Faculty Bibliography

This study used latent transition analysis to examine the stability and change in perceived threats in youth's primary social contexts-neighborhoods, schools, and families-and associations with emotional and behavioral problems when youth transitioned from childhood to adolescence. The sample included 8208 racially and ethnically diverse youth enrolled in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (47.4% female, M _{age_Baseline} = 9.83, M _{age_Timepoint3} = 11.99). Results revealed that while perceived threats in youth's neighborhoods were considerably stable, perceived threats in youth's families fluctuated in relation to stressful life events. Further, subgroups of youth characterized by elevated perceived threat experiences in different contexts showed differential associations with emotional and behavioral problems. Overall, findings highlight the importance of considering the stability of perceived threats to direct appropriate interventions.

Immigrant communities in the United States are diverse and have many assets. Yet, they often experience stressors that can undermine the mental health of residents. To fully promote mental health and well-being among immigrant communities, it is important to emphasize population-level policies and practices that may serve to mitigate stress and prevent mental health disorders. In this paper, we describe the stressors and stress experienced by immigrant families, using Sunset Park, Brooklyn as an example. We discuss ways to build structures and policies in support of equitable environments that promote mental health at the population level and enable families and their children to thrive.

The Family Time-Out (FTO) is a trans-theoretical and trans-diagnostic therapeutic protocol designed to treat intense and chronic conflict in families for whom parent-adolescent conflict plays a salient role. This article outlines the goals, objectives, and stepwise implementation process of the FTO protocol, including the initial FTO family session, follow-up session structure, and troubleshooting of common clinical issues that arise during implementation. A companion article in this issue (Fasulo and Waugh, 2024) presents the FTO protocol’s broader clinical justification, conceptual and developmental foundation, recommended intervention style and clinical assumptions, and strategies for optimizing and managing family commitment to change.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:This study examined the potential interplay between motor development and intervention in support of action understanding. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Eighty nine-month-old infants completed a tool-use training session and goal imitation paradigm that assessed action understanding in counterbalanced order. A metric of motor development was obtained using the Early Motor Questionnaire. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Results indicated that training improved action understanding, particularly for those infants who started out with lower means-end skills. Results further indicated that infants who did not receive any training experience in the lab beforehand, drew on their existing means-end skills. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:These results emphasize independent contributions of training and motor development on action understanding and shed light on the interaction between training and individual motor readiness in facilitating action understanding in infancy.

While the emergency department (ED) is an important setting for identifying youth with psychiatric symptoms and connecting them to services, the demands of the ED make efficient and accurate measurement essential in the implementation of mental health screening. The Kiddie-Computerized Adaptive Test (K-CAT) scales, a new electronically administered measure that offers quick and comprehensive assessment across several mental health domains, may be particularly useful in this setting. Given current recommendations for youth suicide risk screening in EDs, this study compared the K-CAT-Suicide Scale (K-CAT-SS) and the Ask Suicide-screening Questions (ASQ), a widely used measure in EDs, in a sample of participants presenting to a pediatric, psychiatric emergency setting. The measures agreed on the presence of suicide risk in over 85% of cases (κ=0.59), and the characteristics of youth who screened at risk on both were similar. Cases of disagreement were more often male and more often had educational accommodations. They had lower symptom levels of and were less often diagnosed with internalizing disorders and were less often identified as high risk by ED psychiatrists and psychologists. Examination of item endorsement patterns in cases of disagreement revealed important areas of future study, including the role of caregiver report in suicide risk screening, item comprehension concerns, and the validity of assessing youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities. While additional research would be beneficial into its psychometrics when deployed in real-world settings, the K-CAT-SS should be considered a viable alternative for suicide risk screening in EDs.

Around 5% of the children and teenagers worldwide are affected by Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder [ADHD], making it a major public health concern. Recently, demand for assessments has substantially increased, putting strain on healthcare and waiting lists. There is concern that pressure to clear service bottlenecks is leading to variable quality and reliability of ADHD assessments in this population. The ADHD Assessment Quality Assurance Standard for Children and Teenagers [CAAQAS] aims to address this by proposing a quality framework for ADHD assessments in this population. CAAQAS is intended to complement formal training, provide support to clinicians, inform commissioners, and empower children, teenagers, and caregivers on what to expect from an assessment and assessment report. Our goal is to promote evidence-based high-quality assessments, improve diagnostic accuracy, and reduce the risks of overdiagnosis, misdiagnosis, and underdiagnosis. Seven key topics were identified by authors which guided the development of this expert consensus statement. It was agreed that a high-quality diagnostic assessment of ADHD in this population commences with advance preparation to facilitate engagement of the child or teenager and caregivers. The consensus agreed that the minimum/essential standards for assessing and diagnosing ADHD adopt a systematic approach from pre-assessment through assessment to post-diagnostic stage, enabling ADHD to be disentangled from differential diagnoses. The process applies multi-source information to inform an assessment of development history and early risk factors, history of physical, mental health and other neurodevelopmental conditions, family, educational, and social histories. Assessment of core ADHD symptoms should include specific developmentally appropriate examples of associated difficulties and impairments. Neuropsychiatric and physical comorbidities should be assessed and identified. Recommendations for report writing are intended to facilitate effective communication between ADHD specialists and other services, and we highlight the importance of linking the diagnosis to an appropriate post-diagnostic discussion. Further, we discuss core competencies required to conduct a diagnostic assessment of ADHD in children and teenagers.

AIMS/UNASSIGNED:) to impute missing alcohol data in a prospective study among pregnant women. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:imputed values were weighted for the distances and matched for the day of the week. Since participants with no missing days were not comparable to those with missing data, segments of non-missing data from all participants were included as a reference. Validation was done after randomly deleting data for 5-15 consecutive days from the first trimester. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:We found that data from 5 nearest neighbors (i.e., K = 5) and segments of 55 days provided imputed values with least imputation error. After deleting data segments from the first trimester data set with no missing days, there was no difference between actual and predicted values for 64% of deleted segments. For 31% of the segments, imputed data were within +/-1 drink/day of the actual. Imputation accuracy varied by study site because of the differences in the magnitude of drinking and proportion of missing data. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:

Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at increased risk for mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic, with prior data suggesting women may be particularly vulnerable. Our global mental health study aimed to examine factors associated with gender differences in psychological distress and depressive symptoms among HCWs during COVID-19. Across 22 countries in South America, Europe, Asia and Africa, 32,410 HCWs participated in the COVID-19 HEalth caRe wOrkErS (HEROES) study between March 2020 and February 2021. They completed the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and questions about pandemic-relevant exposures. Consistently across countries, women reported elevated mental health problems compared to men. Women also reported increased COVID-19-relevant stressors, including insufficient personal protective equipment and less support from colleagues, while men reported increased contact with COVID-19 patients. At the country level, HCWs in countries with higher gender inequality reported less mental health problems. Higher COVID-19 mortality rates were associated with increased psychological distress merely among women. Our findings suggest that among HCWs, women may have been disproportionately exposed to COVID-19-relevant stressors at the individual and country level. This highlights the importance of considering gender in emergency response efforts to safeguard women's well-being and ensure healthcare system preparedness during future public health crises.