Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Hypertension is a known risk factor for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but it is unclear whether blood pressure (BP) at hospital arrival can be used to distinguish hypertensive ICH from non-hypertensive etiologies. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:We performed a single-center cohort study using data from consecutive ICH patients over 12 months. ICH characteristics including etiology were prospectively adjudicated by two attending neurologists. Using adjusted linear regression models, we compared first recorded systolic BPs (SBP) and mean arterial pressures (MAP) in patients with hypertensive vs. other ICH etiologies. We then used area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis to determine the accuracy of admission BP in differentiating between hypertensive and non-hypertensive ICH. RESULTS:Of 311 patients in our cohort (mean age 70.6 ± 15.6, 50% male, 83% white), the most frequent ICH etiologies were hypertension (50%) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA; 22%). Mean SBP and MAP for patients with hypertensive ICH was 175.1 ± 32.9 mmHg and 120.4 ± 22.9 mmHg, respectively, compared to 156.4 ± 28.0 mmHg and 109.6 ± 20.3 mmHg in non-hypertensive ICH (p < .001). Adjusted models showed that hypertensive ICH patients had higher BPs than those with CAA (mean SBP difference 10.7 mmHg [95% CI 0.8-20.5]; mean MAP difference 8.1 mmHg [1.1-15.0]) and especially patients with other non-CAA causes (mean SBP difference 23.9 mmHg [15.3-32.4]; mean MAP difference 14.5 mmHg [8.5-20.6]). However, on a patient-level, arrival BP did not reliably discriminate between hypertensive and non-hypertensive etiologies (AUC 0.660 [0.599-0.720]). CONCLUSIONS:Arrival BP differs between hypertensive and non-hypertensive ICH but should not be used as a primary determinant of etiology, as hypertension may be implicated in various subtypes of ICH.

To become a unifying theory of brain function, predictive processing (PP) must accommodate its rich representational diversity. Gilead et al. claim such diversity requires a multi-process theory, and thus is out of reach for PP, which postulates a universal canonical computation. We contend this argument and instead propose that PP fails to account for the experiential level of representations.

Anti-CD20 therapies have established efficacy in the treatment of immune-mediated neurological and non-neurological diseases. Rituximab, one of the first B-cell-directed therapies, is relatively inexpensive compared to newer anti-CD20 molecules, is available in many countries, and has been used off-label in pediatric patients with neuroimmune conditions. The objective of this paper is to describe the experience with rituximab in pediatric multiple sclerosis and other inflammatory immune-mediated disorders of the central nervous system (CNS), and to define a protocol for its use in clinical practice, in particular addressing doses, interval of administration, duration of treatment, and tests to perform at baseline and during follow-up.

Introduction/UNASSIGNED:Recognition of faces of family members, friends, and colleagues is an important skill essential for everyday life. Individuals affected by prosopagnosia (face blindness) have difficulty recognizing familiar individuals. The prevalence of prosopagnosia has been estimated to be as high as 3%. Prosopagnosia can severely impact the quality of life of those affected, and it has been suggested to co-occur with conditions such as depression and anxiety. Methods/UNASSIGNED:To determine real-world diagnostic frequency of prosopagnosia and the spectrum of its comorbidities, we utilized a large database of more than 7.5 million de-identified electronic health records (EHRs) from patients who received care at major academic health centers and Federally Qualified Health Centers in New York City. We designed a computable phenotype to search the database for diagnosed cases of prosopagnosia, revealing a total of n = 902 cases. In addition, data from a randomly sampled matched control population (n = 100,973) were drawn from the database for comparative analyses to study the condition's comorbidity landscape. Diagnostic frequency of prosopagnosia, epidemiological characteristics, and comorbidity landscape were assessed. Results/UNASSIGNED:We observed prosopagnosia diagnoses at a rate of 0.012% (12 per 100,000 individuals). We discovered elevated frequency of prosopagnosia diagnosis for individuals who carried certain comorbid conditions, such as personality disorder, depression, epilepsy, and anxiety. Moreover, prosopagnosia diagnoses increased with the number of comorbid conditions. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Results from this study show a wide range of comorbidities and suggest that prosopagnosia is vastly underdiagnosed. Findings imply important clinical consequences for the diagnosis and management of prosopagnosia as well as its comorbid conditions.

On May 22-24, 2019, the 15th Antiepileptic Drug and Device (AEDD) Trials Conference was held, which focused on current issues related to AEDD development from preclinical models to clinical prognostication. The conference featured regulatory agencies, academic laboratories, and healthcare companies involved in emerging epilepsy therapies and research. The program included discussions around funding and support for investigations in epilepsy and neurologic research, clinical trial design and integrated outcome measures for people with epilepsy, and drug development and upcoming disease-modifying therapies. Finally, the conference included updates from the preclinical, clinical, and device pipeline. Summaries of the talks are provided in this paper, with the various pipeline therapeutics in the listed tables to be outlined in a subsequent publication.

OBJECTIVE:To determine the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) rates. METHODS:We queried all decedents presented for medico-legal investigation at 3 medical examiner (ME) offices across the country (New York City, Maryland, San Diego County) in 2009 to 2010 and 2014 to 2015. We identified all decedents for whom epilepsy/seizure was listed as cause/contributor to death or comorbid condition on the death certificate. We then reviewed all available reports. Decedents determined to have SUDEP were included for analysis. We used median income in the ZIP code of residence as a surrogate for SES. For each region, zip code regions were ranked by median household income and divided into quartiles based on total population for 2 time periods. Region-, age-, and income-adjusted epilepsy prevalence was estimated in each zip code. SUDEP rates in the highest and lowest SES quartiles were evaluated to determine disparity. Examined SUDEP rates in 2 time periods were also compared. RESULTS:< 0.0001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:ME-investigated SUDEP incidence was significantly higher in people with the lowest SES compared to the highest SES. The difference persisted over a 5-year period despite decreased overall SUDEP rates.

OBJECTIVE:To outline changes made to a neurology residency program in response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS:In early March 2020, the first cases of COVID-19 were announced in the United States. New York City quickly became the epicenter of a global pandemic, and our training program needed to rapidly adapt to the increasing number of inpatient cases while being mindful of protecting providers and continuing education. Many of these changes unfolded over days, including removing residents from outpatient services, minimizing the number of residents on inpatient services, deploying residents to medicine services and medical intensive care units, converting continuity clinic patient visits to virtual options, transforming didactics to online platforms only, and maintaining connectedness in an era of social distancing. We have been able to accomplish this through daily virtual meetings among leadership, faculty, and residents. RESULTS:Over time, our program has successfully rolled out initiatives to service the growing number of COVID-related inpatients while maintaining neurologic care for those in need and continuing our neurologic education curriculum. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:It has been necessary and feasible for our residency training program to undergo rapid structural changes to adapt to a medical crisis. The key ingredients in doing this successfully have been flexibility and teamwork. We suspect that many of the implemented changes will persist long after the COVID-19 crisis has passed and will change the approach to neurologic and medical training.

The COVID-19 pandemic is causing world-wide social dislocation, operational and economic dysfunction, and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Medical practices are responding by developing, disseminating and implementing unprecedented changes in health care delivery. Telemedicine has rapidly moved to the frontline of clinical practice due to the need for prevention and mitigation strategies; these have been encouraged, facilitated, and enabled by changes in government rules and regulations and payer-driven reimbursement policies.We describe our neurology department's situational transformation from in-person outpatient visits to a largely virtual neurology practice in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Two key factors enabled our rapid deployment of virtual encounters in neurology and its subspecialties. The first was a well-established robust information technology infrastructure supporting virtual urgent care services at our institution; this connected physicians directly to patients using both the physician's and the patient's own mobile devices. The second is the concept of one patient, one chart, facilitated by a suite of interconnected electronic medical record (EMR) applications on several different device types.We present our experience with conducting general teleneurology encounters using secure synchronous audio and video connections integrated with an EMR. This report also details how we perform virtual neurological examinations that are clinically meaningful, and how we document, code and bill for these virtual services. Many of these processes can be used by other neurology providers, regardless of their specific practice model. We then discuss potential roles for teleneurology after the COVID-19 global pandemic has been contained.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Delayed parkinsonism and dystonia are recognized phenomena in osmotic demyelinating syndrome (ODS). Dopamine receptor agonists and levodopa have been reported to benefit select patients. Case report/UNASSIGNED:We report a patient with ODS with severe pseudobulbar deficits, parkinsonism and dystonia, poorly responsive to levodopa, who experienced a remarkable improvement with pramipexole. Discussion/UNASSIGNED:A marked response to pramipexole with lack of response to levodopa suggests a pre-synaptic source for his deficits coupled with injuries to non-nigral compensatory structures. Highlights/UNASSIGNED:This case highlights a dramatic response of osmotic demyelination-induced parkinsonism/dystonia to pramipexole. A lack of response to levodopa suggests deficits in the pre-synaptic nigral as well as non-nigral compensatory structures.

Introduction: Advances in the understanding of the mechanisms that lead to Lewy body pathology in Parkinson disease (PD) have yielded rationales for tackling neurodegeneration associated with α-Synuclein (α-Syn) misfolding, aggregation and/or its related spreading. Immunization therapies targeting distinct α-Syn epitopes (conformational and linear) that aim to limit extracellular spread in the brain, are now in development. Completed and ongoing studies have enrolled early PD patients without considering individual clinical differences and assume a common pathogenetic mechanism of the disease. Such approaches have led to disappointing results; this is most likely attributed to trial methodology and inadequate patient selection rather than underlying target biology.Areas covered - This review presents the status of immunotherapies that target α-Syn epitopes in PD. Mechanisms associated with neurodegeneration are examined along with the limitations of current antibody research strategies and ongoing clinical trials. Patient stratification based on disease progression is discussed and the article culminates with author suggestions on how to progress future clinical trials.Expert opinion - The efficacy of passive and active immunotherapies is inadequately evaluated in ongoing clinical trials where participating patients have various progression rates, genetic backgrounds and clinical phenotypes. Future disease-modifying studies can overcome these limitations by enrolling patients based on progression pathways and genotypic contribution to disease manifestations.