Faculty Bibliography

Many childhood cancer survivors desire biological children but are at risk for infertility after treatment. One option for mitigating risk is the use of fertility preservation prior to gonadotoxic therapy. Adolescents and emerging adults may rely on their parents to help them decide whether to use fertility preservation. While this is often a collaborative process, it is currently unknown how parents can optimally support adolescents and emerging adults through this decision. To address this gap, we developed a family-centered, psychoeducational intervention to prompt adolescents and emerging adults to reflect on their future parenthood goals and attitudes towards fertility preservation, as well as to prompt their parents (or other caregivers) to reflect on their own and their child's perspectives on the topic. In this randomized controlled trial, families will be randomized to either the standard of care control group (fertility consult) or the intervention group. After their fertility consult, adolescents and emerging adults and parents in the intervention group will complete a fertility preservation values clarification tool and then participate in a guided conversation about their responses and the fertility preservation decision. The primary expected outcome of this study is that participation in the intervention will increase the use of fertility preservation. The secondary expected outcome is an improvement in decision quality. Chi-square analyses and t-tests will evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. The goal of this intervention is to optimize family-centered fertility preservation decision-making in the context of a new cancer diagnosis to help male adolescents and emerging adults achieve their future parenthood goals.

We present a hierarchical integrated model of self-regulation in which executive function is the cognitive component of the model, together with emotional, behavioral, physiological, and genetic components. These five components in the model are reciprocally and recursively related. The model is supported by empirical evidence, primarily from a single longitudinal study with good measurement at each level of the model. We also find that the model is consistent with current thinking on related topics such as cybernetic theory, the theory of allostasis and allostatic load, and the theory of skill development in harsh and unpredictable environments, referred to as "hidden talents." Next, we present literature that the integrative processes are susceptible to environmental adversity, poverty-related risk in particular, while positive social interactions with caregivers (e.g., maternal sensitivity) would promote self-regulatory processes or mitigate the adverse effect of early risk on the processes. A hierarchical integrative model of self-regulation advances our understanding of self-regulatory processes. Future research may consider broader social contexts of the integrative self-regulation system, such as neighborhood/community contexts and structural racism. This can be an integral step to provide children with equitable opportunities to thrive, even among children living in socioeconomically and psychosocially disadvantaged environments.

Background/UNASSIGNED:While societal acceptance for sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals is increasing, this group continues to face barriers to quality healthcare. Little is known about clinicians' experiences with SGM patients in the oncology setting. To address this, a mixed method survey was administered to members of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group. Materials and methods/UNASSIGNED:We report results from the open-ended portion of the survey. Four questions asked clinicians to describe experiences with SGM patients, reservations in caring for them, suggestions for improvement in SGM cancer care, and additional comments. Data were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. Results/UNASSIGNED:The majority of respondents noted they had no or little familiarity with SGM patients. A minority of respondents noted experience with gay and lesbian patients, but not transgender patients; many who reported experience with transgender patients also noted difficulty navigating the correct use of pronouns. Many respondents also highlighted positive experiences with SGM patients. Suggestions for improvement in SGM cancer care included providing widespread training, attending to unique end-of-life care issues among SGM patients, and engaging in efforts to build trust. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Clinicians have minimal experiences with SGM patients with cancer but desire training. Training the entire workforce may improve trust with, outreach efforts to, and cancer care delivery to the SGM community.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245064.].

Background: We recently implemented the Age-Friendly Health System's 4Ms (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) framework in New York City Health + Hospitals/Bellevue Hospital Center's Geriatrics clinic to improve care of older adults.
Method(s): We examined the impact of 4Ms assessment on patient care and changes in care processes through specific interventions triggered after assessment. We conducted chart reviews of patient visits during March 2021, the first month of 4Ms implementation and identified interventions made during these visits. To assess "What Matters" providers asked "What Matters the most to you;" potentially inappropriate Medications (PIM) were identified using the Beers list; Mentation was evaluated using the Mini-Cog; and Mobility was determined using timed up and go (TUG) test. We used descriptive statistics to characterize findings.
Result(s): Among the 121 patients who had 4Ms assessment in March 2021, 85% (n=103) were asked "What Matters;" providers reviewed Medications for almost all (n=118; 98%) and conducted a Mini-Cog for 64% (n=78). Most not cognitively assessed were either previously screened (n=11; 9%) or had dementia (n=12; 10%). Providers used the TUG test for 87% (n=105). What Mattered to patients most commonly was "getting better" (n=24; 23%). There were 39 (33%) patients with potentially inappropriate Medications (including proton pump inhibitors, gabapentinoids, and NSAIDS) of which 10 (26%) Medications were either discontinued or reduced. Other interventions included further cognitive evaluation (n=2) and home care referrals (n=2) among 14 (18%) with an abnormal Mini- Cog. Among the 51 (42%) patients with an abnormal TUG, providers intervened for 19 (37%) with devices, referrals or home services.
Conclusion(s): The adoption of 4Ms assessment during routine visits identified issues with Medications, Mentation and Mobility, triggering several interventions for common geriatric conditions. 4Ms assessment is a helpful strategy to organize geriatric care, routinely assess patients for common geriatric syndromes, and improve care. Future directions include prioritizing interventions integrated with "What Matters" to maintain patient-centered care

Background: Neighborhood disadvantage influences health outcomes regardless of personal economic status, illustrating the importance of neighborhood context on health. The Area Deprivation index (ADI) establishes a ranking system of U.S. neighborhoods on state and national levels based on 17 neighborhood factors. Using data from an ongoing study of patients with dual diagnoses of diabetes and dementia, we investigated the relationship between ADI and diabetic outcomes, including glycemic control, blood pressure, and dementia severity.
Method(s): We conducted descriptive and bivariate statistics using 3 years of health record data from patients of NYU Langone Health. We included patients >=65 years, with ADRD and DM, and on DM medication. In addition to demographic measures and NY home addresses, we collected hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and assessed dementia severity, surveying proxies with the dementia severity rating scale (DSRS). We used ArcGIS and ADI data to link patient addresses to an ADI score. We stratified the sample into two groups: a low deprivation group with ADI scores 1-5, and a high deprivation group with ADI scores 6-10.
Result(s): Of those meeting inclusion criteria (n=996), most were over 75 years (73.5%), female (60.1%), white (71.2%), and not Hispanic or Latino (72.4%). Mean patient age was 81.3; standard deviation (SD): 7.6. More than 50% of patients had an NY state ADI score of 1, 2 or 3 out of 10, indicating that the majority of the population lived in neighborhoods of less disadvantage. 83.4% (n=831) of the population fell into the low deprivation group. There were no differences in hemoglobin A1c (7.09 vs. 7.01) or dementia severity (25.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 22.4 +/- 2.0) between low and high deprivation groups, respectively. However, systolic blood pressure was greater in high deprivation individuals (132.4 +/- 19.3 mm Hg vs. 128.6 +/- 18.2; p=0.02).
Conclusion(s): The ADI in this study was associated with blood pressure but not diabetic control or dementia severity. Less heterogeneity in disadvantage limited our ability to detect this potential social determinant of health. In a city, where neighborhood disadvantage changes from block to block, the influence of environment on health may be more difficult to detect