Faculty Bibliography

Pediatric MS occurs in approximately 5% of patients and is defined as MS onset prior to age 18 years Those with pediatric MS tend to have a more inflammatory course but recover from relapses better than adults. Pediatric MS has been associated with cognitive problems in approximately 30% of patients where as 60-70% of adults have impaired cognitive functioning. Cognitive processing speed is the most frequently affected domain. In a recent study, 16% of CIS and 23% of RRMS had impaired cognitive functioning. Of concern is that other work has shown that while those with pediatric onset do well early in their course, over their life-time they may continue to show declines, particularly around 15 years after disease onset. The hope is that, early recognition, more effective symptomatic interventions such as cognitive retraining, and high efficacy disease modifying therapy can forestall the development of cognitive decline in those with pediatric MS onset

Background: Cognitive impairment is a common feature of multiple sclerosis (MS). A semi-structured interview, including informant input, can characterize the experience of individuals living with MS and cognitive involvement. Objective: We administered the Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI), a patient- and informant-based semi-structured interview, to characterize the experience of cognitive impairments in those living with MS. Methods: Trained raters administered the CAI to a sample of MS participants and their informants enrolled for a trial of cognitive remediation. Cognitive impairments on the CAI were characterized and compared to those captured by neuropsychological and self-report measures. Results: A total of n = 109 MS participants (mean age = 50.3 ± 12.2) and their available informants (n = 71) were interviewed. Participants reported experiencing processing speed (90/106, 85%), working memory (87/109, 80%), and learning and memory (79/109, 72%) problems most commonly. CAI-based ratings were moderately correlated with a self-report measure (Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire, r_s = 0.52, p < 0.001) and only mildly correlated with objective neuropsychological measures specific to executive functions (r

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:Given the opioid epidemic in the US, it is vital that clinicians who prescribe opioids for pain management to do so in an evidence-based manner, eg considering all pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic options, assessing risk of opioid use disorder prior to initiating opioids. Continuing education regarding the evidence-based prescribing of opioids is now required for US healthcare providers who prescribe opioids. A "blueprint" of the content to be included in continuing education programs was developed by the US Food and Drug Administration and updated in 2018. Methods/UNASSIGNED:To understand the baseline knowledge and confidence of healthcare professionals in prescribing opioids for pain management, we posed 27 unique knowledge-based questions and 1 confidence question to clinician participants before or during 2 continuing educational programs that were based respectively on the 2016 and 2018 FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) educational blueprints for pain management. Results/UNASSIGNED:Overall, 5571 clinicians completed these programs, including 1925 physicians (1516 [79%] identifying as primary care), 1181 physician assistants, 737 advanced practice nurses, 719 nurses, and 479 pharmacists. Responses to pretest questions in both programs indicated profound and persistent gaps in knowledge, particularly in definitions and mechanisms of pain, general principles of pharmacologic analgesic therapy, and specific aspects of opioid analgesic therapy and addiction. Participants in both programs also expressed limited confidence in their abilities to incorporate patient engagement techniques into pain management or develop a treatment plan for a patient with chronic pain. Discussion/UNASSIGNED:These data support an ongoing need for comprehensive clinician-based education as outlined in the FDA REMS educational blueprint, especially given recent data of escalating overdose deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is an inflammatory demyelinating central nervous system (CNS) disorder, characterized by new onset polyfocal neurologic symptoms with encephalopathy and multifocal demyelination, typically occurring in early childhood. The initial diagnosis of ADEM can be challenging as up to 20% of children with multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) are initially diagnosed with ADEM.
Objective(s): To describe characteristics of patients with ADEM vs. recurrent demyelinating syndromes (MS or NMOSD) at the time of initial presentation and identify features at disease onset associated with monophasic demyelinating disease.
Method(s): This is a multicenter observational cohort study of children with a demyelinating disease diagnosis of ADEM, multiphasic ADEM, MS, and NMOSD who were followed at 12 regional pediatric MS referral centers in the US Network of Pediatric MS Centers. Descriptive statistics were used to report patient characteristics, clinical/imaging presenting features and clinical followup outcomes. Logistic regression was used to predict features associated with monophasic demyelination and to identify features associated with poor recovery from ADEM in patients with ADEM-like presentation at 2 years from disease onset.
Result(s): As of July 2019, 872 pediatric patients with a final diagnosis of ADEM (n=89), MS (n= 664) and NMOSD (n=119) were identified. The mean follow-up for all patients was 5.7 +/-3.1 years. ADEM patients were the youngest with mean age at first event 5.4 +/-3.7 years and male predominance (62%), p < 0.001. Severe clinical symptoms at onset were more frequent in ADEM (55% vs. 35% NMOSD and 15% MS, p < 0.001). After 2 years of follow-up, 86.2% of patients initially diagnosed with ADEM retained this diagnosis (ADEM to ADEM), while 10.1% were later reclassified as MS and 3.6% with NMOSD. In univariable regression, younger age at first event and having an antecedent infection at onset were associated with ADEM, while presentation with optic neuritis and gadolinium enhancement on brain MRI were associated with ADEM reclassification to MS or NMOSD after 2 years of follow up. In a multivariable analysis, older age at first event (OR 1.29 [95% CI 1.07-1.56], p = 0.007), presenting with optic neuritis (OR 27.56 [95% CI 3.19-238.14], p = 0.003) and presence of gadolinium enhancement on brain MRI at onset (OR 14.36 [95% CI 2.53-81.36], p = 0.003) were associated with reclassification of ADEM to MS or NMOSD within 2 years. Younger age at onset was associated with higher risk of EDSS 2.0 or higher after 2 years of follow-up (p = 0.0422).
Conclusion(s): Those who remain classified as ADEM vs. those who are reclassified as other demyelinating disorders are younger at onset, more likely to be male, have a more severe initial presentation, and are less likely to have optic neuritis or gadolinium enhancing lesions at onset