Faculty Bibliography
Searched for:
person:ahujat01
Total Results:
71
Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in people living with human immunodeficiency virus
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is associated with increased rates of cardiovascular disease and vascular events, and people living with HIV (PLWH) may often have indications for therapeutic anticoagulation. However, the ideal anticoagulant in PLWH remains unknown. This retrospective cohort evaluated the tolerability and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in PLWH. The primary outcome was tolerability, defined as a composite of bleeding and/or discontinuation rates. The secondary outcomes included recurrent thromboembolism, bleeding, and discontinuations, independently. There were 92 patients included for analysis, 48 in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) arm and 44 in the warfarin arm. There were 35 (38%) PLWH that did not tolerate oral anticoagulation therapy in the total cohort. Among these, 19 received a DOAC and 16 received warfarin. There were 16 (17%) PLWH that experienced a bleeding event: six in the DOAC arm and 10 in the warfarin arm. There were 15 (16%) PLWH that experienced recurrent thromboembolism, with similar rates between DOAC versus warfarin (10, 21% vs 5, 11%, respectively; p = 0.11). The most commonly prescribed HIV regimens were protease inhibitor and integrase inhibitor-based regimens. Overall, anticoagulation-related outcomes with either a DOAC or warfarin were poor in our cohort of PLWH, with high rates of bleeding, discontinuations, and recurrent thromboembolism. Further studies are necessary to validate and assess reasons for poor tolerability.
PMID: 34293995
ISSN: 1758-1052
CID: 5005752
Therapeutic Anticoagulation with Heparin in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19
BACKGROUND:Thrombosis and inflammation may contribute to morbidity and mortality among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). We hypothesized that therapeutic-dose anticoagulation would improve outcomes in critically ill patients with Covid-19. METHODS:In an open-label, adaptive, multiplatform, randomized clinical trial, critically ill patients with severe Covid-19 were randomly assigned to a pragmatically defined regimen of either therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin or pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in accordance with local usual care. The primary outcome was organ support-free days, evaluated on an ordinal scale that combined in-hospital death (assigned a value of -1) and the number of days free of cardiovascular or respiratory organ support up to day 21 among patients who survived to hospital discharge. RESULTS:The trial was stopped when the prespecified criterion for futility was met for therapeutic-dose anticoagulation. Data on the primary outcome were available for 1098 patients (534 assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and 564 assigned to usual-care thromboprophylaxis). The median value for organ support-free days was 1 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) among the patients assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and was 4 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) among the patients assigned to usual-care thromboprophylaxis (adjusted proportional odds ratio, 0.83; 95% credible interval, 0.67 to 1.03; posterior probability of futility [defined as an odds ratio <1.2], 99.9%). The percentage of patients who survived to hospital discharge was similar in the two groups (62.7% and 64.5%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95% credible interval, 0.64 to 1.11). Major bleeding occurred in 3.8% of the patients assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and in 2.3% of those assigned to usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS:In critically ill patients with Covid-19, an initial strategy of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin did not result in a greater probability of survival to hospital discharge or a greater number of days free of cardiovascular or respiratory organ support than did usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. (REMAP-CAP, ACTIV-4a, and ATTACC ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02735707, NCT04505774, NCT04359277, and NCT04372589.).
PMCID:8362592
PMID: 34351722
ISSN: 1533-4406
CID: 4980752
Comparison of Outcomes of Enoxaparin Bridge Therapy in HeartMate II versus HeartWare HVAD Recipients
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:There is a lack of robust data evaluating outcomes of enoxaparin "bridge" therapy in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We performed a retrospective study of HeartMate II (HM II) and HeartWare HVAD recipients that received therapeutic enoxaparin as "bridge" therapy to describe bleeding and thrombotic events and compare outcomes between devices. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding within 30 days of "bridge" episode. Major bleeding was defined by INTERMACS criteria. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= .02). We observed 3 (1%) thromboembolic events in 2 (4%) patients with an HVAD device. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a HM II device was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of bleeding. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:We found the use of enoxaparin "bridge" therapy to be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding in patients with a HM II device compared with an HVAD device. Assessment of device- and patient-specific factors should be evaluated to minimize bleeding events.
PMID: 33844604
ISSN: 1940-4034
CID: 4845762
Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin for Intracardiac Thromboses
ABSTRACT/UNASSIGNED:Intracardiac thrombus (ICT) formation is a common complication of several cardiovascular diseases. Warfarin is recommended for treatment of ICT by guidelines based on observational studies occurring prior to the advent of non-vitamin K antagonist direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aim to evaluate the current prescribing patterns at our institution and to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of warfarin versus DOACs for ICT.This is a retrospective review of adult patients treated with oral anticoagulation for ICT between May 2013 and December 2019. Our primary endpoint was complete thrombus resolution. Secondary outcomes included time to resolution of thrombus, treatment failure, and duration of therapy. Safety endpoints included stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and bleeding events.A total of 123 patients were included (DOAC n=61; warfarin n=62). At baseline, more patients in the DOAC group had anemia (6 [10%] vs 0 [0%], p=0.013) and alcohol use disorder (6 [10%] vs 0 [0%], p = 0.013). Complete thrombus resolution occurred in 50 (82%) and 46 (74%) patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively (p = 0.298). There was a shorter time to thrombus resolution in the DOAC group versus the warfarin group (63 days [IQR 40, 138] vs 123 days [IQR 86, 244], p = 0.003). There were no differences found in SSE or bleeding between the groups (DOAC 11 [19%] vs warfarin 17 [28%], p = 0.213). For patients with an ICT, treatment with a DOAC for at least 3 months may be a comparable alternative to warfarin in terms of safety and efficacy.
PMID: 33560043
ISSN: 1533-4023
CID: 4814782
Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease
Introduction/UNASSIGNED:Warfarin remains the preferred oral anticoagulant for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become preferred for treatment of VTE in the general population, patients with advanced CKD were excluded from the landmark trials. Postmarketing, safety data have demonstrated oral factor Xa inhibitors (OFXais) such as apixaban and rivaroxaban to be alternatives to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, it remains unknown if these safety data can be extrapolated to the treatment of VTE and CKD. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective cohort study from January 2013 to October 2019 was performed at NYU Langone Health. All adult patients with CKD stage 4 or greater, treated with anticoagulation for VTE, were screened. The primary outcome was tolerability of anticoagulant therapy at 3 months, defined as a composite of bleeding, thromboembolic events, and/or discontinuation rates. The secondary outcomes included bleeding, discontinuations, and recurrent thromboembolism. Results/UNASSIGNED:. OFXais were better tolerated compared to warfarin for the treatment of VTE in CKD, with lower rates of bleeding, discontinuations, and recurrent thromboembolism in a small cohort. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings.
PMCID:7895609
PMID: 33628255
ISSN: 1687-9104
CID: 4802352
To DOAC or Not to DOAC for Left Ventricular Thrombi-What Is the Dose?
PMID: 33471023
ISSN: 2380-6591
CID: 4799462
A Comparison of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate and Recombinant Activated Factor VII for the Management of Bleeding With Cardiac Surgery
Bleeding following cardiac surgery that warrants transfusion of blood products is associated with significant complications, including increased mortality at 1 year following surgery. Factor concentrates, such as prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) have been used off-label for bleeding in cardiac surgery that is refractory to conventional therapy. The objective of this retrospective study is to assess the hemostatic effectiveness of 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa for bleeding after a broad range of cardiac surgeries. Patients were included if they were at least 18 years of age and had undergone cardiac surgery with bleeding requiring intervention with 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa. There were no differences observed in the number of packed red blood cells (4-factor PCC: 2 units vs. rFVIIa: 2 units), fresh frozen plasma (0 units vs. 1 unit) or platelet (2 units vs. 2 units) transfusions following the administration of 4-factor PCC or rFVIIa. The patients in the rFVIIa group, required more cryoprecipitate than those in the 4-factor PCC group (4-factor PCC: 2 units (range 0-6) vs. rFVIIa: 2 units (range 0-8), p = 0.03). There were no differences in secondary outcomes of chest tube output at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours, nor was there a difference in reexploration rates or the median length of stay in the intensive care unit. Thromboembolic complications at 30 days were similar between the two groups (4-factor PCC: 13% vs. rFVIIa 26%, p = 0.08). The total median dose requirement for 4-factor PCC was 1000 units (15 units/kg) and 2 mg (20 mcg/kg) for rFVIIa. The results demonstrate feasibility of utilizing the minimum amount of drug in order to achieve a desired effect. Both 4-factor PCC and rFVIIa appear to be safe and effective options for the management of bleeding associated with cardiac surgery.
PMID: 33402016
ISSN: 1525-1489
CID: 4762512
Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Neonatal IVC and Bilateral Renal Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report
Renal vein thrombosis is the most common non-catheter-associated venous thromboembolism event in neonates, accounting for up to 20% of cases. Although mortality rates are lower than a variety of other forms of pediatric thrombosis, renal vein thrombi are associated with significant short-term and long-term sequelae. This report presents the case of a full-term neonate presenting with bilateral renal vein thrombosis with inferior vena cava involvement treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis. This case report intends to highlight the value of a multidisciplinary approach to pediatric venous thromboembolism and to outline relevant procedural details and current laboratory and imaging monitoring of catheter-directed thrombolysis.
PMID: 32569035
ISSN: 1536-3678
CID: 4492822
Antithrombotic Stewardship: Assessing Use of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Tools to Enhance Safe Prescribing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Hospitalized Patients
Prescribing patterns for oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism is shifting from vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin to the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Although many hospital systems have implemented clinical decision support or enhanced monitoring for patients prescribed warfarin, there is limited evidence to suggest similar levels of enhanced monitoring for DOACs. The antithrombotic stewardship team at our institution developed guidelines and implemented computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) tools to enhance medication and patient safety related to the DOACs. We sought to assess the safety and effectiveness of these CCDS tools available to clinicians upon DOAC prescription in hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective review of 121 patients who received at least two doses of a DOAC from January 2013 to July 2014. We assessed dosing of the DOAC according to the CCDS provided upon order entry. Adherence to CCDS was 80% (n = 24), 75% (n = 46), and 87% (n = 27) in the dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban group, respectively. Our data demonstrate that implementing CCDS for DOACs into the electronic medical record may ensure safe prescribing of high-risk medications.
PMID: 30252771
ISSN: 1549-8425
CID: 3315992
COVID-19 pandemic preparedness: A practical guide from clinical pharmacists' perspective
PURPOSE:To describe our hospital pharmacy department's preparation for an influx of critically ill patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and offer guidance on clinical pharmacy services preparedness for similar crisis situations. SUMMARY:Personnel within the department of pharmacy at a medical center at the US epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic proactively prepared a staffing and pharmacotherapeutic action plan in anticipation of an expected surge in admissions of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and expansion of acute care and intensive care unit (ICU) capacity. Guidance documents focusing on supportive care and pharmacotherapeutic treatment options were developed. Repurposing of non-ICU-trained clinical pharmacotherapy specialists to work collaboratively with clinician teams in ICUs was quickly implemented; staff were prepared for these duties through use of shared tools to facilitate education and practice standardization. CONCLUSION:As challenges were encountered at the initial peak of the pandemic, interdisciplinary collaboration and teamwork was crucial to ensure that all patients were proactively assessed and that their respective pharmacotherapeutic regimens were optimized.
PMCID:7314144
PMID: 34279575
ISSN: 1535-2900
CID: 5018322
