Faculty Bibliography

: media-1vid110.1542/5839981580001PEDS-VA_2018-0290Video Abstract OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of antibiotic use with weight outcomes in a large cohort of children.

Grade IV glioma is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumour. Gross total resection with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) guided surgery combined with local chemotherapy (carmustine wafers) is an attractive treatment strategy in these patients. No previous studies have examined the benefit carmustine wafers in a treatment programme of 5-ALA guided resection followed by a temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy protocol. The objective of this study was to examine the benefit of carmustine wafers on survival in patients undergoing 5-ALA guided resection. A retrospective cohort study of 260 patients who underwent 5-ALA resection of confirmed WHO 2007 Grade IV glioma between July 2009 and December 2014. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from surgery. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between groups. Cox regression was performed to identify variables predicting survival. A propensity score matched analysis was used to compare survival between patients who did and did not receive carmustine wafers while controlling for baseline characteristics. Propensity matched analysis showed no significant survival benefit of insertion of carmustine wafers over 5-ALA resection alone (HR 0.97 [0.68-1.26], p = 0.836). There was a trend to higher incidence of wound infection in those who received carmustine wafers (15.4 vs. 7.1%, p = 0.064). The Cox regression analysis showed that intraoperative residual fluorescent tumour and residual enhancing tumour on post-operative MRI were significantly predictive of reduced survival. Carmustine wafers have no added benefit following 5-ALA guided resection. Residual fluorescence and residual enhancing disease following resection have a negative impact on survival.

Importance:Physicians often report practicing defensive medicine to reduce malpractice risk, including performing expensive but marginally beneficial tests and procedures. Although there is little evidence that malpractice reform affects overall health care spending, it may influence physician behavior for specific conditions involving clinical uncertainty. Objective:To examine whether reducing malpractice risk is associated with clinical decisions involving coronary artery disease testing and treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants:Difference-in-differences design, comparing physician-specific changes in coronary artery disease testing and treatment in 9 new-cap states that adopted damage caps between 2003 and 2005 with 20 states without caps. We used the 5% national Medicare fee-for-service random sample between 1999 and 2013. Physicians (n = 75 801; 36 647 in new-cap states) who ordered or performed 2 or more coronary angiographies. Data were analyzed from June 2015 to January 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures:Changes in ischemic evaluation rates for possible coronary artery disease, type of initial evaluation (stress testing or coronary angiography), progression from stress test to angiography, and progression from ischemic evaluation to revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting). Results:We studied 36 647 physicians in new-cap states and 39 154 physicians in no-cap states. New-cap states had younger populations, more minorities, lower per-capita incomes, fewer physicians per capita, and lower managed care penetration. Following cap adoption, new-cap physicians reduced invasive testing (angiography) as a first diagnostic test compared with control physicians (relative change, -24%; 95% CI, -40% to -7%; P = .005) with an offsetting increase in noninvasive stress testing (7.8%; 95% CI, -3.6% to 19.3%; P = .17), and referred fewer patients for angiography following stress testing (-21%; 95% CI, -40% to -2%; P = .03). New-cap physicians also reduced revascularization rates after ischemic evaluation (-23%; 95% CI, -40% to -4%; P = .02; driven by fewer percutaneous coronary interventions). Changes in overall ischemic evaluation rates were similar for new-cap and control physicians (-0.05%; 95% CI, -8.0% to 7.9%; P = .98). Conclusions and Relevance:Physicians substantially altered their approach to coronary artery disease testing and follow-up after initial ischemic evaluations following adoption of damage caps. They performed a similar number of ischemic evaluations but conducted fewer initial left heart catheterizations, referred fewer stress-tested patients for left heart catheterizations, and referred fewer patients for revascularization. These findings suggest that physicians tolerate greater clinical uncertainty in coronary artery disease testing and treatment if they face lower malpractice risk.

Introduction: Natalizumab treatment early in the relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) disease course may improve clinical outcomes. STRIVE is a multicentre, observational, openlabel, single-arm study of anti-JC virus antibody negative patients starting natalizumab < 3 years after RRMS diagnosis.
Objective(s): To examine no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) status, cognitive function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over 3 years of natalizumab treatment in patients with early RRMS.
Method(s): NEDA was defined as no Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening (a score increase of >=1.5 from a baseline [BL] of 0, >=1.0 from a BL of 1.0-5.5, or >=0.5 from a BL >=6.0, confirmed over >=24 weeks), relapses, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, or new/enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions. Clinical NEDA was defined as no 24-week-confirmed EDSS worsening or relapses. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to 24-week-confirmed EDSS worsening and improvement (a score decrease of >=1.0 from a BL >=2.0). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS- 29) were assessed at BL and yearly thereafter. Changes from BL (CFBs) to year 3 were analysed via Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
Result(s): At BL, the intent-to-treat population (N=222) had early RRMS with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) time since diagnosis of 1.6 (0.8) years, a mean (SD) EDSS score of 2.0 (1.1), and a mean (SD) of 1.4 (1.2) relapses in the prior year. A total of 50% of the patients had not used prior disease-modifying therapies. At year 3, 55 of 164 patients (33.5%) maintained NEDA (95% CI: 26.3%, 40.8%) and 107 of 171 patients (62.6%) maintained clinical NEDA (95% CI: 55.3%, 69.8%). At year 3, the cumulative probabilities of 24-week-confirmed EDSS worsening and improvement were 19.5% and 36.2%, respectively. From BL to year 3, patients exhibited significant improvements in SDMT score (n=153; mean CFB [95% CI]: 3.6 [2.0, 5.2]; P< 0.001) and in MSIS-29 (n=147) physical score (mean CFB [95% CI]: -4.8 [-7.1, -2.5]; P< 0.001), psychological score (mean CFB [95% CI]: -2.2 [-3.5, -0.9]; P=0.001), and quality-of-life score (mean CFB [95% CI]: -7.0 [-10.3, -3.7]; P< 0.001).
Conclusion(s): In patients with early RRMS, natalizumab treatment over 3 years was associated with NEDA maintenance and improved cognitive and HRQoL outcomes. These results are consistent with previous work showing natalizumab's effectiveness when initiated early in the RRMS disease course

Objective: To determine optimal thresholds for inter-eye differences in retinal nerve fiber (RNFL) and ganglion cell+inner plexiform (GCIP) layer thicknesses that are predictive of a unilateral optic nerve lesion in multiple sclerosis (MS).
Background(s): The optic nerve is a frequent site for involvement in MS. Current international diagnostic criteria for MS do not include the optic nerve as a lesion site despite the high prevalence of acute optic neuritis (ON). Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) detects thinning of RNFL and GCIP in MS.
Method(s): In this multi-center international study at 9 sites, SD-OCT, high-contrast visual acuity (VA), low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA), and vision-specific quality of life (QOL) were measured for MS patients and healthy controls as part of the International Multiple Sclerosis Visual System Consortium (IMSVISUAL). QOL was measured using the NEI-VFQ-25 and 10-item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement (NOS). Presence of an optic nerve lesion was defined as history of acute unilateral ON.
Result(s): Among healthy controls (n=348), the 95th percentile value for inter-eye difference (upper boundary of expected) was 7.0 microns; for GCIP, the 95th percentile was 3.0 microns. These values were applied to the MS cohort (n=1,346), and were associated with worse vision-specific QOL for inter-eye differences above the threshold values (P<=0.04, linear regression, accounting for age). Greater inter-eye differences in VA and LCLA were associated with greater inter-eye RNFL differences (P< 0.001) and GCIP (P<=0.002). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated an optimal RNFL inter-eye difference threshold of 5 microns for identifying patients with unilateral ON (n=404) in the MS cohort (point on ROC curve where sensitivity and specificity are both optimized). For GCIP, the threshold was 4 microns.
Conclusion(s): Optimal inter-eye differences of 5 microns for peripapillary RNFL and 4 microns for macular GCIP thickness are robust thresholds for identifying unilateral optic nerve lesions based on analyses of an international MS cohort