Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION: Until recently, there has not been a valid and reliable screening test for lung cancer. As compared to chest X-ray, low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening has demonstrated greater sensitivity resulting in lung cancer diagnosis at an earlier stage, thereby reducing lung cancer mortality among high-risk individuals by 20%. In the current study, we sought to examine knowledge and attitudes about LDCT screening for lung cancer among an ethnically and racially diverse sample of high risk (HR) community members and primary care providers (PCP). METHODS: Eligible individuals participated in a focus group using semi-structured interview guides. Focus groups were conducted with PCPs (by telephone) and HRs (in-person). Sessions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. The constant comparison method and content analysis were used to analyze results. RESULTS: The majority of PCPs had limited knowledge of lung cancer CT screening. PCPs cited barriers to recommendation including, cost/insurance barriers and the potential for false positives. PCPs perceived the main benefit to be early detection of lung cancer. The majority of HRs had never heard of lung LDCT screening and had never had a healthcare provider recommend it to them. Perceived barriers included fear of results (bad news) and financial costs. The main perceived benefit was early detection. CONCLUSION: Lack of knowledge about LDCT was a key a barrier across both the PCP and HR. RESPONDENTS: Understanding the barriers to lung screening across diverse community populations is necessary to improve screening rates and shared decision-making.

BACKGROUND: National surveys indicate high rates of burnout, particularly among primary care physicians. Despite concerns about the impact of burnout on health outcomes, this relationship is not well studied. HealthyHearts NYC, funded through the EvidenceNOW initiative of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality is evaluating the effectiveness of practice facilitation to improve adoption of Million Hearts' evidence-based ABCS guidelines (Aspirin, Blood pressure control (BP), Cholesterol management, and Smoking cessation) in small-to-medium size primary care practices. This study examined the association between site characteristics and physicians' burnout, as well as the relationship with the ABCS outcomes. METHODS: We present data on 99 small practices working with the NYCDOHMH Primary Care Information Project, and 8 Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) from the Community Health Care Association of New York State. Each provider from participating practice sites completed a survey that included a validated question assessing burnout that used a 5-point scale ranging from 1- no symptoms of burnout to 5- completely burned out. For sites with multiple providers, we calculated a site burnout score by extracting the maximum score within each site. The burnout level was dichotomously coded as 1- burned out, and 0- not burned out. Each site completed a practice survey to report site characteristics, including the number of providers (1 vs. 2 or more), Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) status (recognized vs. not recognized), average number of patient visits per week, and total number of support staff. We used logistic regression analysis to assess the association of practice site characteristics and burnout. We also calculated a composite measure for patients with multiple CVD risk factors to capture the extent to which targets are met across three of the outcome measures (ABC). We used ttests to assess the difference in ABCS and composite measures by burnout status. RESULTS: Overall, 19% of physicians reported burnout. A significant difference was detected for all ABCS measures by the sites' burnout status. Sites reporting burnout had higher rates of meeting aspirin, smoking, and composite measure targets, but lower rates of meeting BP and cholesterol target measures and were more likely to have achieved PCMH recognition. FQHCs reported higher rates of burnout compared with small practices. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rates of burnout were lower than reported in previous surveys. Lower burnout rates among small independent practices compared with FQHCs may be related to small practice providers' greater level autonomy. We will present additional data exploring organizational factors that may explain variation in burnout across these different practice settings. Finally, previous research has similarly found inconsistent associations between quality and burnout. Further studies are required to determine whether healthier workplaces also result in higher quality care

BACKGROUND:Patients with advanced-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may suffer severe respiratory exacerbations and need to decide between accepting life-sustaining treatments versus foregoing these treatments (choosing comfort care only). We designed the InformedTogether decision aid to inform this decision and describe results of a pilot study to assess usability focusing on participants' trust in the content of the decision aid, acceptability, recommendations for improvement, and emotional reactions to this emotionally laden decision. METHODS:Study participants ( N = 26) comprising clinicians, patients, and surrogates viewed the decision aid, completed usability tasks, and participated in interviews and focus groups assessing comprehension, trust, perception of bias, and perceived acceptability of InformedTogether. Mixed methods were used to analyze results. RESULTS:Almost all participants understood the gist (general meaning) of InformedTogether. However, many lower literacy participants had difficulty answering the more detailed questions related to comprehension, especially when interpreting icon arrays, and many were not aware that they had misunderstood the information. Qualitative analysis showed a range of emotional reactions to the information. Participants with low verbatim comprehension frequently referenced lived experiences when answering knowledge questions, which we termed "alternative knowledge." CONCLUSIONS:We found a range of emotional reactions to the information and frequent use of alternative knowledge frameworks for deriving meaning from the data. These observations led to insights into the impact of lived experiences on the uptake of biomedical information presented in decision aids. Communicating prognostic information could potentially be improved by eliciting alternative knowledge as a starting point to build communication, in particular for low literacy patients. Decision aids designed to facilitate shared decision making should elicit this knowledge and help clinicians tailor information accordingly.