Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the teaching program of Class I and Class II resin-based composite (RBC) restorations in Brazilian dental schools and to observe if any differences were found from similar surveys conducted in North American, European, and Japanese dental schools. METHOD AND MATERIALS/METHODS:A questionnaire containing 15 questions was distributed to 92 Brazilian dental schools, and 64 (70%) schools returned the questionnaire. The questions inquired the amount of time the curriculum dedicated to teaching of posterior RBC restorations, future expectation regarding the teaching time, limitation in extension of the occlusal width and the proximal box in Class II, contraindications for placing posterior RBC restorations, protocol for using bases and liners, brand of bonding agents and RBC used, instruments and techniques employed for finishing, cost relative to amalgam restorations, and biologic reactions related to the use of posterior RBC. The responses were calculated as percentages based on the number of schools that responded to the questionnaire. Where appropriate, the Chi-squared test and the Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS:Of the dental schools that responded, 88% dedicated 10% to 50% of the teaching time in operative dentistry to posterior RBC restorations. A significant correlation (P = 0.041) was found between the percentage of time dedicated to the teaching of posterior RBC restorations and the higher cost of posterior RBC compared to amalgam restorations. Resin-based composite restorations cost 30% to 70% more than amalgam restorations in the 40% of dental schools that charged a fee. Posterior composites for large restorations in molars were used by 14% of the dental schools. Base and liner were not placed by 10% of dental schools in deep Class I or Class II RBC restorations. One school did not recommend acid etching of the dentin. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:No major differences were found in the teaching philosophy of posterior RBC restorations by comparing the Brazilian data to the data from similar surveys done in North America, Japan, and Europe.

Polyethers are elastomeric materials commonly used for making precision impressions. They are hydrophilic, which facilitates the contact of the unset material with the intraoral tissue and the wetting of the impression by cast materials. The final hardness of this new impression material is reduced in an attempt to overcome rigidity of the set impression. A case is described involving the restoration of a fractured maxillary premolar and a single-phase impression technique using the new polyether impression material.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM/BACKGROUND:Veneer preparations are considered to weaken endodontically treated maxillary incisors. Prefabricated posts have been controversially indicated to reinforce endodontically treated teeth before final restoration. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This in vitro study evaluated whether (1) veneer preparation in enamel or in enamel/dentin weakens endodontically treated maxillary incisors, (2) bonding of direct composite veneer restores the original strength of the unprepared teeth, and (3) use of prefabricated metal posts increases fracture resistance of prepared and restored teeth. MATERIAL AND METHODS/METHODS:Ninety extracted human maxillary central incisors were submitted to conventional root canal treatment. Specimens were randomly divided into 8 experimental groups (veneer preparation in enamel or dentin with/without post and with/without direct composite veneer restoration) and a control group (n = 10). Specimens were loaded to fracture, and the data were analyzed statistically. RESULTS:Statistical analysis revealed that a conservative veneer preparation does not significantly reduce maxillary incisors' fracture resistance. For prepared incisors, bonding of direct composite veneer restored their original strength, and the use of posts did not increase their fracture resistance. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Conservative veneer preparations involving enamel and enamel/dentin did not significantly reduce the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary incisors. In addition, restoration of the intraenamel preparations with direct composite resulted in teeth more resistant to fracture than teeth having restorations in dentin. The use of posts did not improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary incisors reduced and veneered with direct composite.

Different mutations in the amelogenin gene (AMELX) result in the markedly different enamel phenotypes that are collectively known as amelogenesis imperfecta (AI). We hypothesize that unique phenotypes result from specific genetic mutations. The purpose of this study was to characterize the enamel compositional and structural features associated with a specific AMELX mutation in three families with X-linked AI. We performed mutational analysis by amplifying AMELX exons and sequencing the products. Permanent and primary affected (N = 6) and normal (N = 3) teeth were collected and examined by light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy. Enamel proteins were evaluated by immunolocalization of amelogenin and amino acid analysis. AI-affected individuals all shared a common AMELX point mutation (C to A change at codon 41). The dental phenotypic findings were remarkably consistent in all affected individuals. The AI enamel was opaque, with numerous prism defects or holes encompassing the entire prism width. Affected crystallites appeared more radiolucent and morphologically less uniform, compared with that of normal enamel. Immunogold labeling with anti-amelogenin antibodies localized amelogenin to the crystallites but not to the inter-crystalline spaces. No immunogold labeling was seen in normal enamel. There was an increased and amelogenin-like protein content in AI enamel (0.95%) compared with normal enamel (0.13%). We conclude that this codon 41 C to A missense point mutation, in a highly conserved region of the AMELX gene, results in a remarkably consistent phenotype.