Faculty Bibliography

Stercoral colitis is an inflammatory reaction secondary to fecal impaction and almost always occurs in the setting of chronic constipation. Luminal distention caused by dense and dehydrated stool compresses the vascular supply of the distal colon, resulting in bowel ischemia and ulceration. Stercoral colitis primarily affects elderly patients, but it can be seen in any patient with decreased bowel motility, with risk factors including neurodegenerative disorders, chronic medical diseases, malignancy, immobility, and the use of narcotic or anticholinergic medications. Patients most often present with abdominal pain and tenderness. However, the presentation is often nonspecific and can include nongastrointestinal symptoms. Due to the common presence of comorbidities, a thorough history and physical examination findings may be difficult to obtain. Imaging, especially CT, plays a vital role in the diagnosis of stercoral colitis, demonstrating hallmark features such as fecal impaction and a large colorectal stool burden. Mural thickening (>3 mm) and other CT signs of inflammation aid in diagnosis, although findings including perirectal fat stranding can be nonspecific. Signs of perforation, including mural discontinuity, extraluminal air, and extraluminal stool collections, can also be identified. Other potential complications include obstruction, bleeding, fistulas, and urinary tract involvement secondary to mass effect. The overlap of findings between stercoral colitis and other colonic diseases, particularly diverticulitis and malignancy, can sometimes make diagnosis challenging. Identification of fecal impaction and associated inflammatory changes helps in distinguishing stercoral colitis from other pathologic conditions. Prompt diagnosis of stercoral colitis and its complications allows appropriate management, which can range from preventive measures to emergent surgical treatment. ^©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

OBJECTIVE:Controversy persists regarding the optimal management of gout in routine primary care. There is a lack of clarity on whether treating to a target serum urate (TTT-SU) versus treating to avoid symptoms (TTASx) is more effective. METHODS:We designed a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial aimed at patients in primary care who have known gout, have elevated SU levels, and had at least one flare in the previous 12 months. The trial was designed to be pragmatic and incorporated structured input from primary care physicians, rheumatologists, and patients. The TTASx strategy group will receive weeklong courses of typical therapies for gout flares, such as colchicine, naproxen, or an oral glucocorticoid. The TTT-SU strategy group will receive urate-lowering therapy (primarily allopurinol) with dose titration to maintain an SU level <6 mg/dL, colchicine (or naproxen) prophylaxis for the first six months of urate-lowering therapy, and access to the same flare therapies as the TTASx group. Two clinicians (nurses or physicians) per site will be trained in each strategy to manage the patients in each arm without contamination. Gout flares are the primary outcome and are assessed every two weeks by trained study staff masked to treatment assignment using a validated questionnaire. The secondary outcome is quality of life. Blood pressure control, kidney function, glycemic control, and coronary atherosclerosis are exploratory secondary outcomes. RESULTS:Several sites have started prescreening using automated search strategies in their patients' electronic health records. Of the first 1,381 patients found in primary care practices with a history of gout, 691 patients (50%) passed prescreening checks. These potentially eligible participants have a median age of 67 years, 85% are men, median SU levels are 7.2 mg/dL, and 18% are taking low dosages of allopurinol. These patients have been targeted for recruitment efforts that are underway now. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This randomized controlled active comparator strategy trial will answer a key question in the treatment of patients with gout in primary care: the comparative effectiveness of TTT-SU versus TTASx in gout. Secondary and exploratory outcomes will add important information regarding the broader extra-articular and quality-of-life effects of lowering SU levels.

BACKGROUND:The primary goal of our study is to assess the national US prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), along with its socio-demographic characteristics, severity, and co-occurring medical and psychiatric disorders, using data from the 2020-2021 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). METHODS:We analyzed 2020-2021 NSCH data to estimate the prevalence of ever-diagnosed and current ASD among 79,182 children and adolescents (3-17 years). Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to examine associations between medical and psychiatric co-morbidities, socio-demographic factors, and ASD severity. RESULTS:< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:This study provides updated prevalence estimates of ASD and highlights the high burden of co-morbidities, emphasizing the need for comprehensive, multidisciplinary approaches in ASD management. Additionally, our findings emphasize gender differences in ASD presentation, which should be considered in future research and clinical practice to ensure more tailored diagnostic and intervention strategies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Chylomicron biosynthesis plays a vital role in supplying essential lipids and lipid soluble vitamins to peripheral tissues for various functions. Despite this, the intracellular synthesis, trafficking, and secretion of chylomicrons remains only partly understood. The purpose of this review is to summarize the role of established proteins in this process and bring attention to recently identified proteins to provide an up-to-date model of chylomicron biosynthesis. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Recently, several proteins have been shown to play a role in the initial formation and lipidation of chylomicrons at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which include: TM6SF2, PLA2G12B, PRAP1, and SURF4. In addition, mitochondria have been implicated in chylomicron metabolism, but mechanistic insight is missing. The trafficking of chylomicrons from the ER to the Golgi, and the subsequent trafficking from the Golgi to the basolateral side of enterocytes, however, remains a mystery. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:Progress in the chylomicron biosynthesis field is largely associated with findings in VLDL biosynthesis. In addition, increased insight in events after prechylomicrons leave the ER is needed. Given the important role of chylomicron biosynthesis in whole-body lipid metabolism, further research into the molecular mechanisms is warranted.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:For patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency, AAT augmentation therapy can be an important part of care. However, for those who require a lung transplant (LT), there is currently only limited information to guide the use of AAT augmentation therapy post-LT. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We identified all LT recipients from 2011-2021 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients with an AAT deficiency diagnosis. We categorized recipients by use of AAT augmentation therapy post-LT and compared their baseline characteristics using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses and estimated the average treatment effect (ATE) of post-LT AAT augmentation therapy on mortality and all-cause graft failure (ACGF). The ATE measures the observed effect we would see if everyone in the population received the intervention as opposed to just a subset. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.02, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:In our study, the use of augmentation therapy post-LT was associated with improved survival. Confirmatory prospective studies should be considered to inform post-LT AAT therapy guidelines.

BACKGROUND:Randomized trials of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization vs medical therapy have yielded inconsistent results. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes with an initial invasive strategy (INV) vs an initial conservative strategy (CON) in patients with coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA)-determined CTO in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial. METHODS:Participants in ISCHEMIA who underwent CCTA evaluated for CTO by the core laboratory (3,113 of 5,179 randomized patients [60%]) were categorized into subgroups with (100% stenosis) and without (<100% stenosis) CTO. Primary analysis compared outcomes in those randomized to INV vs CON using an intention-to-treat approach. Secondary analyses compared outcomes using inverse probability weighting to model successful CTO revascularization (REV) in all INV participants vs CON participants. RESULTS:Of the 3,113 CCTA-evaluable participants, 1,470 had at least 1 CTO (752 INV and 718 CON). INV did not reduce cardiovascular (CV) death or myocardial infarction (MI) (5-year difference -3.5%; 95% CI: -7.8% to 0.8%) and resulted in more procedural MIs (2.5%; 95% CI: 1.0%-4.0%) but fewer spontaneous MIs (-6.3%; 95% CI: -9.7% to -3.2%) than CON. CTO REV modeled across INV had a high probability (>90%) of any lower CV death or MI, MI, spontaneous MI, unstable angina, and heart failure counterbalanced by a higher rate of procedural MI. CTO REV significantly improved angina-related quality of life (mean difference 4.6 points), Rose Dyspnea Scale score (rescaled) (mean difference 5.3 points), and EQ-5D visual analog scale score (4.6 points). CONCLUSIONS:In the ISCHEMIA trial, the risks and benefits of INV compared with CON were similar among patients with and without CCTA-determined CTO (more frequent procedural MI, less frequent spontaneous MI, and significantly improved angina and dyspnea-related quality of life). In an observational comparison, successful CTO REV was associated with a high probability of lower CV death or MI (driven by lower MI) compared with CON. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522).

OBJECTIVE:Naming difficulty is a common symptom of left (i.e., language dominant) hemisphere epilepsy. As such, in the presurgical evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy, which aims to localize the epileptogenic region, identification of a naming deficit typically implicates the left temporal region. However, the well-established finding of poor naming in those with left but not right (i.e., nondominant) hemisphere seizures in monolingual patients is unreliable in bilingual adults with epilepsy, despite proficiency in the language tested. We aimed to examine naming performance and its relation with seizure lateralization in bilingual children with epilepsy. METHODS:This multisite study included 57 bilingual and 202 monolingual pediatric epilepsy patients, aged 6-17 years. All patients underwent neuropsychological evaluation including assessment of auditory and visual object naming in English. RESULTS:In the context of age-appropriate English expressive vocabulary skills, bilingual children with epilepsy demonstrated significantly weaker auditory and visual naming than monolingual patients. Additionally, unlike monolingual patients, who showed poorer naming among those with left compared to those with right hemisphere seizures, bilingual children with unilateral left and right hemisphere seizures demonstrated similarly weak naming performances. Furthermore, naming score cutoffs failed to differentiate individual bilingual patients with left versus right hemisphere seizure onset as they did among monolingual patients. SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:Despite conversational proficiency and normal English expressive vocabulary, the relation between seizure laterality and naming performance demonstrated in monolingual children with unilateral seizures was not observed in a comparable group of bilingual children. Consequently, poor naming performance in bilingual children with epilepsy may be misinterpreted, most seriously in those with nondominant hemisphere seizures, as scores may be erroneously interpreted to reflect dominant hemisphere seizure involvement, potentially leading to unnecessary invasive and costly procedures. Results suggest cautious interpretation of naming performance in bilingual children with epilepsy.