Faculty Bibliography

Limited evidence is available to guide periprocedural management of oral anticoagulants in the setting of interventional radiology (IR) procedures. For direct oral anticoagulants, therapy interruption (TI) is based on medication half-life and procedural bleeding risk. Periprocedural management of warfarin includes INR monitoring, and possible bridging with parenteral anticoagulants. It is unknown if these recommendations apply to IR procedures. To evaluate bleeding complications and thromboembolic events following periprocedural management of the factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors or warfarin in patients undergoing IR procedures. We performed a retrospective, observational study at NYU Langone Health (NYULH) of all adult patients who underwent an IR procedure from January 2015 to July 2017 and were receiving apixaban, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. Patients who were pregnant or who had a mechanical heart valve were excluded. At NYULH, TI is not required for FXa inhibitors, and an INR < 3 is recommended for patients on warfarin undergoing low risk procedures. For moderate/high risk procedures, TI for 48 h or 72 h with reduced renal function, is recommended for FXa inhibitors, and an INR < 1.5 is recommended for patients on warfarin. We evaluated 350 IR procedures, with a total of 174 low bleeding risk and 176 moderate/high bleeding risk. The 30-day major bleeding rate was 0.9%, clinically relevant non-major bleeding rate was 3%, minor bleeding rate was 1% and thromboembolic event rate was 1%. The periprocedural oral anticoagulation management strategy at NYULH appears safe given the low 30-day incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events.

BACKGROUND:Parameters within reconstitution, storage, stability, and administration may be optimized according to the unique pharmacokinetics of each antibiotic to ensure a successful desensitization. OBJECTIVE:The study aims to evaluate the successfulness and safety of antibiotic desensitization protocols developed by the pharmacy department at our institution. METHODS:A retrospective study was conducted at an 800-bed, urban, tertiary care, academic medical center. A total of 36 patients 18 years of age or older, admitted to our intensive care units between March 2013 and July 2017, who underwent antibiotic desensitization utilizing our pharmacy developed protocols were included. RESULTS:In 36 patients, 61 desensitization cases were identified and included; 17 (47%) were male, 27 (75%) were Caucasian, and the median age was 55 years (range 19-94). In all, 15 different antibiotics were administered for desensitization, with meropenem (n = 12, 20%), ampicillin (n = 7, 11%), piperacillin/tazobactam (n = 7, 11%), and penicillin (n = 7, 11%) being the most common; 59 (97%) of 61 desensitizations were completed successfully with or without experiencing reactions, and 53 (89%) of the successful desensitization cases were completed without reactions. Two cases were categorized as anaphylaxis, which was severe enough to terminate the desensitization process. Of the 59 cases successfully completed, the 6 (10%) cases that experienced reactions were managed successfully during desensitization with completion of the process. Conclusion and Relevance: The findings suggest that our pharmacy-developed antibiotic desensitization protocols are successful and safe and may be adapted by other institutions.

Inotropes are an integral component of the early stabilization of the patient presenting with cardiogenic shock. Despite years of clinical experience with the 2 most commonly used inotropes, dobutamine and milrinone, there remains limited data comparing outcomes between the two. We conducted a retrospective review to compare the effectiveness and safety of milrinone or dobutamine for the initial management of cardiogenic shock. Adult patients with cardiogenic shock regardless of etiology who received initial inotrope therapy with either milrinone (n = 50) or dobutamine (n = 50) and did not receive mechanical circulatory support were included. The primary end point was the time to resolution of cardiogenic shock. Changes in hemodynamic parameters from baseline and adverse events were also assessed. Resolution of shock was achieved in similar numbers in both the groups (milrinone 76% vs dobutamine 70%, P = .50). The median time to resolution of shock was 24 hours in both groups ( P = .75). There were no differences in hemodynamic changes during inotrope therapy, although dobutamine trended toward a greater increase in cardiac index. Arrhythmias were more common in patients treated with dobutamine than milrinone, respectively (62.9% vs 32.8%, P < .01), whereas hypotension occurred to a similar extent in both groups (milrinone 49.2% vs dobutamine 40.3%, P = .32). The use of concomitant vasoactive medications, dosage required, and duration of therapy did not differ between groups. There was no difference in the overall rate of discontinuation due to adverse event; however, milrinone was more commonly discontinued due to hypotension (13.1% vs 0%, P < .01) and dobutamine was more commonly discontinued due to arrhythmia (0% vs 11.3%, P < .01). Milrinone and dobutamine demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety profiles but with differences in adverse events. The choice of milrinone or dobutamine as initial inotrope therapy for cardiogenic shock may depend more on tolerability of adverse events.

Our goal was to provide comprehensive data on the effectiveness of ketamine in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and to describe the potential consequences of long-term ketamine infusion. Ketamine, an N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, blocks excitatory pathways contributing to ongoing seizure. While ketamine use is standard in anaesthetic induction, no definitive protocol exists for its use in RSE, and little is known about its adverse effects in long-term, high-dose administration. We present two cases of RSE that responded rapidly to ketamine infusion, both with fatal outcomes secondary to metabolic acidosis and cardiovascular collapse. We performed a systematic review of the application and consequences of ketamine use in RSE. PubMed, Ovid, MEDLINE and PMC were searched for articles describing ketamine treatment for RSE according to a predetermined search strategy and inclusion criteria. The systematic review revealed wide discrepancies in ketamine dosing (infusion maintenance dose range 0.0075-10.5 mg/kg/hour), but good outcomes in medically managed RSE (75% of studies reported moderate or complete seizure control in adults, 62.5% in paediatrics). Additionally, literature review elucidated a potentially causal relationship between prolonged ketamine infusion and both cardiovascular and metabolic dysregulation. Ketamine is effective in RSE by antagonising excitotoxic NMDA receptors. However, there is high variability in ketamine dosing and scarce data on its safety in long-term infusion. Metabolic acidosis and haemodynamic instability associated with the use of long-term, high-dose ketamine infusions must be of concern to clinicians administering ketamine to critically ill patients.

Nephrotoxicity is a known adverse effect of polymyxin B (PMB). Animal data suggests that once daily dosing may reduce the rate and delay the onset of acute kidney injury (AKI).In a multicenter, retrospective study, we evaluated adult patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥30 mL/min who received ≥48h of PMB therapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in rate of AKI comparing once and twice daily PMB dosing. Secondary endpoints included time to AKI and recovery of renal function.Of 273 eligible patients, 100 from each group were matched based on propensity scores. In the matched groups, nephrotoxicity, defined according to RIFLE criteria, was more frequent with once versus twice daily dosing (47% vs. 17% P=0.0005). After adjusting for residual differences by multivariate conditional logistic regression, once daily dosing was more likely to result in nephrotoxicity (adjusted odds ratio 2.5, 95% CI 1.413-4.541, P=0.002). Among 64 patients who developed AKI, the median onset was similar between groups (7 days with once vs. 6 days with twice daily dosing, P=0.095). Of 37 patients who had their serum creatinine evaluated subsequently, 29/37 (78%) had recovery of renal function. No patient required renal replacement therapy.Our findings suggest that AKI is significantly more common with PMB once daily as compared to twice daily dosing with no difference in time to AKI. Prospective randomized study is warranted to validate these results.

BACKGROUND:There is little data guiding clinicians on how to discontinue vasopressors among septic shock patients on concomitant norepinephrine (NE) and vasopressin (VP). OBJECTIVE:To determine the incidence of hypotension within 24 hours of discontinuing NE (NE DC first) versus VP (VP DC first) first in septic shock patients. METHODS:This retrospective study evaluated septic shock patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) and surgical ICU (SICU) receiving concomitant NE and VP. Receipt of additional vasopressors, mixed shock states, expired or care withdrawn, and NE and VP discontinued simultaneously were exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was incidence of hypotension within 24 hours of first vasopressor discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included time to hypotension, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and ICU mortality. RESULTS:A total of 80 patients were included (NE DC first [n = 35]; VP DC first [n = 45]), with a median age of 73 years and median modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores of 21 and 7, respectively. More patients in the NE DC first group were in the SICU (42.9% vs 20.0%; P = 0.048) with more intra-abdominal infections (40.0% vs 15.6%; P = 0.021) and fewer appropriate empirical antibiotics (62.9% vs 86.7%; P = 0.018). Hypotension within 24 hours of first agent discontinuation was higher in the VP DC first group (28.6% vs 62.2%; P = 0.004), with similar hospital LOS and ICU mortality. Multivariate analysis identified VP DC first as an independent predictor of hypotension (odds ratio = 7.2; CI = 2.3-22.7). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among septic shock patients on concomitant NE and VP, discontinuation of VP first was associated with an increased incidence of hypotension; future prospective control trials are warranted.

Cancer is a known hypercoagulable state that leads to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low molecular weight heparin remains the preferred anticoagulant for VTE in patients with cancer over vitamin K antagonist. However, the preferred anticoagulant in prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cancer has yet to be determined. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly being utilized; however their role in cancer has only recently been investigated. The objective of this retrospective cohort was to describe real-world anticoagulation prescribing patterns in cancer patients at a large academic medical center between January 1, 2013 and October 31, 2016. We sought to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DOACs in patients with cancer for either VTE and/or AF. Patient demographic, clinical characteristics, as well as bleeding and thrombotic events were collected. There were 214 patients in our analysis, of which 71 patients (33%) received a DOAC [apixaban (n = 22), dabigatran (n = 17), and rivaroxaban (n = 32)]. There were fewer bleeding events and/or discontinuations in the DOAC group compared to enoxaparin (13 vs. 27, p = 0.022). There was no difference in major or minor bleeds or thromboembolic events in comparing DOAC to enoxaparin or DOAC to warfarin. This was a retrospective, single-institution study assessing the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to warfarin or enoxaparin in patients with cancer. DOACs may represent an alternative to warfarin or enoxaparin in patients with cancer for VTE and/or stroke reduction in AF.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, sodium chloride 3% has been administered via a central venous line (CVL) because of the perceived risk of infiltration and tissue injury due to its high osmolarity. In clinical practice, sodium chloride 3% is commonly administered through peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) given the necessity of timely administration. However, there is no published data on the safety of administering sodium chloride 3% through PVCs in the adult population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of peripheral venous administration of sodium chloride 3%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted in patients who received sodium chloride 3% in the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients were excluded if they had a CVL for the entire duration of the infusion or younger than 18 years at the time of administration. Baseline patient and infusion characteristics were collected. Infusion-related adverse events (IRAEs) were recorded, graded, and interventions required were noted. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were included in the analysis. The most common indication was hyponatremia and majority of the patients were managed in the neurosurgical ICU. The most common risk factor for IRAEs was the presence of altered mental status. Four patients experienced an IRAE at an event rate of 6.1%. Patients who experienced an IRAE ranged from 38 to 82 years old. The IRAEs were grade 1 in severity, managed conservatively with removal of the PVC, and 2 of the 4 patients had their infusions restarted peripherally. The time to initial IRAE ranged from 2 to 94 hours. For the entire cohort, hospital and ICU length of stay were 8 and 4 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of IRAEs related to the infusion of sodium chloride 3% through PVCs appears to be similar to those reported with other hyperosmotic agents and could be considered for patients who need time-sensitive therapy.

Background. Due to altered pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in critically ill patients, administration of beta-lactams as EI provides better target attainment in therapeutic drug monitoring studies. To optimize meropenem (MER) dosing in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, our antimicrobial stewardship program implemented a MER EI protocol in an 18-bed medical intensive care unit (MICU) in March 2014. Methods. We conducted a retrospective evaluation to compare outcomes in MICU patients with severe sepsis and septic shock who received MER for >=72h administered as EI 1 g over 3 h Q8H with a total daily dose (TDD) 3g (1/2015-1/2017) vs. SI 500 mg over 30 minutes Q6H with TDD 2 g (1/2012-1/2014). ICU mortality and clinical response (CR) were evaluated as endpoints. CR was defined by improvement in signs and symptoms of infection. Results. Of 667 patients who received MER, 148 were included (EI n = 52, SI n = 96). Age, weight, comorbidities (malignancy 31 vs. 33%, P = 0.8; chronic liver disease [CLD] 15 vs. 23%, P = 0.4), severity of illness (median mAPACHE II 18 vs. 19, P = 0.6; SOFA 5 vs. 6, P = 0.5) and vasopressors' use (75 vs. 79%, P = 0.5) were comparable between EI and SI groups. Serum creatinine (SCr) was lower in EI group (median 1.1 vs. 1.4 SI, P = 0.05). Gram-negative (GN) pathogens (MIC<=0.25 mg/mL, 94%) were identified in 44% of patients in EI vs. 38% in SI group, P = 0.5. MER TDD was higher in EI group (3 vs. 1.5g SI, P < 0.01) with no difference in use of combination therapy (64 vs. 46%, P = 0.06). ICU mortality (median time to death 9 days) was lower (19 vs. 37%, P = 0.047) and CR was higher (83 vs. 46%, P = 0.038) in EI vs. SI group. Total pressor days on MER were shorter (2 vs. 3 days, P < 0.01) and white blood cell normalization rate was higher (87% vs. 51%, P < 0.01) in EI vs. SI group, whereas there was no difference in days of mechanical ventilation, duration of MER therapy and ICU stay. After adjusting for SCr, severity of illness scores, combination therapy and SI group in a multivariate model, CLD (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.36-7.77, P = 0.008) and lower MER TDD (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.09-2.98, P = 0.02) were independent predictors of ICU mortality. Conclusion. In this cohort of MICU patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and low MIC of GN pathogens, there was improved mortality and CR in MER EI group. Our finding of potential benefit of higher MER TDD in these patients warrants further exploration in a prospective study