Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To make recommendations on the identification, routine evaluation, and management of fetuses at risk for airway compromise at delivery. METHODS:Recommendations are based on expert opinion by members of the International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group (IPOG). A two-iterative Delphi method questionnaire was distributed to all members of the IPOG and responses recorded. The respondents were given the opportunity to comment on the content and format of the survey, which was modified for the second round. "Consensus" was defined by >80% respondent affirmative responses, "agreement" by 51-80% affirmative responses, and "no agreement" by 50% or less affirmative responses. RESULTS:Recommendations are provided regarding etiologies of perinatal airway obstruction, imaging evaluation, adjunct evaluation, multidisciplinary team and decision factors, micrognathia management, congenital high airway obstruction syndrome management, head and neck mass management, attended delivery procedure, and delivery on placental support procedure. CONCLUSIONS:Thorough evaluation and thoughtful decision making are required to optimally balance fetal and maternal risks/benefits.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a drastic decline in the number of elective surgeries performed in the United States. Many national societies and local governments provided recommendations for surgeons to initially suspend and progressively resume elective surgery. The authors used a survey to the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons (ACAPS) to assess the effect on plastic surgeons.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Controversy exists about whether the elastic modulus (E) mismatch between the loading indenter and ceramic materials influences fatigue testing results. The research hypotheses were that for porcelain veneered Y-TZP crowns 1) A low modulus Steatite indenter (SB) leads to higher fatigue reliability compared to a high modulus tungsten carbide indenter (WC); 2) Different surface damage patterns are expected between low and high modulus indenters after sliding contact fatigue testing. All ceramic crowns will exhibit similar step-stress accelerated life testing (SSALT) contact fatigue reliability (hypothesis 1) and failure characteristics (hypothesis 2) when using high stiffness tungsten carbide (WC, E = 600 GPa) vs. enamel like steatite (SB, E = 90 GPa) indenters. METHODS:Manufacturer (3M Oral Care) prepared Y-TZP-veneered all-ceramic molar crowns were bonded to aged resin composite reproductions of a standard tooth preparation and subjected to mouth-motion SSALT fatigue (n = 18 per indenter type). Failure was defined either as initial inner cone crack (IC), or final fracture (FF) when porcelain fractured (chipping). Selected IC specimens that did not progress to FF were embedded in epoxy resin and sectioned for fractographic analysis. RESULTS:The distribution of failures across the load and cycle profiles lead to similar calculated Weibull Use Level Probability Plots with overlap of the 2-sided 90% confidence bounds. The calculated reliability for IC and FF was equivalent at a mission of 300 N or 700 N load and 50,000 cycles, although the WC indenter had a trend for lower reliability for IC at 700 N. Both indenters produced similar patterns of wear and cracking on crown surfaces. Fractographic landmarks showed competing failure modes, but sliding contact partial inner cone cracks were the most dominant for both groups. SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:The more compliant Steatite indenter had similar veneered crown fatigue reliability and failure modes to those found with use of a high stiffness tungsten carbide indenter (hypotheses 1 and 2 rejected).

BACKGROUND:The gender disparity between the number of female and male chairs and program directors has been previously established. The aim of this study was to determine whether any differences in objective credentials existed between male and female plastic surgery department chairs/division chiefs and program directors. METHODS:Information about each plastic surgery program director and chair/chief was extracted from the websites of all institutions affiliated with a plastic surgery residency program. For each individual, information about the length of their career, number of fellowships completed, and number of publications was recorded. The two-tailed t test was used to compare differences between male and female chairs and program directors. RESULTS:A total of 99 chairs were recorded, of which nine (9.1 percent) were female. Of the 99 program directors, 13 (13.1 percent) were female. There was no difference in the number of years in practice or number of fellowships between men and women for either position. On average, male chairs had significantly fewer publications than female chairs (71.9 versus 128; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of publications between male and female program directors. Compared to program directors, chairs had significantly more years in practice and numbers of publications, which held true for both men and women. CONCLUSIONS:Women are not only underrepresented in the department chair and program director positions, but also possess higher qualifications that may reflect differences in standards for promotion and appointment. Additional research is needed to elucidate the reasons behind the observed differences in qualifications.

Anesthetic considerations are integral to the success of facial transplantation (FT), yet limited evidence exists to guide quality improvement. This study presents an institutional anesthesia protocol, defines reported anesthetic considerations, and provides a comprehensive update to inform future directions of the field.

Facial transplantation (FT) has become a feasible reconstructive solution for patients with devastating facial injuries. Secondary revisions to optimize functional and aesthetic outcomes are to be expected, yet the optimal timing and approach remain to be determined. The purpose of this study was to analyze all facial allograft revisions reported to date, including the senior author's experience with 3 FTs.

The aim of facial transplantation (FT) was to enhance quality of life (QoL) for individuals living with severe facial disfigurement. Yet QoL has proved challenging to assess, as the field lacks a unified approach for incorporating FT recipients' perspectives into meaningful QoL measures. In this study, we review FT recipients' self-reported QoL through a qualitative analysis of publicly available posttransplant interviews to identify the aspects of QoL they report as meaningful.