Faculty Bibliography

Background and Aims: We systematically evaluated the impact of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on stroke care across the world.
Method(s): Observational studies comparing characteristics, acute treatment delivery or hospitalization outcomes between stroke patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic and those admitted prior to the pandemic were identified by Medline, Scopus and Embase databases search. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for all outcomes.
Result(s): We identified 46 studies including 129, 494 patients. Patients admitted with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic were found to be younger [mean difference (MD)= -1.19, 95%CI: -2.05, -0.32; I²=70%] and more frequently male (OR=1.11, 95%CI:1.01, 1.22; I²=54%) compared to stroke patients admitted in the pre-pandemic era. Stroke patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic, also, had higher baseline NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (MD=0.55, 95%CI:0.12, 0.98; I²=90%), higher probability for large vessel occlusion presence (OR=1.63, 95%CI: 1.07, 2.48; I²=49%) and higher risk for in-hospital mortality (OR=1.26, 95%CI:1.05, 1.52; I²=55%). Acute ischemic stroke patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic had higher probability of receiving endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) treatment (OR=1.24, 95%CI:1.05, 1.47; I²=40%). No difference in the rates of intravenous thrombolysis administration or difference in time metrics regarding onset to treatment time for intravenous thrombolysis and onset to groin puncture time for EVT were detected.
Conclusion(s): Increased prevalence of younger patients, more severe strokes attributed to large vessel occlusion, and higher endovascular treatment rates were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stroke patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic had higher in-hospital mortality. These findings need to be interpreted with caution in view of discrepant reports and heterogeneity being present across studies

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To provide recommendations to otolaryngologists, pulmonologists, and allied clinicians for tracheostomy decannulation in pediatric patients. METHODS:An iterative questionnaire was used to establish expert recommendations by the members of the International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group. RESULTS:Twenty-six members completed the survey. Recommendations address patient criteria for decannulation readiness, airway evaluation prior to decannulation, decannulation protocol, and follow-up after both successful and failed decannulation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Tracheostomy decannulation recommendations are aimed at improving patient-centered care, quality and safety in children with tracheostomies.

Implant therapy is a predictable treatment to replace missing teeth. However, the osseointegration process may be negatively influenced by systemic conditions, such as diabetes mellitus (DM). Microtopography and implant surface developments are strategies associated to better bone repair. This study aimed to evaluate, in healthy and diabetic rats, histomorphometric (bone to implant contact = %BIC; and bone area fraction occupancy = %BAFO) and nanomechanical (elastic modulus = EM; and hardness = H) bone parameters, in response to a nanometric hydroxyapatite implant surface. Mini implants (machined = MAC; double acid etched = DAE, and with addition of nano-hydroxyapatite = NANO) were installed in tibias of healthy and diabetic rats. The animals were euthanized at 7 and 30 days. NANO surface presented higher %BIC and %BAFO when compared to MAC and DAE (data evaluated as a function of implant surface). NANO surface presented higher %BIC and %BAFO, with statistically significant differences (data as a function of time and implant surface). NANO surface depicted higher EM and H values, when compared to machined and DAE surfaces (data as a function of time and implant surface). Nano-hydroxyapatite coated implants presented promising biomechanical results and could be an important tool to compensate impaired bone healing reported in diabetics.

BACKGROUND:Congestive heart failure affects 6.2 million people in the United States. Patients have a decreased cardiopulmonary reserve and often suffer from peripheral edema, important considerations in lower extremity reconstructive surgery. In this study, the authors sought to determine the impact of congestive heart failure on postoperative outcomes following lower extremity pedicled flap reconstruction using a national multi-institutional database. METHODS:The authors isolated all patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent lower extremity pedicled flap reconstruction from 2010 to 2016. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared between patients with and without congestive heart failure. Multivariable regressions were performed to determine the independent effect of congestive heart failure on postoperative outcomes. RESULTS:The authors identified 1895 patients who underwent lower extremity pedicled flap reconstruction, of whom 34 suffered from congestive heart failure. No significant difference was observed between patients with versus without congestive heart failure in postoperative wound complications (superficial wound infection, deep wound infection, and wound dehiscence), renal failure, or readmission. On multivariable analysis, congestive heart failure was independently associated with increased cardiopulmonary complications (i.e., myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, pneumonia, reintubation, and failed ventilator weaning) (OR, 3.92; 95 percent CI, 1.53 to 9.12), septic events (OR, 4.65; 95 percent CI, 2.05 to 10.02), and length of hospital stay (β, 0.37; 95 percent CI, 0.01 to 0.72). CONCLUSIONS:In patients undergoing lower extremity pedicled flap reconstruction, congestive heart failure independently predicts a four-fold increase in postoperative sepsis and cardiopulmonary complications and a significantly increased length of hospital stay. The authors' findings highlight the need for heightened perioperative vigilance and medical optimization in this high-risk population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Risk, II.

The basic concepts from the fields of biology and engineering are integrated into tissue engineering to develop constructs for the repair of damaged and/or absent tissues, respectively. The field has grown substantially over the past two decades, with particular interest in bone tissue engineering (BTE). Clinically, there are circumstances in which the quantity of bone that is necessary to restore form and function either exceeds the patient's healing capacity or bone's intrinsic regenerative capabilities. Vascularized osseous or osteocutaneous free flaps are the standard of care with autologous bone remaining the gold standard, but is commonly associated with donor site morbidity, graft resorption, increased operating time, and cost. Regardless of the size of a craniofacial defect, from trauma, pathology, and osteonecrosis, surgeons and engineers involved with reconstruction need to consider the complex three-dimensional (3D) geometry of the defect and its relationship to local structures. Three-dimensional printing has garnered significant attention and presents opportunities to use craniofacial BTE as a technology that offers a personalized approach to bony reconstruction. Clinicians and engineers are able to work together to produce patient-specific space-maintaining scaffolds tailored to site-specific defects, which are osteogenic, osseoconductive, osseoinductive, encourage angiogenesis/vasculogenesis, and mechanically stable upon implantation to prevent immediate failure. In this work, we review biological and engineering principles important in applying 3D printing technology to BTE for craniofacial reconstruction as well as present recent translational advancements in 3D printed bioactive ceramic scaffold technology.

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a clinically heterogenous and genetically diverse disease with 22 known complementation groups (FA-A to FA-W), resulting from the inability to repair DNA interstrand crosslinks. This rare disorder is characterized by congenital defects, bone marrow failure, and cancer predisposition. FANCA is the most commonly mutated gene in FA and a variety of mostly private mutations have been documented, including small and large indels, and point and splicing variants. Genotype-phenotype associations in FA are complex and a relationship between particular FANCA variants and the observed cellular phenotype or illness severity remains unclear. In this study, we describe two siblings with compound heterozygous FANCA variants (c.3788_3790delTCT and c.4199G>A) who both presented with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at the age of 51. The proband came to attention when he developed pancytopenia after a single cycle of low-dose chemotherapy including platinum-based therapy. Other than a minor thumb abnormality, neither patient had prior findings to suggest FA, including normal blood counts and intact fertility. Patient fibroblasts from both siblings display increased chromosomal breakage and hypersensitivity to interstrand crosslinking agents as seen in typical FA. Based on our functional data demonstrating that the c.4199G>A/p.R1400H variant represents a hypomorphic FANCA allele, we conclude that the residual activity of the Fanconi anemia repair pathway accounts for lack of spontaneous bone marrow failure or infertility with the late presentation of malignancy as the initial disease manifestation. This and similar cases of adult-onset esophageal cancer stress the need for chromosome breakage testing in patients with early onset of aerodigestive tract squamous cell carcinomas before platinum-based therapy is initiated.

BACKGROUND:Cross-sex vascularized composite allotransplantation has been performed in cadaveric facial transplantation and clinical extremity transplantation. Understanding the challenge of appropriate donor-recipient matching, this study sought to characterize the public's perception of cross-sex vascularized composite allotransplantation. METHODS:Participants were surveyed in New York City. Data collected included demographics and willingness to donate vascularized composite allografts (VCAs) of various types. Similar questions were asked in the context of same-sex and cross-sex donation. RESULTS:A total of 101 participants (male: 56.4%; age ≤35 years: 62.4%) were surveyed. The majority expressed willingness to donate to recipients of a different sex (hand: 78.2%, face: 56.4%, penis or uterus: 69.3%, lower limb: 81.2%, abdominal wall: 80.2%, larynx: 81.2%, and solid organs: 85.2%). Among VCAs, willingness to donate facial allografts was significantly different in same-sex versus cross-sex contexts (64.4% vs 56.4%; P = 0.008). Participants were also significantly more likely to donate VCAs to same-sex recipients on behalf of themselves versus loved ones (P < 0.05). There was significantly lower willingness to receive cross-sex versus same-sex facial (P = 0.022) and genital allografts (P = 0.022). Education on the preservation of recipient masculinity or femininity in cross-sex facial transplantation increased participants' willingness to receive a cross-sex face transplant from 56.4% to 71.3% (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:This study highlights the urban public's acceptance of VCA donation or reception regardless of sex mismatch. There is increased willingness to receive a cross-sex face transplant after education, highlighting opportunities for future focused interventions to increase public awareness and ultimately the donor pool.