Faculty Bibliography

Program/Project Purpose: Teaching medicine in English in non-English-speaking countries is increasingly common. IMGs receive less communication skills training and tend to perform less well on communication skills assessments. This project's purpose was to create the first Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) program in English with standardized patients at one medical school in Turkey. Structure/Method/Design: All 48 medical students in the fourth year M.D. class (of six years) at Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, were separated into two internal medicine blocks in 2015-16, and were given a single station, pass/fail, end-of-block OSCE in English. Palpitations and abdominal pain OSCE cases were adapted with permission from New York University. Six American teachers from the KU English Learning Center and five faculty from KUSOM were recruited and trained as SPs and faculty assessors, respectively, in 3 training sessions per OSCE. NYU's competency-based assessment checklists were used. To prepare students, specific bedside teaching sessions were delivered during the clinical block. Data was analyzed in REDCap and ethical approval was obtained at KUSOM. Outcome & Evaluation: For each block, 58-100% students passed the OSCE. SPs gave well done marks to 50-88% for eliciting the story with appropriate questions, 8-20% for providing clear explanations about diagnosis and treatment, 58-76% for managing the physical exam respectfully, 66-80% for using clear and easy to understand English, and 50-64% of students would be recommended or highly recommended to a friend, respectively (N=48 divided into two blocks). Students who failed scored poorly on medical English anchors (N=10). Students most strongly agreed that the OSCE helped them identify strengths and weaknesses and stimulated them to learn more (3.24 and 2.96 averages, Likert scale 1=strongly disagree, 4=strongly agree). Going Forward: KUSOM's OSCE pilot program exceeded expectations. Education and counseling was more challenging than information gathering or conducting physical examination. The second block performed better than the first block. The large increase in performance between blocks is likely explained by better attendance at bedside sessions. Offering OSCEs in both English and Turkish next year will help clarify whether their performance reflected clinical skills or English language alone. These findings inform expansion of curriculum and faculty development in bedside teaching at KUSOM

BACKGROUND: Almost half of adult men in Vietnam are current cigarette smokers. Recent surveys also suggest a high prevalence of water pipe use, particularly in rural areas. Yet services to treat tobacco dependence are not readily available. The purpose of this study was to characterize current tobacco use treatment patterns among Vietnamese health care providers and factors influencing adherence to recommended guidelines for tobacco use screening and cessation interventions for water pipe, cigarette and dual users. METHODS: We conducted cross sectional surveys of 929 male current tobacco users immediately after they completed a primary care visit at one of 18 community health centers. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of smokers used cigarettes only, 24% water pipe only, and 42% were dual users. Overall 12% of patients reported that a provider asked them if they used tobacco products during the visit. Providers were significantly more likely to screen cigarette smokers compared with water pipe or dual users (16%, 9% and 11% respectively). Similarly, 9% of current cigarette smokers received advice to quit compared to 6% of water pipe and 5% of dual users. No patients reported that their health care provider offered them assistance to quit (e.g., self-help materials, referral). CONCLUSION: Despite ratifying the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, Vietnam has not made progress in implementing policies and systems to ensure smokers are receiving evidence-based treatment. High rates of water pipe and dual use indicate a need for health care provider training and policy changes to facilitate treatment for both cigarette and water pipe use.

BACKGROUND: While primary care work conditions are associated with adverse clinician outcomes, little is known about the effect of work condition interventions on quality or safety. DESIGN: A cluster randomized controlled trial of 34 clinics in the upper Midwest and New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care clinicians and their diabetic and hypertensive patients. INTERVENTIONS: Quality improvement projects to improve communication between providers, workflow design, and chronic disease management. Intervention clinics received brief summaries of their clinician and patient outcome data at baseline. MAIN MEASURES: We measured work conditions and clinician and patient outcomes both at baseline and 6-12 months post-intervention. Multilevel regression analyses assessed the impact of work condition changes on outcomes. Subgroup analyses assessed impact by intervention category. KEY RESULTS: There were no significant differences in error reduction (19 % vs. 11 %, OR of improvement 1.84, 95 % CI 0.70, 4.82, p = 0.21) or quality of care improvement (19 % improved vs. 44 %, OR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.58, 1.21, p = 0.42) between intervention and control clinics. The conceptual model linking work conditions, provider outcomes, and error reduction showed significant relationships between work conditions and provider outcomes (p