAD, and ADARTE emerge at mild dementia rather than MCI. APOE4 has varied cognitive and psychiatric impact dependent on neuropathology group and stage.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To develop an assessment and recognition tool to identify elite athletes at risk for mental health symptoms and disorders. METHODS:We conducted narrative and systematic reviews about mental health symptoms and disorders in active and former elite athletes. The views of active and former elite athletes (N=360) on mental health symptoms in elite sports were retrieved through an electronic questionnaire. Our group identified the objective(s), target group(s) and approach of the mental health tools. For the assessment tool, we undertook a modified Delphi consensus process and used existing validated screening instruments. Both tools were compiled during two 2-day meeting. We also explored the appropriateness and preliminary reliability and validity of the assessment tool. SPORT MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT TOOL 1 AND SPORT MENTAL HEALTH RECOGNITION TOOL 1: The International Olympic Committee Sport Mental Health Assessment Tool 1 (SMHAT-1) was developed for sports medicine physicians and other licensed/registered health professionals to assess elite athletes (defined as professional, Olympic, Paralympic or collegiate level; aged 16 years and older) potentially at risk for or already experiencing mental health symptoms and disorders. The SMHAT-1 consists of: (i) triage with an athlete-specific screening tool, (ii) six subsequent disorder-specific screening tools and (iii) a clinical assessment (and related management) by a sports medicine physician or licensed/registered mental health professional (eg, psychiatrist and psychologist). The International Olympic Committee Sport Mental Health Recognition Tool 1 (SMHRT-1) was developed for athletes and their entourage (eg, friends, fellow athletes, family and coaches). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The SMHAT-1 and SMHRT-1 enable that mental health symptoms and disorders in elite athletes are recognised earlier than they otherwise would. These tools should facilitate the timely referral of those athletes in need for appropriate support and treatment.