Faculty Bibliography

Background This study examined if the intersection of stress and experiences of incarceration was associated with sexual risk-taking among Black gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men ('Black MSM') in the Deep South of the United States. Methods Data for this analysis were collected during 2013- 2015 as part of a study of sexual health among Black cisgender MSM in the states of Mississippi and Georgia. At baseline, participants responded to a 12-item scale of stressful experiences in the previous year with responses organized into tertiles (low, medium, high stress). Multivariate analyses assessed independent and interactional associations between stress/incarceration and several key sexual health risk practices. Results Among our overall sample of 355 Black MSM, compared to those reporting a relatively low level of stress, a high level of stress was associated with drug use in the context of sex (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.1-3.6, p=0.03). While this association was observed for men without incarceration histories (aOR=2.6, 95%CI:1.2-5.8, p=0.015), among those who had been incarcerated the relationship was stronger (aOR=3.9, 95%CI:1.8- 8.6, p<0.001) and for these men experiencing even a medium level of stress was associated with sexual drug use (aOR=3.4, 95%CI:1.6-9.1, p<0.001). High stress among previously incarcerated MSM was also associated with condomless casual sex (aOR=2.8, 95%CI:1.3-6.1, p<0.001) and having >=6 partners in six months (aOR=2.8, 95%CI:2.8-1.1-7.1, p=0.03); similar associations were not observed among men who had not been incarcerated. Conclusion While stress was associated with some sexual risk taking among Black MSM, its intersection with incarceration was consistently (and more strongly) associated with a greater number and diversity of sexual risk practices. Men who have been incarcerated may struggle to deal with life stressors. Post-release programs for this population should provide adaptive tools for dealing with stress, including specific attention to safer sex and sexual risk

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Female veterans smoke cigarettes at high rates compared with both male veterans and nonveteran women. Proactive outreach to smokers may reduce gender disparities in cessation care. The objectives of this study were to compare baseline experiences with VA smoking cessation care for men and women and to assess for gender differences in response to a proactive outreach intervention. METHODS:We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis of a pragmatic, multisite randomized, controlled trial comparing proactive outreach with usual care (UC). Baseline experiences included physician advice to quit, satisfaction with care, and past-year treatment use. At the 1-year follow-up, treatment use, quit attempts, and 6-month prolonged abstinence for women and men randomized to proactive outreach versus UC were compared using logistic regression. RESULTS:Baseline and follow-up surveys were returned by 138 women and 2,516 men. At baseline, women were less likely than men to report being very or somewhat satisfied with the process of obtaining smoking cessation medications in the VA (47% of women vs. 62% of men), but no less likely to report having used cessation medications from the VA in the past year (39% of women vs. 34% of men). After the intervention, phone counseling and combined therapy increased among both women and men in proactive outreach as compared with UC. At the 1-year follow-up, men in proactive outreach were significantly more likely to report prolonged abstinence than those in UC (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.28-2.14); results for women were in the same direction but not statistically significant (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.48-3.99). CONCLUSIONS:Satisfaction with cessation care in VA remains low. Proactive outreach to smokers was associated with an increased use of cessation therapies, and increased odds of achieving prolonged abstinence. A subgroup analysis by gender did not reveal significant differences in the treatment effect.

BACKGROUND:Medication for addiction treatment (MAT) has received much attention in recent years for treating individuals with opioid use disorders (OUD). However, these medications have been significantly underused among particular subgroups. In this paper, we describe the age distribution of treatment episodes for substance use disorder among Medicaid beneficiaries in New York and corresponding MAT use. METHODS:Using New York Medicaid claims, we identified individuals with OUD that received treatment for substance use disorder in 2015. The type of substance use treatment is the primary outcome measure, which includes methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone or other non-medication treatment. RESULTS:A total of 88,637 individuals were diagnosed with OUD and received treatment for substance use disorder and 56,926 individuals received some type of MAT in 2015, with 40.2% receiving methadone, 21.9% receiving buprenorphine and 2.2% receiving naltrexone while 21.9% received non-medication based treatment. Young adults (ages 18-29) were a large proportion (25%) of individuals in treatment for OUD yet were the least likely to receive MAT. Relative to young adults, 30-39 year olds (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.56-1.68), 40-49 year olds (AOR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.82-1.99), 50-59 year olds (AOR = 2.65, 95% CI = 2.52-2.78), and 60-64 year olds (AOR = 5.03, 95% CI = 4.62-5.48) were more likely to receive MAT. CONCLUSIONS:These preliminary findings highlight high numbers of young adults in treatment for OUD and low rates of MAT, which is not consistent with treatment guidelines. Significant differences exist in the type of medication prescribed across age. More attention is needed to address the treatment needs among individuals of different age, notably young adults.

Low perception of risk is a risk factor for heroin use. Research is needed to determine whether this risk factor for heroin use is affected by the use of other drugs. Data were analyzed from participants in the 2015/2016 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health who denied lifetime heroin use (N= 110,102). We examined how recency of use of various drugs and number of drugs used relate to perceptions that using heroin is not a great risk. Results from multivariable models suggest that no lifetime drug use, and recent prescription opioid misuse and methamphetamine use, in particular, were associated with higher odds of perceiving that heroin use is not of great risk. Recent marijuana use was associated with lower odds of reporting that heroin use is not of great risk. Use of more drugs in one's lifetime, past year, and/or past month tended to be associated with lower odds of reporting heroin use as not a great risk. Prevention experts should consider that recent prescription opioid misuse in particular is a risk factor for the lower perception of risk, while individuals reporting no lifetime drug use may also require better education regarding harms associated with heroin use.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Over one-third of American adults have obesity with increased risk of chronic disease. Primary care providers often do not counsel patients about weight management due to barriers such as lack of time and training. To address this problem, we developed a technology-assisted health coaching intervention called Goals for Eating and Moving (GEM) to facilitate obesity counseling within the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model of primary care. The objective of this paper is to describe the rationale and design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial to test the GEM intervention when compared to Enhanced Usual Care (EUC). METHOD/METHODS:We have randomized 19 PCMH teams from two NYC healthcare systems (VA New York Harbor Healthcare System and Montefiore Medical Group practices) to either the GEM intervention or EUC. Eligible participants are English and Spanish-speaking primary care patients (ages 18-69 years) with obesity or who are overweight with comorbidity (e.g., arthritis, sleep apnea, hypertension). The GEM intervention consists of a tablet-delivered goal setting tool, a health coaching visit and telephone calls for patients and provider counseling training. Patients in the EUC arm receive health education materials. The primary outcome is mean weight loss at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include changes in waist circumference, diet, and physical activity. We will also examine the impact of GEM on obesity-related provider counseling competency and attitudes. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:If GEM is found to be efficacious, it could provide a structured approach for improving weight management for diverse primary care patient populations with elevated cardiovascular disease risk.

STUDY OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the effect of self-reported clinical diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) on longitudinal changes in brain amyloid-PET and CSF-biomarkers (Aβ42, T-tau and P-tau) in cognitively normal (NL), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) elderly. METHODS:Longitudinal study with mean follow-up time of 2.52±0.51 years. Data was obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Participants included 516 NL, 798 MCI and 325 AD elderly. Main Outcomes were annual rate-of-change in brain amyloid-burden (i.e. longitudinal increases in florbetapir-PET uptake or decreases in CSF-Aβ42 levels); and tau-protein aggregation (i.e. longitudinal increases in CSF total-tau (T-tau) and phosphorylated-tau (P-tau)). Adjusted multi-level mixed effects linear regression models with randomly varying intercepts and slopes was used to test whether the rate-of-biomarker-change differed between participants with and without OSA. RESULTS:In NL and MCI groups, OSA+ subjects experienced faster annual increase in florbetapir uptake (B=.06, 95% CI .02, .11 and B=.08, 95% CI .05, .12 respectively) and decrease in CSF-Aβ42 levels (B=-2.71, 95% CI -3.11, -2.35 and B=-2.62, 95% CI -3.23, -2.03, respectively); as well as increases in CSF T-tau (B=3.68, 95% CI 3.31, 4.07 and B=2.21, 95% CI 1.58, 2.86, respectively) and P-tau (B=1.221, 95% CI, 1.02, 1.42 and, B=1.74, 95% CI 1.22, 2.27, respectively); compared to OSA- participants. No significant variations in the biomarker changes over time were seen in the AD group. CONCLUSIONS:In both NL and MCI, elderly, clinical interventions aimed to treat OSA are needed to test if OSA treatment may affect the progression of cognitive impairment due to AD.

BACKGROUND:With the number of annual global travelers reaching 1.2 billion, many individuals encounter greater levels of air pollution when they travel abroad to megacities around the world. This study's objective was to determine if visits to cities abroad with greater levels of air pollution adversely impacts cardiopulmonary health. METHODS:Thirty-four non-smoking, adult, healthy participants who traveled abroad to selected cities from the NYC metropolitan area were pre-trained to measure lung function, blood pressure, heart rate/variability, and record symptoms before, during, and after traveling abroad. Outdoor PM2.5 concentrations were obtained from central monitors in each city. Associations between PM exposure concentrations and cardiopulmonary health endpoints were analyzed using a mixed effects statistical design. RESULTS:East and South Asian cities had significantly higher PM2.5 concentrations compared to pre-travel NYC PM2.5 levels, with maximum concentrations reaching 503 μg/m3. PM exposure-related associations for lung function were statistically significant and strongest between evening FEV1 and same day morning PM2.5 concentrations: a 10 μg/m3 increase in outdoor PM2.5 was associated with a mean decrease of 7 ml. Travel to a highly polluted city (PM2.5 > 100 μg/m3) was associated with a 209 ml reduction in evening FEV1 compared to a low polluted city (PM2.5 < 35 μg/m3). In general, participants who traveled to East and South Asian cities experienced increased respiratory symptoms/scores and changes in heart rate and heart rate variability. CONCLUSIONS:Exposure to increased levels of PM2.5 in cities abroad caused small but statistically significant acute changes in cardiopulmonary function and respiratory symptoms in healthy young adults. These data suggest that travel-related exposure to increased PM2.5 adversely impacts cardiopulmonary health, which may be particularly important for travelers with pre-existing respiratory or cardiac disease.

BACKGROUND:STRIVE is a multicenter, observational, open-label, single-arm study of natalizumab in anti-JC virus (JCV) seronegative patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The objective of this prespecified 2-year interim analysis was to determine the effectiveness of natalizumab in establishing and maintaining no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) in early RRMS. METHODS:Patients aged 18-65 years had an RRMS diagnosis < 3 years prior to screening, an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≤ 4.0, and anti-JCV antibody negative status. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and yearly thereafter. Cumulative probabilities of 24-week-confirmed EDSS worsening and improvement were evaluated at 2 years. NEDA (no 24-week-confirmed EDSS worsening, no relapses, no gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and no new/newly enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions) was evaluated over 2 years. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Score (MSIS-29) were assessed at baseline and 1 and 2 years. Statistical analysis used summary statistics and frequency distributions. RESULTS:The study population (N = 222) had early RRMS, with mean (standard deviation [SD]) time since diagnosis of 1.6 (0.77) years and mean (SD) baseline EDSS score of 2.0 (1.13). NEDA was achieved in 105 of 187 patients (56.1%) during year 1 and 120 of 163 (73.6%) during year 2. Over 2 years, 76 of 171 patients (44.4%) attained overall NEDA. Probabilities of 24-week-confirmed EDSS worsening and improvement were 14.1% and 28.4%, respectively. After 2 years, patients exhibited significant improvements from baseline in SDMT (n = 158; mean [SD]: 4.3 [11.8]; p < 0.001) and MSIS-29 physical (n = 153; mean [SD]: - 3.9 [14.7]; p = 0.001), psychological (n = 152; mean [SD]: - 2.0 [7.9]; p < 0.001), and quality-of-life (n = 153; mean [SD]: - 6.0 [21.3]; p < 0.001) scores. CONCLUSIONS:These results support natalizumab's effectiveness over 2 years, during which nearly half of early RRMS patients achieved NEDA. During year 2, nearly 75% of patients exhibited NEDA. Over 2 years, patients continued to experience significant cognitive and quality-of-life benefits. These results are limited by the lack of a comparator group to determine the extent of a placebo effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01485003 , registered 5 December 2011.