Faculty Bibliography

Oral cancer pain is attributed to the release from cancers of mediators that sensitize and activate sensory neurons. Intraplantar injection of conditioned media (CM) from human tongue cancer cell line HSC-3 or OSC-20 evokes nociceptive behavior. By contrast, CM from noncancer cell lines, DOK, and HaCaT are non-nociceptive. Pain mediators are carried by extracellular vesicles (EVs) released from cancer cells. Depletion of EVs from cancer cell line CM reverses mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. CM from non-nociceptive cell lines become nociceptive when reconstituted with HSC-3 EVs. Two miRNAs (hsa-miR-21-5p and hsa-miR-221-3p) are identified that are present in increased abundance in EVs from HSC-3 and OSC-20 CM compared to HaCaT CM. The miRNA target genes suggest potential involvement in oral cancer pain of the toll like receptor 7 (TLR7) and 8 (TLR8) pathways, as well as signaling through interleukin 6 cytokine family signal transducer receptor (gp130, encoded by IL6ST) and colony stimulating factor receptor (G-CSFR, encoded by CSF3R), Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (JAK/STAT3). These studies confirm the recent discovery of the role of cancer EVs in pain and add to the repertoire of algesic and analgesic cancer pain mediators and pathways that contribute to oral cancer pain.

BACKGROUND:Recipient selection is an important determinant of surgical outcomes in facial transplantation (FT). Appropriately, each FT program develops their own guidelines for recipient selection criteria. Currently, there is no resource to simultaneously assess and identify similarities and differences between these guidelines. Such information could be useful in distinguishing areas of FT that are well understood from those that could benefit from further exploration. METHODS:We performed a systematic review of the scientific literature from inception to June 18, 2021, using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify articles pertaining to recipient selection criteria. Clinical trials were identified through the Clinicaltrials.gov registry. United States and international program websites were reviewed for patient-facing information. RESULTS:Our systematic review yielded 90 suitable articles, 8 clinical trials, and 7 program websites containing the recipient selection criteria of 24 different FT programs. The most reported on recipient criteria were age, positive human immunodeficiency viral status (HIV+), positive hepatitis C viral status, psychosocial stability, and medical compliance. Other criteria were rarely addressed, such as blindness and recipient immune status. CONCLUSIONS:Guidelines among different face transplant programs are changing over time. We found consensus on certain recipient selection criteria, but the majority remain program or surgeon dependent, emphasizing that FT is still an evolving procedure. Although most programs reported on their recipient selection criteria, the rationale was often missing. Further discussion about recipient selection criteria and the reasoning behind employing or changing them will help advance the field.

SUMMARY:Defects involving the midface and maxilla pose unique challenges to reconstructive surgeons. The maxilla serves as the central keystone of the face and interfaces with various other facial subunits to affect form and function. Reconstructive methods range from prosthetics to free tissue transfer, and the indications for different options are reviewed here. Finally, special considerations including management of the orbit, dental rehabilitation, and future directions are discussed.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to compare the demographic differences of the most common peripheral nerve compressions in the upper extremity-carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), ulnar nerve compression (UNC) at the elbow, combined CTS and UNC, radial tunnel syndrome (RTS), and posterior interosseous nerve syndrome (PINS)-as a means to better understand the etiologies of each. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:< .05). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< .001). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The demographics of patients with various compressive neuropathies were not homogeneous, suggesting different etiologies.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effect of composition, fabrication mode, and thermal cycling on the mechanical properties of different polymeric systems used for temporary dental prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Standard bar-shaped specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm) were fabricated of six polymeric systems of varying compositions and fabrication modes (n = 10/group): conventional PMMA (Alike, GC) - group CGC; conventional PMMA (Dêncor, Clássico) - group CD; bis-acryl (Tempsmart, GC) - group BGC; bis-acryl (Yprov, Yller) - group BY; milled PMMA (TelioCAD, Ivoclar) - group MI; 3D printed bis-acryl - (Cosmos Temp, Yller) group PY. Half of the specimens were subjected to 5000 thermal cycles (5 °C to 55 °C). Three-point bending tests were performed using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed set to 0.5 mm/min. Flexural strength and elastic modulus were calculated from the collected data. FTIR spectra were recorded pre and post curing and after thermal cycling to evaluate material composition and degree of conversion. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were utilized to examine the composition and micromorphology of the systems, respectively. Data were analyzed using two-analysis of variance and Tukey tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS:FTIR spectra indicated that BGC, BY and PY groups corresponded to urethane dimethacrylate systems (bis-acryl), while CGC, CD, and MI groups corresponded to monomethacrylate systems, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Bis-acryl BGC system yeilded the highest flexural strength (80 MPa), followed by the milled PMMA MI system (71 MPa), both statistically significant different relative to other groups. Bis-acryl BY exhibited the lowest flexural strength (27 MPa). Thermocycling significantly increased the flexural strength of all polymeric systems (∼10-15 MPa), except for the 3D-printed PY group. Bis-acryl BGC (1.89 GPa) and conventional PMMA CGC (1.66 GPa) groups exhibited the highest elastic modulus, followed by milled PMMA MI group (1.51 GPa) and conventional PMMA CD (1.45 GPa) systems, with significant difference detected between BGC group and MI and CD groups. The 3D printed PY (0.78 GPa) and bis-acryl BY (0.47 GPa) systems presented the lowest elastic modulus. Thermocycling did not have a significant influence on the elastic modulus. FTIR spectra indicate water sorption and release of unreacted monomers as well as increased degree of conversion (∼5-12%) after thermal cycling. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Composition and fabrication mode and thermal cycling significantly affected the mechanical properties of polymeric systems used for temporary dental prostheses.

Background:Patients with psychiatric comorbidities represent a significant subset of those sustaining pilon fractures. The purpose of this study is to examine the association of psychiatric comorbidities (PC) in patients with pilon fractures and clinical outcomes. Methods:A multi-institution, retrospective review was conducted. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were skeletally mature patients with a tibia pilon fracture (OTA Type 43B/C) who underwent definitive fracture fixation utilizing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with a minimum of 24 weeks of follow-up. Patients were stratified into two groups for comparison: PC group and no PC group. Results:There were 103 patients with pilon fractures that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria of this study. Of these patients, 22 (21.4%) had at least one psychiatric comorbidity (PC) and 81 (78.6%) did not have psychiatric comorbidities (no PC). There was a higher percentage of female patients (PC: 59.1% vs no PC: 25.9%, p=0.0.005), smokers (PC: 40.9% vs no PC: 16.0%, p=0.02), and drug users (PC: 22.7% vs no PC: 8.6%, p=0.08) amongst PC patients. Fracture comminution (PC: 54.5% vs no PC: 32.1%, p=0.05) occurred more frequently in PC patients. The PC group had a higher incidence of weightbearing noncompliance (22.7% vs 7.5%, p=0.04) and reoperation (PC: 54.5% vs no PC: 29.6%, p=0.03). Conclusion:.

OBJECTIVE:Primary cleft nasal repair can include septal reconstruction. We hypothesize that primary cleft septoplasty and adult septoplasty have fundamental differences that render these procedures as distinct surgical entities. DESIGN/METHODS:Systematic review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases performed on pediatric cleft and general adult septoplasty techniques through December 2021. (PROSPERO ID CRD42022295763). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Collected data included information on septal dissection, septal detachment, and management of the bony and cartilaginous septum. RESULTS:Twenty-eight pediatric cleft septoplasty and 229 adult septoplasty studies were included. Dissection in primary cleft septoplasty was limited to the anterocaudal septum, while secondary cleft septoplasty and adult septoplasty techniques entailed wide exposures of the cartilaginous septum with or without exposure of the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid. In primary cleft septoplasty, detachment of the septum was mostly limited to the nasal spine and anterior base of the cartilaginous septum, while secondary cleft septoplasty and adult septoplasty included detachment from the vomer, and ethmoid. In the few reports of cartilage excision during primary cleft septoplasty, removal was limited to the anterior inferior border of the septum, while secondary cleft septoplasty and adult septoplasty included excision of the cartilaginous and bony septum. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Primary cleft septoplasty is distinct from septoplasty performed on facially mature patients. More specifically, septal dissection and detachment are limited to the anterior caudal area during primary lip repair, with rare removal of cartilage or bone. Given these differences, the authors suggest the term "septal reset" to describe septoplasty performed during primary cleft nasal repair.