Faculty Bibliography

Purpose: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) invasion and metastasis result in treatment failure and correlate with increased pain. We have previously shown that the "endothelin axis," consisting of endothelin A and B receptors (ETAR and ETBR), mediates oral SCC pain, and that inhibiting ETAR with macitentan alleviates pain. We now hypothesize that the endothelin axis also mediates oral SCC growth and metastasis. We explore the therapeutic effect of concurrent ETAR antagonism (with macitentan) and ETBR re-expression on oral SCC growth and invasion in vitro and in vivo. Methods: We quantified the effect of macitentan treatment and targeted ETBR re-expression on oral SCC cell invasion and proliferation, in vitro indices of metastasis and growth, using a Matrigel invasion chamber assay and the Real Time Cell Analyzer (RTCA). We then created an oral SCC mouse model to determine the effect of macitentan treatment on oral SCC growth. Results: Macitentan treatment or ETBR re-expression alone significantly inhibited oral SCC proliferation and invasion in a dose-dependent manner; macitentan combined with ETBR re-expression had the strongest inhibitory effect on cancer proliferation and invasion. In the oral SCC mouse model, macitentan treatment and ETBR re-expression had significant anti-proliferative and anti-metastatic effects compared to control treatment. Conclusion: Our strategy of targeting the endothelin axis inhibited cancer growth and invasion in vitro and in a preclinical model. These results establish the therapeutic potential of macitentan, an orally available ETAR antagonist, for oral SCC metastasis

Orofacial pain may be a symptom of diverse types of cancers as a result of local or distant tumor effects. The pain can be presented with the same characteristics as any other orofacial pain disorder, and this should be recognized by the clinician. Orofacial pain also can arise as a consequence of cancer therapy. In the present article, we review the mechanisms of cancer-associated facial pain, its clinical presentation, and cancer therapy associated with orofacial pain.

Differential thermal nociception across inbred mouse strains has genetic determinants. Thermal nociception is largely attributed to the heat/capsaicin receptor TRPV1; however, the contribution of this channel to the genetics of thermal nociception has not been revealed. In this study we compared TRPV1 expression levels and electrophysiological properties in primary sensory neurons and thermal nociceptive behaviors between two (C57BL/6 and BALB/c) inbred mouse strains. Using immunofluorescence and patch-clamp physiology methods, we demonstrated that TRPV1 expression was significantly higher in isolectin B4 (IB4) -positive trigeminal sensory neurons of C57BL/6 relative to BALB/c; the expression in IB4-negative neurons was similar between the strains. Furthermore, using electrophysiological cell classification (current signature method), we showed differences between the two strains in capsaicin sensitivity in IB4-positive neuronal cell types 2 and 13, that were previously reported as skin nociceptors. Otherwise electrophysiological membrane properties of the classified cell types were similar in the two mouse strains. In publicly available nocifensive behavior data and our own behavior data from the using the two mouse strains, C57BL/6 exhibited higher sensitivity to heat stimulation than BALB/c, independent of sex and anatomical location of thermal testing (the tail, hind paw and whisker pad). The TRPV1 selective antagonist JNJ-17203212 inhibited thermal nociception in both strains; however, removing IB4-positive trigeminal sensory neurons with IB4-conjugated saporin inhibited thermal nociception on the whisker pad in C57BL/6, but not in BALB/c. These results suggest that TRPV1 expression levels in IB4-positive type 2 and 13 neurons contributed to differential thermal nociception in skin of C57BL/6 compared to BALB/c.

PURPOSE: In this study, we evaluated the analgesic potential of demethylating drugs on oral cancer pain. Although demethylating drugs could affect expression of many genes, we focused on the mu-opioid receptor (OPRM1) gene pathway, because of its role in pain processing. We determined the antinociceptive effect of OPRM1 re-expression in a mouse oral cancer model. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using a mouse oral cancer model, we determined whether demethylating drugs produced antinociception through re-expression of OPRM1. We then re-expressed OPRM1 with adenoviral transduction and determined if, and by what mechanism, OPRM1 re-expression produced antinociception. To determine the clinical significance of OPRM1 on cancer pain, we quantified OPRM1 methylation in painful cancer tissues and nonpainful contralateral normal tissues of patients with oral cancer, and nonpainful dysplastic tissues of patients with oral dysplasia. RESULTS: We demonstrated that OPRM1 was methylated in cancer tissue, but not normal tissue, of patients with oral cancer, and not in dysplastic tissues from patients with oral dysplasia. Treatment with demethylating drugs resulted in mechanical and thermal antinociception in the mouse cancer model. This behavioral change correlated with OPRM1 re-expression in the cancer and associated neurons. Similarly, adenoviral-mediated OPRM1 re-expression on cancer cells resulted in naloxone-reversible antinociception. OPRM1 re-expression on oral cancer cells in vitro increased beta-endorphin secretion from the cancer, and decreased activation of neurons that were treated with cancer supernatant. CONCLUSION: Our study establishes the regulatory role of methylation in cancer pain. OPRM1 re-expression in cancer cells produces antinociception through cancer-mediated endogenous opioid secretion. Demethylating drugs have an analgesic effect that involves OPRM1.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer pain creates a poor quality of life and decreases survival. The basic neurobiology of cancer pain is poorly understood. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and the ATP ionotropic receptor subunits, P2X2 and P2X3, mediate cancer pain in animal models; however, it is unknown whether this mechanism operates in human, and if so, what the relative contribution of P2X2- and P2X3-containing trimeric channels to cancer pain is. Here, we studied head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), which causes the highest level of function-induced pain relative to other types of cancer. RESULTS: We show that the human HNSCC tissues contain significantly increased levels of ATP compared to the matched normal tissues. The high levels of ATP are secreted by the cancer and positively correlate with self-reported function-induced pain in patients. The human HNSCC microenvironment is densely innervated by nerve fibers expressing both P2X2 and P2X3 subunits. In animal models of HNSCC we showed that ATP in the cancer microenvironment likely heightens pain perception through the P2X2/3 trimeric receptors. Nerve growth factor (NGF), another cancer-derived pain mediator found in both human and mouse HNSCC, induces P2X2 and P2X3 hypersensitivity and increases subunit expression in murine trigeminal ganglion (TG) neurons. CONCLUSIONS: These data identify a key peripheral mechanism in cancer pain and highlight the clinical potential of specifically targeting nociceptors expressing both P2X2 and P2X3 subunits (e.g., P2X2/3 heterotrimers) to alleviate cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: Cancer pain severely limits function and significantly reduces quality of life. Subtypes of sensory neurons involved in cancer pain and proliferation are not clear. METHODS: We produced a cancer model by inoculating human oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cells into the hind paw of athymic mice. We quantified mechanical and thermal nociception using the paw withdrawal assays. Neurotoxins isolectin B4-saporin (IB4-SAP), or capsaicin was injected intrathecally to selectively ablate IB4(+) neurons or TRPV1(+) neurons, respectively. JNJ-17203212, a TRPV1 antagonist, was also injected intrathecally. TRPV1 protein expression in the spinal cord was quantified with western blot. Paw volume was measured by a plethysmometer and was used as an index for tumor size. Ki-67 immunostaining in mouse paw sections was performed to evaluate cancer proliferation in situ. RESULTS: We showed that mice with SCC exhibited both mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity. Selective ablation of IB4(+) neurons by IB4-SAP decreased mechanical allodynia in mice with SCC. Selective ablation of TRPV1(+) neurons by intrathecal capsaicin injection, or TRPV1 antagonism by JNJ-17203212 in the IB4-SAP treated mice completely reversed SCC-induced thermal hyperalgesia, without affecting mechanical allodynia. Furthermore, TRPV1 protein expression was increased in the spinal cord of SCC mice compared to normal mice. Neither removal of IB4(+) or TRPV1(+) neurons affected SCC proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: We show in a mouse model that IB4(+) neurons play an important role in cancer-induced mechanical allodynia, while TRPV1 mediates cancer-induced thermal hyperalgesia. Characterization of the sensory fiber subtypes responsible for cancer pain could lead to the development of targeted therapeutics.

Cisplatin resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) reduces survival. In this study we hypothesized that methylation of key genes mediates cisplatin resistance. We determined whether a demethylating drug, decitabine, could augment the anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects of cisplatin on SCC-25/CP, a cisplatin-resistant tongue SCC cell line. We showed that decitabine treatment restored cisplatin sensitivity in SCC-25/CP and significantly reduced the cisplatin dose required to induce apoptosis. We then created a xenograft model with SCC-25/CP and determined that decitabine and cisplatin combination treatment resulted in significantly reduced tumor growth and mechanical allodynia compared to control. To establish a gene classifier we quantified methylation in cancer tissue of cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant HNSCC patients. Cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant patient tumors had distinct methylation profiles. When we quantified methylation and expression of genes in the classifier in HNSCC cells in vitro, we showed that decitabine treatment of cisplatin-resistant HNSCC cells reversed methylation and gene expression toward a cisplatin-sensitive profile. The study provides direct evidence that decitabine restores cisplatin sensitivity in in vitro and in vivo models of HNSCC. Combination treatment of cisplatin and decitabine significantly reduces HNSCC growth and HNSCC pain. Furthermore, gene methylation could be used as a biomarker of cisplatin-resistance.

Cisplatin is the primary chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). No equally effective chemotherapeutics are available when cisplatin resistance occurs. We hypothesize that DNA methylation of key genes mediates cisplatin resistance; moreover, pretreatment with decitabine, a demethylating agent, restores cisplatin sensitivity by mediating expression of genes that are instrumental to cisplatin resistance. Objectives: 1) Determine whether decitabine treatment of a cisplatin-resistant HNSCC cell line restores the anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects of cisplatin; 2) Evaluate the anti-proliferative effect of decitabine and cisplatin (i.e. combination treatment) on a preclinical HNSCC model; 3) Determine whether combination treatment reduces cancer pain; and 4) Create a "gene expression profile of cisplatin resistance" by analyzing cisplatinsensitive and cisplatin-resistant HNSCC in patients. Methods: SCC-25, a cisplatin-sensitive HNSCC cell line, and SCC-25/CP, a cisplatin-resistant cell line, were pre-treated with 5mM decitabine and then treated with cisplatin (3-300 mM) for 48 hours. Proliferation was quantified with an MTS assay. Apoptosis was quantified with a caspase 3/7 assay. A preclinical model was created by inoculating SCC-25/CP cells into the hind-paw of BALB/ c mice. Twenty-four mice were placed into one of four treatment groups: control sham, decitabine-only, cisplatin- only, or combination treatment. Decitabine (6 mg/kg) was administered on post-inoculation days (PID) seven and nine, and cisplatin (6 mg/kg) was administered on PID 12, 15, 18, and 21. Tumor growth was quantified. Mechanical allodynia (i.e. pain) was quantified with a paw withdrawal assay. Formalin-fixed, paraffin- embedded biopsies were obtained from HNSCC patients who underwent chemotherapy with cisplatin. Tumors were classified as either cisplatin-sensitive (RECIST 3 or 4) or cisplatin-resistant (RECIST 1 or 2). Gene expression was quantified in these two sets of samples. Results: In the in !

BACKGROUND: Physiological studies have been determinant for the understanding of migraine pathophysiology and the screening of novel therapeutics. At present, there is no animal model that translates fully the clinical symptoms of migraine, and generally these studies are conducted on anesthetized animals. METHODOLOGY: Pain as well as non-painful symptoms such as photophobia, need to have a conscious individual to be experienced; therefore, the new development and adaptation of behavioral assays assessing pain and other non-painful symptomatology in conscious animals represents a great opportunity for headache research and it is exciting that more and more researchers are using behavioral paradigms. SUMMARY: This review will describe the different behavioral models for the study of headache that are performed in non-anesthetized conscious animals. The pearls and challenges for measuring hypersensitivity in rodents such as the common tests for measuring mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia have been the landmark for the development of assays that measure hypersensitivity in the craniofacial region. Here we describe the different behavioral assays that measure hypersensitivity in the craniofacial region as well as the established behavioral models of trigeminovascular nociception and non-nociceptive migrainous symptoms.

Cancer patients often suffer from pain and most will be prescribed mu-opioids. mu-opioids are not satisfactory in treating cancer pain and are associated with multiple debilitating side effects. Recent studies show that mu and delta opioid receptors are separately expressed on IB4 (-) and IB4 (+) neurons, which control thermal and mechanical pain, respectively. In this study we investigated IB4 (+) and IB4 (-) neurons in mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity in an orthotopic mouse oral cancer model. We used a delta opioid receptor agonist and a P2X(3) antagonist to target IB4 (+) neurons and to demonstrate that this subset plays a key role in cancer-induced mechanical allodynia, but not in thermal hyperalgesia. Moreover, selective removal of IB4 (+) neurons using IB4-saporin impacts cancer-induced mechanical but not thermal hypersensitivity. Our results demonstrate that peripherally administered pharmacological agents targeting IB4 (+) neurons, such as a selective delta-opioid receptor agonist or P2X(3) antagonist, might be useful in treating oral cancer pain. PERSPECTIVE: To clarify the mechanisms of oral cancer pain, we examined the differential role of IB4 (+) and IB4 (-) neurons. Characterization of these 2 subsets of putative nociceptors is important for further development of effective clinical cancer pain relief.