Faculty Bibliography

Objective: To develop a clinical score to distinguish between the parkinsonian variant of multiple system atrophy (MSA-P) and Parkinson's disease (PD).
Background(s): The differential diagnosis between MSA-P and PD is often difficult, particularly early in the disease course.
Method(s): We compared patients with probable MSA-P and with PD with a disease duration of <3 years, selected from those who were enrolled in the Natural History Study of the Synucleinopathies, an international prospective observational study. Detailed clinical neurological, and autonomic parameters were assessed at enrollment using UMSARS part I, II and IV; Schrag quality of life (QoL) scale; burden of autonomic dysfunction by COMPASS-31 scale; smell function using the UPSIT; cardiovascular autonomic function using heart rate variability during deep-breathing, analysis of the Valsalva maneuver, orthostatic stress test, plasma catecholamine levels during supine rest and after head-up tilt; and cognitive evaluation using MoCA. Positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) were obtained for each variable assessed. Multiple iterations of a composite score based on sequential addition of variables with the highest diagnostic accuracy were created by multiplying each variable's LR and applying a logarithmic function.
Result(s): Fifty-eight MSA-P and 53 PD patients had a disease duration of less than 3 years. The vast majority of patients had been diagnosed within the last 12 months (81% MSA-P and 66% PD patients). MSA-P patients were more frequently female (53% vs. 30% p<0.05) and younger at diagnosis (63+/-8 years vs. 71+/-8 years, p<0.001). A 7-item score comprising the bladder weighted subscore of the COMPASS-31, UMSARS's part 1, UPSIT, hyperreflexia, the motor subscore of Schrag's MSA quality of life scale, falls within 3 years of diagnosis, and new or increased snoring resulted in a ROC curve AUC of 0.983, with excellent 93% sensitivity and 98% specificity to distinguish early MSA-P from PD.
Conclusion(s): We propose a scale of 7 clinical items to distinguish early stage MSA-P from PD. It considers urinary function, olfactory function, corticospinal signs, performance of activities of daily living, motor symptoms burden on quality of life, frequent early falls and sleep disordered breathing. We are now prospectively validating the scale to determine its predictive value in our prodromal cohort. (Figure Presented)

Objective: To study the rate of progression of multiple system atrophy (MSA) and assess for a potential ceiling effect of the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS).
Background(s): Disease progression of MSA as measured by UMSARS varied significantly in natural history studies. Reported 1-year UMSARS-1 and UMSARS-2 progression rates ranged from 3.9 to 6.5 and 3.5 to 8.2 respectively. We hypothesize that this variability is due, at least in part, to differences in severity at enrollment and a potential ceiling effect in the scale, so that patients in more advanced stages may appear to worsen less, which would have important implications for clinical trial design.
Method(s): We analyzed the rate of change in the UMSARS in a large international cohort of well-characterized patients with a clinical diagnosis of possible or probable MSA enrolled in the Natural History Study of Synucleinopathies. Annualized progression rates were obtained using 2-year follow-up data.
Result(s): Three hundred and forty nine patients (61.4+/-7.9 years old) with MSA were enrolled. Disease duration was 4.5+/-5.1 years. 143 patients completed 1-year evaluations and 61 completed the 2-year evaluation. The 12-month progression rates were 5.4+/-5.1 for the UMSARS-I, 5.9+/-5.3 for the UMSARS-II, and 11.8+/-9.6 for the total score. The 24-month progression rates were 10.8+/-7.3 for the UMSARS-I, 12.2+/-7.9 for the UMSARSII, and 22.6+/-13.7 for the total score. Annualized progression rates were divided according to their baseline UMSARS-I and UMSARS II. There was a significant (p = 0.0153) inverse relationship between rate of progression and UMSARS-I at baseline. A similar, but not significant trend was observed with UMSARS-II at baseline.
Conclusion(s): The rate of progression as measured by UMSARS is influenced by the baseline disease severity. A possible ceiling effect should be considered when planning enrollment, power calculations, and outcome measures in clinical trials

Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that reduces obsessive-compulsive symptoms. There is limited evidence supporting its efficacy for repetitive behaviors (RRBs) in autistic spectrum disorder (ASD). We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of fluoxetine in 158 individuals with ASD (5-17 years). Following 14 treatment weeks (mean dose 11.8 mg/day), no significant differences were noted on the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale; the proportion of responders was similar (fluoxetine: 36%; placebo: 41%). There were similar rates of AEs (e.g., insomnia, diarrhea, vomiting); high rates of activation were reported in both groups (fluoxetine: 42%; placebo: 45%). Overly cautious dosing/duration may have prevented attainment of a therapeutic level. Results are consistent with other SSRI RCTs treating RRBs in ASD.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00515320.

Objective: To confirm: 1) clinical efficacy and safety of once-daily oral ampreloxetine in a 4-week double-blind (

OBJECTIVE:Spinal cord infarction due to interruption of the spinal vascular supply during anterior thoracolumbar surgery is a rare but devastating complication. Here, the authors sought to summarize the data on this complication in terms of its incidence, risk factors, and operative considerations. They also sought to summarize the relevant spinal vascular anatomy. METHODS:They performed a systematic literature review of the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases to identify reports of spinal cord vascular injury related to anterior thoracolumbar spine procedures as well as operative adjuncts and considerations related to management of the segmental artery ligation during such anterior procedures. Titles and abstracts were screened, and studies meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed in full. RESULTS:Of 1200 articles identified on the initial screening, 16 met the inclusion criteria and consisted of 2 prospective cohort studies, 10 retrospective cohort studies, and 4 case reports. Four studies reported on the incidence of spinal cord ischemia with anterior thoracolumbar surgery, which ranged from 0% to 0.75%. Eight studies presented patient-level data for 13 cases of spinal cord ischemia after anterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. Proposed risk factors for vasculogenic spinal injury with anterior thoracolumbar surgery included hyperkyphosis, prior spinal deformity surgery, combined anterior-posterior procedures, left-sided approaches, operating on the concavity side of a scoliotic curve, and intra- or postoperative hypotension. In addition, eight studies analyzed operative considerations to reduce spinal cord ischemic complications in anterior thoracolumbar surgery, including intraoperative neuromonitoring and preoperative spinal angiography. CONCLUSIONS:While spinal cord infarction related to anterior thoracolumbar surgery is rare, it warrants proper consideration in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods. The spine surgeon must be aware of the relevant risk factors as well as the pre- and intraoperative adjuncts that can minimize these risks. Most importantly, an understanding of the relevant spinal vascular anatomy is critical to minimizing the risks associated with anterior thoracolumbar spine surgery.