Faculty Bibliography

Large, complex bony defects can be a vexing problem for the reconstructive surgeon, especially when standard donor sites are not available or do not provide sufficient tissue. Using the concept of flap prefabrication, we demonstrated in a single patient that (1) iliac crest bone chips and bone morphogenic protein in an alloplastic mandibular tray can ossify in a heterotopic location and (2) neovascularization sufficient to support a large, custom-designed bone graft occurs within a convenient "carrier" flap. Ultimately, the fields of angiogenesis and osteogenesis research could significantly contribute to the ability of the plastic surgeon to construct the "ideal" composite prefabricated flap for complicated reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Physiologically programmed cell death or apoptosis occurs during the natural balance between cellular proliferation and demise. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the expression of 64 apoptosis-related genes in keloids and normal scars to investigate the potential role of apoptosis in keloid formation. Two sets of mRNA were isolated from keloids excised from four previously untreated patients and four normal scar patients separately. Human cDNA arrayed hybridization was performed to compare the apoptosis-related gene expression between these two groups. In addition, TUNEL assays were performed to evaluate the percentage of apoptotic cells in keloids (center and periphery) versus normal scars. RESULTS: Eight of the sixty-four apoptosis-related genes studied were significantly underexpressed in keloid tissue. The underexpressed genes and their relative expression compared with normal scar were defender against cell death 1 (DAD-1) (34.1% of normal scar); nucleoside diphosphate kinase B (c-myc transcription factor) (24.7%); glutathione S-transferase (17.9%); glutathione S-transferase microsomal (28.1%); glutathione peroxidase (47.2%); tumor necrosis factor receptor 1-associated protein (TRADD) (51.0%); 19-kDa interacting protein 3 (NIP3) (36.0%); and cytoplasmic dynein light chain 1 (HDLC1) (47.7%). Spatial analysis of apoptosis using TUNEL assays revealed apoptosis indices of 0.83 for keloid periphery and 0.63 for keloid center. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we demonstrated underexpression of apoptosis-related genes in human keloid tissue and decreased apoptotic activity in fibroblasts derived from keloids versus normal scars. We hypothesized that keloid fibroblasts fail to undergo physiologically programmed cell death and, thus, continue to produce and secrete connective tissue beyond the period expected in normal scar formation, accounting for the progressive and hypertrophic nature of keloids. This mechanism leads to new possibilities for treatment of keloids through induction of apoptosis.

Economic theory dictates that changes in consumer demand have predictable effects on prices. Demographics represents an important component of demand for aesthetic surgery. Between the years of 1997 and 2010, the U.S. population is projected to increase by 12 percent. The population increase will be skewed such that those groups undergoing the most aesthetic surgery will see the largest increase. Accounting for the age-specific frequencies of aesthetic surgery and the population increase yields an estimate that the overall market for aesthetic surgery will increase by 19 percent. Barring unforeseen changes in general economic conditions or consumer tastes, demand should increase by an analogous amount. An economic demonstration shows the effects of increasing demand for aesthetic surgery on its fees. Between the years of 1992 and 1997, there was an increase in demand for breast augmentation as fears of associated autoimmune disorders subsided. Similarly, there was increased male acceptance of aesthetic surgery. The number of breast augmentations and procedures to treat male pattern baldness, plastic surgeons, and fees for the procedures were tracked. During the study period, the supply of surgeons and consumer demand increased for both of these procedures. Volume of breast augmentation increased by 275 percent, whereas real fees remained stable. Volume of treatment for male pattern baldness increased by 107 percent, and the fees increased by 29 percent. Ordinarily, an increase in supply leads to a decrease in prices. This did not occur during the study period. Economic analysis demonstrates that the increased supply of surgeons performing breast augmentation was offset by increased consumer demand for the procedure. For this reason, fees were not lowered. Similarly, increased demand for treatment of male pattern baldness more than offset the increased supply of surgeons performing it. The result was higher fees. Emphasis should be placed on using these economic relationships to expand the demand for aesthetic surgery.

The laws of microeconomics explain how prices affect consumer purchasing decisions and thus overall revenues and profits. These principles can easily be applied to the behavior aesthetic plastic surgery patients. The UCLA Division of Plastic Surgery resident aesthetics clinic recently offered a radical price change for its services. The effects of this change on demand for services and revenue were tracked. Economic analysis was applied to see if this price change resulted in the maximization of total revenues, or if additional price changes could further optimize them. Economic analysis of pricing involves several steps. The first step is to assess demand. The number of procedures performed by a given practice at different price levels can be plotted to create a demand curve. From this curve, price sensitivities of consumers can be calculated (price elasticity of demand). This information can then be used to determine the pricing level that creates demand for the exact number of procedures that yield optimal revenues. In economic parlance, revenues are maximized by pricing services such that elasticity is equal to 1 (the point of unit elasticity). At the UCLA resident clinic, average total fees per procedure were reduced by 40 percent. This resulted in a 250-percent increase in procedures performed for representative 4-month periods before and after the price change. Net revenues increased by 52 percent. Economic analysis showed that the price elasticity of demand before the price change was 6.2. After the price change it was 1. We conclude that the magnitude of the price change resulted in a fee schedule that yielded the highest possible revenues from the resident clinic. These results show that changes in price do affect total revenue and that the nature of these effects can be understood, predicted, and maximized using the tools of microeconomics.

To gather information about aesthetic surgery's current practice structures, competitive environment, patient price sensitivity, and marketing and practice development requirements, a two-page survey was developed and mailed to all 1180 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. A total of 632 surveys were returned (response rate of 54.5 percent). Most aesthetic plastic surgeons said they were in solo practice (63.3 percent). More than two-thirds described the marketplace as "very competitive," with 59 percent reporting 25 or more surgeons offering aesthetic surgery in their area. They estimated their patients' average income at $62,800. Nearly all plastic surgeons labeled their patients as "moderately price sensitive" (62.3 percent) or "very price sensitive" (30.6 percent). Similarly, 23.2 percent estimated that they had lost 20 or more patients within the last year for reasons of price. Practice development and marketing efforts represented an average of 7.3 percent of plastic surgeons' working time. Parameters associated with a high percentage of time devoted to these activities were solo practice, percentage of revenue from aesthetic surgery greater than 50 percent, a practice environment designation of moderately or very competitive, and ten or more area surgeons offering aesthetic surgery (p < 0.05). High patient income led to only slight decreases in price sensitivity and did not significantly reduce the amount of time spent on marketing and practice development. Although the rest of the healthcare industry has undergone a period of consolidation, aesthetic surgeons have been able to resist these changes. The results of this survey suggest that the fragmented nature of the aesthetic surgery industry is associated with additional burdens on plastic surgeons. As the aesthetic surgery market becomes more competitive, plastic surgeons may benefit from consolidation to reduce costs and maximize efficiency.

The size of the plastic surgery workforce has important effects on the financial environment of the specialty. Economic theory predicts that increasing the area supply of surgeons performing aesthetic surgery will result in lower fees for their services. This study tested that theory in the actual aesthetic surgery marketplace. The study examined the ratio of plastic surgeons to the general population of several states. It then traced the aesthetic surgery fees resulting from different densities of area plastic surgeons. This information was economically analyzed to project the fee effects of possible future changes in the number of practicing plastic surgeons. For the states of New York, California, and Texas, there is a proportional decrease in fees as the density of plastic surgeons increases. For example, New York has 34 percent more plastic surgeons proportionally than Texas, and its fees are 30 percent lower in real dollars. Economic analysis can project the fee effects of changing the supply of surgeons performing aesthetic surgery. The analysis reveals that a 30 percent national increase in the supply of plastic surgeons would lower fees by approximately 32 percent. Similarly, if the number of plastic surgeons increases by 50 percent, fees will decrease by approximately 53 percent. However, these fee effects can be mitigated by expanding the demand for aesthetic surgery. In conclusion, the size of the plastic surgery workforce has profound effects on the fees paid for aesthetic surgery, and the magnitude of these effects can be understood, predicted, and optimized using the tools of economics.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal replacement is associated with significant morbidity that may lead to operative interventions. This study reviews the management and outcome of children who underwent reoperation after esophageal replacement. METHODS: Eighteen patients who underwent esophageal replacement from 1985 to 1997 were reviewed retrospectively. Ten patients underwent reoperation. Patient management, perioperative morbidity, and the dietary intake at follow-up were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: Of the reoperated patients, 7 had esophageal atresia, 2 had caustic ingestion, and 1 had achalasia. Nine patients received a colon interposition, and 1 received a reverse gastric tube as the initial esophageal replacement. Seven patients required revision of the anastomoses. Three patients required complex esophageal reconstruction: 1 underwent gastric transposition, 1 underwent free jejunal graft, and 1 underwent gastric transposition combined with free jejunal graft. Seven patients were eating well at follow-up. Two patients still required partial gastrostomy tube feeding. One patient died 6 months postoperatively from aspiration pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal replacement continues to be a challenging operation associated with significant complications. Most reoperative procedures were directed toward strictures and persistent fistulae. Complete graft failure can be managed by gastric transposition or free jejunal graft. Despite the perioperative morbidity, most patients have good functional outcome.

INTRODUCTION: In 1980, age-adjusted mortality rates in Central Harlem were the highest among New York City's 30 health districts. This population-based study was designed to describe the self-reported frequency of selected health conditions, behavioral risk factors, preventive health practices, and drug use in the Harlem community. METHODS: From 1992 to 1994, in-person interviews were conducted among 695 adults aged 18 to 65 years who were randomly selected from dwelling-unit enumeration lists for the Central Harlem health district. Descriptive statistics were computed for men and women separately, and compared to other population-based surveys. RESULTS: Self-reported medical insurance coverage in Harlem was unexpectedly high (74% of men, 86% of women) as was lifetime use of preventive health practices, e.g., blood cholesterol screening (58% of men, 70% of women). However, lifetime rates of substance use, e.g. crack cocaine (14%) and self-reported history of traumatic events, e.g., witnessing someone seriously injured or violently killed (49% of men, 21% of women) were also high in Harlem, especially in comparison to other populations. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified important patterns of similarities and differences in risk behaviors between Harlem and other populations. Potential solutions to the health problems of Harlem may lie in the creation of strategies that operate at the community, municipal, and regional level, as well as at the level of individual behavior and risk-taking.