Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Fatigue is a common complaint among older adults with hearing loss. The impact of addressing hearing loss on fatigue symptoms has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial. In a secondary analysis of the ACHIEVE study, we investigated the effect of hearing intervention versus health education control on 3-year change in fatigue in community-dwelling older adults with hearing loss. METHODS:Participants aged 70-84 years old with untreated hearing loss recruited across 4 study sites in the United States (Forsyth County, NC; Jackson, MS; Minneapolis, MN; Washington County, MD) were randomized (1:1) to hearing intervention or health education control and followed for 3 years. Three-year change in fatigue symptoms was measured by 2 instruments (RAND-36 and PROMIS). We estimated the intervention effect as the difference in the 3-year change in fatigue between intervention and control groups using a linear mixed-effects model under the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS:Participants (n=977) had a mean age (SD) of 76.8 (4.0) years, were 53.5% female and 87.8% White. Over 3 years, a beneficial effect of the hearing intervention versus health education control on fatigue was observed using the RAND-fatigue score (β= -0.12 [95% CI -0.22, -0.02]). Estimates also suggested beneficial effect of hearing intervention on fatigue when measured by the PROMIS fatigue score (β= -0.32 [95% CI -1.15, 0.51]). CONCLUSIONS:Our findings suggest that hearing intervention may reduce fatigue over 3 years among older adults with hearing loss.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Serum creatinine reflects both muscle mass and kidney function. Serum cystatin C has recently been recommended as an additional marker for estimating kidney function, and use of both markers together may provide an index of muscle mass. This review aims to describe the biological basis for and recent research examining the relationship of these markers to muscle mass in a range of adult populations and settings. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:This review identified 67 studies, 50 of which had direct measures of muscle mass, and almost all found relationships between serum creatinine and cystatin C and muscle mass and related outcomes. Most studies have been performed in older adults, but similar associations were found in general populations as well as in subgroups with cancer, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and other morbid conditions. Creatinine to cystatin C ratio was the measure examined the most often, but other measures showed similar associations across studies. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:Measures of serum creatinine and cystatin C together can be an index of muscle mass. They are simple and reliable measures that can be used in clinical practice and research. Further study is needed to determine actionable threshold values for each measure and clinical utility of testing and intervention.

BACKGROUND:Asian New York City (NYC) residents have the lowest cancer screening uptake across race and ethnicity. Few studies have examined screening differences across Asian ethnic subgroups in NYC. METHODS:Cross-sectional survey data were analyzed using multivariable logistic and multinomial regression analyses. Differences among Chinese, Korean, and South Asian adults in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake; breast and CRC screening knowledge; and cancer fatalism were examined. Associations between breast and CRC screening knowledge and their uptake were also assessed along with associations between cancer fatalism and breast, cervical, and CRC screening uptake. RESULTS:Korean women reported 0.52 (95%CI: 0.31, 0.89) times lower odds of Pap test uptake compared to Chinese women; South Asian adults had 0.43 (95%CI: 0.24, 0.79) times lower odds of CRC screening uptake compared to Chinese adults. Korean adults reported 1.80 (95%CI: 1.26, 2.58) times higher odds of knowing the correct age to begin having mammograms compared to Chinese adults; and South Asian adults had 0.67 (95%CI: 0.47, 0.96) times lower odds of knowing the correct age to begin CRC screening compared to Chinese adults. Korean adults had 0.37 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.53) times lower odds of reporting cancer fatalism compared to Chinese adults. CONCLUSIONS:Low cancer screening uptake among Asian American adults, low screening knowledge, and high cancer fatalism were found. Cancer screening uptake, knowledge, and fatalism varied by ethnic subgroup. IMPACT/CONCLUSIONS:Findings indicate the need for ethnic-specific cultural and linguistic tailoring for future cancer screening interventions.

BACKGROUND:Because of advances in medical treatment of heart failure, patients are living longer than in previous eras and may approach the need for advanced therapies, including heart transplantation, at older ages. This study assesses practices surrounding heart transplant in older adults (> 70 years) and examines short- and medium-term outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS/RESULTS:This study is a retrospective analysis using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database from 2010 to 2021. The absolute number of older adults being transplanted is increasing. Older adults were more likely to have had a prior malignancy or ischemic cardiomyopathy and less likely to be on extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation or have a high UNOS status prior to transplant. Mortality at 1-year was higher for older adults (27.8% vs. 23.4%), but at 5 years there was no significant difference (22.3% vs. 19.4%.). Older adults were more likely to die of malignancy or infection. Adults under 70 were more likely to die of cardiovascular causes or graft failure. There was less rejection in older adults. Mortality has not changed for older adults transplanted before versus after the 2018 UNOS allocation change. CONCLUSIONS:Carefully selected older adults may be considered for heart transplantation, given similar intermediate-term mortality.

The incidence of twin pregnancies has been rising, largely attributable to increasing use of artificial reproductive techniques. Ultrasound plays a critical role in establishing the chorionicity and amnionicity of multiple gestations, a key predictor of the expected risk and complications, along with guiding future clinical and imaging follow-up examinations and intervals. People carrying multiple gestations will typically undergo more ultrasound examinations (and occasionally fetal MRI) than those carrying singletons, at minimum including a first trimester dating scan, nuchal translucency scan at 11 to 14 weeks, an anatomy scan at 18 to 22 weeks, and other scans in the second and third trimesters for growth and surveillance. This document clarifies the most appropriate imaging guidelines for multiple gestations for seven clinical scenarios/variants, which range from initial imaging, follow-up imaging, growth and surveillance for uncomplicated multiple gestations, and those complicated by a known abnormality or discordance between fetuses. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Asian individuals are among the highest immigrant group to the United States and at particularly high risk of gestational diabetes, which is associated with long-term maternal cardiovascular disease. Limited data are available on the association of prepregnancy cardiometabolic risk factors with gestational diabetes among Asian American subjects. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:This study sought to determine the association of prepregnancy hypertension and body mass index (BMI) among Asian ancestry subgroups and by maternal nativity. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Using data from the National Vital Statistics System from 2016 to 2019, the prevalence of gestational diabetes, stratified according to prepregnancy hypertension and obesity, was examined according to maternal race. Predicted probability of gestational diabetes with continuous BMI was calculated across Asian ancestry subgroups and by maternal nativity. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:. Predicted probability of gestational diabetes was higher for mothers born outside the United States among all Asian subgroups, except for Japanese American subjects. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Asian American individuals have the highest prevalence of gestational diabetes at any BMI and with hypertension. Substantial variation in risk is present across Asian subgroups. Findings suggest a need for more tailored screening and intervention for gestational diabetes among Asian American subjects, with a specific focus on risk for individuals born outside the United States.

The purpose of this article is to summarize disparities in blood pressure (BP) by race in the United States, discuss evidence-based strategies to increase equity in BP, review recent American Heart Association BP equity initiatives, and highlight missed opportunities for achieving equity in hypertension. Over 122 million American adults have hypertension, with the highest prevalence among Black Americans. Racial disparities in hypertension and BP control in the United States are estimated to be the single largest contributor to the excess risk for cardiovascular disease among Black versus White adults. Worsening disparities in cardiovascular disease and life expectancy during the COVID-19 pandemic warrant an evaluation of the strategies and opportunities to increase equity in BP in the United States. Racial disparities in hypertension are largely driven by systemic inequities that limit access to quality education, economic opportunities, neighborhoods, and health care. To address these root causes, recent studies have evaluated evidence-based strategies, including community health workers, digital health interventions, team-based care, and mobile health care to enhance access to health education, screenings, and BP care in Black communities. In 2021, the American Heart Association made a $100 million pledge and 10 commitments to support health equity. This commitment included implementing multifaceted interventions with a focus on hypertension as a seminal risk factor contributing to disparities in cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity. The American Heart Association is one organizational example of advocacy for equity in BP. Achieving equity nationwide will require sustained collaboration among individual stakeholders and public, private, and community organizations to address barriers across multiple socioecological levels.

Endometriosis is a common condition impacting individuals assigned female at birth. Though incompletely understood, the disorder is caused by endometrial-like tissue located outside of the endometrial cavity, associated with inflammation and fibrosis. Clinical presentation is variable, ranging from asymptomatic to severe pelvic pain and infertility. Treatment is determined by the patient's individualized goals and can include medical therapies to temporize symptoms or definitive surgical excision. Imaging is used to help diagnose endometriosis and for treatment planning. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.