Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Childhood environmental factors back to the prenatal environment can contribute to MS risk. Childhood adversity, which causes biological, behavioral, and epigenetic changes that can be passed down through families, has been understudied in MS. Here, we emphasize the need to understand the role that intergenerational adversity may play among families affected by MS. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the frequency and types of adverse childhood experiences among parents of children with MS. METHODS:Individuals with pediatric MS (n = 68) were enrolled in a longitudinal study of cognition. At enrollment, the patient and one caregiver or parent completed questionnaires. As the pediatric participants were under age 18 at time of enrollment, one parent completed the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs, a 10-item self-report measure) about the parents' own childhood. Results from the ACE questionnaire among parents of pediatric healthy controls (n = 96) and adults in a national cohort are also reported for comparison. RESULTS:Over half of pediatric MS parents reported at least one ACE exposure. Of parents that did have ACE exposures, the exposures were broad in terms of abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. Over 10 % of parents reported total ACE scores of 7 or above. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Over half of pediatric MS parents experienced some degree of childhood adversity. The impact of intergenerational adversity on the development of pediatric onset MS warrants further study.

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is associated with preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). Suboptimal sleep is also a risk factor for cognitive decline, but with unclear relationship to SCD. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study in a biracial research cohort of 148 cognitively normal older adults who underwent quantification of SCD (Cognitive Change Index; CCI), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale; ESS), depression (Geriatric Depression Scale; GDS), and amyloid/tau PET. ESS score was associated with total, amnestic, and non-amnestic CCI scores, after adjustment for GDS, amyloid/tau burden, and race. This supports future longitudinal work on how sleepiness impacts SCD outcomes.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Seizures are common in autoimmune encephalitis (AE), but identifying patients at risk of chronic epilepsy in the post-acute phase remains challenging. This study aims to identify risk factors of treatment-resistant postencephalitic epilepsy. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective cohort study included patients with AE who experienced new-onset seizures within one year of symptom onset from two tertiary care centers in New York. EEG findings were analyzed separately based on whether the EEG recording was obtained in the acute (<3 months from symptom onset) or subacute phase. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify independent predictors of postencephalitic epilepsy. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Eighty-nine patients were included (median age: 33 years). Neural antibodies were present in 73% of patients (NMDAR: 35, LGI1: 19, GAD65: 9, Hu: 1, AGNA-1: 1). Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 29.2% developed treatment-resistant postencephalitic epilepsy. Independent predictors of postencephalitic epilepsy included focal slowing on acute EEG (OR 0.15, CI 0.02-0.90), interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) or periodic discharges (PDs) on subacute EEG (OR 20.01, CI 1.94-206.44), and cell surface antibodies (OR 0.21, CI 0.05-0.89). Immunotherapy within three months of onset was associated with decreased epilepsy development in patients with neural antibodies (OR 4.16, CI 1.11-16.30). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Nearly one-third of patients with AE and acute seizures developed treatment-resistant postencephalitic epilepsy, with significant predictors including absence of focal slowing on acute EEG, presence of IEDs and PDs on subacute EEG, absence of cell surface antibodies, and absence of early immunotherapy treatment of patients with positive neural antibodies.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:It remains unclear whether children and adolescents with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at heightened risk for long-term kidney complications. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To investigate whether SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk of postacute kidney outcomes among pediatric patients, including those with preexisting kidney disease or acute kidney injury (AKI). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective cohort study used data from 19 health institutions in the National Institutes of Health Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) initiative from March 1, 2020, to May 1, 2023 (follow-up ≤2 years completed December 1, 2024; index date cutoff, December 1, 2022). Participants included children and adolescents (aged <21 years) with at least 1 baseline visit (24 months to 7 days before the index date) and at least 1 follow-up visit (28 to 179 days after the index date). EXPOSURES/UNASSIGNED:SARS-CoV-2 infection, determined by positive laboratory test results (polymerase chain reaction, antigen, or serologic) or relevant clinical diagnoses. A comparison group included children with documented negative test results and no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Outcomes included new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 2 or higher or CKD stage 3 or higher among those without preexisting CKD; composite kidney events (≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], eGFR ≤15 mL/min/1.73 m2, dialysis, transplant, or end-stage kidney disease diagnosis), and at least 30%, 40%, or 50% eGFR decline among those with preexisting CKD or acute-phase AKI. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with propensity score stratification. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 1 900 146 pediatric patients (487 378 with and 1 412 768 without COVID-19), 969 937 (51.0%) were male, the mean (SD) age was 8.2 (6.2) years, and a range of comorbidities was represented. SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with higher risk of new-onset CKD stage 2 or higher (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.12-1.22) and CKD stage 3 or higher (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.62). In those with preexisting CKD, COVID-19 was associated with an increased risk of composite kidney events (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.27) at 28 to 179 days. Children with acute-phase AKI had elevated HRs (1.29; 95% CI, 1.21-1.38) at 90 to 179 days for composite outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this large US cohort study of children and adolescents, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a higher risk of adverse postacute kidney outcomes, particularly among those with preexisting CKD or AKI, suggesting the need for vigilant long-term monitoring.

Presence of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) in focal epilepsy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for FBTCS are poorly understood, and little is known regarding FBTCS recurrence after treatment initiation. This study aimed to investigate factors related to FBTCS in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and their recurrence after starting antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) cohort. HEP was an international, prospective cohort study that enrolled people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy within 4 months of treatment initiation and followed them for up to 6 years. Baseline characteristics, treatment choices, and seizure outcomes were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was conducted to assess the differences between study participants who had FBTCS and those who never experienced FBTCS. A total of 443 participants were included in this analysis; 77% (n = 342) had FBTCS at some point prior to or within the study period. In participants with FBTCS, regardless of initial seizure type, diagnosis was mostly made after FBTCS (335/342, 98%). After treatment initiation, FBTCS did not recur in 57% (n = 194/342) of cases. A higher number of total pretreatment seizures (median = 16 vs. 11, p = .048, Mann-Whitney U-test), predominantly focal aware seizures (FAS) or focal impaired awareness seizures (FIAS; median = 15 vs. 10, p = .049, Mann Whitney U-test), was associated with no recurrence in FBTCS after treatment initiation. Of 108 participants without FBTCS prior to treatment, only seven (6%) developed FBTCS after treatment initiation. There was no significant difference in choice of initial ASM class (levetiracetam vs. sodium channel blockers) between participants who experienced FBTCS and those who did not. This study highlights the significance of FBTCS among individuals with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. The majority of participants who experienced FBTCS were diagnosed with epilepsy after experiencing their first FBTCS despite preceding FAS/FIAS. The more frequent FAS/FIAS in participants whose FBTCS resolved may be a characteristic of their epilepsy.

Severe brain injury can result in disorders of consciousness (DoC), including coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, and minimally conscious state. Improved emergency and trauma medicine response, in addition to expanding efforts to prevent premature withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, has led to an increased number of patients with prolonged DoC. High-quality bedside care of patients with DoC is key to improving long-term functional outcomes. However, there is a paucity of DoC-specific evidence guiding clinicians on efficacious bedside care that can promote medical stability and recovery of consciousness. This Viewpoint describes the state of current DoC bedside care and identifies knowledge and practice gaps related to patient care with DoC collated by the Care of the Patient in Coma scientific workgroup as part of the Neurocritical Care Society's Curing Coma Campaign. The gap analysis identified and organized domains of bedside care that could affect patient outcomes: clinical expertise, assessment and monitoring, timing of intervention, technology, family engagement, cultural considerations, systems of care, and transition to the post-acute continuum. Finally, this Viewpoint recommends future research and education initiatives to address and improve the care of patients with DoC.

We propose and prioritize important outcome domains that should be considered for future research investigating long-term outcomes (LTO) after new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). The study was led by the international NORSE Institute LTO Working Group. First, literature describing the LTO of NORSE survivors was identified using a PubMed search and summarized to identify knowledge gaps. Subsequently, a consensus-building process was performed to prioritize and rank important LTO domains for further research. The prioritization of LTO domains was qualitative, enabling the expert panel to generate ideas, share opinions, and provide reasons for the rankings. A second round took place to allow expansion and agreement regarding specific details for each domain. Outcomes were classified into eight main domains: (1) Function: Neuropsychological, Neurological (other than seizures), and Psychiatric (mood and behavior); (2) Quality of Life; (3) Epilepsy; (4) Nonneurological (medical); (5) Social; (6) Caregiver Burden; (7) Long-Term Mortality; and (8) Health Care System Impact. In addition, the working group suggested obtaining outcome measures for each domain at 6 months and 1 year after discharge and annually thereafter until stability has been reached. There are no currently established time frames set for when LTO in NORSE begin or plateau, and previously there existed no consensus regarding which LTO should be considered. This consensus process identifies and recommends NORSE LTO domains that should be considered in future research studies to provide more consistent results that can be compared between studies. Survivors of NORSE should be evaluated serially and at fixed points over time to maximize our understanding of the recovery trajectory for all LTO domains. Establishing reliable and standardized data describing LTO (beyond seizures) after NORSE will support discussions with families during the acute stages, prognostication, the development of targeted management strategies for survivors, and future comparative research globally helping to identify biomarkers that may predict LTO.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:Neurosarcoidosis poses a diagnostic and management challenge due to its rarity, phenotypic variability, and lack of randomized controlled studies to guide treatment selection. Recommendations for management based on expert opinion are useful in clinical practice and provide a framework for designing prospective studies. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:In this Delphi survey study, specialists with experience in managing patients with neurosarcoidosis were invited to anonymously complete 2 surveys about key elements of evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and long-term management of neurosarcoidosis. Expert consensus recommendations were adopted if >80% threshold of agreement was reached. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Of the 41 invited expert clinicians across the United States, 32 (78%) participated in the study. All round 1 respondents self-identified as neuroimmunologists (except for 1 pulmonologist). Consensus was reached regarding the need to consider neurosarcoidosis phenotype and severity to guide the choice of initial immunosuppression in both the acute (relapse) and maintenance phases. Experts endorsed the use of TNF-α inhibitors as first-line agents in selected phenotypes with poor prognosis. Neuroimaging was recommended to complement clinical surveillance for treatment response. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:There was agreement on several key issues, most importantly on the need to consider neurosarcoidosis phenotype and severity when deciding initial treatment. No consensus was achieved on the dosing and duration of specific immunosuppressants, nor regarding the management of the peripheral nervous system manifestation of neurosarcoidosis. These topics warrant further investigation.

Seizures associated with low-grade tumors in pediatric patients can be drug resistant and associated with significant morbidity. There are several low-grade tumor types associated with epilepsy in this population with the majority localized to the temporal lobe and some extra-temporal locations (frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes). The primary treatment of low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors is surgical resection, though the surgical approach and the use of intraoperative techniques remain controversial. Newer treatments are under investigation as primary and/or adjunctive therapy, including non-invasive surgical options and gene-targeted therapy. A multimodal approach to treatment may improve long-term outcomes and quality of life.