Faculty Bibliography

COVID-19 has infected millions of patients and impacted healthcare workers worldwide. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is a key component of protecting frontline clinicians against infection. The benefits of PPE far outweigh the risks, nonetheless, many clinicians are exhibiting skin injury caused by PPE worn incorrectly. These skin injuries, ranging from lesions to open wounds are concerning because they increase the susceptibility of viral infection and transmission to other individuals. Early into the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020), the U.S. National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) developed a series of position statements to improve wear-ability of PPE and protect healthcare professionals and their patients as safe from harm as possible under the circumstances. The NPIAP positions, which were formed by conducting a systematic review of what was known at the time, include: (1) Prepare skin before and after wearing PPE with skin sealants, barrier creams and moisturizers; (2) Frequent PPE offloading to relieve pressure and shear applied to skin; (3) treat visible skin injuries immediately caused by PPE to minimize future infection; (4) non-porous dressings may provide additional skin protection, but lack evidence; (5) health systems should take care to educate clinicians about placement and personal hygiene related to handling PPE. Throughout all of these practices, handwashing remains a top priority to handle PPE. These NPIAP positions provided early guidance to reduce the risk of skin injury caused by PPE based on available research regarding PPE injuries, a cautious application of evidence-based recommendations on prevention of device related pressure injuries in patients and the expert opinion of the NPIAP Board of Directors. Clinicians who adhere to these recommendations reduce the prospects of skin damage and long-term effects (e.g. scarring). These simple steps to minimize the risk of skin injury and reduce the risk of coronavirus infection from PPE can help.

BACKGROUND:Brow lift is frequently combined with blepharoplasty; however, the literature is lacking on their combined effect on complication rates. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:This study aims to evaluate major complication rates after blepharoplasty and brow lift and to determine if complication rates increase when blepharoplasty and brow lift were performed simultaneously. METHODS:A prospective cohort of patients who underwent cosmetic blepharoplasty, brow lift, or a combination of the 2 procedures between 2008 and 2013 was identified from the CosmetAssure Insurance database. The primary outcome was a postoperative major complication requiring emergency room evaluation, hospital admission, or reoperation within 30 days. Groups were compared with univariate analysis (significance, P < 0.05). RESULTS:A total of 6126 patients underwent aesthetic eye surgery, of which, 4879 (79.6%) underwent blepharoplasty, 441 (7.2%) brow lift, and 806 (13.2%) a combination the 2 procedures. Patients who underwent a combined procedure were older than patients who underwent isolated blepharoplasty or brow lift (55.5 ± 9.4 vs 54.6 ± 11.1 vs 53.3 ± 12.0 years; P < 0.01). In males, blepharoplasty was the most commonly performed procedure, followed by a combined procedure and brow lift (17.6% vs 12.9% vs 10.7%; P < 0.01). There were similar rates of smokers between the 3 groups (5.7% vs 8.0% vs 6.6%; P = 0.06). Between combined procedures, blepharoplasty, and brow lift there, were similar rates of major complications (0.4% vs 0.4% vs 0.7%; P = 0.65) and hematoma (0.2% vs 0.2% vs 0.5%; P = 0.49), which was the most common complication. CONCLUSIONS:Aesthetic eye surgery has a very low overall major complication rate (0.4%). When brow lift is combined with blepharoplasty, it poses no additional risk of major complications compared with either procedure alone.

GENERAL PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To discuss a standardized methodology for wound photography with a focus on aiding clinicians in capturing high-fidelity images. TARGET AUDIENCE/BACKGROUND:This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES/OBJECTIVE:After participating in this educational activity, the participant will be able to:1. Discriminate the components of high-quality wound photography.2. Identify the technological innovations that can augment clinical decision-making capacity.3. Choose strategies that can help clinicians avoid adverse medicolegal outcomes.

Liposuction is a relatively safe surgical procedure, with most complications being minor in nature. However, there are a few life-threatening complications that should not be underestimated. We present a case of a patient who developed bilateral pneumothoraces, pneumomediastinum, and pneumoperitoneum after combined liposuction and abdominoplasty. Although this presentation is rare, clinicians should keep a high index of suspicion in patients presenting with shortness of breath, chest pain, and/or abdominal pain after liposuction.

Objective: Compare short term surgical outcomes and trends in cleft lip repair with or without gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP). Design: Retrospective review of the ACS NSQIP-Pediatric database from 2014 to 2019. Patients: Patients between 2 and 18 months of age undergoing any initial cleft lip repair, with or without GPP, were selected via relevant CPT^® codes. Main Outcome Measures: Patient demographics, comorbidities, 30-day readmissions and post-operative complications are assessed. Results: From 2014 to 2019, a total of 6269 patients were identified, of which 6.67% underwent GPP (n = 418). Patients undergoing GPP were significantly older with an average age of 9 months compared to 5 months in the non-GPP group (P <.001). Co-morbidities were similar amongst both cohorts, although patients undergoing GPP were more likely to have a higher ASA class (P =.006), cardiac risk factors (P =.012) and syndromic diagnosis (P <.001). There were no differences in 30-day short term surgical outcomes. GPP was associated with increased operative time by ~25 minutes when compared to cleft lip repair alone (P <.001). Conclusion: GPP was not associated with increased 30-day postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, or total length of hospital stay, and was associated with an increased operative time of 25 minutes. Children undergoing GPP were significantly older in age and were more likely to have a higher ASA class/cardiac risk factors.

Background/Purpose: APS ACTION is an international Clinical Database and Repository of persistently antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive subjects, collecting demographic, medical history, and aPL data.This study focused on the prevalence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in aPL positive patients without a defined concomitant autoimmune disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate potential differences when stratifying patients by ANA, and to better phenotype aPL positive patients.
Method(s): Data from aPL positive patients with or without APS classification criteria were retrieved from the APS ACTION Database. Patients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or other connective tissue disease were excluded. Patients were divided in two groups (ANA+ and ANA-), based on ANA status at registry entry. Subsequently, Table 1. Demographic, clinical and serological characteristics of the patients. demographic, clinical (including 1997 ACR SLE classification criteria), and serological data were compared between the two subgroups.
Result(s): 521 aPL-positive patients were included in the study (meanage 52.1+/-13 years, 70% female). Among them, 224 patients were ANA+ and 297 ANA-. Patients characteristics are displayed in Table 1. ANA positivity was significantly associated with previous history of hematologicalmanifestations as a whole, including hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia, (19.3% ANA+ vs. 8.4% ANA-, p < 0.01) and livedo reticularis (15.1% ANA+ vs. 10% ANA-, p < 0.05). A positive association with the number of unexplained fetal deaths beyond 10 weeks of gestation was also noted (p < 0.05), and a trend was observed for lower platelet count, aPL-related nephropathy and arthritis, though these associations were not statistically significant. No significant association was found for extra-criteria manifestations such as haemolytic anemia and history of thrombocytopenia, when considered individually. When sub-analysing the ANA-group, a significant association with any history of arterial thromboses (29.4% ANA+ vs. 38.8% ANA-, p < 0.02) and the number of arterial events was observed (p < 0.01). When evaluating ANA positivity in aPL carriers and primary APS (PAPS) individually, the association between ANA+ and previous hematologic disorder remained significant for both groups, with stronger significance for PAPS patients. In addition, ANA positivity in PAPS patients was significantly associated with livedo reticularis and previous history of small vessel disease (p < 0.05).
Conclusion(s): In this large international cohort, ANA positivity was associated with a higher rate of hematologic manifestations in aPL-positive patients without connective tissue disease. ANA+ patients, especially those with PAPS, showed a tendency toward a higher rate of microvascular manifestations and arthritis. ANA-subjects showed a significantly higher rate of arterial thrombosis, without any other significant association with clinical, serological or demographic data

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The use of low-temperature plasma (LTP) is a novel approach to treating peri-implantitis. LTP disrupts the biofilm while conditioning the surrounding host environment for bone growth around the infected implant. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial properties of LTP on newly formed (24 h), intermediate (3 days), and mature (7 days) peri-implant-related biofilms formed on titanium surfaces. METHODS/UNASSIGNED: RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:≤ 0.016), and CLSM corroborated these results. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:.

UNLABELLED:Facial transplantation (FT) has advanced extensively over the past two decades, with over 40 transplants performed to date. Over this time, the FT literature has evolved as well, from early discussions on ethics and feasibility of FT to functional outcomes reports more recently. We aimed to evaluate the entire body of FT literature to identify trends in publications over time in addition to current existing gaps in the field. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the published FT literature from 1994, the first year FT was mentioned in the literature, through July 2020. Co-authorship and keyword information were analyzed using VOSviewer. Articles were manually categorized based on keywords and their aim to provide insight on trends. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 2182 articles were identified. Analysis identified the top 50 publishing authors in the field and demonstrated co-authorship linkage between 84.8% of the top 1000 authors. Clinical surgical techniques, protocols, and experiments were the most frequently published category. Within clinical outcomes, immunologic outcomes were most frequent, while psychosocial were the lowest. Gaps were identified in long-term outcomes reporting and patient-reported outcomes, with physician-reported outcomes heavily outweighing patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:As the field continues to evolve, rigorous tracking of publication patterns over time will encourage development of a more robust evidence base, identify gaps in the published literature, and highlight opportunities to enhance collaboration in the field. This data will provide surgeons and research institutions with information to further improve this life-changing procedure.