Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (SFN) is common following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), but studies on its quality-of-life (QOL) impact are limited. We examined patient-reported QOL and satisfaction after NSM with/without SFN utilizing the BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) survey. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Patients undergoing NSM between April 2018 and July 2021 at our institution were examined; the BREAST-Q PROM was administered preoperatively, and at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. SFN extent/severity was documented at 2-3 weeks postoperatively; QOL and satisfaction domains were compared between patients with/without SFN. RESULTS:A total of 573 NSMs in 333 patients were included, and 135 breasts in 82 patients developed SFN (24% superficial, 56% partial thickness, 16% full thickness). Patients with SFN reported significantly lower scores in the satisfaction with breasts (p = 0.032) and psychosocial QOL domains (p = 0.009) at 6 months versus those without SFN, with scores returning to baseline at 1 year in both domains. In the "physical well-being-of-the-chest" domain, there was an overall decline in scores among all patients; however, there were no significant differences at any time point between patients with or without SFN. Sexual well-being scores declined for patients with SFN compared with those without at 6 months and also at 1 year, but this did not reach significance (p = 0.13, p = 0.2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing NSM who developed SFN reported significantly lower satisfaction and psychosocial well-being scores at 6 months, which returned to baseline by 1 year. Physical well-being of the chest significantly declines after NSM regardless of SFN. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to determine SFN's impact on long-term QOL.

Bone regeneration remains a significant clinical challenge, often necessitating surgical approaches when healing bone defects and fracture nonunions. Within this context, the modulation of adenosine signaling pathways has emerged as a promising therapeutic option, encouraging osteoblast activation and tempering osteoclast differentiation. A literature review of the PubMed database with relevant keywords was conducted. The search criteria involved in vitro or in vivo models, with clear methodological descriptions. Only studies that included the use of indirect adenosine agonists, looking at the effects of bone regeneration, were considered relevant according to the eligibility criteria. A total of 29 articles were identified which met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and they were reviewed to highlight the preclinical translation of adenosine agonists. While preclinical studies demonstrate the therapeutic potential of adenosine signaling in bone regeneration, its clinical application remains unrealized, underscoring the need for further clinical trials. To date, only large, preclinical animal models using indirect adenosine agonists have been successful in stimulating bone regeneration. The adenosine receptors (A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃) stimulate various pathways, inducing different cellular responses. Specifically, indirect adenosine agonists act to increase the extracellular concentration of adenosine, subsequently agonizing the respective adenosine receptors. The agonism of each receptor is dependent on its expression on the cell surface, the extracellular concentration of adenosine, and its affinity for adenosine. This comprehensive review analyzed the multitude of indirect agonists currently being studied preclinically for bone regeneration, discussing the mechanisms of each agonist, their cellular responses in vitro, and their effects on bone formation in vivo.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM/BACKGROUND:Maxillofacial prosthodontists were advanced digital technology (ADT) adopters early in the new Millennium. The past two decades saw a range of digital enablers emerge including digital imaging (internal and surface), digital surgical planning, digital functional assessment, subtractive and additive manufacturing, navigation, and robotics among others. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the latest ADT arrival that will be a challenging disruptive technology. ADT has served as a profound change agent in maxillofacial prosthodontics. The intent was to explore the process and level of ADT engagement in maxillofacial prosthodontics. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose was twofold. Firstly, to explore maxillofacial prosthodontic engagement of ADT. Secondly, to develop a discussion document to assist the American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics (AAMP) with establishing a collective awareness and considered opinion on the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics in the digital era. MATERIAL AND METHODS/METHODS:AAMP member interest in ADT was assessed through analysis of AAMP annual congress programs and publications in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (JPD). The history of the maxillofacial prosthodontic journey to the digital era was undertaken with a selective literature review. The perceptions maxillofacial prosthodontists hold on ADT engagement was assessed through a survey of AAMP members. Developing an understanding of the influence AI was conducted with a review of pertinent literature. RESULTS:From 2011-2020, an annual mean of 38% of papers published in the JPD involved clinical use of ADT. From 2017-2019, 44% of invited presentations at AAMP annual congresses included clinical use of ADT. The journey to the digital era distinguished three periods with formative and consolidation periods influencing the innovation digital era. The AAMP member survey had a 59% response rate and studied 10 domains through 31 questions. Of the respondents, 89% thought ADT important to the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics. CONCLUSIONS:The discussion document will assist the AAMP in developing a collective consciousness and considered opinion on ADT in the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics. Members of the AAMP have a developed interest in clinical applications of ADT. A great challenge is that no formal education, training, or clinical competency requirements for ADT could be identified. Clinical competency requirements are important to prepare maxillofacial prosthodontics for the inevitability of a digital era future. The discussion document poses the fundamental question of whether maxillofacial prosthodontists will remain as passive end users of ADT and AI or will they become engaged knowledge workers that have determined clinical competency in ADT and AI in patient care. Without this knowledge worker role, maxillofacial prosthodontists may experience difficulty being part of the inevitable ADT-AI driven future.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:This study investigates whether open distal radius fractures (ODRFs) treated after 24 hours from time of injury have an increased risk of infection or overall complication profile compared with those treated within 24 hours. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective review was performed of all patients treated for ODRF over a 6-year period at a single large academic institution. Postoperative complications included surgical site infections, need for revision irrigation and debridement, delayed soft tissue healing, loss of reduction, nonunion, and malunion. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:One-hundred twenty patients were treated for ODRF. Mean (SD) age at time of injury was 59.92 (17.68) years. Twenty patients (16.7%) had postoperative complications. Regarding mechanism of injury, 78 (65.0%) had a low-energy and 42 (35.0%) had a high-energy injury. Age and fracture grade were not significant factors. Mean (SD) open wound size was 1.18 (1.57) cm. Mean (SD) time from injury presentation to the emergency department (ED) and first dose of intravenous antibiotics was 3.07 (4.05) hours and mean (SD) time from presentation to the ED and operative treatment was 11.90 (6.59) hours, which did not show a significant association with postoperative complications. Twenty-four patients (20.0%) were treated greater than 24 hours after presentation to the ED, which was not significantly distinct from those treated within 24 hours. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Patients with ODRFs treated after 24 hours were not associated with a greater risk of postoperative complications. Factors including age, energy and mechanism of injury, and fracture grade did not alter outcome in any statistically significant manner. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Level IV.

OBJECTIVE:Previous work identified an association between genetics and neurodevelopmental delays in patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. The authors investigated the role of genetic mutations on behavioral outcomes of patients with treated sagittal synostosis. METHODS:Parents of children aged 6-18 years with surgically corrected sagittal synostosis were recruited to complete the Child Behavioral Checklist (overall behavioral problems), Conners 3rd Edition-Parent (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder), Social Responsiveness Scale 2nd Edition (autism spectrum disorder [ASD]), and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function 2nd Edition (executive function). Genomic analysis was completed, and patients were identified if they had mutations in high probability of loss of function intolerant (pLI) genes (high pLI vs nonhigh pLI). Genetic burden was assessed relative to controls. Multivariate linear regression determined the association of mutations in high pLI genes with behavioral scores, while controlling for sociodemographic factors, age at surgery, surgery type, and IQ. RESULTS:Sixteen of 45 patients were in the high pLI group. There were no differences between the groups in terms of sociodemographic factors. A greater proportion of children in the high pLI group scored at or above borderline clinical levels for aggression (18.8% vs 0.0%, p = 0.05) and externalizing problems (31.3% vs 3.7%, p = 0.02). Among children in the nonhigh pLI group, older age at surgery was associated with worse scores on the rule-breaking, aggression, and externalizing problems domains and four out of five ASD domains. CONCLUSIONS:Children with treated nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis and mutations in high pLI genes had worse behavioral problems in externalizing behaviors and aggression, whereas older age at surgery was a significant predictor of worse behavioral outcomes in patients without mutations in high pLI genes.

The innovative technique of "presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation" (PLANA) offers a new approach within the domain of presurgical infant orthopedics for infants born with cleft lip and palate. Presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation introduces the utilization of the NoseAlign device in conjunction with medical adhesive tapes, designed to approximate and support displaced soft tissue nasolabial structures in patients with cleft, without an intraoral plate. The NoseAlign device, constructed from medical-grade silicone, consists of 2 tubular portions that fit into the nostrils, connected by a columella band. Notably, it also features a wave-shaped and curved horizontal lip band, resting on the upper lip, with elastic clasps for secure attachment to the face with medical adhesive tapes. Presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation therapy employs the NoseAlign device to support the collapsed nasal alar rim and cartilage, the displaced columella, the deviated nasal septum, and the displaced nasal alar base. This innovative approach minimizes the need for frequent office visits, making it particularly suitable for patients residing at a distance from specialized cleft centers. The prefabricated NoseAlign device offers effective support to nasal structures, making it suitable for unilateral and bilateral clefts. Importantly, the absence of an intraoral plate ensures it does not interfere with feeding. Presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation therapy, initiated as early as 1 to 2 weeks, leverages the plasticity of nasal soft tissue and cartilage to achieve the desired nasal form before primary surgery. Although presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation therapy does have some limitations, particularly in cases of medially collapsed alveolar segments, its simplicity, universal applicability, and patient-friendliness make it a promising technique in the presurgical infant orthopedics field.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To objectively quantify results of sagittal lip changes following Abbe flap reconstruction in patients with bilateral cleft lip. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective, observational study. SETTING/METHODS:Single institution, 8-year retrospective review. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:In total, 17 patients with bilateral cleft lip that underwent Abbe flap reconstruction were included in this study. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Patients had lateral photographs taken prior to Abbe flap reconstruction and at least 8 months post-Abbe flap. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Vegter's index, Sushner's S2 line and Burstone's B line reference lines were used for evaluation of sagittal lip changes. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used in analysis. RESULTS:The mean pre-Abbe flap upper to lower lip ratio, defined as Vegter's Lip Index, was 0.906 compared to a mean of 0.946 following Abbe flap reconstruction. The mean upper to lower lip ratio for Sushner's S2 and Burstone's B line exhibited an increase in upper lip sagittal projection from -0.164 to 1.459 and 0.259 to 0.957, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:This study quantifies sagittal changes to upper and lower lip position after Abbe flap reconstruction. These findings may aid in operative planning and patient/caregiver expectations during counseling.