Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Amyloid-β42 (Aβ42) is associated with plaque formation in the brain of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Studies have suggested the potential utility of plasma Aβ42 levels in the diagnosis, and in longitudinal study of AD pathology. Conventional ELISAs are used to measure Aβ42 levels in plasma but are not sensitive enough to quantitate low levels. Although ultrasensitive assays like single molecule array or immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry have been developed to quantitate plasma Aβ42 levels, the high cost of instruments and reagents limit their use. OBJECTIVE:We hypothesized that a sensitive and cost-effective chemiluminescence (CL) immunoassay could be developed to detect low Aβ42 levels in human plasma. METHODS:We developed a sandwich ELISA using high affinity rabbit monoclonal antibody specific to Aβ42. The sensitivity of the assay was increased using CL substrate to quantitate low levels of Aβ42 in plasma. We examined the levels in plasma from 13 AD, 25 Down syndrome (DS), and 50 elderly controls. RESULTS:The measurement range of the assay was 0.25 to 500 pg/ml. The limit of detection was 1 pg/ml. All AD, DS, and 45 of 50 control plasma showed measurable Aβ42 levels. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This assay detects low levels of Aβ42 in plasma and does not need any expensive equipment or reagents. It offers a preferred alternative to ultrasensitive assays. Since the antibodies, peptide, and substrate are commercially available, the assay is well suited for academic or diagnostic laboratories, and has a potential for the diagnosis of AD or in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND:Tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor, is approved for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and several other immune-mediated disorders. Off-label use of the intravenous formulation of tocilizumab for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) decreased relapse rates in two small case series. However, treatment protocol that requires frequent intravenous infusions may adversely affect adherence to therapy, especially in the more disabled patients, thereby reducing effectiveness. A subcutaneous formulation of tocilizumab was shown to be noninferior to the IV formulation for approved rheumatologic diseases. The effectiveness of subcutaneous TCZ for NMOSD is unknown. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed clinical, radiological and serological data on all NMOSD patients who received subcutaneous TCZ in two tertiary referral centers between 2014-2019. RESULTS:Twelve NMOSD patients who received at least 6 months of subcutaneous TCZ were identified. Eleven were female; mean age was 46.9 ± 14.5 years and mean disease duration was 6.6 ± 4.6 years. Seven patients were seropositive for AQP-4 antibodies, two - for MOG-IgG antibodies, and three were doubly seronegative. During subcutaneous TCZ treatment, eight patients (66.6%) were relapse-free, one patient (8.3%) experienced 1 relapse, two patients (16.6%) - 2 relapses, and one patient (8.3%) - 3 relapses. The median relapse rate within 1 year after starting subcutaneous TCZ - 0 (interquartile range =1.75-0) - was significantly lower than in the year prior to treatment initiation (2, interquartile range = 4.0-0.25; p = 0.04). Overall, the annual relapse rate (ARR) decreased from a median of 2 (interquartile range = 5.75-1.29) prior to subcutaneous TCZ to 0 (interquartile range= = 1.0-0) on treatment (p = 0.0015). One TCZ-treated patient died following a severe myelitis attack. CONCLUSIONS:Effectiveness of subcutaneous TCZ in NMOSD appears to be similar to that reported for the IV formulation and has an advantage of at-home administration. Prospective, comparative studies of subcutaneous TCZ for NMOSD are warranted.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:We conducted focus groups in people who had participated in mobile health (mHealth) studies of behavioral interventions for migraine to better understand: (a) Participant experience in the recruitment/enrollment process; (b) participant experience during the studies themselves; (c) ideas for improving participant experience for future studies. METHODS:We conducted four focus groups in people who had agreed to participate in one of three studies involving mHealth and behavioral therapy for migraine. Inclusion criteria were being age 18-80, owning a smartphone, and having four or more headache days per month. All participants met the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition beta version criteria for migraine. Exclusion criteria were not speaking English and having had behavioral therapy for migraine in the past year. Focus groups were audio recorded, fully transcribed and coded using general thematic analysis. RESULTS:(ii) Enrollment should be simple and study requirements should be carefully explained prior to enrollment. When asked about their experiences during the studies (b), the following themes emerged: (i) It is difficult to participate in study follow-up and compliance phone calls; (ii) participants prefer to choose from among various options for contact with the study team; (iii) there are barriers that limit app use related to migraine itself, as well as other barriers; (iv) completing diaries on a daily basis is challenging; (v) technical difficulties and uncertainties about app features limit use; (vi) being part of a research study promoted daily behavioral therapy use; (vii) progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) is enjoyable, and has a positive impact on life; (viii) behavioral therapy was a preferred treatment to reduce migraine pain. Ideas for improving study design or patient experience (c) included: (i) Increased opportunity to interact with other people with migraine would be beneficial; (ii) navigating the app and data entry should be easier; (iii) more varied methods for viewing the data and measures of adherence are needed; (iv) more information on and more varied behavioral treatment modalities would be preferred. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Though people with migraine are motivated to participate in mHealth and behavioral treatment studies, better communication up front about interventions as well as greater flexibility in interventions and follow-up methods are desired.