Faculty Bibliography

Paired vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a promising strategy to potentiate recovery after neurological injury. This approach, which combines short bursts of electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve with rehabilitation exercises, received approval from the US Food and Drug Aministration in 2021 as the first neuromodulation-based therapy for chronic stroke. Because this treatment is increasingly implemented in clinical practice, there is a need to take stock of what we know about this approach and what we have yet to learn. Here, we provide a survey on the foundational basis of VNS therapy for stroke and offer insight into the mechanisms that underlie potentiated recovery, focusing on the principles of neuromodulatory reinforcement. We discuss the current state of observations regarding synaptic reorganization in motor networks that are enhanced by VNS, and we propose other prospective loci of neuromodulation that should be evaluated in the future. Finally, we highlight the future opportunities and challenges to be faced as this approach is increasingly translated to clinical use. Collectively, a clearer understanding of the mechanistic basis of VNS therapy may reveal ways to maximize its benefits.

BACKGROUND:Underlying intracranial stenosis is the most common cause of failed mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. Adjunct emergent stenting is sometimes performed to improve or maintain reperfusion, despite limited data regarding its safety or efficacy. METHODS:We conducted a prospective multicenter observational international cohort study. Patients were enrolled between January 2022 and December 2023 at 25 thrombectomy capable centers in North America, Europe, and Asia. Consecutive patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy were included if they were identified as having underlying intracranial stenosis, defined as 50-99% residual stenosis of the target vessel or intra-procedural re-occlusion. The primary outcome was functional independence, defined as modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days. After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores, we compared outcomes among patients who underwent adjunct emergent intracranial stenting (stenting) versus those who received mechanical thrombectomy alone. RESULTS:A total of 417 patients were included; 218 patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy alone (168 anterior circulation) and 199 with mechanical thrombectomy plus stenting (144 anterior circulation). Patients in the stenting group were less likely to be non-Hispanic White (51.8% vs 62.4%, p=0.03), and less likely to have diabetes (33.2% vs 43.1%, p=0.037) or hyperlipidemia (43.2% vs 56%, p= 0.009). In addition, there was a lower rate of IV thrombolysis use in the stenting group (18.6% vs 27.5%, p=0.03). There was a higher rate of successful reperfusion (modified Treatment In Cerebral Infarction score ≥ 2B) in the stenting versus mechanical thrombectomy alone group (90.9% vs 77.9%, p<0.001) and a higher rate of a 24-hour infarct volume of <30 mL (n=260, 67.9% vs 50.3%, p=0.005). The overall complication rate was higher in the stenting group (12.6% vs 5%, p=0.006), but there was not a significant difference in the rate of symptomatic hemorrhage (9% vs 5.5%, p=0.162). Functional independence at 90 days was significantly higher in the stenting group (42.2% vs. 28.4%, adjusted odds ratio 2.67; 95% CI, 1.66-4.32). CONCLUSIONS:In patients with underlying stenosis who achieved reperfusion with mechanical thrombectomy, adjunct emergent stenting was associated with better functional outcome without a significantly increased risk of symptomatic hemorrhage. REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05403593.

OBJECTIVE:This study examines the American Headache Society First Contact-Headache in Primary Care program metrics to date in order to assess the program's reach and provide direction for future initiatives. BACKGROUND:Approximately 4 million primary care office visits annually are headache-specific encounters. Therefore, it is important that primary care providers are knowledgeable about headache management. Recognizing the need, the American Headache Society First Contact designed the comprehensive First Contact-Headache in Primary Care program with input from an advisory board comprised of a diverse group of physicians and advanced practice providers with backgrounds in family and internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and neurology. This is the first study to assess the reach of the program and critically examine how to best meet the needs of clinicians and patients going forward. METHODS:We report descriptive statistics for the First Contact website metrics from October 2020 to June 2023 and grand rounds program data from May 2020 to December 2023. We also conducted a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from presentations conducted at two large national family medicine symposia, as well as a thematic analysis of the question: "Please indicate what areas of your practice could be enhanced or improved with additional education?" RESULTS:The First Contact program homepage was the second most visited page on the American Headache Society website (>100,000 views). A total of 20 podcast episodes were created for the program (>3500 plays). The First Contact program held 99 events (72 institutional grand rounds, 22 State-level meetings, and five national meetings), reaching >7000 clinicians. The institutional grand rounds and state-level meetings were held across 27 States and Washington D.C. Only 31.9% (30/94) of First Contact program events (excluding national meetings) occurred in the West census region, which has the fewest headache subspecialists and lowest headache subspecialist density in the United States. When examining survey data of participants who attended the two virtual national family medicine symposia (39.3% response rate, N = 636/1620), 85.7% (544/635) reported being "completely confident" or "very confident" in their ability to recognize and accurately diagnose patients presenting with a primary complaint of headache and 81.5% (517/634) reported being "completely confident" or "very confident" in their ability to develop evidence-based treatment plans that are tailored to the needs of individual patients. The use of diagnostic tools to recognize patients with migraine (60.4%, 384/636) and translating standards of care to the practice setting (42.5%, 270/636) were the most reported intended changes by participants. Most participants reported that program content was of clinical relevance and would improve their patients' outcomes (90.5% [571/631] and 90.6% [572/631], respectively). Over three-quarters (77.8%, 495/636) of participants reported areas of their practice that can be improved by additional education specifically regarding workflow, diagnosis, and management. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study evaluates one of the first national initiatives for primary care education. Data from the two First Contact Family Medicine national symposia indicate the program is generally well received with most participants reporting improved confidence and intention to implement key changes in practice to improve care for patients with headache; however, there remain areas of exploration for education that could further enhance participant experience and expand the reach of the initiatives. Areas for future programming include continued education on multifactorial approaches to headache treatment and suggestions for addressing cost, insurance, and time constraints. Also, future work may examine where the First Contact program might focus initiatives based on specific areas of need in headache care, such as geographic "desert" areas, racial and ethnic disparities, and uninsured/underinsured populations.

BACKGROUND:There is practice heterogeneity in the use, type, and duration of prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASM) in patients hospitalized with acute nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS:We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing ASM primary prophylaxis in adults hospitalized with acute nontraumatic ICH. The following population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) questions were assessed: (1) Should ASM versus no ASM be used in patients with acute ICH with no history of clinical or electrographic seizures? (2) If an ASM is used, should levetiracetam (LEV) or phenytoin/fosphenytoin (PHT/fPHT) be preferentially used? and (3) If an ASM is used, should a long (> 7 days) versus short (≤ 7 days) duration of prophylaxis be used? The main outcomes assessed were early seizure (≤ 14 days), late seizures (> 14 days), adverse events, mortality, and functional and cognitive outcomes. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to generate recommendations. RESULTS:The initial literature search yielded 1,988 articles, and 15 formed the basis of the recommendations. PICO 1: although there was no significant impact of ASM on the outcomes of early or late seizure or mortality, meta-analyses demonstrated increased adverse events and higher relative risk of poor functional outcomes at 90 days with prophylactic ASM use. PICO 2: we did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of PHT/fPHT compared to LEV for early seizures or adverse events, although point estimates tended to favor LEV. PICO 3: based on one decision analysis, quality-adjusted life-years were increased with a shorter duration of ASM prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS:We suggest avoidance of prophylactic ASM in hospitalized adult patients with acute nontraumatic ICH (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). If used, we suggest LEV over PHT/fPHT (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) for a short duration (≤ 7 days; weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence).

T cell receptor (TCR) gene therapy is a potent form of cellular immunotherapy in which patient T cells are genetically engineered to express TCRs with defined tumor reactivity. However, the isolation of therapeutic TCRs is complicated by both the general scarcity of tumor-specific T cells among patient T cell repertoires and the patient-specific nature of T cell epitopes expressed on tumors. Here we describe a high-throughput, personalized TCR discovery pipeline that enables the assembly of complex synthetic TCR libraries in a one-pot reaction, followed by pooled expression in reporter T cells and functional genetic screening against patient-derived tumor or antigen-presenting cells. We applied the method to screen thousands of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)-derived TCRs from multiple patients and identified dozens of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell-derived TCRs with potent tumor reactivity, including TCRs that recognized patient-specific neoantigens.

BACKGROUND:The goal of precision oncology is to find effective therapeutics for every patient. Through the inclusion of emerging therapeutics in a high-throughput drug screening platform, our functional genomics pipeline inverts the common paradigm to identify patient populations that are likely to benefit from novel therapeutic strategies. APPROACH/METHODS:Utilizing drug screening data across a panel of 46 cancer cell lines from 11 tumor lineages, we identified an ovarian cancer-specific sensitivity to the first-in-class CRL4 inhibitors KH-4-43 and 33-11. CRL4 (i.e., Cullin-4 RING E3 ubiquitin ligase) is known to be dysregulated in a variety of cancer contexts, making it an attractive therapeutic target. Unlike proteasome inhibitors that are associated with broad toxicity, CRL4 inhibition offers the potential for tumor-specific effects. RESULTS:We observed that CRL4 inhibition negatively regulates core gene signatures that are upregulated in ovarian tumors and significantly slowed tumor growth as compared to the standard of care, cisplatin, in OVCAR8 xenografts. Building on this, we performed combination drug screening in conjunction with proteomic and transcriptomic profiling to identify ways to improve the antitumor effects of CRL4 inhibition in ovarian cancer models. CRL4 inhibition consistently resulted in activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade at both the transcriptomic and protein levels, suggesting that survival signaling is induced in response to CRL4 inhibition. These observations were concordant with the results of the combination drug screens in seven ovarian cancer cell lines that showed CRL4 inhibition cooperates with MEK inhibition. Preclinical studies in OVCAR8 and A2780 xenografts confirmed the therapeutic potential of the combination of KH-4-43 and trametinib, which extended overall survival and slowed tumor progression relative to either single agent or the standard of care. CONCLUSIONS:Together, these data demonstrate the prospective utility of functional modeling pipelines for therapeutic development and underscore the clinical potential of CRL4 inhibition in the ovarian cancer context. HIGHLIGHTS/CONCLUSIONS:A precision medicine pipeline identifies ovarian cancer sensitivity to CRL4 inhibitors. CRL4 inhibition induces activation of MAPK signalling as identified by RNA sequencing, proteomics, and phosphoproteomics. Inhibitor combinations that target both CRL4 and this CRL4 inhibitor-induced survival signalling enhance ovarian cancer sensitivity to treatment.

OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to externally validate the Memory Assessment Clinics Scale for Epilepsy (MAC-E), a brief self-report measure of subjective memory complaints in adults with epilepsy. METHODS:A cross-sectional study was conducted including adults with focal pharmacoresistant epilepsy from three Level 4 epilepsy centers in the U.S., who completed the MAC-E as part of a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, and goodness-of-fit criteria were calculated to assess model fit: comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean residual (SRMR). Item response theory models were constructed, and Mokken analysis was used to assess discrimination and unidimensionality. Internal consistency was evaluated with McDonald's Omega. RESULTS:values for each of the 5 factors (0.58-0.91 and 0.34-0.82, respectively). MAC-E items demonstrated high levels of discrimination as well as the ability to evaluate across the entirety of each latent trait. Score responses were uniformly distributed across latent traits, and unidimensionality was established by factor (all H coefficients > 0.4). Internal consistency was high across factors (omega range: 0.77-0.88). CONCLUSIONS:Results of this study demonstrate good external validation of the MAC-E in an independent, multicenter cohort of adults with epilepsy. These findings provide further support that the MAC-E is a psychometrically valid, self-report instrument to assess every-day memory abilities in adults with epilepsy in both clinical and research settings.

BACKGROUND:Early neurological deterioration (END) and recurrence of vessel blockage frequently complicate intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Several studies have indicated the potential effectiveness of the early initiation (within < 24 h) of antiplatelet therapy (APT) after IVT. However, conflicting results have been reported by other studies. We aimed to offer a thorough overview of the current literature through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS:Our systematic review and meta-analysis were prospectively registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023488173) following the PRISMA guidelines. We systematically searched Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, and Cochrane Library until May 5, 2024. Rayyan. ai facilitated the screening process. The R statistical programming language was used to calculate the odds ratios and conduct a meta-analysis. Our primary outcomes were excellent functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. RESULTS:Eight studies involving 2,134 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Early APT showed statistically significant increased odds of excellent functional recovery (mRS 0-1) compared to the standard APT group (OR, 1.81; [95% CI: 1.10, 2.98], p = 0.02). However, we found no differences between the early and standard APT groups regarding sICH (OR, 1.74; [95% CI: 0.91, 3.33], p = 0.10) and mortality (OR, 0.88; [95% CI: 0.62, 1.24]; p = 0.47). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Early APT within 24 h of IVT in stroke patients is safe, with no increase in bleeding risk, and has a positive effect on excellent functional recovery. However, there was a statistically insignificant trend of increased sICH with early APT, and the current evidence is based on highly heterogeneous studies. Further large-scale RCTs are warranted.