Faculty Bibliography

We studied adaptations in nucleus accumbens opioidergic circuitry mediating noxious stimulus-induced antinociception (NSIA) in rats withdrawing from chronic morphine administration. Although the magnitude of NSIA in withdrawing rats was similar to that observed in naive rats despite the tolerance of withdrawing rats to the antinociceptive effects of acutely administered morphine, the involvement of nucleus accumbens opioid receptors in NSIA in withdrawing rats was different from previous observations in both naive and tolerant rats. In withdrawing rats intra-accumbens administration of the mu-opioid receptor antagonist Cys2, Tyr3, Orn5, Pen7 amide (CTOP), but not the delta-receptor antagonist naltrindole, blocked NSIA. Both antagonists blocked NSIA in the naive state, but neither was effective in tolerant rats. Also, intra-accumbens administration of the mu-agonist [D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe(4,) Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) alone was sufficient to induce antinociception in withdrawing rats, whereas a combination of both mu- and delta-receptor agonists (ie, DAMGO and D-Pen(2,5)-enkephalin [DPDPE], respectively) is required to induce antinociception in naive rats. The delta- agonist DPDPE was without effect in the withdrawing rat, alone or when combined with DAMGO. Thus, although the magnitude of NSIA does not differ significantly among the 3 states, it is mediated by both mu- and delta-receptors in the naive rat, mu- but not delta-receptors in the withdrawing rat, and neither receptor type in the morphine tolerant rat. These changes may result from different degrees of tolerance, with delta-receptors being the most sensitive; however, it is not known how these changes occur without affecting the magnitude of the resultant antinociception

BACKGROUND: An explanation for the predominance of injuries to lingual nerves over those to inferior alveolar nerves as a result of inferior alveolar nerve blocks may be due to the nerves' fascicular pattern. A unifascicular nerve may be injured more easily than a multifascicular nerve. METHODS: The authors unilaterally dissected lingual and inferior alveolar nerves from 12 cadavers. They cut the specimens 2 millimeters above the lingula for both the lingual nerve and inferior alveolar nerve and opposite the site of the middle of the third molar for the lingual nerve, and they counted the number of fascicles at each site. RESULTS: For the lingual nerve at the lingula, the mean number of fascicles was three (range, one to eight). Four of the 12 nerves (33 percent) were unifascicular at this point. Opposite the third molar, the lingual nerve had a mean of 20 fascicles (range, six to 39). In every case, there were more fascicles in the third molar region than above the lingula in the same nerve. At the lingula, the inferior alveolar nerve had a mean of 7.2 fascicles (range, three to 14). CONCLUSION: This study may explain the observation that when an inferior alveolar nerve block causes permanent nerve impairment, the lingual nerve is affected about 70 percent of the time and the inferior alveolar nerve is affected only 30 percent of the time. In 33 percent of cases, the lingual nerve had only one fascicle at the lingula; a unifascicular nerve may be injured more easily than a multifascicular one. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: There is no known way to avoid the remote possibility of nerve damage resulting from an inferior alveolar nerve block. The lingual nerve may be predominantly affected because of its fascicular pattern

Escherichia coli grows over a wide range of pHs (pH 4.4 to 9.2), and its own metabolism shifts the external pH toward either extreme, depending on available nutrients and electron acceptors. Responses to pH values across the growth range were examined through two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-D gels) of the proteome and through lac gene fusions. Strain W3110 was grown to early log phase in complex broth buffered at pH 4.9, 6.0, 8.0, or 9.1. 2-D gel analysis revealed the pH dependence of 19 proteins not previously known to be pH dependent. At low pH, several acetate-induced proteins were elevated (LuxS, Tpx, and YfiD), whereas acetate-repressed proteins were lowered (Pta, TnaA, DksA, AroK, and MalE). These responses could be mediated by the reuptake of acetate driven by changes in pH. The amplified proton gradient could also be responsible for the acid induction of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) enzymes SucB and SucC. In addition to the autoinducer LuxS, low pH induced another potential autoinducer component, the LuxH homolog RibB. pH modulated the expression of several periplasmic and outer membrane proteins: acid induced YcdO and YdiY; base induced OmpA, MalE, and YceI; and either acid or base induced OmpX relative to pH 7. Two pH-dependent periplasmic proteins were redox modulators: Tpx (acid-induced) and DsbA (base-induced). The locus alx, induced in extreme base, was identified as ygjT, whose product is a putative membrane-bound redox modulator. The cytoplasmic superoxide stress protein SodB was induced by acid, possibly in response to increased iron solubility. High pH induced amino acid metabolic enzymes (TnaA and CysK) as well as lac fusions to the genes encoding AstD and GabT. These enzymes participate in arginine and glutamate catabolic pathways that channel carbon into acids instead of producing alkaline amines. Overall, these data are consistent with a model in which E. coli modulates multiple transporters and pathways of amino acid consumption so as to minimize the shift of its external pH toward either acidic or alkaline extreme.