Searched for: Department/Unit:Population Health
Prenatal Air Pollution Exposure and Autism Spectrum Disorder in the ECHO Consortium
Ghassabian, Akhgar; Dickerson, Aisha S; Wang, Yuyan; Braun, Joseph M; Bennett, Deborah H; Croen, Lisa A; LeWinn, Kaja Z; Burris, Heather H; Habre, Rima; Lyall, Kristen; Frazier, Jean A; Glass, Hannah C; Hooper, Stephen R; Joseph, Robert M; Karr, Catherine J; Schmidt, Rebecca J; Friedman, Chloe; Karagas, Margaret R; Stroustrup, Annemarie; Straughen, Jennifer K; Dunlop, Anne L; Ganiban, Jody M; Leve, Leslie D; Wright, Rosalind J; McEvoy, Cindy T; Hipwell, Alison E; Giardino, Angelo P; Santos, Hudson P; Krause, Hannah; Oken, Emily; Camargo, Carlos A; Oh, Jiwon; Loftus, Christine; O'Shea, T Michael; O'Connor, Thomas G; Szpiro, Adam; Volk, Heather E
PMCID:13347653
PMID: 42428257
ISSN: 1552-9924
CID: 6064232
Diagnosis and Staging of Patients with Prostate Cancer: Report from the 2025 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) Diagnostics
Fanti, Stefano; Turco, Fabio; Tombal, Bertrand; Walz, Jochen; Hofman, Michael S; Hadaschik, Boris; Emmett, Louise; Tilki, Derya; Pecoraro, Giovanna; Salfi, Giuseppe; Attard, Gerhardt; Beltran, Himisha; Bjartell, Anders; Briganti, Alberto; Burger, Irene A; Castro, Elena; Cerci, Juliano J; Chiti, Arturo; Cooperberg, Matthew; Fizazi, Karim; Fossati, Nicola; Gafita, Andrei; Gallina, Andrea; Goffin, Karolien; Horvath, Lisa G; Hugosson, Jonas; Iagaru, Andrei; James, Nicholas D; Kasivisvanathan, Veeru; Koh, Dow-Mu; Kristiansen, Glen; Kumar, Rakesh; Lecouvet, Frederic; Loeb, Stacy; McKay, Rana R; Morris, Michael J; Murphy, Declan G; Murthy, Vedang; Naoun, Natacha; Oprea-Lager, Daniela E; Ost, Piet; O'Sullivan, Joe; Padhani, Anwar R; Palapattu, Ganesh; Paone, Gaetano; Petralia, Giuseppe; Roobol, Monique J; Sartor, Oliver A; Sathekge, Mike; Schuster, David M; Seibert, Tyler M; Spratt, Daniel E; Tempany, Clare; Tunariu, Nina; Vargas, H Alberto; Vogl, Ursula M; Wyatt, Alexander W; Zilli, Thomas; Lin, Hui-Ming; Omlin, Aurelius; Gillessen, Silke; Herrmann, Ken
BACKGROUND:For over a decade the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) covers a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. In 2025, a dedicated event was organised to discuss key questions in clinical management of patients with prostate cancer (PC) related to diagnostic tools (APCCC Diagnostics). Here we present the voting results of the APCCC Diagnostics questions. OBJECTIVE; DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTECIPANTS: APCCC Diagnostics 2025 is a pilot project. The scientific committee for APCCC Diagnostics 2025 developed 88 multiple-choice consensus questions on six different topics. Prior to the conference, the panel members (''panellists'') voted on these questions via a web-based survey. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS/METHODS:Consensus was only reached on 17 of 88 questions (19%), of which six (7%) received a strong consensus. Specifically, consensus was reached for two of 17 questions (14%) in "how to diagnose PC"; seven of 16 (44%) in "how to stage PC"; three of 14 (21%) in "Biochemical Recurrence Scenario"; two of 11 (18%) in "metastatic disease: what to do?"; zero of 18 (0%) in "monitoring metastatic PC"; and three of 12 (25%) in "radioligand therapy and imaging." CONCLUSIONS:The voting results and their discussion may assist physicians in navigating controversial areas of clinical management related to diagnosis, staging, and restaging in the different clinical settings for PC, particularly where high-level evidence is scarce or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research.
PMID: 42399196
ISSN: 1873-7560
CID: 6063842
Engagement With Mobile Health Cardiac Rehabilitation Varies Widely Among Older Adults With Ischemic Heart Disease
Graves, Claire; Schoenthaler, Antoinette; Sweeney, Greg; Johanek, Camila; Meng, Yuchen; Grant, Eleonore; Whiteson, Jonathan; George, Barbara; Marzo, Kevin; Kovell, Lara C; Troxel, Andrea B; Adhikari, Samrachana; Dodson, John A
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Mobile health cardiac rehabilitation may improve access to care among older adults with ischemic heart disease, but engagement remains poorly understood. We analyzed weekly engagement data from the RESILIENT (Rehabilitation Using Mobile Health for Older Adults with Ischemic Heart Disease in the Home Setting) trial, a large, randomized trial of mobile health cardiac rehabilitation in older adults conducted in the United States. METHODS:Data from 298 intervention participants were analyzed. Weekly engagement was scored from 0 to 11 based on exercise entry (7 points), communication with exercise therapist (2 points), video viewing (1 point), and blood pressure measurement (1 point). Latent class analysis identified digital engagement phenotypes. Participant characteristics were compared, and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with phenotype membership. RESULTS:Median age was 71.0 years, 28% were women, 23% were non-White, and 62% were enrolled after elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Latent class analysis identified 3 phenotypes: persistently low (n = 81), intermediate declining (n = 93), and persistently high (n = 124). Participants with persistently low engagement were more likely to be non-White (48% vs 12% vs 15%, P < .001), Medicaid enrolled (22% vs 8% vs 7%, P = .001), have less than high school education (16% vs 4% vs 3%, P < .001), have frailty phenotype (28% vs 10% vs 7%, P < .001), and have a greater mean number of comorbidities (3.1 vs 3.0 vs 2.6; P = .012). After adjustment, non-White race and frailty remained independently associated with low engagement. Improvement in 6-minute walk test distance varied: 20.8 m (low), 29.7 m (intermediate), and 54.5 m (high) (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS:Three distinct digital engagement phenotypes emerged. Persistently low engagement was more common among non-White and frail participants, underscoring ongoing disparities despite efforts to overcome the digital divide.
PMID: 42384598
ISSN: 1932-751x
CID: 6062952
Air pollution and autism-like traits: sensitive periods and joint effects of exposure to sources and constituents of fine particulate matter
Lichtiger, Lydia; Yeung, Edwina; Lin, Tzu-Chun; Putnick, Diane L; Sundaram, Rajeshwari; Bell, Erin M; Rahman, Md Mostafijur; Thurston, George; Wang, Yuyan; Ghassabian, Akhgar
Growing evidence suggests that exposure to air pollution during early life is associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, results have been inconsistent for autism-like traits and in low exposure settings. Here, we assessed sensitive windows of exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3) and joint effects of exposure to sources and constituents of PM2.5 on autism-like traits among 798 children in the Upstate KIDS cohort. Residential air pollution exposures were assessed with machine learning and land use regression models. Autism-like traits at age 10 were assessed via the ASD subscale on the Child Behavior Checklist. Treed distributed lag mixture model was used to identify critical windows of exposure to PM2.5, NO2, and O3 and partial linear single index model was applied to estimate contributions of sources and constituents of PM2.5 on autism-like traits. The median PM2.5 exposures were 8.36 and 8.00 μg/m3 for pregnancy and the first year of life. We did not observe critical windows of exposure to PM2.5, NO2, or O3 for autism-like traits. Exposures to elemental carbon (EC) PM2.5 during gestation and to EC and traffic PM2.5 during the first year of life were associated with higher odds of autism-like traits (prenatal EC adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.72, 95% CI: 1.04-2.83; first year EC aOR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.21-2.46; traffic aOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.71). Our results suggest that exposure to motor vehicle traffic sources of PM2.5 may drive previously reported associations between total PM2.5 and autism-like traits.
PMID: 42431535
ISSN: 1096-0953
CID: 6064362
Epidemiologic approaches to policy research - examinations of single policies, policy clusters, and policy climates: Conceptualization, measurement, and analysis
Zubizarreta, Dougie; Beccia, Ariel L; Matthay, Ellicott C; Jahn, Jaquelyn L; Schnake-Mahl, Alina
Given intensifying political polarization and sweeping legal actions targeting marginalized populations across the U.S., there are increasing calls to examine how these policy changes are shaping population health and health inequities. To meet these calls, researchers have developed and applied various approaches to support rigorous, theoretically-informed quantitative research on policies and health. To date, much of the literature has examined single policies; however, there is growing interest in examining alternative ways of conceptualizing policy exposures, namely as policy clusters or policy climates, to better capture how policies are enacted (and experienced) in "real-world" contexts. To advance this work, greater clarity is needed regarding how different approaches to policy conceptualization, measurement, and analysis align with distinct research questions and goals, ranging from identifying specific, manipulable policy levers to informing ways of extending the "policy space" beyond already existing laws to support broader social change. In this essay, we help fill this gap by outlining key issues related to policy exposures, including conceptualization, methods for measure development, and analytic approaches for understanding the relationship between policies and health. We end by discussing future directions for population health research on single policies, policy clusters, and policy climates, with an eye towards advancing health equity.
PMID: 42379093
ISSN: 1873-5347
CID: 6062682
Telehealth Utilization for Prostate Cancer Management in the Veteran Affairs Healthcare System: A Study from 2016 to 2023
Nakhostin-Ansari, Amin; Khera, Zain; Becker, Daniel; Dardashti, Navid; Loeb, Stacy; Makarov, Danil; Nicholson, Andrew; Orstad, Stephanie L; Thomas, Jerry; Zullig, Leah L; Sherman, Scott E
BACKGROUND:There are limited studies on telehealth use patterns among patients with prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE:We assessed the patterns of delivery of care for prostate cancer management in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). DESIGN/METHODS:A retrospective observational cohort study from January 2016 to February 2023. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Data were from the VHA's Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW). Veterans with a new diagnosis of prostate cancer were included in the study. Those who died within 1 year of diagnosis, had missing staging information, or had no prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy, or treatment recorded within 2 years of initial diagnosis were excluded. MAIN MEASURES/METHODS:Veterans were categorized into watchful waiting, active surveillance, and active treatment management groups based on subsequent care received and categorized into National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk categories. We categorized outpatient urology or oncology visits as telephone-based, video-based, or in-person using administrative stop codes. We used logistic regression models to evaluate the characteristics associated with at least one video/virtual visit. KEY RESULTS/RESULTS:In total, 60,381 Veterans were included in the study (20.3% low risk, 49.8% intermediate risk, and 29.8% high risk). Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, less than 6% and 9% of Veterans had at least one urology or oncology video visit, respectively, in the first year after diagnosis across all management groups. In the regression model, Veterans aged 60 and older were less likely to have video visits for both urology and oncology. In contrast, living in urban areas, being diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and being in the intermediate NCCN risk group were associated with higher odds of having at least one video visit in both specialties. CONCLUSIONS:Despite improvements in telehealth use among Veterans with prostate cancer, telehealth utilization, particularly video visits, remains low, warranting attention from leadership and policymakers.
PMID: 42414805
ISSN: 1525-1497
CID: 6063632
GLP-1 medications: use and interest in a representative survey of Finns
Jallinoja, Piia Tuuli; Pietiläinen, Kirsi H; Chang, Virginia W
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:GLP-1-based medications have rapidly reshaped the landscape of obesity treatment. Semaglutide was approved for obesity treatment in 2021 in the US and 2022 in Europe, sparking global interest, and the GLP-1/GIP dual-agonist tirzepatide has demonstrated even greater efficacy. However, survey-based data on who uses or considers these medications-particularly across socioeconomic groups, BMI categories, and weight management experiences-remain limited. SUBJECTS/METHODS/METHODS:A nationally representative online survey of Finnish adults (n = 1729, of which 1693 were included) was conducted in June 2025 via a market research company using quota sampling. Use and awareness of GLP-1 medications for obesity were measured with a single item listing widely known brands-Ozempic, Wegovy, Zepbound, and Mounjaro-to aid recognition. In regression analyses, current, past, and potential users (n = 322) were combined. RESULTS:In total, 3.5% reported current and 2.0% past use, and 13.5% expressed interest in future use. Notably, ~40% of individuals with obesity reported no interest. Bivariate analysis showed that current use was more common among women, those aged 50-69, those with household income exceeding €70,000, individuals with higher BMI, frequent weight loss attempts, experiences of weight-based discrimination, and self-blame. Multivariable analysis showed that current, past, and potential use had strongest associations with BMI ≥30.0 kg/m², repeated or persistent weight loss attempts, experiences of discriminatory treatment due to weight, self-blaming thoughts and hopeful perceptions of GLP-1 medications. Concern about serious health risks was associated with lower likelihood of use or interest. CONCLUSIONS:GLP-1-based medications are gaining recognition, but uptake remains heterogeneous and many individuals with obesity remain uninterested. Concerns about potential health risks persist. Attitudes toward these medications are shaped not only by weight status but also by prior weight management experiences and perceptions. Clinical communication should be sensitive to these factors.
PMID: 42414609
ISSN: 1476-5497
CID: 6063532
Lymphovascular Invasion in SOUND-Eligible Breast Cancer: Implications for Occult Axillary Nodal Metastasis
Amburn, Thomas; Sporn, Matthew; Arthurs, Likolani; Marsh, Caitlin; Sharma, Acacia; Wu, Jiaqi; DiMaggio, Charles; Axelrod, Deborah; Schnabel, Freya; Gemignani, Mary L
BACKGROUND:The SOUND randomized controlled trial demonstrated that omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is noninferior to performing SLNB in early-stage breast cancer. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI), however, is an adverse pathologic feature associated with axillary nodal metastasis. In this study, we evaluated the association of LVI with occult axillary nodal metastasis in early-stage, SOUND-eligible breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed patients with cT1N0 breast cancer from 2011 to 2025 who underwent upfront breast-conserving surgery and lymph node surgery who met SOUND trial eligibility criteria. Clinicopathologic variables were collected, and Pearson's chi-square test, unpaired t-test, and logistic regression were used to analyze the cohort. RESULTS:We identified 364 cT1N0 breast tumors, of which 63 (17.3%) were LVI-present. The overall nodal upstaging rate (pN+) was 11.3%. However, pN+ among LVI-present patients was 33.3% compared with 6.6% among LVI-absent patients (OR 7.03; 95%CI 3.51, 14.05; p < 0.001). Only 1 case (0.3%) had extensive nodal disease (pN2) in which LVI was present. On multivariate analysis for predictors of LVI-present, premenopausal (OR 4.23, 95%CI 2.31, 7.76; p < 0.001) was significantly associated with LVI-present, and well differentiated was significantly associated with LVI-absent (OR 0.060, 95%CI 0.010, 0.47; p = 0.0071). On multivariate analysis for predictors of pN+, only LVI-present (OR 6.47, 95%CI 3.14, 13.34 p < 0.001) was significantly associated with pN+. CONCLUSIONS:Pathologic-confirmed LVI was present in one-third of patients with SOUND-eligible breast cancer with axillary nodal metastasis. LVI-present was independently predictive of axillary nodal metastasis and may have implications for decision-making regarding SLNB-omission.
PMID: 42418085
ISSN: 1534-4681
CID: 6063812
Performance of Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Models in Different Racial and Ethnic Groups in the United States: Results From the Lung Cancer Cohort Consortium
Feng, Xiaoshuang; Guida, Florence; Guenoun, Aghiles; Alcala, Karine; Aldrich, Melinda C; Arslan, Alan A; Cai, Qiuyin; Zheng, Wei; Chen, Chu; Triplette, Matthew; Tinker, Lesley F; Patel, Alpa V; Liao, Linda M; Sinha, Rashmi; Rohan, Thomas E; Sesso, Howard D; Zhang, Xuehong; Visvanathan, Kala; Wang, Ying; Johansson, Mattias; Robbins, Hilary A
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Racial and ethnic disparities are a concern in lung cancer screening. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To investigate the performance of risk prediction models to define screening eligibility across 4 U.S. racial and ethnic groups. DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Cohort study. SETTING/UNASSIGNED:United States, Lung Cancer Cohort Consortium. PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:641 830 participants aged 50 to 80 years with a smoking history from 12 U.S. cohorts, including 6390 Asian, 9781 Hispanic, 39 872 non-Hispanic Black, and 585 787 non-Hispanic White participants. MEASUREMENTS/UNASSIGNED:Calibration and discrimination were quantified for 16 lung cancer prediction models. Then, screening-related metrics were calculated after applying model thresholds to select the same number of eligible participants as the 2021 criteria from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF-2021). These included eligibility, sensitivity, and efficiency measured as estimated number needed to screen (NNS; the ratio between participants and lung cancer cases) for each strategy or prediction model in each racial and ethnic group. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:General patterns across the 16 models included substantial underestimation of lung cancer risk in non-Hispanic Black participants (expected-observed ratio < 0.75 for 11 of 16 models), lower discrimination in Asian participants than all other groups (13 of 16 models), and lower discrimination in non-Hispanic Black than non-Hispanic White participants (15 of 16 models). When a same-sized screening-eligible population as USPSTF-2021 (38.0%) was enforced, all risk-based strategies achieved better average estimated screening efficiency and reduced racial and ethnic differences in efficiency compared with USPSTF-2021. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Model 2012 (PLCOm2012) and Life Years gained From Screening-Computed Tomography model (LYFS-CT) performed best (mean estimated NNS, 36.5 [SD, 8.8] and 40.1 [SD, 8.2], respectively). However, no strategy could simultaneously optimize eligibility, sensitivity, and efficiency while also reducing racial and ethnic differences. LIMITATION/UNASSIGNED:Smaller sample for Asian and Hispanic participants. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:To optimize efficiency and minimize its variation across racial and ethnic groups, risk-based strategies were superior to USPSTF criteria. Further optimization of prediction models for the diverse U.S. population is needed. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE/UNASSIGNED:U.S. National Cancer Institute, Lung Cancer Research Foundation, and Cancer Research UK.
PMID: 42372272
ISSN: 1539-3704
CID: 6062412
Identifying populations with faster cognitive decline using blood-based biomarkers
Pike, James Russell; Liu, Yongmei; Chisolm, Theresa; Deal, Jennifer; Ding, Jingzhong; Gottesman, Rebecca F; Huang, Alison; Hughes, Timothy M; Lohman, Kurt; McCray, Mason; Mosley, Thomas H; Nguyen, Anh Tram; Palta, Priya; Reed, Nicholas; Sullivan, Kevin J; Thyagarajan, Bharat; Walker, Keenan A; Coresh, Josef
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Identifying individuals who undergo cognitive decline is vital to the success of prevention trials that aim to slow cognitive decline. Yet, the benefits of using blood-based biomarkers of neurodegeneration, as well as amyloid and tau, to enrich population-based prevention trials have not been quantified. METHODS: = 552). RESULTS:Elevated plasma biomarker levels identified dementia-free older adults with faster cognitive decline. By selecting participants with Quanterix SiMoA measurements of neurofilament light > 30.65 pg/mL, the sample size needed to detect a 33% reduction in cognitive decline in a clinical trial decreased by 57%. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Clinical trials can use plasma biomarkers as a screening tool to increase statistical power.
PMCID:13344891
PMID: 42421822
ISSN: 2352-8737
CID: 6064022