Faculty Bibliography

This editorial presents an overview of the two books discussed in the issue Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. The first book is about fighting stigma that argues against several myths. It is important to keep debates around stigma alive and to investigate the myths and realities of stigma, rather than just assuming that stigma is an all-powerful force, that we are necessarily bound to our patients with a shared stigma, or that it explains more than it really does. The second book examines treatment for a behavior that has been imbued with all the hallmarks of stigma, including shame and secrecy.

Reviews the book, Reading Anna Freud by Nick Midgley (see record 2012-32286-000). Reading Anna Freud is less a work of criticism than a work of orientation, and doubly valuable as such. First, because of the Freud family fame, one sometimes presumes one knows more about them than one really does (indeed, a misplaced presumption of familiarity is at the core of so much of the popular contempt hurled Sigmund's way). Second, orienting yourself to Anna Freud is a way of orienting yourself to child mental health: from how we speak to children and the role of schools in a child's psychological health to developmental psychopathology and the consultation-liaison service. What comes through in Reading Anna Freud is that the core of Freud's success was not just patient, compassionate intellectualism, genes, or an ability to get published, but advocacy. Moreover, you do not need a degree or an internal review board to be an advocate. In fact, it is in this regard that she is most inspiring. Although the book provides a historical and personal orientation, it is intended as an orientation to Freud's intellectual contributions, and Midgely does an excellent job translating her work, some of it nearly a century old, into a language that is still alive, relevant, and enriching.

The future of the textbook as we know it is in doubt. Knowledge is being shuttled into the virtual world, where it is collaborative, linked, multimedia, and transnational. The iterative nature of knowledge never fit comfortably with textbooks. They have always been notoriously out of date by the time they roll off the press. Nevertheless, there remains something comforting in the textbook's authoritative heft, which is lost not only in the vapor-thin flicker of Web pages but also in the suspicion with which we approach anything online, knowing full well that the provenance is dubious. Sock puppetry is not just a children's craft anymore; it's a modern form of authorship. Of course, textbooks have value as a corpus of knowledge that is not constantly changing; as a way of studying a topic without being distracted by the rabbit holes of the Internet; and as a backup: all knowledge will not be lost in a blackout. What the future of the textbook means for expert knowledge is unclear. How can hardcover and paperback textbooks carve out a place in tomorrow's society? One answer may be to look back.

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been shown to be associated with shrinkage of the corpus callosum mid-sagittal cross-sectional area (CCA). Objective: To study temporal rates of corpus callosum atrophy not previously reported for early AD. Methods: We used longitudinal MRI scans to study the rates of change of CCA and circularity (CIR), a measure of its shape, in normal controls (NC, n = 75), patients with very mild AD (AD-VM, n = 51), and mild AD (AD-M, n = 21). Results: There were significant reduction rates in CCA and CIR in all three groups. While CCA reduction rates were not statistically different between groups, the CIR declined faster in AD-VM (p < 0.03) and AD-M (p < 0.0001) relative to NC, and in AD-M relative to AD-VM (p < 0.0004). Conclusion: CIR declines at an accelerated rate with AD severity. Its rate of change is more closely associated with AD progression than CCA or any of its sub-regions. CIR may be a useful group biomarker for objective assessment of treatments that aim to slow AD progression.

Anxiety disorders are common among children but can be difficult to diagnose. An actuarial approach to the diagnosis of anxiety may improve the efficiency and accuracy of the process. The objectives of this study were to determine the clinical utility of the Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Youth Self Report (YSR), two widely used assessment tools, for diagnosing anxiety disorders in youth and to aid clinicians in incorporating scale scores into an actuarial approach to diagnosis through a clinical vignette. Demographically diverse youth, 5 to 18 years of age, were drawn from two samples; one (N = 1,084) was recruited from a research center, and the second (N = 651) was recruited from an urban community mental health center. Consensus diagnoses integrated information from semistructured interview, family history, treatment history, and clinical judgment. The CBCL and YSR internalizing problems T scores discriminated cases with any anxiety disorder or with generalized anxiety disorder from all other diagnoses in both samples (ps < .0005); the two scales had equivalent discriminative validity (ps > .05 for tests of difference). No other scales, nor any combination of scales, significantly improved on the performance of the Internalizing scale. In the highest risk group, Internalizing scores greater than 69 (CBCL) or greater than 63 (YSR) resulted in a Diagnostic Likelihood Ratio of 1.5; low scores reduced the likelihood of anxiety disorders by a factor of 4. Combined with other risk factor information in an actuarial approach to assessment and diagnosis, the CBCL and YSR Internalizing scales provide valuable information about whether a youth is likely suffering from an anxiety disorder.

This article reviews the progression of a research program designed to develop, implement, and study the implementation of "achievable" evidence-based practices (EBPs) in schools. We review challenges encountered and ideas to overcome them to enhance this avenue of research. The article presents two federally funded randomized controlled trials involving comparison of a four-component targeted intervention (Quality Assessment and Improvement, Family Engagement and Empowerment, Modular Evidence-Based Practice, Implementation Support) versus a comparison intervention focused on personal wellness. In both studies, primary aims focused on changes in clinician attitudes and behavior, including the delivery of high-quality EBPs and secondary aims focused on student-level impacts. A number of challenges, many not reported in the literature, are reviewed, and ideas for overcoming them are presented. Given the reality that the majority of youth mental health services are delivered in schools and the potential of school mental health services to provide a continuum of mental health care from promotion to intervention, it is critical that the field consider and address the logistical and methodological challenges associated with implementing and studying EBP implementation by clinicians.