Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:There is a paucity of data on treatment outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases from sarcoma primaries. METHODS:The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation member-sites were queried for patients with brain metastases from sarcoma primaries treated with SRS. Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were calculated via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate analyses examined prognostic factors associated with LC and OS via log-rank t-tests and multivariate analyses (MVA) via Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS:A total of 146 patients with 309 brain metastases were identified. Two-hundred and thirty lesions were treated with single-fraction SRS with a median dose of 20 Gy (15-24 Gy). Ninety-five patients had extracranial metastases, including 75 oligometastatic patients. One- and 2-year OS and LC rates were 47.7% and 37.3%, and 78.3% and 62.2%, respectively. On univariate analyses, superior 1-year OS was noted among leiomyosarcomas (69.7% vs. 42.6%; p = .02) with poorer outcomes among pleomorphic histologies (10.5% vs. 50.7%; p = .002). Pleomorphic histologies were associated with poorer OS on MVA (hazard ratio [HR], 3.13; p = .006). On MVA, LC was inferior among patients of age ≥45 years (HR, 3.78; p < .001) and superior among leiomyosarcomas (HR, 0.31; p = .03). OS was prognosticated based on adverse factors (ie, nonleiomyosarcoma histology and progressive extracranial metastases). Two-year OS for patients with and without adverse features were 78.6% and 31.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:LC outcomes were driven by histology and age with superior LC among leiomyosarcomas and patients of age <45 years. OS was driven by nonleiomyosarcoma histology and the presence of progressive extracranial disease.

OBJECTIVE:To validate the carotid web (CW) risk stratification assessment described in previous works within a larger cohort of patients with symptomatic and incidentally found asymptomatic CWs. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of our institution's electronic medical records identified all patients with a diagnosis of CW from 2017 to 2024. We included symptomatic patients and those with asymptomatic CWs, that is, incidentally found webs without history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, imaging, comorbidities, and a diagnosis of stroke after diagnosis of asymptomatic CW. All angles were measured as described in previous work on a sagittal reconstruction of neck CT angiography in which the common carotid artery (CCA), external carotid artery, and internal carotid artery (ICA) were well visualized, together with the CW itself. Principal component analysis and logistic regression were performed to evaluate the association between high-risk angles and stroke risk.  RESULTS: Twenty-six symptomatic and 26 asymptomatic patients were identified. Of note, the number of patients with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking history was 17 (65.0%), 16 (62.0%), and 8 (31.0%) for symptomatic patients and 18 (69.0%), 17 (65.0%), and 15 (58.0%) for asymptomatic patients. All angular measurements showed statistically significant associations with stroke status. The CCA-web-pouch angle showed the strongest association (p=2.07×10⁻⁴), followed by the CCA-pouch-tip angle (p=3.23×10⁻⁴), ICA-web-pouch angle (p=0.004), and ICA-pouch-tip angle (p=0.005). Each additional high-risk angle increased the odds of stroke by 9.47-fold (p<0.0001). The associated probability of stroke increased from 6.3% with no high-risk angles to 39.1% with one high-risk angle and further to 85.9% with two high-risk angles. The model demonstrated high sensitivity, correctly identifying 84.6% of positive cases, and high specificity, correctly identifying 88.5% of negative cases. The F1 score was 0.863, indicating good overall model performance.  CONCLUSION: Given this successful stratification of CWs into high- and low-risk groups, the utilization of geometric CW parameters may play a role in improving patient selection for intervention in the setting of incidentally diagnosed CW. .

BACKGROUND:The Drivewire 24 (DW24) is a newly FDA-cleared 0.024 inch steerable guidewire. Its proximally controlled deflectable tip allows for intravascular steering to facilitate selective navigation of diagnostic or therapeutic catheters. We present the first clinical experience with the DW24. METHODS:All neurointerventional procedures using the DW24 from October 2024 to April 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications, procedural details, DW24 performance, wire-related complications, and operator feedback were assessed. RESULTS:27 procedures were performed utilizing the DW24. Indications included aneurysm (n=16), stroke (n=5), arteriovenous fistula or malformation (n=4), and diagnostic venography (n=2). Technical success was achieved in 92.6% of cases. Target vessels included the MCA, anterior cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery, internal carotid artery segments, transverse sinus, and torcula. The device's radiopaque, hydrophilic distal tip aided fluoroscopic visibility, and the variable support enabled articulation across a range of aspiration and delivery catheters without requiring additional support devices. The DW24's steerability enabled access to challenging cerebrovascular anatomy, including one stroke case where conventional guidewires failed to reach a distal M2 occlusion. The DW24's intravascular steering also allowed for the delivery of catheters for Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) deployment and facilitated PED post-processing to improve wall apposition without requiring wire removal, reshaping, or balloon angioplasty. Operators observed a short learning curve. There were no device-related complications, though the wire's response to rotational force was a limitation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The DW24 demonstrated a high technical success rate with no device-related complications. Its versatility across catheter sizes and precise controllability facilitate navigating complex cerebrovasculature. Further studies should assess efficacy in larger cohorts across additional clinical scenarios.

Brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) is accepted as legal death throughout much of the world. The World Brain Death Project and a subsequent review of the literature through 2023 highlighted several medicolegal controversies related to BD/DNC in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States but did not discuss medicolegal controversies related to BD/DNC in low- and middle-income countries, such as India. Although the Transplantation of Human Organs Act of 1994 acknowledged BD/DNC as death in India, BD/DNC evaluations are not always completed when BD/DNC is suspected. This has been attributed to lack of awareness/acceptance by medical professionals, lack of public awareness/acceptance of BD/DNC, communication challenges, fear, time limitations, and the inclusion of BD/DNC in organ donation law (but not general law). There has been a gradual rise in the number of donations after BD/DNC (a correlate for the number of BD/DNC determinations) in southern and western states, but the number of donations after BD/DNC has decreased in the southwestern state of Kerala in the setting of recent medicolegal controversies. This article reviews the history of BD/DNC determination in India as a whole, then describes the recent medicolegal controversies related to BD/DNC in the state of Kerala. Finally, these controversies are contextualized relative to the aforementioned controversies in high-income countries. Three key international themes of medicolegal controversies related to BD/DNC are regulation, religion, and resource allocation. The global neurocritical care community must advocate for consistency and accuracy in BD/DNC determination and collaborate with legal and policy experts to develop means to mitigate these challenges through revisions to the law, standardization of practice and policies, education, and communication.

Study DesignLiterature review with clinical recommendations.ObjectiveSpinal metastases represent a late complication of cancer and a major factor in decreased quality of life. The role of surgery for specific indications for spinal metastases is well established. Given the significant morbidity associated with spine surgery in this frail population, efforts are ongoing to decrease the surgical footprint. The objective of this study is to provide the readers with a concise curation of the latest spine literature on reducing the surgical footprint for spine metastases and clinical recommendations for how the practicing clinician should interpret and make use of this evidence.MethodsThe latest spine literature in the topic of reducing the surgical footprint for spine metastases was reviewed and clinical recommendations were formulated. The recommendations are dichotomously graded into strong and conditional based on the integration of scientific methodology and content expert opinion. This opinion considers experience and practical issues such as risks, burdens, costs, patient values, and circumstances.ResultsFour high impact studies were selected for review. The findings suggest that surgery plays a key role in improving patients' quality of life, but incidence of adverse events remains high and hence methods to decrease surgical morbidity are necessary. The integration of radiation into the treatment algorithm allows for less extensive surgical procedures and SBRT should be strongly considered after surgery for spine metastases in appropriate patient populations. Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols reduce perioperative morbidity for both open and minimally invasive surgeries and should be considered on an institutional level. Utilization of minimally invasive surgical stabilization should be considered as it results in fewer post operative complications, lower infection rates, less blood loss during surgery, and a shorter hospital stay compared to open stabilization of unstable pathology thoracolumbar fractures.ConclusionsThe role and benefits of surgery for metastatic spine disease are well established, yet surgery carries significant risk for adverse events which may negatively affect overall cancer care. Methods for reducing the surgical footprint include incorporation of stereotactic radiation allowing less extensive surgery, implementation of ERAS protocols and utilization of minimally invasive surgical strategies.

Study DesignBibliometric analysis.ObjectivesThis study used bibliometric analyses to characterize the effect of AO Spine Knowledge Forum (KF) participation on publication trends among members. We examined associations of membership in KF organizations with academic productivity, collaboration, and scientific impact.MethodsWe queried the Web of Science database for publications by members of KF Tumor (N = 58), KF Trauma and Infection (N = 45), KF Spinal Cord Injury (N = 38), KF Degenerative (N = 54), and KF Deformity (N = 55). Resulting metadata were exported; statistical and bibliometric analyses were performed using Python packages.ResultsOur query returned 24,267 articles by KF members, of which 18,804 were identified as relevant to respective organizational themes through an algorithmic analysis of titles and abstracts. These works, published between 1980 and 2025, included contributions from 67,895 authors. Research productivity, co-authorship among members (P < 0.001), unique institutional affiliations per article (P < 0.001), and international collaboration increased contemporaneously with the first KF formation (2010). A positive association was found between the number of KF authors per publication and source journal impact factor (P < 0.001). Term analysis highlighted research foci within each KF and influential publications were identified.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that formalization of researcher relationships and the research infrastructure and support provided by the KF model was associated with increased and more impactful research output and collaboration. The KF model could be applied in other organizations whose mission includes collaborative research. Methods used in this study are easily replicable and may be applied to investigate the impact of other professional organizations across various fields.

Neuronal oscillations at about 10 Hz, called alpha oscillations, are often thought to arise from synchronous activity across the occipital cortex and are usually largest when the cortex is inactive. However, recent studies measuring visual receptive fields have reported that local alpha power increases when cortex is excited by visual stimulation. This contrasts with the expectation that alpha oscillations are associated with cortical inactivity. Here, we used intracranial electrodes in human patients to measure alpha oscillations in response to visual stimuli whose location varied systematically across the visual field. We hypothesized that stimulus-driven local increases in alpha power result from a mixture of two effects: a reduction in alpha oscillatory power and a simultaneous increase in broadband power. To test this, we implemented a model to separate these components. The two components were then independently fit by population receptive field (pRF) models. We find that the alpha pRFs have similar center locations to pRFs estimated from broadband power but are several times larger and exhibit the opposite effect: alpha oscillatory power decreases in response to stimuli within the receptive field, reinforcing the link between alpha oscillations and cortical inactivity, whereas broadband power increases. The results demonstrate that alpha suppression in the human visual cortex can be precisely tuned, but that to measure these effects, it is essential to separate the oscillatory signal from broadband power changes. Finally, we show how the large size and the negative valence of alpha pRFs can explain key features of exogenous visual attention.

The AO Spine Knowledge Forums are independent expert-driven global study groups dedicated to improving patient care by publishing evidence-based recommendations and conducting high-impact clinical studies. Five Knowledge Forums represent 6 spine pathologies: tumor, deformity, spinal cord injury, degeneration, trauma, and infection. A summary highlighting their most impactful research achievements over the past 10 years is provided. The results illustrate the critical clinical role of these independent Knowledge Forums.

Study DesignThis study is part of the AO Spine Metastatic Tumor Research and Outcomes Network [MTRON], an international multicenter prospective observational registry including patients with spinal metastases.ObjectivesThis study aims to elucidate the incidence of surgical complications, their risk factors and consequent effects on survival outcomes, hospital length of stay, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL) parameters in a large cohort of patients affected by spinal metastases who were surgically treated.MethodsAvailable data from February 2017 to July 2023 were analyzed. The primary outcome of this study was the evaluation of the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events (AEs). The secondary outcomes included the assessment of risk factors for surgery-related AEs and the impact of AEs on survival, length of hospital stay and quality of life.ResultsAmong the 1267 patients analyzed, 6.9% experienced intraoperative AEs and 19.3% experienced at least 1 postoperative AE. Several factors resulted to be associated to the occurrence of postoperative AEs: age, smoking habit, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status, previous radiation therapy at the index target, duration of surgery, number of instrumented levels, simultaneous anterior and posterior approach, presence of metastases at other sites, multiple spinal metastases. Postoperative AEs were associated with reduced survival rates, increased hospital length of stay and poorer HRQOL outcomes, particularly in domains such as neurological function and mental health. In general, surgery substantially improves HRQOL across multiple domains, with these benefits persisting over time despite the occurrence of AEs. However, patients with preoperative risk factors, including comorbidities, smoking, neurological impairment, and prior radiation therapy, experienced less improvement.ConclusionsThe negative impact of AEs on overall survival and HRQOL could be associated with the presence of some preoperative parameters of frailty that are detected as risk factors for AEs occurrence. This finding emphasizes the need for personalized preoperative assessments and optimized perioperative care strategies.

BACKGROUND:Given the low haemorrhagic risk of intracranial low-grade dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), the benefits of routine intervention remain controversial. This study compares patient outcomes treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus conservative management. METHOD/METHODS:Multicentre retrospective analysis of the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research and the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation data. Inclusion criteria were (1) intracranial low-grade dAVF diagnosed by catheter-based angiography, (2) no prior dAVF-related haemorrhage and (3) management with upfront SRS (intervention group) or conservative management (observation group). The primary outcome was symptomatic improvement. Secondary outcomes included dAVF obliteration, up-conversion, haemorrhage, improvement and favourable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at follow-up. RESULTS:304 patients with a mean age of 56 years (SD 13.5) and a follow-up of 46.7 months (SD 45.5) were included. 135 (44.4%) were managed conservatively and 169 (55.6%) had upfront SRS. Compared with the observation group, symptomatic and mRS Score improvement (≥1-point decrease in baseline score) was more likely in the intervention group (95.1% vs 58.5%; OR=13.75 (5.61-33.69) and 37.0% vs 24.0%; OR=1.85 (1.09-3.15), respectively). These findings remained significant after multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Remaining outcomes were similar between groups. The all-cause mortality rate was 5.4% (n=16), unrelated to the dAVF or treatment. Five (3.0%) SRS-related complications were reported and resolved during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS:SRS was associated with increased symptomatic and mRS Score improvement for low-grade dAVFs compared with conservative management. SRS had a low complication risk and did not appear to alter dAVF obliteration or haemorrhage. Future prospective trials on SRS as a first-line intervention for symptomatic low-grade dAVFs should be considered.