Faculty Bibliography

Trauma exposure in children and adolescents is a significant public health concern due to its profound impact on mental health and development. This study explores the complexities of trauma in youth, including the differentiation between trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder, and the long-term effects of adverse childhood experiences. The study discusses the risks and benefits of polypharmacy in treating complex trauma and comorbid conditions in youth. Given the current gaps in research, the study emphasizes the need for comprehensive, individualized treatment plans that integrate psychotherapy, pharmacologic interventions, and psychosocial support to foster resilience and improve outcomes for trauma-exposed youth.

Exposure to trauma is common and frequently overlooked in behaviorally dysregulated youth. Common trauma-related symptoms, such as exaggerated startle responses, dissociative episodes, and irritability, may resemble behavioral dysregulation. These responses may not be recognized as being related to trauma. As a result, traumatized young people are often misdiagnosed and treated with antipsychotics. Trauma-informed care in health care settings, which includes systematic screening, staff training, trauma skills groups, and ongoing monitoring, is one way of addressing the effects of trauma and ensuring that young people receive access to the evidence-based care they deserve.

OBJECTIVE:To identify optimal strategies to integrate early relational health (ERH) programs in pediatric primary care (PPC) and to describe the development of a best practices toolkit to provide guidance and useful tools that clinicians can use to navigate this process. METHODS:A two-phased approach to develop, assess, and refine a best practices toolkit for the integration of multiple ERH programs in PPC through a modified Delphi process. Phase One included identification and assessment around barriers to ERH program integration and strategies to address them through surveys and focus groups of PPC clinics nationwide. Phase Two then utilized the identified barriers and strategies from Phase One to create a toolkit of best practices on integrating ERH programs in PPC that included two rounds of revision for a final version. RESULTS:126 PPC personnel from 44 clinics nationwide completed the Phase One survey, with respondents reporting many notable strengths and challenges to ERH program integration. 18 survey participants also participated in follow-up focus groups, which reiterated the strengths and challenges found in the surveys. An initial toolkit was then drafted, and experts provided qualitative, free-response feedback around clarity and presentation. Further improvement was made to create the final toolkit, which was rated highly useful and important, though slightly less feasible, by practitioners using formal feedback questions. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study employed a modified Delphi process to create a consensus-based best practices toolkit for integrating multiple ERH programs in PPC to help meet the heterogeneous needs of families to promote optimal child development.

BACKGROUND:This study aims to explore for the first time the knowledge, understanding and management of sleep problems in children with ADHD among clinicians who specialise in sleep and ADHD. The aim was to inform the development of digital sleep awareness training for clinicians. METHOD/METHODS:Fifteen clinicians who work with children with ADHD and sleep difficulties in the United Kingdom participated in semistructured qualitative interviews. Data were analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis approach to generate and guide the content of digital sleep awareness training. RESULTS:Four core themes were developed: 'It's a Problem' highlighted the extent to which children with ADHD were reported to struggle with sleep difficulties and the impact this has on the child and family. Clinicians also discussed the difficulty they had in finding evidence-based information they could share with caregivers. With little to no formal training, most of the advice they gave came from 'learning on the job'. When discussing ADHD specific sleep difficulties and disorders, clinicians reflected on their own 'insight into limitations of knowledge'. 'Learning for practice' highlighted the divergence in the methods of learning preferred by clinicians, despite convergence of learning content needed. CONCLUSIONS:Sleep problems in children with ADHD are common, and clinicians often struggle to support these due to lack of formal training. There is a need for accessible, authoritative training for UK practitioners who work with children with ADHD.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Assessing suicide risk among children is complex, in part due to their developmental differences in identifying, recalling, and verbally describing internal states, alongside cultural differences in how distress is experienced. This study aimed to identify expressions of distress around suicide ideation or attempts through body mapping, a qualitative technique that facilitates both visual and verbal expressions. METHOD/UNASSIGNED: = 16). Children completed the Childhood Suicide Ideation Interview, which included semi-structured questions about their suicide ideation and/or attempt and a body mapping activity, where children illustrated and described their thoughts, feelings, body sensations, and social connections surrounding their suicidal crisis on a printed body silhouette. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Analyses conducted with Anthropac yielded 94 expressions of distress. The congruence in overall experiences across children was low (24%), yet specific somatic experiences like "shaking" (70%), "pain" (43%), and "dizziness" (39%) were prevalent. Other frequent experiences included "sad" (48%), "passive suicide ideation" (43%), and "thoughts about family" (39%). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Body mapping was a valuable tool for uncovering unique expressions of distress among ethnoracially diverse children. Somatic expressions, often overlooked in risk assessments, were prominent. Ours and similar studies have the potential to inform the design of culturally and developmentally responsive risk assessment tools and safety planning protocols.

Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) face significantly reduced life expectancy, mainly driven by natural causes such as cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, cancer, and stroke. Although medical care has advanced, the mortality gap between individuals with SMI and the general population has continued to expand in many countries over recent decades. This disparity is exacerbated by systemic healthcare inequities, fragmented healthcare, insufficient use of preventive measures, and the burden of multimorbidity. This paper proposes six actionable strategies to reduce the excess mortality associated with SMI by integrating physical healthcare into psychiatric services. Across all recommendations, we explicitly embed lifestyle interventions, especially structured physical activity given its comparatively stronger evidence base in SMI, alongside sleep and nutrition support delivered through pragmatic, accessible programs. First, psychoeducation should be expanded to include physical health literacy. Second, structured smoking cessation programs must be implemented. Third, early identification and management of obesity, including pharmacological interventions, should be prioritized. Fourth, hypertension should be routinely screened and treated within psychiatric settings. Fifth, dyslipidaemia and diabetes require systematic monitoring and timely initiation of statins, metformin and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Sixth, these interventions must be delivered through integrated care models that ensure continuity, optimal self-management, and long-term outcome monitoring. Together, these six approaches offer a framework to narrow the mortality gap between people with SMI and the general population, as well as support a shift toward holistic, person-centered care. We synthesise the evidence on physical health disparities in SMI and provide practical, evidence-based recommendations for psychiatric settings. Together, these strategies offer a feasible, person-centered framework to improve health outcomes and reduce premature mortality in individuals with SMI.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Umbrella reviews, or overviews of reviews, synthesize information using systematic reviews (SRs) as their unit of analysis. Although a formal guideline exists for reporting umbrella reviews of healthcare interventions (i.e. Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews [PRIOR]), no formal guideline exists for conducting and/or reporting umbrella reviews of observational studies that examine epidemiological associations. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To review the existing guidance on conducting and/or reporting umbrella reviews of observational studies on epidemiological associations, as part of the process of developing a formal reporting guideline. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We reviewed the scoping review conducted in the context of PRIOR development and identified documents through forward citation search in PubMed, Scopus, and manual search in Google Scholar, Google Search up to December 22, 2024. Documents, regardless of format, were included if they provided guidance for conducting and/or reporting umbrella reviews of observational studies (including meta-research studies of their features). Title/abstract screening and data extraction were performed independently and in duplicate and summarized narratively by stages of the umbrella review process. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The search retrieved 4491 unique records, with 96 full texts assessed and eight documents included. These documents, published between 2014 and 2023, offered guidance across seven topic areas, but overall guidance on conducting and/or reporting is limited. These areas include the answerable questions, prerequisite considerations, the scope of umbrella reviews, searching for SRs, primary data collection, analysis, presentation, and assessing the certainty/quality of the body of evidence. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:There is a need for dedicated, practical, and evidence-based formal reporting guidelines for umbrella reviews of observational studies on epidemiological associations. This review lays the groundwork for developing the PRIOR-extension for such studies: the Preferred Reporting Items for Umbrella Reviews of Cross-sectional, Case-control, and Cohort Studies.

OBJECTIVE:Pediatric primary care (PPC) offers an ideal platform for integrating evidence-based programs (EBPs) to enhance early relational health (ERH). However, implementing such integration faces several challenges. This study uses quantitative and qualitative data to identify the barriers, facilitators, and strategies for implementing ERH-focused EBPs in PPC. METHODS:Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework, we conducted a survey and focus groups with PPC personnel recruited through nationwide networks. The survey measured clinic readiness (i.e., challenges, resources, and needs) for integration and examined its associations with personnel roles and clinic characteristics using nested ANOVAs and multilevel regressions. Focus groups further probed potential strategies and were coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS:126 PPC personnel from 44 clinics completed the survey, and 18 participated in five focus groups. Clinics had strong leadership support for integrated services and high utilization of program resources and implementation practices, yet notable challenges in structural and human resources existed. Clinic staff perceived higher readiness for integration than other personnel roles. Lower-percent Medicaid eligible patients and urbanicity were associated with higher readiness, while academic affiliation showed both positive and negative associations. Promoting culturally responsive care, fostering team cohesion, utilizing standardized implementation processes, adopting flexible delivery and collaborative models, and partnering with local communities were key strategies for integrating EBPs. CONCLUSIONS:The findings can help PPC clinics more effectively integrate one or multiple EBPs into routine care and can inform ways to sustain such integrated services to optimize population-level reach and positive impacts on child and family well-being.