Faculty Bibliography

The incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) associated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) is about one in five cases of ICH and associated with severe clinical presentation, frequently rapid clinical deterioration, and 30-days mortality of app 50%. This narrative review gives an overview of presentation and acute treatment of OAC-ICH. Oral anticoagulants do not cause ICH but lead to prolongation of bleeding and higher risk of hematoma expansion (HE). Clinicoradiological characteristics of oral anticoagulant associated ICH are not different from ICH in general. The therapeutic principle of reversal is to prevent or limit HE. The mode of action of the reversal agents for vitamin K antagonists, direct oral thrombin inhibitor and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors are described in the main text. We also discuss the principles of blood pressure lowering in the setting of acute OAC-ICH as it may be the second driving force of HE. Stroke unit care is needed to prevent further complications. Data from randomized controlled trials and observational data from unselected patients are needed to make stronger and more precise recommendations on acute therapy.

Presence of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) in focal epilepsy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for FBTCS are poorly understood, and little is known regarding FBTCS recurrence after treatment initiation. This study aimed to investigate factors related to FBTCS in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and their recurrence after starting antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) cohort. HEP was an international, prospective cohort study that enrolled people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy within 4 months of treatment initiation and followed them for up to 6 years. Baseline characteristics, treatment choices, and seizure outcomes were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was conducted to assess the differences between study participants who had FBTCS and those who never experienced FBTCS. A total of 443 participants were included in this analysis; 77% (n = 342) had FBTCS at some point prior to or within the study period. In participants with FBTCS, regardless of initial seizure type, diagnosis was mostly made after FBTCS (335/342, 98%). After treatment initiation, FBTCS did not recur in 57% (n = 194/342) of cases. A higher number of total pretreatment seizures (median = 16 vs. 11, p = .048, Mann-Whitney U-test), predominantly focal aware seizures (FAS) or focal impaired awareness seizures (FIAS; median = 15 vs. 10, p = .049, Mann Whitney U-test), was associated with no recurrence in FBTCS after treatment initiation. Of 108 participants without FBTCS prior to treatment, only seven (6%) developed FBTCS after treatment initiation. There was no significant difference in choice of initial ASM class (levetiracetam vs. sodium channel blockers) between participants who experienced FBTCS and those who did not. This study highlights the significance of FBTCS among individuals with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. The majority of participants who experienced FBTCS were diagnosed with epilepsy after experiencing their first FBTCS despite preceding FAS/FIAS. The more frequent FAS/FIAS in participants whose FBTCS resolved may be a characteristic of their epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE:This study was an open-label single-arm clinical trial evaluating the fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, and clinical signal of abbreviated mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT-brief) delivered either via telephone (MBCT-T) or by video conferencing (MBCT-V) for people with migraine and comorbid depressive symptoms. BACKGROUND:Migraine is commonly comorbid with elevated depressive symptoms. MBCT reduces depressive symptoms and shows promise to reduce migraine-related disability. An abbreviated and remotely delivered version of MBCT could increase access to care. METHODS:) at baseline, mid-treatment, and post-treatment. Feasibility and acceptability rates were compared to a priori benchmarks. RESULTS:(pre-treatment median [interquartile range] score 8 [5, 13] vs. post-treatment 4 [3, 6], p = 0.003). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We found that remotely delivered MBCT-brief for migraine and depressive symptoms was feasible and acceptable to patients in both the telephone and video modalities. Intervention was associated with significant post-treatment reductions in headache-related disability and depressive symptomatology, findings that must be interpreted cautiously in the absence of a control group.

We here present evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of migraine. These guidelines, created by the Italian Society for the Study of Headache and the International Headache Society, aim to offer clear, actionable recommendations to healthcare professionals. They incorporate evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials and expert-based opinions. The guidelines follow the GRADE approach for assessing the quality of evidence. The guideline development involved a systematic review of literature across multiple databases, adherence to Cochrane review methods, and a structured framework for data extraction and interpretation. Although the guidelines provide a robust foundation for migraine treatment, they also highlight gaps in current research, such as the paucity of head-to-head drug comparisons and the need for long-term outcome studies. These guidelines serve as a resource to standardize migraine treatment and promote high-quality care across different healthcare settings.

Since the first antiseizure medication (ASM) was introduced in 1857, more than 30 medications have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of epilepsy. However, limitations in efficacy and tolerability have led to one-third of patients suffering from uncontrolled seizures. Recent advances in genetics, disease modeling, high-throughput target-based and phenotype-based screening, study design, and identification of novel mechanisms of action or routes of delivery have resulted in more than 200 therapeutics currently under development in the epilepsy pipeline. This study discusses near-to-market drugs in advanced clinical development, with select drugs in earlier stages. Background regarding mechanisms, animal studies, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, tolerability, and safety data are provided for each drug when available.

BACKGROUND:Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the gold standard for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, concomitant intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) might render AIS-LVO patients ineligible for EVT in real-life practice. OBJECTIVE:To provide robust evidence regarding the outcomes of EVT in AIS-LVO patients with concomitant ICH. METHODS:We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data analysis was performed using OpenMetaAnalyst software. We assessed the pooled incidence rate with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) for qualitative data and analyzed the pooled mean difference (MD) with a 95 % CI for continuous data. The pooled effect size for all outcomes was calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. RESULTS:Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall incidence rate of successful revascularization was 85.3 % (95 % CI: 75.8 %-94.7 %), with rates of 76.1 % for ipsilateral hemorrhages and 66.1 % for contralateral hemorrhages. Functional independence was achieved in 20 % of patients (95 % CI: 4.8 %-36.8 %), with rates of 23 % for ipsilateral and 27.7 % for contralateral hemorrhages. Mortality was reported at 52 % (95 % CI: 34.9 %-69 %), with a higher rate of 52.6 % for ipsilateral hemorrhages compared to 36.8 % for contralateral hemorrhages. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This meta-analysis indicates that EVT is feasible in AIS patients with concurrent ICH, yet it is associated with poor functional outcomes and high mortality rates. Careful patient selection is essential to optimize the outcomes, and further research is needed to enhance outcomes for these high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:This study was undertaken to synthesize evidence on the benefits and harms of behavioral interventions for migraine prevention in children and adults. The efficacy and safety of behavioral interventions for migraine prevention have not been tested in recent systematic reviews. METHODS:An expert panel including clinical psychologists, neurologists, primary care physicians, researchers, funders, individuals with migraine, and their caregivers informed the scope and methods. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, clinicaltrials.gov, and gray literature for English-language randomized trials (January 1, 1975 to August 24, 2023) of behavioral interventions for preventing migraine attacks. Primary outcomes were migraine/headache frequency, migraine disability, and migraine-related quality of life. One reviewer extracted data and rated the risk of bias, and a second verified data for completeness and accuracy. Data were synthesized with meta-analysis when deemed appropriate, and we rated the strength of evidence (SOE) using established methods. RESULTS:For adults, we included 50 trials (77 publications, N = 6024 adults). Most interventions were multicomponent (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT], biofeedback, relaxation training, mindfulness-based therapies, and/or education). Most trials were at high risk of bias, primarily due to possible measurement bias and incomplete data. For adults, we found that any of three components (CBT, relaxation training, mindfulness-based therapies) may reduce migraine/headache attack frequency (SOE: low). Education alone that targets behavior may improve migraine-related disability (SOE: low). For three other interventions (biofeedback, acceptance and commitment therapy, and hypnotherapy), evidence was insufficient to permit conclusions. We also found that mindfulness-based therapies may reduce migraine disability more than education, and relaxation + education may improve migraine-related quality of life more than propranolol (SOE: low). For children/adolescents, we included 13 trials (16 publications, N = 1444 children), but the evidence was only sufficient to conclude that CBT + biofeedback + relaxation training may reduce migraine attack frequency and disability more than education alone (SOE: low). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Results suggest that for adults, CBT, relaxation training, and mindfulness-based therapies may each reduce the frequency of migraine/headache attacks, and education alone may reduce disability. For children/adolescents, CBT + biofeedback + relaxation training may reduce migraine attack frequency and disability more than education alone. Evidence consisted primarily of underpowered trials of multicomponent interventions compared with various types of control groups. Limitations include semantic inconsistencies in the literature since 1975, differential usage of treatment components, expectation effects for subjectively reported outcomes, incomplete data, and unclear dosing effects. Future research should enroll children and adolescents, standardize intervention components when possible to improve reproducibility, consider smart study designs and personalized therapies based on individual characteristics, use comparison groups that control for expectation, which is a known challenge in behavioral trials, enroll and retain larger samples, study emerging digital and telehealth modes of care delivery, improve the completeness of data collection, and establish or update clinical trial conduct and reporting guidelines that are appropriate for the conduct of studies of behavioral therapies.

BACKGROUND:In Down syndrome (DS) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), nerve growth factor precursor protein (proNGF) accumulates in the brain. However, its non-invasive detection using neuron-derived extracellular vesicles (NDEVs) from plasma remains unexplored. METHODS:We included 139 adults with DS (45 asymptomatic [aDS], 94 symptomatic for AD [sDS]) and 37 healthy controls. NDEVs were isolated from plasma. ProNGF and tetraspanin (CD81) were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We assessed proNGF/CD81 changes with age, along the AD continuum (aDS and sDS), and associations with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), plasma biomarkers, episodic memory, and basal forebrain volume. RESULTS:In DS, proNGF/CD81 levels increased with age and were higher in NDEVs from asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals compared to controls, with the highest levels in the symptomatic group. ProNGF correlated with CSF phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181, plasma p-tau217, neurofilament light chain, and episodic memory. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:ProNGF/CD81 levels in NDEVs increase along the AD continuum in DS and parallel tau pathology, indicating the potential as a promising biomarker for monitoring disease progression in plasma. HIGHLIGHTS/CONCLUSIONS:Nerve growth factor precursor protein (ProNGF)/tetraspanin (CD81) ratio increased in the third decade of life, 20 years before Alzheimer's disease (AD) symptom onset in Down syndrome (DS). proNGF/CD81 concentrations were significantly higher in individuals with DS compared to controls and were notably elevated in individuals with DS and symptomatic AD compared to asymptomatic AD. proNGF/CD81 concentrations were associated with tau pathology and neuronal injury.