Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Age is the strongest factor determining disease expression in multiple sclerosis (MS). We previously demonstrated biological age acceleration in pediatric-onset MS (POMS) compared to controls with both epigenetic clocks (DNAm) and telomere length (TL). It is unknown whether these markers report overlapping or distinct aging-related processes. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the correlation between DNAm and TL aging markers. METHODS:We conducted a cross-sectional case-control study within the US Network of Pediatric MS Centers. We calculated age acceleration residuals for the Horvath, Hannum, PhenoAge, and GrimAge epigenetic clocks and measured TL from whole blood samples to estimate telomere to somatic DNA ratios (T/S ratio). We employed multivariable analysis of covariance to assess the correlation between DNAm estimates and TL. RESULTS: = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS:DNAm did not correlate with TL in this sample of POMS and controls, suggesting that these biomarkers may capture complementary and non-overlapping elements of aging-related biology.

OBJECTIVE:To assess real-world effectiveness of switching disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) initially treated with platform injectables on disease activity. METHODS:Of 2615 pediatric-onset demyelinating disease patients at 12 clinics in the United States (US) Network of Pediatric MS Centers, those with MS/CIS on initial therapy with a platform injectable who switched to another class of platform injectable, oral or infusion DMT were analyzed. Relapse rate was modeled with negative binomial regression, adjusted for preidentified confounders. RESULTS:A total of 212 children switched DMT before age 18 (67% female, 95% MS). Ninety-three switched from injectable to injectable, 76 injectable to oral, and 43 injectable to infusion. Switchers to oral or infusion were older at onset (injectable 12.3 years, oral 13.5 years, and infusion 14.2 years) and switch (injectable 14.6 years, oral 16.0 years, and infusion 15.7 years). Switchers to infusion DMT were more likely to have enhancing lesions (injectable 45%, oral 28%, and infusion 67%). Compared to injectable (annualized relapse rate [ARR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-1.48), relapse rates were lower for injectable to oral (ARR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.20-0.57; rate ratio: 0.38, 95% CI = 0.21-0.69) and injectable to infusion (ARR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.09-0.37; rate ratio: 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10-0.44) (p < 0.001). Adjusted number needed to treat in person-years to prevent 1 relapse with oral over injectable was 1.84 (95% CI = 1.03-8.69) and infusion over injectable 1.43 (95% CI = 1.00-3.88). INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:Switching from platform injectable to oral or infusion compared to other platform injectable DMT led to better disease control in pediatric MS. Long-term safety data are required. ANN NEUROL 2025.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The Curing Coma Campaign Ethics Working Group sought to understand informed consent practices for research involving persons with disorders of consciousness (DoC) to establish an empirical foundation to formulate common consent elements for research regarding this vulnerable population. METHODS:Consent forms for research involving persons with DoC were collected from the Curing Coma Campaign members and Clinicaltrials.gov in the fall of 2024. We abstracted data about study specifics, the consent process, and unique considerations related to persons with DoC and then reviewed and collated them using descriptive statistics. RESULTS:The collection process yielded 58 consent forms: 40 (69%) from member submissions and 18 (31%) from Clinicaltrials.gov. After excluding duplicates and studies that did not pertain to persons with DoC, there were 43 forms, which included 62 unique terms to describe acute brain injury/consciousness/DoC. Of 41 studies that enrolled persons with DoC, there were 4 (10%) that mentioned an evaluation for covert consciousness. Although only 3 (7%) forms mentioned an evaluation for capacity of the person with DoC/recovered from DoC, 16 (39%) referenced first-person consent if the person with DoC regained capacity. Most studies that involved study-specific medications/interventions/tests included some mention of experiential risks (26/32, 81%), but only 2 (6%) specifically addressed the challenges associated with these risks in a person with DoC. CONCLUSIONS:Consent forms for research involving persons with DoC include inconsistent terminology to describe acute brain injury/consciousness/DoC, the capacity to consent, and the potential experiential risks of study participation in the context of a DoC. There are opportunities to improve transparency and consistency of communication about research involving persons with DoC via creation of common consent elements to ensure the informed consent process protects individual autonomy.

After stroke, upper extremity (UE) motor recovery may be mediated in part by transcallosal projections between hemispheres. The interhemispheric competition model posits that transcallosal inhibition (TI) from the contralesional hemisphere is abnormally strengthened following stroke and interferes with motor recovery. This model has recently been questioned. In this longitudinal study, we aimed to definitively confirm or refute a maladaptive role of contralesional TI in subacute motor recovery. We assessed 30 mild-to-moderately impaired subjects over the six months following ischemic stroke. We tracked contralesional TI and motor functions in the proximal and distal segments of the paretic UE. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine the ipsilateral silent period (iSP) in an arm and hand muscle. We used quantitative and clinical testing to examine deficits in muscle strength, motor control, and individuation; UE segmental impairment; and UE activity limitation. We assessed the relationships of contralesional TI to motor functions in the subacute period. Despite recovery of most motor functions in the proximal and distal UE, contralesional TI was largely static and unrelated to recovery of any motor function. There were inconsistent associations between stronger TI, less hand impairment, and less activity limitation in the subacute period overall. We found no compelling evidence to suggest a maladaptive role of contralesional TI in UE motor recovery in mild-to-moderately impaired stroke subjects. The scattered associations between stronger TI and better levels of paretic UE function suggest a potential supportive role rather than a limiting one. These findings challenge the validity of the interhemispheric competition model in the subacute recovery period, and prompt reconsideration of neuromodulatory strategies that subacutely target contralesional TI.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is a widely studied biomarker of cerebral hemodynamics, commonly used in risk stratification and treatment planning in patients with steno-occlusive disease (SOD). Conventional use relies on normalization of estimates to contralateral hemisphere reference values, which is unsuitable for bilateral or indeterminate distributions of disease. We report upon a custom data-driven approach leveraging random forest classifiers (RFc) to identify candidate voxels for normalization in order to facilitate interrogation outside conditions of known unilateral SOD MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 16 patients with unilateral SOD who underwent acetazolamide-augmented BOLD-MRI and DSC perfusion. Three RFc models were trained using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) to identify candidate voxels brain-wide whose CVR were within 10% of the normal hemispheric median: i. all voxels; ii. gray matter only; and iii. white matter only. Model input features included time-to-maximum (Tmax), mean transit time (MTT), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and cerebral blood volume (CBV) from contemporaneous DSC. The median model-predicted reference CVR (CVRref) was compared to ground-truth medians in LOOCV, and its impact on threshold-based volumetric classification of CVR reduction assessed. RESULTS:RFc models effectively predicted ground-truth CVR voxels, achieving median absolute percent differences of 12.8% (IQR: 5.0%-18.9%) using all voxels, 11.3% (IQR: 9.3%-16.1%) for gray matter, and 9.8% (IQR: 4.4%-16.9%) for white matter. Volumetric estimates of CVR reduction across thresholds for the models revealed excellent agreement between ground-truth and model estimates without statistically significant differences (p>0.01), excepting lowest white matter CVR thresholds. Model use in a small pilot deployment of bilateral SOD cases demonstrated the potential utility, enabling voxel-wise CVR assessment without reliance on contralateral reference. CONCLUSIONS:We present a novel data-driven approach for normalizing CVR maps in patients with bilateral or indeterminate SOD. Using an RFc, our method provides an individualized, brain-wide reference CVR, expanding the utility of CVR estimates beyond the typical constraints of unilateral disease, and with potential application to other, similarly constrained scenarios such as for SPECT or PET hemodynamic studies. ABBREVIATIONS/BACKGROUND:CVR = cerebrovascular reactivity; RFc = random forest classifier; SOD = steno-occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE:Up to 30% of people with epilepsy are refractory to current antiseizure medications (ASMs). JNJ-40411813 is a positive allosteric modulator of metabotropic glutamate 2 receptor, a presynaptic glutamate release inhibitor, and was hypothesized to reduce glutamate-mediated neuronal toxicity through inhibition of excessive glutamate release during seizures. METHODS:This 12-week, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2a study, which employed a rational polypharmacy approach using a novel time-to-event endpoint for epilepsy clinical trials, evaluated JNJ-40411813 (Cohort 1: 50/100 mg; Cohort 2: 100/200 mg) as adjunctive treatment for focal seizures in participants aged 18-64 years receiving levetiracetam or brivaracetam and ≤3 other ASMs. Participants were stratified as induced or noninduced based on treatment or no treatment with a cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme-inducing ASM. The primary endpoint was time-to-baseline monthly seizure count. RESULTS:Cohorts 1 and 2 randomized 60 and 50 patients, respectively. No significant clinical benefits were observed in the median time (95% confidence interval [CI]) to reach the baseline monthly seizure count in Cohort 1 (JNJ-40411813: 34 days [27-48], placebo 32 days [28-37], hazard ratio [HR] = .75 [.41-1.38], p = .36) or Cohort 2 (JNJ-40411813: 38 days [28-48], placebo: 29 days [22-69], HR = .83 [.40-1.75], p = .63). Similarly, no clinical benefits of JNJ-40411813 were observed for any of the secondary endpoints. JNJ-40411813 displayed an acceptable safety profile; treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and not treatment limiting. SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:JNJ-40411813 adjunctive to levetiracetam or brivaracetam showed no significant clinical benefit over placebo in reducing time-to-baseline monthly seizure count or improvement in other key measures in patients with focal onset seizures. The time-to-event study design was successful at reducing participant exposure to ineffective treatment. Despite an acceptable safety profile, the overall efficacy and benefit-risk assessment of JNJ-40411813 does not support its use for patients with focal seizures.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:While reductions in optical coherence tomography (OCT) pRNFL and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thicknesses have been shown to be associated with brain atrophy in adult-onset MS (AOMS) cohorts, the relationship between OCT and brain MRI measures is less established in pediatric-onset MS (POMS). Our aim was to examine the associations of OCT measures with volumetric MRI in a cohort of patients with POMS to determine whether OCT measures reflect CNS neurodegeneration in this patient population, as is seen in AOMS cohorts. METHODS:This was a cross-sectional study with retrospective ascertainment of patients with POMS evaluated at a single center with expertise in POMS and neuro-ophthalmology. As part of routine clinical care, patients with POMS are evaluated by a POMS expert and undergo volumetric brain MRI, including whole-brain (WB), subregional, and gray matter (GM) volume analyses. Patients with POMS are routinely referred to neuro-ophthalmology for evaluation that includes high-contrast visual acuity, color vision testing, and OCT. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models, accounting for within-patient, intereye correlations (both eyes of each patient were included), MS disease duration, and disease-modifying therapy efficacy, were used to determine the relationship between visual pathway structure and function and volumetric MRI measures. RESULTS:= 0.015, respectively). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our results demonstrate that changes in visual pathway structures are associated with reductions in overall brain volume and GM volumes, as well as greater lesion and black hole burden. Collectively, our results emphasize the importance of visual assessment in POMS and suggest that OCT reflects overall CNS neurodegeneration in this cohort.

BACKGROUND:CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD) is a rare developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) associated with multiple impairments and comorbidities. Outcome measures for disease-modifying clinical trials for DEEs should measurably capture a spectrum of caregiver priorities and be externally validated. METHODS:The International CDKL5 Clinical Research Network was the data source for this observational study. A Structural Equation Model was constructed with latent, exogenous variables related to observed clinical features to calculate a global severity score from the following assessments: the CDKL5 Clinical Severity Assessment-Clinician and -Caregiver, Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile Infant Toddler Checklist and the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children. Quantitative EEG power was measured as a biomarker. The Quality of Life Inventory-Disability measured quality of life. RESULTS:Acceptable fit statistics for models were obtained using data from 206 subjects (median [range] age 6.8 [3 months to 40] years). Motor and communication measures were the most important weighted contributors to the global severity score which correlated well with the biomarker and quality of life to support external validation. CONCLUSIONS:The resultant global severity score provided evidence that the assessments formed a coherent set of measures that reliably and meaningfully captured the diversity of severity in CDD. The models illustrated how the symptoms form a measurable network of relationships which may be suitable as an outcome measure for CDD and DEEs more broadly in clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The Neighborhoods Study (TNS) is a novel investigation of adverse social exposome and brain health leveraging 22 Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs). TNS aims to understand if the adverse social exposures increase Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) risk. METHODS:TNS uses innovative methods to determine lifetime addresses of living (n = ≈ 3116) and brain bank cohorts (n = ≈ 8637). Addresses are linked to time-concordant adverse social exposome using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and summarized over time. Brain health measures are provided by the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. RESULTS:We highlight a general overview and methodology of TNS. Data collection is ongoing; however, preliminary findings indicate that the adverse social exposome is related to ADRD biomarkers, neuropathology, and cognitive function. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:TNS is the largest study of adverse social exposome and ADRD, using the ADRC network to build robust scientific consortia. Its findings will inform ADRD interventions, precision medicine, and policy. HIGHLIGHTS/CONCLUSIONS:The Neighborhoods Study (TNS) investigates adverse social exposome and brain health. TNS is a collaboration among 22 Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers. TNS will give insight on environmental and exposomal factors which may be modifiable. Participant lifetime addresses are linked to temporal adverse social exposome metrics. This study's findings will inform precision approaches to mitigate dementia risk.