Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:There is paucity of data on long-term functional and cognitive outcomes after COVID-19 compared to COVID-negative controls. METHODS:We conducted an observational cohort study of patients ≥ 1 year after COVID-19 compared to contemporaneous COVID-19 negative controls (SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG negative with no history of COVID-19). Functional (modified Rankin Scale [mRS], Barthel Index), cognitive (telephone MoCA [t-MoCA]), and patient-reported neuropsychiatric symptoms were compared between groups using multivariable logistic regression analysis. In a subgroup of COVID-19 patients who were followed longitudinally, trajectories of recovery were assessed using the paired samples Sign test. RESULTS:Of 145 participants, N = 115 COVID-19 patients (median age 62, 51 % female, 33 % hospitalized for COVID-19, median 2.9 years from index infection), and N = 30 non-COVID-19 controls (median age 75, 70 % female) were enrolled. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were reported in 76 % of COVID-19 patients versus 7 % of controls (aOR 15.0, 95 %CI 3.09-72.47, P < 0.001). Abnormal mRS> 0 occurred in 42 % of COVID-19 patients compared to 11 % of controls (P = 0.002). However, this difference was not significant after adjusting for age, sex, COVID-19 hospitalization and history of mood disorder (aOR 2.10, 95 %CI 0.52-8.51). Rates of abnormal t-MoCA≤ 18 (40 % of COVID-19 versus 41 % of controls, P = 1.00) and Barthel scores< 100 (19 % of COVID-19 versus 14 % in controls, P = 0.785) were similar. Among N = 26 COVID-19 patients with repeated measures, mRS significantly improved between 6-months to 3-years post-COVID (+1.3 points, p = 0.004), while no changes were observed in t-MoCA or Barthel. CONCLUSIONS:Three years after COVID-19, neuropsychiatric symptoms were significantly more frequent compared to controls, however no differences in functional or cognitive status were detected.

OBJECTIVE:People with focal epilepsy experience one or more seizures prior to diagnosis. The Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) was a prospective study enrolling people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. It collected information including cognitive testing at the time of enrollment. This was completed utilizing a computerized test battery called the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB). A prior analysis found that enrollment CBB test scores were below that of age matched controls and that performance on testing was not independently associated with the longer-term development of treatment resistance over the course of the HEP study. The present study assesses the impact of pretreatment seizures on cognition at time of diagnosis, considering time-to-treatment initiation in relation to seizure onset, pre-treatment seizure frequency, and pretreatment seizure classification. METHODS:Participants with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and no other major medical comorbidities or intellectual disability (estimated IQ > 70) were enrolled between June 29, 2012, and September 1, 2019. A subset of the 448 enrolled participants (N = 183) were over 18 years old, had complete HEP enrollment data that included pre-treatment seizure histories, and complete enrollment CBB testing for analysis in this study. Performance on enrollment CBB testing was modeled using multiple linear regression with pre-treatment seizure characteristics including seizure type and duration between seizure onset and treatment initiation, controlling for other key baseline participant characteristics. RESULTS:There were no independent associations between cognitive measures on the CBB at the time of enrollment and pre-treatment seizures after correcting for potentially confounding variables. Z-scores for the attention composite on CBB (an average of Identification and Detection tests) were not associated with a global pre-treatment seizure score that quantified time with seizures (days) and seizure count by seizure type (motor, non-motor, bilateral tonic clonic) (p = 0.29). Similarly, z-scores for the memory composite (an average of the One Card Learning test and One Back tests) were not associated with the pre-treatment seizure score (p = 0.1). No additional independent associations were found to be significant between z-scores for attention or memory composites and other potential explanatory variables. SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:This study highlights an important finding for people who develop focal epilepsy and otherwise are in good health: pre-treatment time-limited seizures do not have an independent impact on cognition early on, as measured by a brief validated cognitive screening test. This suggests that that cognition at the time of epilepsy diagnosis may be more strongly related to underlying etiology, chronic disease, and comorbidities.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:A central vestibular neural mechanism known as velocity storage may be inappropriately conditioned in mal de débarquement syndrome (MdDS), a rare chronic vestibular disorder with a continuous false sensation of self-motion described as non-spinning vertigo. Visual-vestibular therapy approaches designed to recondition the three-dimensional properties of velocity storage have yielded much clinical success, but not without limitations. An alternative therapeutic approach, designed to attenuate the contribution of malfunctioning velocity storage in higher-order neural processing, has also yielded positive results, but at a lower success rate. We sought a possible explanation for the latter shortcoming using a mathematical model. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The three-dimensional orientation properties of velocity storage can be modeled as a dynamical system using a 3 × 3 system matrix. For normal upright, the system matrix is diagonal, with its eigenvectors aligning with the head-fixed roll, pitch, and yaw axes, and the yaw eigenvector with gravity. A pull sensation of MdDS has been expressed with a system matrix with off-diagonal elements representing cross-axis coupling and interpreted as a misalignment between the yaw eigenvector and the head vertical. We manipulated the velocity storage's yaw time constant and output weight. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The model predicted that attenuating the velocity storage contribution could exaggerate the pull sensation. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The present model-based exploration points to a possible weakness in the MdDS treatment approach focused on velocity storage attenuation, while likely beneficial otherwise. When a pulling sensation is present, the treatment protocol may need to be supplemented with another approach that specifically counters this problem, such as optokinetic stimulation.

Background Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in eloquent brain regions pose significant challenges due to the increased risk of neurologic deficits associated with treatment. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and endovascular embolization are used as standalone approaches, their comparative outcomes in eloquent brain AVMs remain unclear. Purpose To directly compare the outcomes of standalone endovascular embolization versus SRS for patients with AVMs in the eloquent brain. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter study analyzed patients with AVMs located in eloquent brain regions treated with standalone SRS or embolization from January 2010 to December 2023 as part of the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs, or MISTA, consortium. Angiographic outcomes were assessed using digital subtraction arterial angiography, MR angiography, or CT angiography. Propensity score weighting (PSW) was used to account for baseline differences. Results A total of 119 patients were included (median age, 35 years [IQR, 21-54 years]; 64 female), with 96 patients treated with SRS and 23 with embolization. SRS achieved 71% (61 of 86 patients) complete obliteration at last follow-up compared with 56% (10 of 18 patients) in the embolization group (odds ratio [OR], 1.95; P = .20) before adjustment. After PSW, SRS achieved higher odds of complete obliteration at last follow-up (OR, 15.58; P = .001) compared with embolization. Before PSW, the SRS group had higher rates of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0-2 at last follow-up (95% [86 of 91 patients] vs 71% [15 of 21 patients]; OR, 6.8; P = .004) and a lower rate of hemorrhagic complications (5.2% [five of 96 patients] vs 26% [six of 23 patients]; OR, 0.15; P = .005) compared with embolization. Mortality rates were 2.1% (two of 96) in the SRS group and 4.3% (one of 23) in the embolization group (OR, 0.46; P = .54). After PSW, there was no evidence of a difference between SRS and embolization in mRS scores 0-2 (OR, 2.04; P = .45) or hemorrhagic complications (OR, 0.60; P = .63). Conclusion SRS was associated with a higher obliteration rate compared with embolization in patients with eloquent brain AVMs, whereas there was no evidence of a difference in functional outcomes or complications after adjustment. © RSNA, 2025 See also the editorial by Russell in this issue.

BACKGROUND:Whether early use of higher-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) reduces later risk of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been studied as a prospective treatment strategy. Herein, we describe the TRaditional versus Early Aggressive Therapy for MS (TREAT-MS) trial design and provide the baseline characteristics of the enrolled population. METHODS:TREAT-MS is a pragmatic, randomized, rater-blinded trial of DMT strategies in treatment-naive people aged 18-60 years with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Participants were randomized (1:1, stratified by site and long-term disability risk classification) to one of two treatment strategies: higher-efficacy or traditional DMT; the specific DMT within the assigned strategy was chosen by the clinician/patient pair. Participants could switch DMT for breakthrough disease occurring after 6 months on DMT. The primary outcome is sustained worsening of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)-plus, a composite endpoint that includes the EDSS and the timed 25-ft walk and 9-hole peg tests. RESULTS:TREAT-MS includes 900 people with the following baseline characteristics: mean age 36 ± 10 years; 629 (70 %) female gender; 648 (72 %) white, 168 (19 %) Black/African American race, and 105 (12 %) Hispanic or Latino. Mean time since MS symptom onset was 2.6 (± 4.5) years, and mean EDSS score was 2.5 (± 1.3). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:TREAT-MS seeks to address how early DMT strategy influences MS disability and related outcomes. The results will be generalizable to future individuals newly diagnosed with RRMS who, with their clinicians, will be able to use them to make data-driven DMT decisions about how to maximize their intermediate-term function.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:The emergency department (ED) is a critical point of contact within the health care system and an opportunity to initiate nonpharmacologic migraine treatment. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To examine whether progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) smartphone-based migraine self-management improved patient-reported outcomes for migraine compared with enhanced usual care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:A randomized clinical trial of the smartphone application RELAXaHEAD with and without PMR. Patients aged 18 to 65 years visiting New York University Langone Health EDs for headache who met migraine criteria and self reported 4 or more migraine days per month were recruited from June 2019 to October 2021 with follow-up at 3 months. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to June 2025. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:Participants in the intervention group were asked to listen to the app-based PMR for 60 days. Participants in the control group were asked to use the app as a symptom diary. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Primary outcome was change in migraine-related disability (MIDAS). Secondary outcomes were change in migraine-specific quality of life (MSQv2) and monthly headache days (MHDs). Adherence (number of days of diary use, PMR use and total minutes of PMR use over 90-day period) was measured using back-end analytics. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Of the 94 patients (median [IQR] age, 33 [26-45] years; 57 [82.6%] female) randomized (48 control patients and 46 PMR patients), 69 of 94 (73%) had 1 or more follow-up MIDAS scores and constituted the modified intent-to-treat population (35 control patients and 34 PMR patients). The mean (SD) change in MIDAS scores from baseline to 3 months (last observation carried forward [LOCF] used if missing 3-month follow-up data) differed between groups (PMR, 25.09 [29.64] vs control, 6.86 [59.61]; P = .01). PMR had nearly double the number of respondents improving by 5 or more MIDAS points (28 of 34 [82.4%] vs 16 of 35 [45.7%] respondents; P = .002). There was no difference in MSQv2 domains from baseline to LOCF between PMR and control (mean [SD] role function preventive domain for PMR, 16.9 [24.5] vs control, 11.3 [25.9]); emotional function domain (mean [SD] for PMR, 26.5 [26.9] vs control, 19.8 [38.5]); and role function restrictive domain (mean [SD] for PMR, 18.1 [22.7] vs control, 18.7 [26.8]). Mean (SD) change in MHDs (baseline to 3 months) did not differ between groups (PMR, 2.9 [8.0]; 23 days vs control, -1.6 [6.5]; 25 days). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:A PMR-based self-management program offered to patients with migraine after ED discharge yielded clinically significant reductions in migraine-related disability. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04281030.

Our understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) has grown exponentially, thanks to significant investments by the National Institute on Aging (NIA). This article celebrates the 40th anniversary of the NIA's Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers, highlighting the pivotal role of neuropathology as the bedrock for neurodegeneration research. Neuropathology has championed the key principles of proteinopathy, selective vulnerability, and stereotypic spread. Furthermore, neuropathologic studies advanced our understanding of ADRD prevalence, heterogeneity, clinical-pathological correlations, and genetic underpinnings, spurring biomarker development for target engagement and disease monitoring. Disease-modifying therapies for AD were inspired and informed by neuropathology. The neuropathology community is poised to refine diagnostics, leveraging digital pathology and integrating genetics and pathomics to enhance subtyping for novel precision medicine approaches. Despite some common misconceptions and logistical challenges, neuropathology continues to be a critical component of the ADRD research infrastructure, serving as a key bridge between allied basic and clinical sciences. HIGHLIGHTS: We celebrate 40 years of NIA-funded ADRCs and their contributions through neuropathology studies that have significantly advanced our understanding and treatment of ADRD. Neuropathology uncovers principles of neurodegenerative disease: proteinopathy, selective vulnerability, and stereotypic spread, informing diagnostics and therapies. Development of AD biomarkers with reference to neuropathology enhances accuracy in diagnosis and monitoring, paving the way for targeted disease-modifying therapies. Integration of digital pathology, genetics, and novel tools in neurodegeneration research promises advanced precision medicine approaches and refined diagnostics. Misconceptions and logistical challenges to neuropathological research are addressed to improve understanding and collaboration.

We present real-world data on patients switching from anti-CD20s to fumarates for various motivations in this retrospective observational study of 43 patients from three multiple sclerosis centers. Recurrent infections on anti-CD20s were the most common reason for switching to fumarates. Patients experienced limited disease activity on fumarates (83.7% were free from relapse and new MRI lesions), suggesting effectiveness was maintained. Of the 16.3% with disease activity on fumarates, 57.1% also had disease activity on anti-CD20s. Tolerability was the main reason for discontinuing fumarates. Future studies will provide additional insight into how to effectively and safely transition from anti-CD20s to fumarates.