Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

Department/Unit:Plastic Surgery

Total Results:

5872


Stem Cell Therapy Enriched Fat Grafting for the Reconstruction of Craniofacial Deficits

Bourne, Debra A; Egro, Francesco M; Bliley, Jacqueline; James, Isaac; Haas, Gretchen L; Meyer, E Michael; Donnenberg, Vera; Donnenberg, Albert D; Branstetter, Barton; Coleman, Sydney; Rubin, J Peter
UNLABELLED:Fat grafting is an effective treatment for craniofacial deformities. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is a concentrated form of adipose derived stem cells that can be isolated from fat. The aim of this clinical trial was to assess the impact of SVF enrichment on craniofacial fat grafting. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Twelve subjects with at least two regions of craniofacial volume deficit were enrolled, and they underwent fat grafting with SVF-enriched or standard fat grafting to each area. All patients had bilateral malar regions injected with SVF-enriched graft on one side and control standard fat grafting to the contralateral side. Outcome assessments included demographic information, volume retention determined by CT scans, SVF cell populations assessed by flow cytometry, SVF cell viability, complications, and appearance ratings. Follow-up was 9 months. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:0.027). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Autologous fat transfer for reconstruction of craniofacial defects is effective and safe, leading to reliable volume retention. However, SVF enrichment does not significantly impact volume retention.
PMCID:10278723
PMID: 37342306
ISSN: 2169-7574
CID: 5542702

In vitro analysis of durability of S-PRG filler-containing composite crowns for primary molar restoration

Nakase, Yutaro; Yamaguchi, Satoshi; Jalkh, Ernesto B Benalcázar; Atria, Pablo J; Witek, Lukasz; Bonfante, Estevam A; Li, Hefei; Sakai, Takahiko; Okawa, Rena; Nakano, Kazuhiko; Imazato, Satoshi
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the reliability, maximum principal stress, shear stress, and crack initiation of a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) resin composite (RC) incorporating surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler for primary molar teeth. METHODS:Mandibular primary molar crowns fabricated by experimental (EB) or commercially available CAD/CAM RCs (HC) were prepared and cemented to a resinous abutment tooth using an adhesive resin cement (Cem) or a conventional glass-ionomer cement (CX). These specimens were subjected to a single compressive test (n = 5/each) and the step-stress accelerated life testing (SSALT) (n = 12/each). Data was evaluated using Weibull analyses and reliability was calculated. Afterwards, the maximum principal stress and crack initiation point of each crown was analyzed by finite element analysis. To evaluate bonding of EB and HC to dentin, microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing was conducted using primary molar teeth (n = 10/each). RESULTS:There was no significant difference between the fracture loads of EB and HC for either cement (p > 0.05). The fracture loads of EB-CX and HC-CX were significantly lower than EB-Cem and HC-Cem (p < 0.05). The reliability at 600 N for EB-Cem was greater than that for EB-CX, HC-Cem, and HC-CX. The maximum principal stress concentrated on EB was lower than that on HC. The shear stress concentrated in the cement layer for EB-CX was higher than that for HC-CX. There was no significant difference among the μTBSs of EB-Cem, EB-CX, HC-Cem, and HC-CX (p > 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:The crowns fabricated with the experimental CAD/CAM RC incorporating S-PRG filler yielded greater fracture loads and reliability than the crowns manufactured with commercially available CAD/CAM RC regardless of the luting materials. These findings suggest that the experimental CAD/CAM RC crown may be clinically useful for the restoration of primary molars.
PMID: 37208292
ISSN: 1879-0097
CID: 5538232

Three-Dimensional Printing Bioceramic Scaffolds Using Direct-Ink-Writing for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Regeneration

Nayak, Vasudev Vivekanand; Slavin, Blaire V; Bergamo, Edmara T P; Torroni, Andrea; Runyan, Christopher M; Flores, Roberto L; Kasper, F Kurtis; Young, Simon; Coelho, Paulo G; Witek, Lukasz
Defects characterized as large osseous voids in bone, in certain circumstances, are difficult to treat, requiring extensive treatments which lead to an increased financial burden, pain, and prolonged hospital stays. Grafts exist to aid in bone tissue regeneration (BTR), among which ceramic-based grafts have become increasingly popular due to their biocompatibility and resorbability. BTR using bioceramic materials such as β-tricalcium phosphate has seen tremendous progress and has been extensively used in the fabrication of biomimetic scaffolds through the three-dimensional printing (3DP) workflow. 3DP has hence revolutionized BTR by offering unparalleled potential for the creation of complex, patient, and anatomic location-specific structures. More importantly, it has enabled the production of biomimetic scaffolds with porous structures that mimic the natural extracellular matrix while allowing for cell growth-a critical factor in determining the overall success of the BTR modality. While the concept of 3DP bioceramic bone tissue scaffolds for human applications is nascent, numerous studies have highlighted its potential in restoring both form and function of critically sized defects in a wide variety of translational models. In this review, we summarize these recent advancements and present a review of the engineering principles and methodologies that are vital for using 3DP technology for craniomaxillofacial reconstructive applications. Moreover, we highlight future advances in the field of dynamic 3D printed constructs via shape-memory effect, and comment on pharmacological manipulation and bioactive molecules required to treat a wider range of boney defects.
PMID: 37463403
ISSN: 1937-3392
CID: 5535642

Evaluation of instrumentation and pedicle screw design for posterior lumbar fixation: A pre-clinical in vivo/ex vivo ovine model

Witek, Lukasz; Parente, Paulo Eduardo Lima; Torroni, Andrea; Greenberg, Michael; Nayak, Vasudev Vivekanand; Hacquebord, Jacques Henri; Coelho, Paulo G
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:" osseodensification rotary drilling compacts the bone fragments into the osteotomy walls, creating nucleating sites for regeneration. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This study aimed to compare both manual versus rotary Osseodensification (OD) instrumentation as well as two different pedicle screw thread designs in a controlled split animal model in posterior lumbar stabilization to determine the feasibility and potential advantages of each variable with respect to mechanical stability and histomorphology. A total of 164 single thread (82 per thread configuration), pedicle screws (4.5 × 35 mm) were used for the study. Each animal received eight pedicles (four per thread design) screws, which were placed in the lumbar spine of 21 adult sheep. One side of the lumbar spine underwent rotary osseodensification instrumentation, while the contralateral underwent conventional, hand, instrumentation. The animals were euthanized after 6- and 24-weeks of healing, and the vertebrae were removed for biomechanical and histomorphometric analyses. Pullout strength and histologic analysis were performed on all harvested samples. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.026) greater pullout strength (1060.6 N ± 181) relative to hand instrumentation (769.3 N ± 181) at the 24-week healing time point. Histomorphometric analysis exhibited significantly higher degrees of bone to implant contact for the rotary instrumentation only at the early healing time point (6 weeks), whereas bone area fraction occupancy was statistically higher for rotary instrumentation at both healing times. The levels of soft tissue infiltration were lower for pedicle screws placed in osteotomies prepared using OD instrumentation relative to hand instrumentation, independent of healing time. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The rotary instrumentation yielded enhanced mechanical and histologic results relative to the conventional hand instrumentation in this lumbar spine stabilization model.
PMCID:10285755
PMID: 37361331
ISSN: 2572-1143
CID: 5540112

Determining the Optimal Dosage of Corticosteroid Injection in Trigger Finger

Bookman, Jared; Rocks, Madeline; Noh, Karen; Ayalon, Omri; Hacquebord, Jacques; Catalano, Louis; Glickel, Steven
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Corticosteroid injection is the mainstay of nonoperative treatment for trigger finger (stenosing tenosynovitis), but despite substantial experience with this treatment, there is minimal available evidence as to the optimal corticosteroid dosing. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of 3 different injection dosages of triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of trigger finger. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Patients diagnosed with a trigger finger were prospectively enrolled and treated with an initial triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog) injection of 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg. Patients were followed longitudinally over a 6-month period. Patients were assessed for duration of clinical response, clinical failure, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 146 patients (163 trigger fingers) were enrolled over a 26-month period. At 6-month follow-up, injections were still effective (without recurrence, secondary injection, or surgery) in 52% of the 5-mg group, 62% of the 10-mg group, and 79% of the 20-mg group. Visual Analog Scale at final follow-up improved by 2.2 in the 5-mg group, 2.7 in the 10-mg group, and 4.5 in the 20-mg group. The QuickDASH scores at final follow-up improved by 11.8 in the 5-mg group, 21.5 in the 10-mg group, and 28.9 in the 20-mg group. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Minimal evidence exists to guide the optimal dosing of steroid injection in trigger digits. When compared with 5-mg and 10-mg doses, a 20-mg dose was found to have a significantly higher rate of clinical effectiveness at 6-month follow-up. The VAS and QuickDASH scores were not significantly different between the 3 groups.
PMID: 37191248
ISSN: 1558-9455
CID: 5544232

Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Liver Biopsy

Ramai, Daryl; Pannu, Viraaj; Facciorusso, Antonio; Dhindsa, Banreet; Heaton, Joseph; Ofosu, Andrew; Chandan, Saurabh; Maida, Marcello; Lattanzi, Barbara; Rodriguez, Eduardo; Bhagat, Vicky H; Samanta, Jayanta; Barakat, Monique T
Recent years have seen the emergence of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) as an effective alternative to traditional (percutaneous or transjugular) liver biopsy techniques. Comparative studies have demonstrated that both endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches are similar in terms of diagnostic adequacy, accuracy, and adverse events; however, EUS-LB offers the advantage of reduced recovery time. Additionally, EUS-LB enables the sampling of both lobes of the liver as well as the advantage of portal pressure measurements. However, EUS-LB may be argued to have a high cost, although this procedure can be cost-effective if bundled with other endoscopic procedures. Approaches utilizing EUS-guided liver therapy, such as the administration of chemotherapeutic agents and EUS elastography, are in development, and their optimal integration into clinical care is likely to emerge in the coming years. In the present review, we evaluate the available literature on EUS-LB indications, contraindications, variations in needle biopsy techniques, comparative outcomes, advantages and disadvantages, and future trends and perspectives.
PMCID:9955464
PMID: 36832272
ISSN: 2075-4418
CID: 5524992

Reducing Complications in Pilon Fracture Surgery: Surgical Time Matters

Shafiq, Babar; Zhang, Bo; Zhu, Diana; Gupta, Deven K; Cubberly, Mark; Stepanyan, Hayk; Rezzadeh, Kevin; Lim, Philip K; Hacquebord, Jacques; Gupta, Ranjan
OBJECTIVE:To correlate patient and surgeon specific factors with outcomes after operative management of distal intra-articular tibia fractures. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Three Level 1 tertiary academic trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:A consecutive series of 175 patients with OTA/AO 43-C pilon fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Primary outcomes include superficial and deep infection. Secondary outcomes include nonunion, loss of articular reduction, and implant removal. RESULTS:The following patient specific factors correlated with poor surgical outcomes: increased age with superficial infection rate (p<0.05), smoking with rate of nonunion (p<0.05), and Charlson Comorbidity Index with loss of articular reduction(p<0.05). Each additional 10 minutes of operative time over 120 minutes was associated with increased odds of requiring I&D and any treatment for infection. The same linear effect was seen with addition of each fibular plate. The number of approaches, type of approach, use of bone graft, and staging were not associated with infection outcomes. Each additional 10 minutes of operative time over 120 minutes was associated with increased rate of implant removal, as did fibular plating. CONCLUSIONS:While many of the patient-specific factors that negatively impact surgical outcomes for pilon fractures may not be modifiable, surgeon-specific factors need to be carefully examined as these may be addressed. Pilon fracture fixation has evolved to increasingly utilize fragment specific approaches applied with a staged approach. Although the number and type of approaches did not affect outcomes, longer operative time was associated with increased odds of infection while additional fibular plate fixation, was associated with higher odds of both infection and implant removal. Potential benefits of additional fixation should be weighed against operative time and associated risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
PMID: 37226911
ISSN: 1531-2291
CID: 5508472

Platysma Hammock or Sling: Are They Different? [Comment]

Aston, Sherrell J; Hanna, Steven A
PMID: 36624072
ISSN: 1527-330x
CID: 5507732

Discussion: Simultaneous Scalp, Skull, Kidney, and Pancreas Transplant from a Single Donor: Insights from a 5-Year Follow-Up

Chaya, Bachar F; Trilles, Jorge; Rodriguez, Eduardo D
PMID: 37224343
ISSN: 1529-4242
CID: 5508412

Perioperative Medication Management in Elective Plastic Surgery Procedures

Chaya, Bachar F; Rodriguez Colon, Ricardo; Boczar, Daniel; Daar, David; Brydges, Hilliard; Thys, Erika; Kantar, Rami; Saadeh, Pierre B
BACKGROUND:Perioperative medication management is vital to maintain patient safety while under anesthesia, as well as to avoid postoperative complications. Plastic surgeons make daily decisions on whether to ask a patient to stop taking medication before their surgery. These important decisions can affect bleeding risk, wound healing, and interactions with anesthetics, which can range from minor to life-threatening. Current plastic surgery literature lacks a comprehensive review of perioperative medication management, with existing reports focusing on specific procedures and specific medication classes. METHODS:A PubMed database search was conducted for articles through July 2021. The bibliographies of included studies were also examined for articles not acquired in the initial search queries. The authors included studies on medication usage and perioperative guidance in patients undergoing elective plastic surgery procedures. The authors excluded studies unrelated to plastic surgery and studies where the medications were used as an intervention. Abstracts, animal studies, studies involving the pediatric population, and book chapters were also excluded, as well as articles not published in English. RESULTS:A total of 801 papers were identified by our search terms. After title and abstract screening, 35 papers were selected for full-text review. After full-text review, 20 papers were selected for inclusion, with an additional 6 papers from cited references added. Of the 26 papers, 6 papers discussed psychotropic drugs, 6 papers discussed medications affecting hemostasis, 4 papers discussed hormone-containing medications, 3 papers discussed antilipid medications, 2 papers discussed antihypertensive medications, 2 papers discussed herbal supplements, 1 paper discussed both psychotropic and herbal supplements, 1 paper discussed medications affecting wound healing, and 1 paper discussed rheumatologic medications. A summary of those recommendations was then compiled together. CONCLUSIONS:The perioperative medication management in elective plastic surgery procedures remains a complex and multidisciplinary process. It is important to manage these patients in a case-by-case manner and to consult a specialist when necessary. Careful medication reconciliation is essential to decrease the likelihood of adverse outcomes and interactions with perioperative anesthetics.
PMID: 36735455
ISSN: 1536-3732
CID: 5502232