Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Little is known regarding long-term outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS:We conducted a prospective study of 6-month outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Patients with new neurological complications during hospitalization who survived were propensity score-matched to COVID-19 survivors without neurological complications hospitalized during the same period. The primary 6-month outcome was multivariable ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale(mRS) comparing patients with or without neurological complications. Secondary outcomes included: activities of daily living (ADLs;Barthel Index), telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Neuro-QoL batteries for anxiety, depression, fatigue and sleep. RESULTS:Of 606 COVID-19 patients with neurological complications, 395 survived hospitalization and were matched to 395 controls; N = 196 neurological patients and N = 186 controls completed follow-up. Overall, 346/382 (91%) patients had at least one abnormal outcome: 56% had limited ADLs, 50% impaired cognition, 47% could not return to work and 62% scored worse than average on ≥1 Neuro-QoL scale (worse anxiety 46%, sleep 38%, fatigue 36%, and depression 25%). In multivariable analysis, patients with neurological complications had worse 6-month mRS (median 4 vs. 3 among controls, adjusted OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.23-3.48, P = 0.02), worse ADLs (aOR 0.38, 95%CI 0.29-0.74, P = 0.01) and were less likely to return to work than controls (41% versus 64%, P = 0.04). Cognitive and Neuro-QOL metrics were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS:Abnormalities in functional outcomes, ADLs, anxiety, depression and sleep occurred in over 90% of patients 6-months after hospitalization for COVID-19. In multivariable analysis, patients with neurological complications during index hospitalization had significantly worse 6-month functional outcomes than those without.

Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is increasingly being prescribed for adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients after cardiac procedures or for reduced exercise tolerance. We aim to describe the functional capacity improvements of ACHD patients in CR. Methods This retrospective study included ACHD patients at NYU Rusk Cardiac Rehabilitation from 2013-2019. We collected data on patient characteristics, number of sessions attended, and exercise testing results. Paired sample t-tests were used to assess for changes between pre- and post-CR exercise time and metabolic equivalents (METs). Results In total, 76 ACHD patients (mean age 38.2 years, 56.6% female, 89.5% moderate or complex conditions by anatomic classification) participated in CR. Referral indication was reduced exercise tolerance for 43.4% and was post-cardiac procedure (transcatheter or surgical) for the remainder. Among 37 patients (48.7%) who finished all 36 CR sessions, complete exercise testing data was available for 29 of them. Exercise time increased by 83.8 seconds (95% CI, 43.9 - 123.8; baseline mean 520.7), METs increased by 1.2 (95% CI, 0.6 - 1.8; baseline mean 8.1), and both parameters increased for 72.4% of these patients. These statistically significant improvements were observed across referral indications. Conclusion On average, CR benefits ACHD patients who complete the program, regardless of referral indication. Efforts to increase CR referral and retention would allow more patients to benefit. [Formula presented]
Copyright

Background Racial disparities in age-associated functional impairments, which are powerful predictors of readmission and mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), have not been described in older AMI patients. Given an aging population and growing recognition of the prognostic value of functional impairments, this is an important knowledge gap. Methods We analyzed data from SILVER-AMI, a prospective cohort study that enrolled patients aged >=75 hospitalized for AMI at 94 sites across the US. Patients were assessed for functional impairments during hospitalization. Patients completed an in-person Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, a Timed Up and Go test of mobility and a grip strength test. Vision and hearing impairments were self-reported. Patients also reported their prehospital independence in activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, ambulating, rising from a chair). We evaluated racial disparities in functional impairments using Pearson's chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction. Results Of 3,041 patients, 2,668 (87.7%) identified as white and 325 (10.7%) identified as another race (250 Black, 40 Asian, 15 American Indian or Alaskan Native, 8 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 12 two or more races). Nonwhite patients were younger (80.9 yr. vs. 81.7 yr.; p<0.01), less likely to have a college degree (35.7% vs. 43.5%; p<0.05) and more often female (59.7% vs. 42.5%; p<0.001). Cognitive impairment was more common among nonwhite patients (35.1% vs. 14.5%; p<0.001), as was mobility impairment (64.3% vs. 54.6%; p<0.001). Weak grip was similarly prevalent in both groups (63.1% vs. 59.4%; p=0.29). Vision impairment was more common among nonwhite patients (50.2% vs. 35.7%; p<0.001), while hearing impairment was less common (38.5% vs. 55.7%; p<0.001). Nonwhite patients were more likely to report a disability in one or more activities of daily living (21.2% vs. 13.0%; p<0.001). Conclusion In this well-characterized AMI cohort, nonwhite patients had a more "geriatric" phenotype despite a younger age, with more functional impairments (cognition, mobility, vision) and a higher rate of disability in one or more activities of daily living.
Copyright

PURPOSE OF REVIEW:The utility of aspirin and statins for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains ambiguous in older adults. Current guidelines and recent data are vague and inconclusive. This review seeks to summarize the landscape of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older adults and explore the role of shared decision making. RECENT FINDINGS:Observational data suggest potential benefit of statin therapy in older adults. Aspirin is presently not recommended for primary prevention based on evidence from recent clinical trials. The implementation of shared decision making and decision aids in routine clinical practice remains challenging but may rise in coming years. Clinical trial data on the horizon may aid in solidifying guideline therapy for statin use. However, in the face of uncertainty, shared decision making between provider and patient should be utilized to determine whether pharmacotherapy may benefit older adults. Decision aids are an effective tool to guide this process.

BACKGROUND:In 2012, the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) formally recommended against all Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer. Our goal was to characterize PSA screening trends in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) before and after the USPSTF recommendation, and to determine if PSA screening was more likely to be ordered based on a Veteran's race or age. METHODS:Using the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, we created 10 annual groups of PSA-eligible men covering 2009-2018. We identified all PSA tests performed in the VA to determine yearly rates of PSA screening. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS:The overall rate of PSA testing in the VA decreased from 63.3% in 2009 to 51.2% in 2018 (p<.001). PSA screening rates varied markedly by age group during our study period, with men aged 70-80 having the highest initial rate and greatest decline (70.6% in 2009 to 48.4% in 2018, p<.001). Men aged 55-69 saw a smaller decline (65.2% in 2009 to 58.9% in 2018, p<.001) while the youngest men, aged 40-54, had an increase in PSA screening (26.2% in 2009 to 37.8 in 2018, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS:In this analysis of PSA screening rates among veterans before and after the 2012 USPSTF recommendation against screening, we found that overall PSA screening decreased only modestly, continuing for more than half of the men in our study. Veterans of different races had similar screening rates, suggesting that VA care may minimize racial disparities. Veterans of varying age experienced significantly different trends in PSA screening.

OBJECTIVE:To develop evidence-informed, expert consensus research diagnostic criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES), the clinical disorder associated with neuropathologically diagnosed chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). METHODS:April, 2019. Before consensus, panelists reviewed evidence from all published cases of CTE with neuropathologic confirmation, and they examined the predictive validity data on clinical features in relation to CTE pathology from a large clinicopathologic study (n = 298). RESULTS:Consensus was achieved in 4 rounds of the Delphi procedure. Diagnosis of TES requires (1) substantial exposure to repetitive head impacts (RHIs) from contact sports, military service, or other causes; (2) core clinical features of cognitive impairment (in episodic memory and/or executive functioning) and/or neurobehavioral dysregulation; (3) a progressive course; and (4) that the clinical features are not fully accounted for by any other neurologic, psychiatric, or medical conditions. For those meeting criteria for TES, functional dependence is graded on 5 levels, ranging from independent to severe dementia. A provisional level of certainty for CTE pathology is determined based on specific RHI exposure thresholds, core clinical features, functional status, and additional supportive features, including delayed onset, motor signs, and psychiatric features. CONCLUSIONS:New consensus diagnostic criteria for TES were developed with a primary goal of facilitating future CTE research. These criteria will be revised as updated clinical and pathologic information and in vivo biomarkers become available.

OBJECTIVE:To determine whether IV metoclopramide 20 mg + diphenhydramine 25 mg (M + D) was more efficacious than IV placebo for acute moderate or severe posttraumatic headache in the emergency room. METHODS:We conducted this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 2 urban emergency departments (EDs). Participants who experienced head trauma and presented to our EDs within 10 days with a headache fulfilling criteria for acute posttraumatic headache were included. We randomized participants in a 1:1 ratio to M + D or placebo. Participants, caregivers, and outcome assessors were blinded to assignment. The primary outcome was improvement in pain on a scale of 0 to 10 between baseline and 1 hour after treatment. RESULTS:= 0.04). CONCLUSION:M + D was more efficacious than placebo with regard to relief of posttraumatic headache in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03220958. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE:This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with acute moderate or severe posttraumatic headache, IV M + D significantly improved pain compared to placebo.