Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

school:SOM

Department/Unit:Population Health

Total Results:

12132


Modern Sources of Controls in Case-Control Studies

Banack, Hailey R; Fox, Matthew P; Platt, Robert W; Garber, Michael D; Li, Xiaojuan; Schildcrout, Jonathan; Matthay, Ellicott C
In 1992, Wacholder and colleagues developed a theoretical framework for case-control studies to minimize bias in control selection. They described three comparability principles (study base, deconfounding, and comparable accuracy) to reduce the potential for selection bias, confounding, and information bias in case-control studies. Wacholder et al. explained how these principles apply to traditional sources of controls for case-control studies, including population controls, hospital controls, controls from a medical practice, friend or relative controls, and deceased controls. The goal of the current manuscript is to extend this seminal work on case-control studies by providing a modern perspective on sources of controls. Today, there are many more potential sources of controls for case-control studies than there were in the 1990s. This is due to technological advances in computing power, internet access, and availability of 'big data' resources. These advances have vastly expanded the quantity and diversity of data available for case-control studies. In this manuscript, we discuss control selection from electronic health records, health insurance claims databases, publicly available online data sources, and social media-based data. We focus on practical considerations for unbiased control selection, emphasizing the strengths and weaknesses of each modern source of controls for case-control studies.
PMID: 39586815
ISSN: 1476-6256
CID: 5803842

Strengthening policy engagement when scaling up interventions targeting non-communicable diseases: insights from a qualitative study across 20 countries

Ramani-Chander, Anusha; Thrift, Amanda G; van Olmen, Josefien; Wouters, Edwin; Delobelle, Peter; Vedanthan, Rajesh; Miranda, J Jaime; De Neve, Jan-Walter; Esandi, Maria Eugenia; Koot, Jaap; Ojji, Dike; Ortiz, Zulma; R Sherwood, Stephen; Teede, Helena; Joshi, Rohina
Policy engagement is an essential component of implementation research for scaling up interventions targeting non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It refers to the many ways that research team members, implementers and policymakers, who represent government decision-making, connect and interact to explore common interests. Well-conducted engagement activities foster co-production, local contextualization and assist in the successful translation of research evidence into policy and practice. We aimed to identify the challenges and facilitators to policy engagement during the early implementation phase of scale-up research studies. This qualitative study was focused on the research projects that were funded through the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases in the 2019 round. Nineteen project teams opted to participate, with these studies implemented in 20 countries. Forty-three semi-structured stakeholder interviews, representing research, implementation and government were undertaken between August 2020 and July 2021. Transcripts were open-coded using thematic analysis to extract 63 codes which generated 15 themes reflecting both challenges and facilitators to undertaking policy engagement. Knowledge of the local government structures and trusting relationships provided the foundation for successful engagement and were strengthened by the research. Four cross-cutting concepts for engagement were identified and included: (1) the importance of understanding the policy landscape; (2) facilitating a network of suitable policy champions, (3) providing an environment for policy leaders to genuinely contribute to co-creation and (4) promoting two-way learning during researcher-policymaker engagement. We recommend undertaking formative policy analysis to gain a strategic understanding of the policy landscape and develop targeted engagement plans. Through engagement, researchers must facilitate cohesive vision and build a team of policy champions to advocate NCD research within their networks and spheres of influence. Ensuring equitable partnerships is essential for enabling local ownership and leadership. Further, engagement efforts must create a synergistic policymaker-researcher lens to promote the uptake of evidence into policy.
PMCID:11570794
PMID: 39552340
ISSN: 1460-2237
CID: 5757982

Prenatal exposure to residential greenness, fetal growth, and birth outcomes: a cohort study in New York City

Heo, Seulkee; Afanasyeva, Yelena; Liu, Mengling; Mehta-Lee, Shilpi; Yang, Wenqing; Trasande, Leonardo; Bell, Michelle L; Ghassabian, Akhgar
Findings for greenspace's impacts on birth outcomes are largely dependent on vegetation indexes. Examinations are needed for various greenspace indicators given varying pathways for fetal development. This prospective cohort study assessed the impacts of prenatal greenspace exposure on preterm birth (PTB), term low birthweight (TLBW), birthweight, and estimated fetal weight (EFW) for pregnant women in the New York City area, 2016-2023 (n=2765). Longitudinal greenspace exposure was measured for residential histories during pregnancy using the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) for 1000m buffers and four park metrics, namely, the total number, sum of area, and the accessibility of parks within residential buffers (500 m) and the distance to the closest park. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the associations for quartiles of exposure (with the first quartile [Q1] as reference). Greenspace exposure was not associated with TLBW, birthweight, or EFW. Odds ratios of PTB for the Q2, Q3, and Q4 EVI exposure groups compared to the Q1 group were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.43-0.98), 0.51 (0.32-0.80), and 0.56 (0.35-0.90), respectively. PTB risks decreased in higher exposure groups (Q2-Q4) of the total park number. Results indicate the benefits of prenatal greenspace exposure for fetal maturity and neonatal outcomes.
PMID: 39562151
ISSN: 1476-6256
CID: 5758462

Patient experiences in outpatient substance use disorder treatment: A qualitative study exploring both clinical and non-clinical contexts

Choi, Sugy; Choi, Jasmin; O'Grady, Megan; Renteria, Diego; Oueles, Crissy; Liebmann, Eddie; Lincourt, Pat; Jordan, Ashly E; Neighbors, Charles J
BACKGROUND:Addressing the persistent treatment gap in substance use disorder (SUD) remains a critical challenge, with only 13 % of Americans with SUDs receiving necessary treatment. We explored the complexities of engaging in SUD treatment from patients' perspectives and aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of their treatment experiences. METHODS:We conducted semi-structured interviews with 34 patients who had been attending outpatient SUD clinics in New York State for 6 or less months. Participants were recruited from seven clinics using purposive sampling. Interviews were conducted between June and August 2022. We conducted thematic analysis of coded data to explore patients' experiences and preferences while navigating their treatment journeys. RESULTS:Critical elements for a positive treatment experience included cultural humility, confidentiality, consistency, trust, peer counselors with SUD experience, a strong sense of connection, and addressing needs beyond clinical settings. These included assistance with housing and employment, participation in external clinic events, and access to amenities like coffee and snacks. Participants favored holistic treatment approaches integrating mental health and involving peer recovery counselors. However, participants also identified ineffective aspects, including rigid and generic approaches, stigmatizing attitudes, and challenges related to communities and environmental influences. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The study highlights the multifaceted nature of outpatient SUD treatment, emphasizing the integration of patient-centered, holistic, and culturally competent approaches. Tailoring interventions to individual circumstances and acknowledging the diverse needs of patients are imperative for effective healthcare practices.
PMID: 39557341
ISSN: 2949-8759
CID: 5758222

Generalizability of Kidney Transplant Data in Electronic Health Records - The Epic Cosmos Database versus the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

Mankowski, Michal A; Bae, Sunjae; Strauss, Alexandra T; Lonze, Bonnie E; Orandi, Babak J; Stewart, Darren; Massie, Allan B; McAdams-DeMarco, Mara A; Oermann, Eric K; Habal, Marlena; Iturrate, Eduardo; Gentry, Sommer E; Segev, Dorry L; Axelrod, David
Developing real-world evidence from electronic health records (EHR) is vital to advance kidney transplantation (KT). We assessed the feasibility of studying KT using the Epic Cosmos aggregated EHR dataset, which includes 274 million unique individuals cared for in 238 U.S. health systems, by comparing it with the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). We identified 69,418 KT recipients transplanted between January 2014 and December 2022 in Cosmos (39.4% of all US KT transplants during this period). Demographics and clinical characteristics of recipients captured in Cosmos were consistent with the overall SRTR cohort. Survival estimates were generally comparable, although there were some differences in long-term survival. At 7 years post-transplant, patient survival was 80.4% in Cosmos and 77.8% in SRTR. Multivariable Cox regression showed consistent associations between clinical factors and mortality in both cohorts, with minor discrepancies in the associations between death and both age and race. In summary, Cosmos provides a reliable platform for KT research, allowing EHR-level clinical granularity not available with either the transplant registry or healthcare claims. Consequently, Cosmos will enable novel analyses to improve our understanding of KT management on a national scale.
PMID: 39550008
ISSN: 1600-6143
CID: 5754062

Don't Just Look East (the Other Way) When There's Smoke Billowing to the West

Myers, Laura C; Pak, Nina; Balaban, Eric; Thakur, Neeta; Cromar, Kevin
PMCID:11568446
PMID: 39312199
ISSN: 1535-4970
CID: 5802882

Lightening the Load: Generative AI to Mitigate the Burden of the New Era of Obesity Medical Therapy

Stevens, Elizabeth R; Elmaleh-Sachs, Arielle; Lofton, Holly; Mann, Devin M
Highly effective antiobesity and diabetes medications such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/GLP-1 (dual) receptor agonists (RAs) have ushered in a new era of treatment of these highly prevalent, morbid conditions that have increased across the globe. However, the rapidly escalating use of GLP-1/dual RA medications is poised to overwhelm an already overburdened health care provider workforce and health care delivery system, stifling its potentially dramatic benefits. Relying on existing systems and resources to address the oncoming rise in GLP-1/dual RA use will be insufficient. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has the potential to offset the clinical and administrative demands associated with the management of patients on these medication types. Early adoption of GenAI to facilitate the management of these GLP-1/dual RAs has the potential to improve health outcomes while decreasing its concomitant workload. Research and development efforts are urgently needed to develop GenAI obesity medication management tools, as well as to ensure their accessibility and use by encouraging their integration into health care delivery systems.
PMCID:11611792
PMID: 39622675
ISSN: 2371-4379
CID: 5804302

Prenatal chemical exposures and the methylome: current evidence and opportunities for environmental epigenetics

Bozack, Anne K; Trasande, Leonardo
Exposure to pollutants and chemicals during critical developmental periods in early life can impact health and disease risk across the life course. Research in environmental epigenetics has provided increasing evidence that prenatal exposures affect epigenetic markers, particularly DNA methylation. In this article, we discuss the role of DNA methylation in early life programming and review evidence linking the intrauterine environment to epigenetic modifications, with a focus on exposure to tobacco smoke, metals, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals. We also discuss challenges and novel approaches in environmental epigenetic research and explore the potential of epigenetic biomarkers in studies of pediatric populations as indicators of exposure and disease risk. Overall, we aim to highlight how advancements in environmental epigenetics may transform our understanding of early-life exposures and inform new approaches for supporting long-term health.
PMID: 39539208
ISSN: 1750-192x
CID: 5753362

The criticality of reasonable accommodations: A scoping review revealing gaps in care for patients with blindness and low vision

Keegan, Grace; Rizzo, John-Ross; Morris, Megan A; Joseph, Kathie-Ann
BACKGROUND:Health and healthcare disparities for surgical patients with blindness and low vision (pBLV) stem from inaccessible healthcare systems that lack universal design principles or, at a minimum, reasonable accommodations (RA). OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:We aimed to identify barriers to developing and implementing RAs in the surgical setting and provide a review of best practices for providing RAs. METHODS:We conducted a search of PubMed for evidence of reasonable accommodations, or lack thereof, in the surgical setting. Articles related to gaps and barriers to providing RAs for pBLV or best practices for supporting RAs were reviewed for the study. RESULTS:Barriers to the implementation of reasonable accommodations, and, accordingly, best practices for achieving equity for pBLV, relate to policies and systems, staff knowledge and attitudes, and materials and technology. CONCLUSIONS:These inequities for pBLV require comprehensive frameworks that offer, maintain, and support education about disability disparities and RAs in the surgical field. Providing RAs for surgical pBLV, and all patients with disabilities is an important and impactful step towards creating a more equitable and anti-ableist health system.
PMID: 39550827
ISSN: 1879-1883
CID: 5757912

The Pittsburgh Study: A Tiered Model To Support Parents During Early Childhood

Krug, Chelsea Weaver; Mendelsohn, Alan L; Wuerth, Jordan; Roby, Erin; Shaw, Daniel S
OBJECTIVE:To test the feasibility of implementing The Pittsburgh Study's (TPS) Early Childhood Collaborative, a population-level, community-partnered initiative to promote relational health by offering accessible preventive parenting program options for families with young children. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:TPS partnered with healthcare and community agencies serving families in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, to enroll and screen 878 parents of 1,040 children 4-years-old and under. Participants were assigned to one of four tiered groups based on identified needs: (1) universal, (2) targeted/universal, (3) secondary/tertiary, or (4) tertiary programs. Parents were offered choices in empirically supported parenting programs within group ranging from texting programs to intensive home visiting. Program selection was optional. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine the likelihood of selecting a program by group. RESULTS:About 25% of participants were assigned to each tiered group; 78% of parents chose to enroll in a parenting program. In general, parents with higher levels of adversity were more likely to select a parenting program compared with those reporting less adversity, including secondary/tertiary versus targeted/universal groups (81.4% vs. 72.8%), and tertiary versus universal and targeted/universal groups (83% vs. 74.1% and 72.8%, respectively; p < .001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our high program enrollment rate supports the feasibility of TPS. TPS successfully engaged families in the study by offering choices in, and optimizing accessibility to, parenting programs. TPS is highly aligned with recent recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics for tiered approaches as part of a broad public health strategy for supporting early relational health.
PMID: 39536860
ISSN: 1097-6833
CID: 5753232