Faculty Bibliography

Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at increased risk for mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic, with prior data suggesting women may be particularly vulnerable. Our global mental health study aimed to examine factors associated with gender differences in psychological distress and depressive symptoms among HCWs during COVID-19. Across 22 countries in South America, Europe, Asia and Africa, 32,410 HCWs participated in the COVID-19 HEalth caRe wOrkErS (HEROES) study between March 2020 and February 2021. They completed the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and questions about pandemic-relevant exposures. Consistently across countries, women reported elevated mental health problems compared to men. Women also reported increased COVID-19-relevant stressors, including insufficient personal protective equipment and less support from colleagues, while men reported increased contact with COVID-19 patients. At the country level, HCWs in countries with higher gender inequality reported less mental health problems. Higher COVID-19 mortality rates were associated with increased psychological distress merely among women. Our findings suggest that among HCWs, women may have been disproportionately exposed to COVID-19-relevant stressors at the individual and country level. This highlights the importance of considering gender in emergency response efforts to safeguard women's well-being and ensure healthcare system preparedness during future public health crises.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/UNASSIGNED:The incorporation of digital technologies and their use in youth's everyday lives has been increasing rapidly over the past several decades with possible impacts on youth development and mental health. This narrative review aimed to consider how the use of digital technologies may be influencing brain development underlying adaptive and maladaptive screen-related behaviors. RECENT FINDINGS/UNASSIGNED:To explore and provide direction for further scientific inquiry, an international group of experts considered what is known, important gaps in knowledge, and how a research agenda might be pursued regarding relationships between screen media activity and neurodevelopment from infancy through childhood and adolescence. While an understanding of brain-behavior relationships involving screen media activity has been emerging, significant gaps exist that have important implications for the health of developing youth. SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:Specific considerations regarding brain-behavior relationships involving screen media activity exist for infancy, toddlerhood, and early childhood; middle childhood; and adolescence. Transdiagnostic frameworks may provide a foundation for guiding future research efforts. Translating knowledge gained into better interventions and policy to promote healthy development is important in a rapidly changing digital technology environment.

Around 5% of the children and teenagers worldwide are affected by Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder [ADHD], making it a major public health concern. Recently, demand for assessments has substantially increased, putting strain on healthcare and waiting lists. There is concern that pressure to clear service bottlenecks is leading to variable quality and reliability of ADHD assessments in this population. The ADHD Assessment Quality Assurance Standard for Children and Teenagers [CAAQAS] aims to address this by proposing a quality framework for ADHD assessments in this population. CAAQAS is intended to complement formal training, provide support to clinicians, inform commissioners, and empower children, teenagers, and caregivers on what to expect from an assessment and assessment report. Our goal is to promote evidence-based high-quality assessments, improve diagnostic accuracy, and reduce the risks of overdiagnosis, misdiagnosis, and underdiagnosis. Seven key topics were identified by authors which guided the development of this expert consensus statement. It was agreed that a high-quality diagnostic assessment of ADHD in this population commences with advance preparation to facilitate engagement of the child or teenager and caregivers. The consensus agreed that the minimum/essential standards for assessing and diagnosing ADHD adopt a systematic approach from pre-assessment through assessment to post-diagnostic stage, enabling ADHD to be disentangled from differential diagnoses. The process applies multi-source information to inform an assessment of development history and early risk factors, history of physical, mental health and other neurodevelopmental conditions, family, educational, and social histories. Assessment of core ADHD symptoms should include specific developmentally appropriate examples of associated difficulties and impairments. Neuropsychiatric and physical comorbidities should be assessed and identified. Recommendations for report writing are intended to facilitate effective communication between ADHD specialists and other services, and we highlight the importance of linking the diagnosis to an appropriate post-diagnostic discussion. Further, we discuss core competencies required to conduct a diagnostic assessment of ADHD in children and teenagers.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:This study examined the potential interplay between motor development and intervention in support of action understanding. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Eighty nine-month-old infants completed a tool-use training session and goal imitation paradigm that assessed action understanding in counterbalanced order. A metric of motor development was obtained using the Early Motor Questionnaire. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Results indicated that training improved action understanding, particularly for those infants who started out with lower means-end skills. Results further indicated that infants who did not receive any training experience in the lab beforehand, drew on their existing means-end skills. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:These results emphasize independent contributions of training and motor development on action understanding and shed light on the interaction between training and individual motor readiness in facilitating action understanding in infancy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:Trauma-related nightmares (TRNs) are a hallmark symptom of PTSD and are highly correlated with PTSD severity and poor sleep quality. Given the salience and arousal associated with TRNs, they might be an effective target for imaginal exposures during Prolonged Exposure (PE) therapy. As a first step in this line of research, the current study compared participants' emotional reactivity during recollection of TRNs to their recollection of the index traumatic event. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Seventeen trauma-exposed participants with clinical or sub-clinical PTSD who reported frequent TRNs engaged in script-driven imagery using scripts depicting their index trauma and their most trauma-like TRN. Heart rate (HRR), skin conductance (SCR), corrugator EMG (EMGR) responses, and emotional ratings were recorded. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:HRR, SCR, and EMGR did not differ significantly between trauma-related and TRN scripts. Bayesian analyses confirmed support for the null hypothesis, indicating no differences. With the exception of "Sadness," for which TRNs elicited significantly lower ratings than trauma scripts, individual emotion ratings showed no significant differences, suggesting likely parity between the emotionality of trauma-related and TRN recollections. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Together, TRN content elicited psychophysiological reactivity similar to that of the index trauma in this pilot study. Upon replication, studies testing TRNs as potential targets for imaginal exposures during PE may be warranted.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:A pilot study to preliminarily examine the effects of Prism EFP NeuroFeedback (NF) in adult ADHD. METHOD/UNASSIGNED:Prism EFP NF is a form of NF specifically designed to target emotional dysregulation (ED) through down regulation of amygdala activity. Prism EFP NF has been shown to improve other disorders with significant ED. Nine participants with adult ADHD received an open trial of Prism EFP NF consisting of fifteen sessions over 8 weeks; all completed at least 5 weeks of treatment with seven completing all 8 weeks. Outcomes were assessed by change in ADHD symptoms from baseline to End of Treatment. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:About two-third reduction was seen in total DSM ADHD symptom scores (primary outcome measure) with improvement observed in all other clinical measures. No significant adverse events were seen. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:This preliminary trial found substantial effects of Prism EFP NF on ADHD/ED symptoms and global impairment.

Conventionally, nanocarriers are used to regulate the controlled release of therapeutic payloads. Increasingly, they can also be designed to have an intrinsic therapeutic effect. For example, a positively charged nanocarrier can bind damage-associated molecular patterns, inhibiting toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway activation and thus modulating inflammation. These nucleic acid-binding nanomaterials (NABNs), which scavenge pro-inflammatory stimuli, exist in diverse forms, ranging from soluble polymers to nanoparticles and 2D nanosheets. Unlike conventional drugs that primarily address inflammation symptoms, these NABPs target the upstream inflammation initiation pathway by removing the agonists responsible for inflammation. Many NABNs have demonstrated effectiveness in murine models of inflammatory diseases. However, these scavengers have not been systematically studied and compared within a single setting. Herein, we screen a subset of the most potent NABNs to define their relative efficiency in scavenging cell-free nucleic acids and inhibiting various TLR pathways. This study helps interpret existing in vivo results and provides insights into the future design of anti-inflammatory nanocarriers.

Prior studies reported mixed effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of children and adolescents with ADHD, but they were mainly cross-sectional and without controls. To clarify the impact, we searched Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline, and PsychINFO until 18/11/2023 and conducted a systematic review of controlled longitudinal cohort studies (Prospero: CRD42022308166). The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess quality. We identified 6 studies. Worsening of mental health symptoms was more evident in ADHD or control group according to symptom considered and context. However, those with ADHD had more persistent elevated symptoms and remained an at-risk population. Sleep problems deteriorated more significantly in those with ADHD. Lower pre-COVID emotion regulation skills and greater rumination were associated with worse mental health outcomes, and longer screen time with poorer sleep. Quality was rated as low in most studies, mainly due to self-report outcome measures and no information on attrition rates. Despite these limitations, results suggest a predominantly negative impact on youths with ADHD and may guide clinical practice and policy.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:An expert consensus approach was used to determine the adequacy of children's psychopharmacology and to examine whether adequacy varied by demographic or clinical characteristics. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Data were from the baseline interview of 601 children, ages 6-12 years, who had visited one of nine outpatient mental health clinics and participated in the Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms study. Children and parents were interviewed with the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia and the Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents to assess the child's psychiatric symptoms and lifetime mental health services use, respectively. An expert consensus approach informed by published treatment guidelines was used to determine the adequacy of children's psychotropic medication treatment. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Black children (compared with White children; OR=1.84, 95% CI=1.53-2.23) and those with anxiety disorders (vs. no anxiety disorder; OR=1.55, 95% CI=1.08-2.20) were more likely to receive inadequate pharmacotherapy; those whose caregivers had a bachelor's degree or more education (vs. those who had a high school education, general equivalency diploma, or less than high school education; OR=0.74, 95% CI=0.61-0.89) were less likely to receive inadequate pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The consensus rater approach permitted use of published treatment efficacy data and patient characteristics (e.g., age, diagnoses, history of recent hospitalizations, and psychotherapy) to assess adequacy of pharmacotherapy. These results replicate findings of racial disparities reported in previous research using traditional methods to determine treatment adequacy (e.g., with a minimum number of treatment sessions) and highlight the continued need for research on racial disparities and strategies to improve access to high-quality care.