Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The goal of precision oncology is to find effective therapeutics for every patient. Through the inclusion of emerging therapeutics in a high-throughput drug screening platform, our functional genomics pipeline inverts the common paradigm to identify patient populations that are likely to benefit from novel therapeutic strategies. APPROACH/METHODS:Utilizing drug screening data across a panel of 46 cancer cell lines from 11 tumor lineages, we identified an ovarian cancer-specific sensitivity to the first-in-class CRL4 inhibitors KH-4-43 and 33-11. CRL4 (i.e., Cullin-4 RING E3 ubiquitin ligase) is known to be dysregulated in a variety of cancer contexts, making it an attractive therapeutic target. Unlike proteasome inhibitors that are associated with broad toxicity, CRL4 inhibition offers the potential for tumor-specific effects. RESULTS:We observed that CRL4 inhibition negatively regulates core gene signatures that are upregulated in ovarian tumors and significantly slowed tumor growth as compared to the standard of care, cisplatin, in OVCAR8 xenografts. Building on this, we performed combination drug screening in conjunction with proteomic and transcriptomic profiling to identify ways to improve the antitumor effects of CRL4 inhibition in ovarian cancer models. CRL4 inhibition consistently resulted in activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade at both the transcriptomic and protein levels, suggesting that survival signaling is induced in response to CRL4 inhibition. These observations were concordant with the results of the combination drug screens in seven ovarian cancer cell lines that showed CRL4 inhibition cooperates with MEK inhibition. Preclinical studies in OVCAR8 and A2780 xenografts confirmed the therapeutic potential of the combination of KH-4-43 and trametinib, which extended overall survival and slowed tumor progression relative to either single agent or the standard of care. CONCLUSIONS:Together, these data demonstrate the prospective utility of functional modeling pipelines for therapeutic development and underscore the clinical potential of CRL4 inhibition in the ovarian cancer context. HIGHLIGHTS/CONCLUSIONS:A precision medicine pipeline identifies ovarian cancer sensitivity to CRL4 inhibitors. CRL4 inhibition induces activation of MAPK signalling as identified by RNA sequencing, proteomics, and phosphoproteomics. Inhibitor combinations that target both CRL4 and this CRL4 inhibitor-induced survival signalling enhance ovarian cancer sensitivity to treatment.

The α-synuclein seed amplification assay (αSyn-SAA) sensitively detects Lewy pathology, the amyloid state of α-synuclein, in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The αSyn-SAA harnesses the physics of seeding, whereby a superconcentrated solution of recombinant α-synuclein lowers the thermodynamic threshold (nucleation barrier) for aggregated α-synuclein to act as a nucleation catalyst ("seed") to trigger the precipitation (nucleation) of monomeric α-synuclein into pathology. This laboratory setup increases the signal for identifying a catalyst if one is present in the tissue examined. The result is binary: positive, meaning precipitation occurred, and a catalyst is present, or negative, meaning no precipitation, therefore no catalyst. Since protein precipitation via seeding can only occur at a concentration many-fold higher than the human brain, laboratory-elicited seeding does not mean human brain seeding. We suggest that a positive αSyn-SAA reveals the presence of pathological α-synuclein but not the underlying etiology for the precipitation of monomeric α-synuclein into its pathological form. Thus, a positive αSyn-SAA supports a clinical diagnosis of PD but cannot inform disease pathogenesis, ascertain severity, predict the rate of progression, define biology or biological subtypes, or monitor treatment response.

BACKGROUND:There is practice heterogeneity in the use, type, and duration of prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASM) in patients hospitalized with acute nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS:We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing ASM primary prophylaxis in adults hospitalized with acute nontraumatic ICH. The following population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) questions were assessed: (1) Should ASM versus no ASM be used in patients with acute ICH with no history of clinical or electrographic seizures? (2) If an ASM is used, should levetiracetam (LEV) or phenytoin/fosphenytoin (PHT/fPHT) be preferentially used? and (3) If an ASM is used, should a long (> 7 days) versus short (≤ 7 days) duration of prophylaxis be used? The main outcomes assessed were early seizure (≤ 14 days), late seizures (> 14 days), adverse events, mortality, and functional and cognitive outcomes. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to generate recommendations. RESULTS:The initial literature search yielded 1,988 articles, and 15 formed the basis of the recommendations. PICO 1: although there was no significant impact of ASM on the outcomes of early or late seizure or mortality, meta-analyses demonstrated increased adverse events and higher relative risk of poor functional outcomes at 90 days with prophylactic ASM use. PICO 2: we did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of PHT/fPHT compared to LEV for early seizures or adverse events, although point estimates tended to favor LEV. PICO 3: based on one decision analysis, quality-adjusted life-years were increased with a shorter duration of ASM prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS:We suggest avoidance of prophylactic ASM in hospitalized adult patients with acute nontraumatic ICH (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). If used, we suggest LEV over PHT/fPHT (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) for a short duration (≤ 7 days; weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence).

BACKGROUND:Underlying intracranial stenosis is the most common cause of failed mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. Adjunct emergent stenting is sometimes performed to improve or maintain reperfusion, despite limited data regarding its safety or efficacy. METHODS:We conducted a prospective multicenter observational international cohort study. Patients were enrolled between January 2022 and December 2023 at 25 thrombectomy capable centers in North America, Europe, and Asia. Consecutive patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy were included if they were identified as having underlying intracranial stenosis, defined as 50-99% residual stenosis of the target vessel or intra-procedural re-occlusion. The primary outcome was functional independence, defined as modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days. After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores, we compared outcomes among patients who underwent adjunct emergent intracranial stenting (stenting) versus those who received mechanical thrombectomy alone. RESULTS:A total of 417 patients were included; 218 patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy alone (168 anterior circulation) and 199 with mechanical thrombectomy plus stenting (144 anterior circulation). Patients in the stenting group were less likely to be non-Hispanic White (51.8% vs 62.4%, p=0.03), and less likely to have diabetes (33.2% vs 43.1%, p=0.037) or hyperlipidemia (43.2% vs 56%, p= 0.009). In addition, there was a lower rate of IV thrombolysis use in the stenting group (18.6% vs 27.5%, p=0.03). There was a higher rate of successful reperfusion (modified Treatment In Cerebral Infarction score ≥ 2B) in the stenting versus mechanical thrombectomy alone group (90.9% vs 77.9%, p<0.001) and a higher rate of a 24-hour infarct volume of <30 mL (n=260, 67.9% vs 50.3%, p=0.005). The overall complication rate was higher in the stenting group (12.6% vs 5%, p=0.006), but there was not a significant difference in the rate of symptomatic hemorrhage (9% vs 5.5%, p=0.162). Functional independence at 90 days was significantly higher in the stenting group (42.2% vs. 28.4%, adjusted odds ratio 2.67; 95% CI, 1.66-4.32). CONCLUSIONS:In patients with underlying stenosis who achieved reperfusion with mechanical thrombectomy, adjunct emergent stenting was associated with better functional outcome without a significantly increased risk of symptomatic hemorrhage. REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05403593.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Alzheimer's disease (AD), primary age-related tauopathy (PART), and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) all feature hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau)-immunoreactive neurofibrillary degeneration, but differ in neuroanatomical distribution and progression of neurofibrillary degeneration and amyloid beta (Aβ) deposition. METHODS:We used Nanostring GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling to compare the expression of 70 proteins in neurofibrillary tangle (NFT)-bearing and non-NFT-bearing neurons in hippocampal CA1, CA2, and CA4 subregions and entorhinal cortex of cases with autopsy-confirmed AD (n = 8), PART (n = 7), and CTE (n = 5). RESULTS:There were numerous subregion-specific differences related to Aβ processing, autophagy/proteostasis, inflammation, gliosis, oxidative stress, neuronal/synaptic integrity, and p-tau epitopes among these different disorders. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:These results suggest that there are subregion-specific proteomic differences among the neurons of these disorders, which appear to be influenced to a large degree by the presence of hippocampal Aβ. These proteomic differences may play a role in the differing hippocampal p-tau distribution and pathogenesis of these disorders. HIGHLIGHTS/CONCLUSIONS:Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC), possible primary age-related tauopathy (PART), definite PART, and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) can be differentiated based on the proteomic composition of their neurofibrillary tangle (NFT)- and non-NFT-bearing neurons. The proteome of these NFT- and non-NFT-bearing neurons is largely correlated with the presence or absence of amyloid beta (Aβ). Neurons in CTE and definite PART (Aβ-independent pathologies) share numerous proteomic similarities that distinguish them from ADNC and possible PART (Aβ-positive pathologies).

BACKGROUND:α-Synuclein seed amplification assay on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF-αSyn-SAA) has shown high accuracy for Parkinson's disease (PD) diagnosis. The analysis of CSF-αSyn-SAA parameters may provide useful insight to dissect the heterogeneity of synucleinopathies. OBJECTIVE:To assess differences in CSF-αSyn-SAA amplification parameters in participants with PD stratified by rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD), dysautonomia, GBA, and LRRK2 variants. METHODS:(T50), time to threshold (TTT), slope, and area under the curve (AUC). Sporadic PD (n = 371) was stratified according to RBD and dysautonomia (DysA) symptoms. Genetic PD included carriers of pathogenic variants of GBA (GBA-PD, n = 52) and LRRK2 (LRRK2-PD, n = 124) gene. RESULTS:CSF-αSyn-SAA was positive in 77% of LRRK2-PD, 92.3% of GBA-PD, and 93.8% of sporadic PD. The LRRK2-PD cohort showed longer T50 and TTT, and smaller AUC than GBA-PD (P = 0.029, P = 0.029, P = 0.016, respectively) and sporadic PD (P = 0.034, P = 0.033, P = 0.014, respectively). In the sporadic cohort, CSF-αSyn-SAA parameters were similar between PD with (n = 157) and without (n = 190) RBD, whereas participants with DysA (n = 193) presented shorter T50 (P = 0.026) and larger AUC (P = 0.029) than those without (n = 150). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:CSF-αSyn-SAA parameters vary across genetic and non-genetic PD subtypes at the group level. These differences are mostly driven by the presence of LRRK2 variants and DysA. Significant overlaps in the amplification parameter values exist between groups and limit their use at the individual level. Further studies are necessary to understand the mechanisms of CSF-αSyn-SAA parameter differences. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Cerebral accumulation of alpha-synuclein (αSyn) aggregates is the hallmark event in a group of neurodegenerative diseases-collectively called synucleinopathies-which include Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and multiple system atrophy. Currently, these are diagnosed by their clinical symptoms and definitively confirmed postmortem by the presence of αSyn deposits in the brain. Here, we summarize the drawbacks of the current clinical definition of synucleinopathies and outline the rationale for moving toward an earlier, biology-anchored definition of these disorders, with or without the presence of clinical symptoms. We underscore the utility of the αSyn seed amplification assay to detect aggregated αSyn in living patients and to differentiate between neuronal or glial αSyn pathology. We anticipate that a biological definition of synucleinopathies, if well-integrated with the current clinical classifications, will enable further understanding of the disease pathogenesis and contribute to the development of effective, disease-modifying therapies.

BACKGROUND:Spetzler-Martin (SM) Grade III brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) represent a transitional risk zone between low- and high-grade BAVMs, characterized by diverse angioarchitecture. The primary treatment options are endovascular embolization, microsurgical resection (MS), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study compares the efficacy and outcomes of MS and SRS. METHODS:We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study involving patients from the MISTA database with SM Grade III BAVMs treated with MS or SRS between 2010 and 2023. Propensity matching was based on age, favorable modified Rankin Score (mRS) at presentation, nidus size, rupture status, location depth, and eloquence. RESULTS:, p = 0.6) were similar. MS showed higher obliteration rates (93.3 %) compared to SRS (46.7 %) at the last follow-up (p < 0.001). The median time to obliteration post-SRS was 31.5 months (IQR: 15.3-60.0). SRS obliteration rates were 19 %, 29 %, and 59 % at 24, 36, and 60 months, respectively. Overall complication rates (MS: 30 % vs. SRS: 20 %, p = 0.4) and permanent complications (MS: 10 % vs. SRS: 13.3 %, p > 0.9) were similar. Hemorrhage occurred once in the MS group and none in the SRS (p > 0.9). Favorable outcomes (mRS 0-2) were higher with SRS than MS (93.3 % vs 80.0 %, p = 0.3), with one AVM-related mortality in the MS group. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:MS and SRS are viable treatments for SM Grade III BAVMs. Treatment choice should be individualized by a multidisciplinary team, considering patient goals.